Author Topic: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?  (Read 1852 times)

sassa

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 120
methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« on: June 17, 2010, 03:12:08 PM »
Last these day I have been proving new writeups of amination. Always I have used nitrometane as source of metylamine, with good succes  but not perfect results as for yields.
 Some time ago I did a few hundreds of grams of metylamine following the bright star´s method that never used. That is to say, with  only 1 filtering of the residual ammonium chloride and without doing any type of purification with chloroform or recrystallization.
I am going to prove the variant of reduction with methylamine, methanol,.... proposed by Roundbottom: " Osmium/BrightStar Al/Hg Methylamine Reductive Amination ", posted on Rhodium,since the yields are really interesting, and the process is way more simply and easier than  Methyl's man method. I am going to use a scale 10X minor to try with few amounts of ket.
My question is with regard to the quality of the produced methylamine following the bright star´s method:i know that is not pure, something  about 95 %, and it must contain significant quantities of ammonium chloride and other amines.. But the production of mda as a side product would not be a  problem. Only wish that  yields were not lowering in excess due to this lack of purity of the methyilamine.10-20% less hydrocloride would not be a problem to handle.It´s posible to need to add some extra mg. of this methylamine to  assure a propper amount of it?
 Some experience using methylamine done with this process?
« Last Edit: June 17, 2010, 03:18:10 PM by sassa »

mumbles

  • Larvae
  • *
  • Posts: 42
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #1 on: June 17, 2010, 05:00:03 PM »
You may want to clean up that methylamine with hot isopropanol, there is a good 4 page-ish thread on this on sciencemadness ('good way to methylamine' ?). I've read roundbottom's take on it as well. Roundbottom's yields were high and he used smaller flasks for the same amount of ketone which is handy.

sassa

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 120
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #2 on: June 22, 2010, 11:29:50 PM »
Proved that methylamine(without cleaning) and worked fine.Roundbottom write-up of the reductive amination with methylamine/AL/HG/MeOH rocks!!both about lower solvents needed,easy procedure  and good yields!Seems too that the product it´s a little more trippier about effect. i have never obtained the expected yields from Methyls´man method ,but of course i supposed my problem wastoo  on crystallization with gas.Anyway,this write-up works way easy.
    Only one thing.The methylamine gas smell :P :P :P.It´s way stronger than produced Using nitromethaneas methylamine source,using exact the same equipment and conditions(cold water with a reflux condenser):Methyalmine gas come over easy.Maybe will try a better and longer reflux condenser.i Really hate that smell that fix on the room for days.Anyway,the product and yields were the expected ;D.
   Only maked diferrent the crystalization to try another method than gas and worked fine.Extract the amine from the final toulene with 10 %HCL and let evaporate water at room Temo:Takes days,but works fine!
   I recommend this write-up as the first to try if it´s your first AL/Hg.Of course  at this day is easier get nitromethane than make Metylamine,but it´s really hard to go wrong.

Osmium/BrightStar Al/Hg Methylamine Reductive Amination

http://www.erowid.org/archive/rhodium/chemistry/redamin.os-bs.html
« Last Edit: June 22, 2010, 11:49:30 PM by sassa »

jon

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,883
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #3 on: June 24, 2010, 11:55:29 PM »
methylamine produced with paraforamldehyde 2 moles and 1 mole nh4cl gives good results the key is temperature control and vacum to eliminate co2 to drive equilibrium to the right the temperature should be held in exactly the 104-106 range just sufficient vacum to pull co2 is important too much and the reactants evaporate the vacum is adjusted so that the co2 evolution is visible from the top of the reaction soup ie. no co2 should be seen bubbling from the bottom.
under these parameters only methylamine is recovered in 2-3 crops under vacum reduction.
no ammonium chloride is precipitated indicating high yeild and efficiency and ease of workup as well.
the methylamine produced in this manner is pure enough to be used without workup it's purity is indicated by the fact that it is not very hygroscopic.
any further questions feel free to ask
« Last Edit: June 24, 2010, 11:58:12 PM by jon »

madprossor

  • Larvae
  • *
  • Posts: 27
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #4 on: June 26, 2010, 06:06:19 AM »
wow, Jon.  the OrgSyn procedure was always my reference but it definitely gives incomplete conversion of the NH4Cl (and slow workup on a small funnel).  i didn't know it was possible to get a close-to-complete conversion without having problems with dimethylation.  VL mentioned slight vacuum, he specified 20 inches of Hg, which confused some people (who tried 20 mmHg and failed) and is still much higher than what you're talking about.

