synthetikal.com Forum Index


mescaline by 1atm Hydrogenation
Goto page Previous1, 2
Post new topic   Reply to topic    synthetikal.com Forum Index -> Phenethylamines
Author Message
transistor child
gnome
Joined: 20 Mar 2005
Posts: 24
404.82 Points

Sun Jun 19, 2005 3:03 am
Reply with quote

Sodium borohydride doesn't reduce carboxylic acids at all.
LAH would form the alcohol. As far as I know there is no practical way to stop the reduction at the aldehyde (it's possible, but uses hard to get and expensive reagents).
Back to top
joe_aldehyde
huxleys associate
Joined: 06 Apr 2005
Posts: 310
5653.90 Points

Sun Jun 19, 2005 2:54 pm
Reply with quote

transistor child wrote:
Sodium borohydride doesn't reduce carboxylic acids at all.
LAH would form the alcohol. As far as I know there is no practical way to stop the reduction at the aldehyde (it's possible, but uses hard to get and expensive reagents).


such as Pd/C, pressurized hydrogen and a catalyst poison, namely the Rosenmund Reduction..
reduction to the alcohol and subsequent Swern Oxidation is also possible (at -78deg.c, with oxalyl chloride and DMSO).
Back to top
anime

Joined: 13 Apr 2005
Posts: 131
Location: Planet Earth
3517.62 Points

Sun Jun 19, 2005 2:58 pm
Reply with quote

joe_aldehyde wrote:
transistor child wrote:
Sodium borohydride doesn't reduce carboxylic acids at all.
LAH would form the alcohol. As far as I know there is no practical way to stop the reduction at the aldehyde (it's possible, but uses hard to get and expensive reagents).


such as Pd/C, pressurized hydrogen and a catalyst poison, namely the Rosenmund Reduction..
reduction to the alcohol and subsequent Swern Oxidation is also possible (at -78deg.c, with oxalyl chloride and DMSO).


Ah thx, a persulfate oxidation on the alcohol would also yield the aldehyde. I found a nice route to methylate gallic acid using dimethyl carbonate and a iodine catalyst.
Back to top
mk-1

Joined: 20 Feb 2005
Posts: 86
2841.38 Points

Sun Jun 19, 2005 6:34 pm
Reply with quote

but if u want to use the acid without going thru the benzaldehyde, look here -
Rhodium Mescsline Synth
Back to top
spicybrown

Joined: 26 Jun 2005
Posts: 19
725.22 Points

Tue Jun 28, 2005 7:17 am
Reply with quote

Since this method wasn't based solely on a Bee's report (and is instead from a published article), I'd assume it works. I mean, it makes sense that it should be possible.

I've been thinking about this however, and the fact that they report lower yields if the hydrogenation isn't done at 0ºC. Pd/C can reduce double bonds at 1atm H2. It can also reduce aromatic nitro groups at 1atm. Reducing alkyl nitro groups on the other hand requires different conditions. In a nitrostyrene, the nitro is conjugated with the aromatic ring; I assume this is why they have success reducing it with Pd/C and only 1atm H2. In this reduction, the double bond reduction and nitro group reduction will happen at different rates. I'd imagine that if the double bond gets reduced first, the nitro group becomes unreactive to the standard 1atm H2 conditions present. Lowering the temperature may lead to a lower rate of reduction of the double bond relative to that of the nitro group. I'd wager a bet that the side product in the reaction they report is the nitroalkane.

This leads me to a thought- I bet better yields can be obtained by doing the following two setp one-pot reaction: carry out the reduction as stated, at 0ºC for 3 hours. Then, warm to room temp, remove the H2 atmosphere and toss in something like potassium formate. If I'm right about the side product being the nitroalkane, this ought to reduce the remaining nitroalkane CTH-style. I suppose it may be necessary to neutralize the reaction mixture first. Don't know. Well I'm going to experiment with this hydrogenation this weekend anyway. I'll let ya'll know.

Oh and somebody stated the dangers of working with Pd/C.. This is no joke. Ideally you should evacuate the reaction vessel of atmosphere and backfill with something heavier than air, like argon, before adding the Pd/C to your presumably flammable solvent.

-SpicyBrown
Back to top
loki
guinea pig
Joined: 09 Mar 2005
Posts: 391
14167.88 Points

Tue Jun 28, 2005 6:00 pm
Reply with quote

regarding scaling, if the temperature requires 0 degrees temperature to be maintained the larger the flask the harder it is to maintain temperatures (less surface per volume). If a reaction is exothermic, endothermic or only occurs within a small temperature range it is hard to keep the temperature controlled the bigger the reaction gets. This applies more so to roundbottom flasks than flatbottoms of course, being spherical the decreased surface is more of a problem.
Back to top
the alchemist

Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 46
Location: Planet Earth, Terran System
1568.10 Points

Thu Jun 30, 2005 12:34 am
Reply with quote

I don't think that would work so well.

Converting the acid to a methyl ester and reducing it to an aldehyde with DIBAL would be better. You could even reduce the ester to an alcohol with LAH and oxidize the alcohol up to the aldehyde with IBX or Swern.
Back to top
spicybrown

Joined: 26 Jun 2005
Posts: 19
725.22 Points

Sat Jul 16, 2005 7:41 am
Reply with quote

So somebody who sometimes talks about random shit to me says they tried this reduction on 3,4,5-trimethoxy-beta-nitrostyrene and it didn't work very well. Then they told me that a little while later somebody clued them into the fact that the bottle of Pd/C (from a commercial source) used was considerably less active than is desirable, and this reaction will be tried again at a later date with "the good shit."

By "it didn't work," this isn't to say it completely failed. Analysis of the reaction mixture by LCMS showed definite product present, but the conversion didn't go far enough to even be worth working up.

-SpicyBrown
Back to top
anime

Joined: 13 Apr 2005
Posts: 131
Location: Planet Earth
3517.62 Points

Sun Jul 17, 2005 11:06 pm
Reply with quote

The Reduction at 1atm.
(Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 63(4), 1252-1254 (1990))
According to the authors of the original article, the reaction works at higher temperature but gives lower yields :

"The hydrogenations of 3,4-methylenedioxy-β-nitrostyrene (1), 4-hydroxy-3-methoxy-β-nitrostyrene (5), and 3-hydroxy-4-methoxy-β-nitrostyrene (7) at 0°C gave higher yields of the corresponding phenethylamines in comparison with those at room temperature. The low yields of phenethylamines at higher temperature might be due to the palladium induced formation of imine metal hydride intermediates4."

One might also consider the amount of catalyst used in this reaction. With most catalytic hydrogenations a smaller amount of catalyst is used per gram of reactant.

This article is in the Rhodium archive, unfortunately synthetikals version is not complete.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    synthetikal.com Forum Index -> Phenethylamines All times are GMT + 5.5 Hours
Goto page Previous1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 



Powered by phpBB 2.0.11 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Igloo Theme Version 1.0 :: Created By: Andrew Charron