OK folks, enough of this dillydallying around, I'd forgotten about this post until iI looked at the 'recent posts' and this one was there,

Now I truly "forgot" I had even READ this topic, Let Alone, Posted in it!!!

BUT, being in the "mood" with a bit o 018 'blend', I see this thread "As New to Me" and tried the Q's.........
I went Oerlikons way-(which I noticed when I read the thread "UNREMEBERINGLY AGAIN!")- there was NO caveat (utfse) about "how many processes,i.e. How many times You could ,say "multiply", a number,,
--the caveat/rule/condition was that you ONLY use EACH NUMBA ONCE......so...it took me a min to "get the right software running" in my "wetware" and in a total of 6 mins I came up with, becoz, it was 'suddenly!'
" SO obvious A Route to my Destination",which was ALL I was after............
((looking for the honey,,which changes from day to day depending upon ones Requirements on that day! and, which on this post means Anything that "Furthers the Cause", and "Shares the Love"..for those who Might "Follow in YOUR Footsteps--so give GOOD advice,,and this forum will be seen as "FAR from a problem" compared to 'other types of Internet based Crime going On,,we're WAY down The List!

..oops I swerved a bit off topic.

))
If this forum is Primarily for These Reasons, and The Members, "Realise, US/WE/THEY Make this Forum either "Informative or threatening ",,Low key OR High Profile, by the Manner in which we "Choose" to Discuss whatever...
6x4+(3x0)+(1x0)=24
I believe this conforms to the "Rules/Conditions"......No? However then I wondered if "Because 'zero' in itself isnt a number,Maybe I am taking 'for granted' its allowed, becoz the semantic ambiguities of the English/american/? language spoken here in the vesp, has its Own Distinct Flavors, from our WWW "club"
Three cheers for Vesp,Goddd work mate

The 'quality and Originality' have Developed Well, in this Forum, Good Mods, Good Members, and I'm enjoying coming here

Lots of cool People-Humans being,,I LIKE IT

But the Q's are good but, Too fuckin easy!!! And NoThanx Oerlikon old mate,, I think i'll Pass on that Kilopage mindfuck you mentioned--Keep up ur Analysis matey,thats where you're Needed-like the 'impurity' post etc.
If the "program IS abstract enough",, which is something, we humans DO So WELL!!,, and the BEST Computa's "work a LOT harder",, to get the same 'result' as humans can,, with an "abstract question", which includes a, "maybe if" functional(but not yet!) group!!!",, than 'we humans do!' Due to our "ability to draw on the most sophisticated database In The WORLD,, our brains/minds ability to be "illogically logical"-kinda "Quantum Thinking".....
Next Q?
Duh,.... "FOUR!",.....C'mon what ELSE can 'It' be, with "those specific conditions",, Kids stuff....
OK.....NOW we're Starting to get a touch trickier,we'll say, and,,we got a bit more serious, but really 'nothing really ANY 'more difficult', just different...
"Same shit,But a Different type of shovel,basically") (as can be org chem) with the question of the two tribes.......
AND NOT ONE 1 of you bunch of geniuii(? tsog, a little help here?

?) had a fuckin clue.....
well here's the ANSWER...

Enjoy mi amigos
"ASK EITHER of the dudes,, which way would the Other Guy would tell me to GO?",... and then Proceed in the direction of the OPPOSITE track EITHER guy tells you to take!!!

Think about it. And Sedit do yor Equation now and add these factors, and Bingo...
Hey Sedit, I hate to 'dis', (in a way

the A for effort you put into your "Logical Breakdown"),,which was most concise and yet elegant. And the aspect of No 'Specific way to 'Identify the tribes' IS intentional, for as you can see, thee "solution just cuts straight through the GAAK's to "The Way Home"

but, here It one of those "perfect examples" of "Reverse Logic" , and BTW its 'styles and methods of thinking, segues 'well', with OTC org chem," like its a lubed ground glass joint"..IT fits easily and well

Cheers me Bruzzers
Hyppy