i disagree that pure MeNH2.HCl is not so hygroscopic though.  i had relatively pure MeNH2.HCl from the OrgSyn procedure and it turns into a puddle after a couple hours of air exposure.  NH4Cl in contrast is much less hygroscopic.  did you try to recrystallize the methylamine hydrochloride from alcohol to see it's purity?  i understand of course even a good bit of residual NH4Cl should not interfere at all in the next reaction.
« Last Edit: June 26, 2010, 06:11:55 AM by madprossor »

jon

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,883
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #5 on: June 26, 2010, 12:46:40 PM »
hi madprossor have'nt seen you here.
umm pure methylamine is hygroscopic but it can be handled without turning into a puddle.
when you crop the methylamine you start to see the scummy looking film and you stop the vacum reduction.
i put a fan on it to cool it all the way to room temp i find if i did'nt do this i wind up filtering endlessly.
because nh4cl always crystalizes first there's a sharp distinction between the two.
i did'nt bother checking purity you can look at it's crystall shape and that tells all.
the way to keep temps in that range is by reacting it in a boiling saturated solution of table salt it boils exactly 106 i bunged 32 ounce beer bottles to an aspirator and pulled a very gentle vacum if the vacum is to high you will know because it will simply foam out.
but that's the way to do it without tieing up glassware.
another minor detail careful with that soda glass don't cool it suddenly.
and lid the pot so the steam heats up the bottles also otherwise the temp gets a little cool and nothing happens.
you can always tell by the rate of co2 generation.
all i did was vacum filter then plop it in the vac dessicator for a day.
the halosafrole process takes a lot of methylamind escpecially if one is doing a couple hundred grams of mdma.
and in this case purity is'nt that critical i would'nt think a little ammonium chloride would stop the reductive amination from happening either.
« Last Edit: June 26, 2010, 01:03:33 PM by jon »

madprossor

  • Larvae
  • *
  • Posts: 27
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #6 on: June 27, 2010, 04:57:09 AM »
beer bottles, heh.  we made some hydroxylamine in champagne bottles- similar concept.

i remember the OrgSyn procedure being tedious.  alcohol is added and distilled off to remove water.  nh4cl is cropped off once.  the next two crops give MeNH2.HCl contaminated with nh4cl.  the MeNH2.HCl is extracted from the nh4cl with boiling dry isopropanol then precip'ed.

i was wondering quantitatively how much the use of vacuum improves yields and decrease the amount of residual nh4cl.  i guess it doesn't matter though any improvement is worth a try, after which all will become clear.

salat

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 276
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #7 on: June 27, 2010, 01:30:50 PM »
Quote
i had relatively pure MeNH2.HCl from the OrgSyn procedure and it turns into a puddle after a couple hours of air exposure

In humid climates try 10 min or less!!

salat
Salat

jon

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,883
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #8 on: June 27, 2010, 05:55:33 PM »
ummm with vacum i cropped no ammonium chloride just like the refs say, temperature is also key that's why the salt water baths you can't fuck it up this way.
it's qauntitative try it and see.
and salat, i enjoy reading your posts i think you're smarter than you let on.
« Last Edit: June 27, 2010, 07:09:34 PM by jon »

salat

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 276
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #9 on: July 04, 2010, 12:42:55 AM »
thanks, I'm smart enough to know what I don't know.  My husband is the chemistry whiz and I learn from him and comment on what he's doing that's why you have this combination of newbie and advanced in my writing.  I'm good at researching, but just getting my feet wet with the real thing. 

He's wondering why he can't wash methylamine with chloroform to remove the small amound of dimethylamine he got (flask too big so he overshot his temperature slightly) - waiting for some butyl alcohol to arrive otherwise. 

I'll research it tomorrow.  Spent all day moving my lab stuff to another room and am tired - was just checking this thread to see if there was anything helpful for him. 
 
salat
Salat

jon

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,883
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #10 on: July 04, 2010, 01:17:28 AM »
dcm and tce also rid the dimethlamine.
that's why i recommend salt water baths (saturated salt water) they hold tempertures at 106 and you never overshoot temps..
beats watching a thermometer.

salat

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 276
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #11 on: July 04, 2010, 01:18:01 PM »
will dcm work on an aquaeous solution of methylamine hcl?  Stuff formed a cake on the bottom of the flask so he dissolved it with water to get it out.  He said he went to 110 on purpose after the reaction was done.  I don't always understand what he is saying.  He's going to do an experiment to try it and see, we'll let you know.

salat
Salat

jon

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,883
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #12 on: July 04, 2010, 01:49:37 PM »
i don't see why not but he's just going to have to reduce it under vacum again mine as well rinse it in the bushner funnel.
next time tell him to use ethanol.

salat

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 276
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #13 on: July 04, 2010, 06:05:03 PM »
The methylamine is sitting in the bottom of the sep funnel so I guess it worked - looks white.  He said ethanol for the reaction or to dissolve it to get it out of the flask?  Don't ask about trying to dry ethanol around here or anything else for that matter.  Glasses fog just walking outside.

At any rate he's going to have to do the washing & drying stuff anyway this is just step 1.



salat
« Last Edit: July 04, 2010, 06:44:48 PM by salat »
Salat

XBee

  • Larvae
  • *
  • Posts: 5
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #14 on: July 04, 2010, 07:03:32 PM »
Yeah, yeah - I messed-up the Brightstar MeAm synth!  I've been playing with "the classic" synth to better understand it, and didn't keep my eye on the ball (so to speak).  SO... LARGE flask, SMALL single neck, LOTS of VERY hard product adhering to flask bottom and keeping both my spinbar and thermocouple tube HOSTAGE!  ON THE BOTTOM no less! 

<sigh>  that's what I git for not warming a beaker for over 7 years... but life's good now - VERY good :)

Anyhow - I FINALLY logged on to say something other than the intro.  Oh, yeah - if anyone wants to know, I've had a great deal of successes - I know a LOT of things that DON'T work! ;)

Bee-was
There are none so ignorant as those who imagine themselves informed

jon

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,883
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #15 on: July 05, 2010, 03:28:47 AM »
ethanol to dissolve it out of the flask.
and as  a solvent to separate the methylamine from the ammonium chloride.
hey pm me you'll probably need a little advice on preping dry alcoholic solns of methylamine it's tricky if you don't have things figured out.
was he asking wheather to use ethanol in the sn2 reaction?
it works but i don't like it. the yeilds are better with ipa.
« Last Edit: July 05, 2010, 04:10:23 AM by jon »

XBee

  • Larvae
  • *
  • Posts: 5
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #16 on: July 11, 2010, 05:55:59 AM »
Got it covered, Jon... just got the gallon of n-Butyl alcohol I've been waiting for.... just the THANG for cleaning it up without needing to mess about (in an EXTREMELY humid place!) making absolute EtOh - more like OH!  Anywho... I'm not exactly trying to get to a "destination" - as I sed, I'm trying to understand the reaction dynamics.  Clearly, one wants to move the puppy "to the right", i.e. eliminate the formic acid, which is the immediate product that's clogging the reaction pipe (given that this is an equilibrium deal).  Mother nature to the rescue!  It spontaneously (under the right conditions!) decomposes into CO2 (how nice!).  THAT can be hurried up with some vac (as wuz mentioned earlier in the thread).  Oh, BTW - in the Brightstar writeup, they "figger" you'll have about 3-4% NH4CL and perhaps as much di-MeAm, which for all intents and purposes one "shouldn't notice" were one to (HORRORS!) actually commit an illegal act.  My trials seem to agree, tho I didn't do the quantitative analysis to confirm (if that answers the original posts' question).

The OTHER way I thought of getting rid of the formic was to add MeOH, which would POOF! make a VERY LOW BP Methyl formate.  Uh... didn't pan out very well.  Now, since I got myself into a bind with the last tests, I'm fiddle-forting about with off-the-wall ideas once the stuff had (allegedly) finished reacting.  I say "allegedly" because I DID get a small crop of NH4CL, so I either had too much to start with, or I screwed the pooch along the way.  I'm also displeases with the near-orange color of the final brew - this I suspect was from the loooonnngg ramp-up time to get to 104c (about 4 hours to get there, then 5 hours AT 104, give or take 0.2c).  Temp control I've GOT DOWN - just playing with the reaction to REALLY understand it.

Hope that answers all those burning questions no one's asked yet ;)

just buzzing 'round
There are none so ignorant as those who imagine themselves informed

lugh

  • Global Moderator
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 876
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #17 on: August 30, 2010, 03:17:41 AM »
The best way to dry methylamine hydrochloride is with a centrifuge as described in Vogels and Organic Syntheses  8)
Chemistry is our Covalent Bond

no1uno

  • Global Moderator
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 681
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #18 on: August 30, 2010, 04:23:28 AM »
Just requested two papers on the acid/thermal decomposition of urotropine/hexamine. I've done the reaction, but I'd dearly love to know if there is a way to add excess ammonium salts to stop the formaldehyde/formic acid production. That shit stinks the place down.

Ok the references are in (Java is a wonder), hydrolysis of hexamine with acetic acid gives acetamide and formaldehyde, two VERY FUCKING USEFUL chemicals which are a bitch to acquire easily. I'll throw up the paper on the Hoffman Degradation of Acetamide to give methylamine as well (given that acetamide is easily made via hexamine). Any input on how to rapidly form paraformaldehyde from the formaldehyde generated by the reaction?

PS Another paper on the production of methylamine from ammonium chloride and 40% formalin solution, it is attached.

PPS Has anyone got a selective preparation of dimethylamine? Right at the moment alkaline hydrolysis of various weed-n-feed-type products (present as about 500g/L in several combinations) as the dimethylamine salts seems like the best "selective" route... I want it to try out the dimethylchloramine + phosphine = RP + dimethylammonium chloride reaction, but dimethylamine:borane looks tasty too.
« Last Edit: August 30, 2010, 11:29:40 AM by no1uno »
"...     "A little learning is a dang'rous thing;
    Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring:
    There shallow draughts intoxicate the brain,
    And drinking largely sobers us again.
..."

NeilPatrickHarris

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 274
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #19 on: October 30, 2010, 06:29:01 AM »
the methylamine produced in this manner is pure enough to be used without workup it's purity is indicated by the fact that it is not very hygroscopic.
any further questions feel free to ask

quick question about how hygroscopic MeAm HCl is.  if one were to titrate a solution of MeOH + MeAm(g) then drive off the MeOH with heat and no vacuum, would that be an issue?  its melting point is 230C so no worry there but what about it sucking up moisture from the air while you're trying to drive off the MeOH?  i hear the more heat you apply (within reason) the dryer it will be so perhaps an oil bath set to 150C would be reassuring to get it nice and dry?

akcom

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 430
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #20 on: October 30, 2010, 01:18:42 PM »
Just to be safe you could always put a drying tube over your flask/vessel

coincoin

  • Larvae
  • *
  • Posts: 28
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #21 on: December 28, 2010, 05:48:44 PM »
what about a simple quick sigh yielding and otc method... like chloromoethane (methanol + nacl  h2so4) bubbled in warm nh3 ?

Sedit

  • Global Moderator
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,099
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #22 on: December 29, 2010, 06:39:45 AM »
Whats your definition of high yeilding? Trying to get MeCl from that method is not that simple or high yeilding and to top that off as the ammonia concentration goes down it starts to form Di and Tri methylamines meaning that atlest a 10-20x molar concentration of Amine must be kept at all times to ensure alternative products from your 5-20% yeild of Chloromethane from the first part of the synthesis.

Sorry But I have seen this proposed many times and I doubt it can be pulled off with any usefullness. Im positive there are simpler ways.
There once were some bees and you took all there stuff!
You pissed off the wasp now enough is enough!!!

jon

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,883
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #23 on: December 29, 2010, 06:56:25 AM »
i dunno how many times i have to go over this methylamine is about temp being exactly 106C i used saturated salt baths(boil exactly that temp) to make mountains of methylamine and slight vacum i get no ammonium chloride back it's easy for me i don't understand why is this so complicated?
i probably made at least 50 batches wigging my ass off it was so easy.
« Last Edit: December 29, 2010, 06:58:06 AM by jon »

coincoin

  • Larvae
  • *
  • Posts: 28
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #24 on: January 02, 2011, 01:43:35 PM »
Same thing... I get chloromethane in high yields (MeCl being taken off the solution the equilibrium goes to the right...) and then again high yields of MeNH2. I'd say it contains around 5% DiMeNH2 but can be easily purified with solvent extraction

jon

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,883
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #25 on: January 02, 2011, 10:04:23 PM »
you get zero dimethylamine if the temperature is kept exactly at 106 C the sweet spot taking co2 off under a slight (i mean very slight) vacum improves yeilds considerably.
this way i noticed no ammonium chloride precipitated.
saturated solutions of salt water boil exactly at this temp making this a breeze to do.
i used to bung 32 oz beer bottles to aspirators flowing at a trickle in a pot of boiling salt water with the lid on it to keep the temp right and prevent the solution from evapotating.
you gauge your vacum by looking at the co2 evolvolution.
if the vacum is right it will evolve from the top if it is too high it will foam over if it is too low the co2 evolves from the bottom.
this works every time.

Sedit

  • Global Moderator
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,099
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #26 on: January 03, 2011, 03:29:18 AM »
Coin care to do a writeup with pictures and a melting point test if you are able. I have seen many others suggest otherwise on MeCl being anything but high yeilding (<30%)and thats even with a catalyst like Zinc Chloride avalible.
There once were some bees and you took all there stuff!
You pissed off the wasp now enough is enough!!!

overunity33

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #27 on: January 03, 2011, 01:02:26 PM »
you get zero dimethylamine if the temperature is kept exactly at 106 C the sweet spot taking co2 off under a slight (i mean very slight) vacum improves yeilds considerably.
this way i noticed no ammonium chloride precipitated.
saturated solutions of salt water boil exactly at this temp making this a breeze to do.
i used to bung 32 oz beer bottles to aspirators flowing at a trickle in a pot of boiling salt water with the lid on it to keep the temp right and prevent the solution from evapotating.
you gauge your vacum by looking at the co2 evolvolution.
if the vacum is right it will evolve from the top if it is too high it will foam over if it is too low the co2 evolves from the bottom.
this works every time.



beautiful level of detail, very nice jon.

Balkan Bonehead

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 117
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #28 on: January 08, 2011, 06:17:57 AM »
The following is an alteration of Eleusis' variant of the ethanol method. Into a 2:1 molar ratio mixture of formlin:NH4Cl in a suitable open vessel is added ethanol dropwise or in portions under stirring at room temperature or slightly warmed, until the rumlike odor of ethyl formate can no longer be detected. Then, the mixture is heated to drive off water and worked up as per usual.

akcom

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 430
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #29 on: January 08, 2011, 07:04:18 AM »
It's important to reflux the mixture for an hour after the ethyl formate is distilled off or else yields will be abysmal.

Balkan Bonehead

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 117
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #30 on: January 08, 2011, 08:38:19 AM »
As Eleusis and Android have demonstrated, that isn't necessarily the case. See this writeup:

Quote
Methylamine Hydrochloride from HMTA, Eleusis' version [with comments by Rhodium]{with SWIM's comments in white)

140g of Hexamine is carefully dissolved in 400mL of Muriatic Acid(swimming pool) (31.45% HCl) to which at least 100mL of (preferably) absolute ethanol(SWIM used denatured) has been added. Add the hexamine slowly while stirring vigorously and with good ventilation as some nasty fumes are produced. Allow all to stir at room temperature for at least 8 hours but preferably 16(SWIM would leave it under the overhead stirrer for 16hrs). The solution will become turbid within several hours of the initial mixing. I *believe* this is the formation of a formaldehyde(ammonium chloride) trimer of some sort and I suspect that the original equation for the conversion of hexamine into methylamine fragments is therefore incorrect. [There is no trimer of any sort formed, if enough water and formaldehyde is present. Eleusis uses 4 moles of amine to 6 methylenes, which is enough, but gives less yield.] At any rate, filter off this white precipitate which is obviously not an amine salt due to it being fluffy even in Florida's humidity (almost all simple amine salts are hygroscopic) [With the exception of ammonium chloride, and this is it]. Finally, remove the excess water, hydrochloric acid and freako volatile products by, ideally, heating the liquid at low to medium heat in a porcelain saucepan(Visionware pot). Stove-proof glass would be ideal, but stainless-steel, aluminum and copper are definitely not! [Rather use a RB flask, with a water aspirator attached, smells considerably less]. The concentration can generally be left unattended for a couple of hours, but try to stick around and babysit it at least the first time so you will have a good idea of how long it takes for your particular stove/pots/etc... [Or else it'll BURN!] Also, the methylamine HCl will form a melt if heated too long at which point it will sublimate off. It will then appear as if it's taking forever for the stuff to concentrate when in fact you are merely boiling your product away. After the concentrated slush has become sufficiently "thick", take it off the heat every so often to see if it doesn't soldify, insuring that the water is mostly gone and that not too much sublimation has occured (some is inevitable and even desireable). The yield of Methylamine HCl should be around 200g as white deliquescent crystals(beautiful, closer to 100g after all is said and done). Note, ACS-grade methylamine HCl is colorless. We aren't using ACS-grade production techniques here, so don't expect ACS-grade product. However, the methylamine produced by this method is eminently suitable for the many purposes normally intended and if allowed to sublimate some when heating, no adjustment for "purity" or "water content" need be made in subsequent uses of it. [I can't understand how he can get 200g of product. 140g hexamine gives 80 grams of NH4Cl, and HOPEFULLY more than 100g of methylamine]. If the crystals are opaque white and do not deliquesce quickly in air of average humidity (65% rh), they may be contaminated with some Hexamine or some bizarre polymer. [Or ammonium chloride. Recrystallize from methanol, then wash with CHCl3]. Washing 100g of the crude product with 100mL of Chloroform by stirring in a beaker then filtering, repeated as many times as necessary, will remove Hexamine. Methylamine HCl is insoluble in Chloroform whereas Hexamine is at the rate of 1g to 10mL. As a final note, I have been informed that hexamine is available in some areas in the form of "fuel tablets" for small camping stoves. I have received mixed results from various individuals using this so, as the saying goes, Caveat Emptor.(the fuel tablets are the bomb, if still available, and the faintest smell of ammonium chloride is always present but SWIM never cleaned it with chloroform and product still produced so...)
There's also a good read by Osmium making methylamine this way that is quite helpful. I'll see if I can find it(or it may already be in that write-up..read that..it was written during those times and is much more concise with the play by play tricks and what-nots..

However, this is not an optimal reaction, because AmCl is present in excess and some ethanol evaporates. The version above means to correct this. A dash of HCl might help things along by catalyzing the esterification.

akcom

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 430
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #31 on: January 11, 2011, 08:09:53 PM »
Everlasting, if one is using straight hexamine, is it important to stir for 8 hours like Eleusis recommends or can one simply combine hexamine, HCl, ethanol, stir and distill off volatiles then proceed to distill off the water?  How slow should the process be?

salat

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 276
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #32 on: April 24, 2011, 08:43:26 PM »
xBee has done a slew of methylamine synth's and I got permission to post his notes.  The best one we've found using hexamine is baalchemist's fav synth.  And the tip of using boiling dry IPA to extract the methylamine works great.

So the following is from an old hive post by baalchemist, with notes and updates by xbee from many trials.

Baalchemist Favorite Methylamine Synth (with Notes by xBee)

Bill of materials
  • HCl (28%), 480ml/mol of HMTA
  • HMTA, 140g/mol
  • Isopropanol, 1180ml/mol HMTA

SPECIFIC BOM EXAMPLE – 4 MOL BATCH
  • HMTA: 560g
  • HCl (28%), 1920ml (make it an even two litres)
  • Isopropanol: 5920ml (call it 6 litres – 1210 followed by 3x770 + 6x400)

Example of procedure
[NOTE: ½ mol batch size]:

A RB flask is charged with 240ml of 28% HCl and a stir bar.  Stirring is begun, 70g hexamine (“Fuel Tablets”) is added to the flask, and the glassware is set up for a vacuum reflux.  Vacuum is applied (c.a. 20-22” Hg) and the flask is heated, but only to a gentle reflux [stirring continues].  The reflux is maintained for about 3 hrs, then the glassware is changed for vacuum distillation and the solution volume gradually reduced over several hours’ time.

Volume reduction continues until only a “mush” [slush] remains in the flask [no fluid sloshing around!].  The “mush” [slush] is made of methylamine HCl, Ammonium chloride, and what’s left of the water.

Working quickly so as not to allow the IPA time to cool, the mush is extracted with 4 110ml portions of DRY IPA.  For each extraction, the IPA is dumped into the mush, the flask is swirled to dissolve as much MeAm as possible before the IPA cools very much [perhaps a short time refluxing would be a better approach – eliminates rushing], then the IPA is decanted from the mush and the next 110ml added.  

The four extractions are pooled and the IPA removed under diminished pressure until, again, only a yellowish mush remains.  This “new” mush is in turn extracted six times with 50ml portions of DRY IPA, working quickly and decanting as one did earlier.  The six extractions are again pooled and, as the IPA cools, crystals will/should spontaneously form.  [NOTE: six extractions are nuts – suggest 100, 100, 50, 50 instead of 6x50ml]  The pooled extracts are placed in a freezer for about an hour to further encourage the MeAm to crash out.

Once crystallization is complete, the cold solution is vacuum filtered to isolate the crystals, which should represent about an 80-95% yield.  The crystals must quickly be stored in an airtight container as MeAm is hygroscopic.

Points to note

  • Ammonium chloride begins crashing out somewhere along the way [depends on vacuum] and it will eventually stall the stirbar.  One can/should remove the NH4Cl when the stirbar stalls; the subsequent extractions are then much easier.
  • A 4 mol batch is the most one can squeeze into a 3 litre flask.
  • Refluxing instead of adding boiling IPA seems to greatly accelerate MeAm extraction.  Consequence is that 3rd and 4th first-level extracts seem to be primarily ammonium chloride (soln is also cloudy as well rather than clear like the first two).  Although it is also possible that the two litres had some water in them even tho they should not have.
  • Three hours reflux is NOT enough – more like 5 to 6 hrs needed.
  • One MUST add the HMTA to the acid, not the other way round.  Especially, don’t dissolve the HMTA first in water – yields REALLY suck.

Salat (and xBee)
« Last Edit: April 24, 2011, 08:49:38 PM by salat »
Salat

xxxxx

  • Larvae
  • *
  • Posts: 8
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #33 on: April 24, 2011, 09:57:55 PM »
Thanks alot for those notes Salat and xBee! I'll try give this a go over the next week and report back with a few photos of how it goes!

akcom

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 430
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #34 on: April 25, 2011, 02:15:51 AM »
This looks a hell of a lot easier although I've yet to put it into practice:
Quote
100g hexamine (pulverized fuel tablets) and 30g nh4cl were added to a 1L rbf, followed by 120g den. etoh, followed by 330g 31.45% hcl.  This mixture was stirred vigorously and heat was evolved.  Gradual heating was applied with an oil bath (took three hours to reach >60c).  Two layers formed and distillate was collected between 34c and 60c with the majority of it around 55c.  Once no more distillate came over in that range, the heat was turned up and the remaining alcohol was distilled out. The flask was then cooled to room temperature and the solids were filtered.  The water in the remaining mixture was then quickly distilled away with an oil bath of ~150c.  The isolated methylamine was recystallized with anhydrous ipa to yield ~120g meam.hcl.

jon

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,883
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #35 on: April 25, 2011, 02:34:23 AM »
hexamine works really good.
just do this mix those prortions up in  a 30 oz beer bottle. bung it to a water aspirator and pull the slightest vacum until you see all the co2 bubbling off the top.
dunk it in saturated boiling salt water (hits the exact temp) cover the pot to prevent evapotartion of the water.
and reflux like that for 6 hours until the fish smell appears.
then take it off under a aspirator vacum un til you see crystals set the bottle next to a fan let it aircool then filter out all the ammonium chloride.
then take off more until you see a scum set it by the fan and filter the methylamine always let it cool or you be filtering endlessly.
that's about as easy as you can get.
no need to overcomplicate shit.
in this way you can do large batches and get good conversion rates it gets very pure because the temperature is spot on and the slight vacum gives quatitative yeilds of formalin coversions.
because its pure it isnt hygroscopic as much and easier to purify

beanhead

  • Larvae
  • *
  • Posts: 37
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #36 on: April 25, 2011, 09:30:42 PM »
Hexamine, hcl and reflux does in fact work fine...

Otherwise caffeine in a concentrated lye solution and distill off methylamine. 100gr caffeine has about ~15g methylamine yield.

If you do the reaction in anhydrous ethylene glycol (antifreeze) you can distil off dry methylamine gas.

akcom

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 430
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #37 on: April 25, 2011, 10:29:41 PM »
I guess I just really like to avoid vacuum refluxing if at all possible. Hopefully I'll have some results to share on the above procedure after exams are over

jon

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,883
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #38 on: April 25, 2011, 11:01:27 PM »
so why ask for advice?
if you know better no need to ask us.

akcom

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 430
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #39 on: April 26, 2011, 12:49:41 AM »
I definitely don't know better, infact it sounds like you've got this thing down to a T. I was just hoping someone would have some personal experience doing these reactions without vacuum reflux.  In fact, I'm wondering now why people don't do it this way?  Anyway, like I said, hopefully I'll have some time to tinker soon.
« Last Edit: April 26, 2011, 12:54:54 AM by akcom »

jon

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,883
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #40 on: April 26, 2011, 04:14:59 AM »
you don't need a condensor just a line of tubing sealed with ductape to a beer bottle in a pot of boiling salt water (boiling at 106) connected to an aspirator running the *slightest* vacum does the best job of making methylamine hands down because it converts all the formalin to methylamine it does'nt come back as dirty yellow it comes back white you don't even have to recrystallize it it's less hygroscopic because it's pure easier to do things right in the first place.
than be lazy and work twice as hard in the end cleaning the shit up.

salat

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 276
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #41 on: April 27, 2011, 04:00:21 PM »
why people don't do it this way

Too much vacuum you wind up pulling the product out, but without it more stuff (like formic acid, CO2) stays in the pot to interfere with the reaction. 

Vacuum is done to increase yields.  When you spend 2 days working a reaction it makes sense to get as much as you can out of it.

I haven't tried jon's reaction but it sounds like it's got all the right ingredients.  Going to ask xBee to try increasing the temp a bit next reaction to see if that helps.  Last batch he made he got 5 mol methylamine with a light yellowish tinge from 4 mol hex.  jon's method sounds like a matter of having hit just the right conditions to get everything working right.  One big pot probably does make it harder to get it done.  All that  fancy lab glass fucks us up! ;D

We don't drink so I guess I could get root beer bottles.... 

Salat
Salat

Methyl Man

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 143
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #42 on: April 27, 2011, 07:12:23 PM »
Couldn't one, if they chose to use lab glass, hook up a vacuum valve type thing inline within the tubing to the vac pump, and use it to dial in an amount of vac that is just right? What are those called again, pin-valves?

Seems like jon's way requires some way of dialing in a slight vac, so why not (if using a strong vac pump) do it with precision. Don't they make them with vacuum gauges as part of the thing too? I could swear I've seen those. With a gauge, one could reproduce the right vac on subsequent operations even more easily.
« Last Edit: April 27, 2011, 07:14:44 PM by Methyl Man »
There's a methyl to my madness...
==+==+==+==+==+==+==+==+==+==

Oerlikon

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 365
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #43 on: April 27, 2011, 07:34:49 PM »
Jon is never THAT specific,his methods work well even with totally amateur equpment.
I think that "just right" vaccum is when reaction mix bubbles like freshly opened soda drink.
Welcome to my lab,
where you can choose your own dreams!

jon

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,883
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #44 on: April 27, 2011, 08:58:59 PM »
the just right vacum is done with an aspirator easy to dial that down just lessen the flow of water.
my favorate part of that reaction is cracking the 32 or 40 ounce what have you beer bottles open and guzzling the shit down.
you'll know when the vacum is spot on because all the co2 can be seen bubbling off the top not the bottom that was the idea to pull co2 out to drive the reaction forward and it works dandy just gauge it by eye.

salat

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 276
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #45 on: April 27, 2011, 09:55:34 PM »
I have a setup on my vac as does xbee - a needle valve connected to a tube of drying agent and a manometer that allows us to control the vacuum pretty precisely.  I'm just trying to figure out why jon's method works so well opposed to what xBee is doing which is pretty close.

xBee says the reaction mixture never got close to 106 so it may be that he should increase heat, but that doesn't sound right either.  Heating in a 3 or 5 liter flask is more likely to have hot spots and be uneven, although xBee says he's got really strong stirring so that shouldn't be it. 

Salat
Salat

jon

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,883
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #46 on: April 27, 2011, 10:14:10 PM »
you should use a saturated salt water bath because the temperature goes between 104-106 106 being optimal you can always tell you have achieved the optimal temperature when co2 evolution becomes vigorous.

akcom

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 430
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #47 on: May 12, 2011, 05:17:22 AM »
not to suck anyones dick here or anything, but jon is a god damn genius.  this salt water bath is perfect, internal temp of the reaction is 106C on the spot.
jon suggested a 4:1 molar ratio, but I ended up using 110mL 31% HCl + 41g Hexamine based on RoundBottom's notes.  Assume 7% of your hexamine is binder if you're using tablets.

I was not comfortable using a beer bottle for the first time.  I couldn't find a clear one, and I wanted to be able to see the reaction.  If you're like me just set your flask in a small pyrex bowl full of saturated salt solution, wrap the bowl in Al foil and tent it over the neck of the flask.  This will reduce the amount of steam you lose, but you will have to add a little water every couple hours.  Connect your aspirator and turn it on once CO2 starts to evolve (when the bath temp hits 85-90C).

My aspirator on an aquarium pump was not strong enough to pull a good vacuum for this reaction.  The CO2 was bubbling from the bottom instead of the top.   Next time I'll try doing it straight from a faucet.

Hexamine & HCl were added to a flask.  The flask is swirled occasionally by hand to help dissolve the hexamine.  The temperature was brought to 106 over a period of 1 hour.  I fiddled with having my aspirator running during this period, but it didn't really seem to be making a difference so I finally just left it off and set up for distillation.  After about 4-5 hours of reacting CO2 stopped evolving.  Some distillate had obviously been sucked down the aspirator because only a very small amount of liquid came over once the solution was at 106C.  As a note the solution is almost colorless, none of the yellow people talk about.  Its much closer to the color of dilute muriatic acid.

I will finish this once I separate off the AmCl
« Last Edit: May 12, 2011, 05:29:35 AM by akcom »

jon

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,883
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #48 on: May 12, 2011, 06:42:49 AM »
you need to dilute that acid you can't just use it straight you can but it's not advisable.
use elusis's dilution in the methylamine from hexamine faq
i'm not a genius i just spent a long time doing the same thing over and over again.
let that cool all the way to room temp or you'll be filtering endlessly.
use a fan to cool it quickly.
also use your nose it should smell of rotten pussy with no detectable hints of formalin (sorry ladies)
« Last Edit: May 12, 2011, 06:46:02 AM by jon »

Shake

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 276
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #49 on: May 12, 2011, 07:59:57 AM »
Quote
not to suck anyones dick here or anything, but jon is a god damn genius

It is like the movie twins, only im danny devito :(


Hey ackom, nice post bro. people seem to take results posting for granted, but for non chemists or people who havnt walked the path before, these write ups are everything.

Cheers


Shhhake

shroomedalice

  • Guest
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #50 on: May 12, 2011, 10:16:47 AM »
another reason to use a slight vacuum when making this amine from hexamine is that it
slows down the dimethylamine being made there for creating more mono methylamine.

this will make it so you dont loose as much weight when washing with dry DCM
to remove the dimethyl amine impurity that arises from making this amine through formaldehyde
and ammonia.

« Last Edit: May 12, 2011, 10:39:40 AM by shroomedalice »

sassa

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 120
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #51 on: May 12, 2011, 03:39:37 PM »
NO SOURCES  

READ THE RULES :

http://127.0.0.1/talk/index.php/topic,369.msg3325.html#msg3325


SORRY MODERATORS!....My most sincere excuses... I was doubting if i can post it or not....

« Last Edit: May 13, 2011, 01:46:35 PM by sassa »

jon

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,883
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #52 on: May 12, 2011, 09:08:59 PM »
actually at 106 no dimethylamine is made

no one in thier right mind would buy that.
some people are sting op's others are genuine outfits that sell hot chemicals for a profit.
the best way to find out is to order a non-suspicious item from them and see how they declare it to customs and where the package came from.

« Last Edit: May 12, 2011, 09:14:22 PM by jon »

RoidRage

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 386
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #53 on: May 12, 2011, 09:09:18 PM »
hXXp://cgi.ebay.com/Methylamine-hydrochloride-95-500g-Lab-Reagent-/330553241486?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item4cf6822f8e  :o    




***ADD TO WATCH LIST*** ;D


Wonders if it will last long ? Technically, it's perfectly legal  ;) Wonders if they're willing to mislabel too  :D

jon

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,883
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #54 on: May 12, 2011, 09:24:03 PM »
only one way to find out, they are purportedly from overseas but that could be a ruse too.
so order something benign say you don't want to pay hazardous material duties and see what they say.
i've seen digs like this before.
just see where they do business off ebay so the pigs aren't privvy to your business.

sassa

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 120
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #55 on: May 12, 2011, 09:29:28 PM »
haha...only posted for fun...
..I discovered that days ago looking for calcium sulfate,and i´m sure he doesn´t carry it days ago,because i was revising all items for sale,......but seems seller it´s a reputable e-seller from China,with lot of happy customers,and auctions are private,..have and advice on the bottom of the auction to ebay´s advertising to not delete items because there are not listed as scheudeled on lot of countries...It´s usual  for people from usa,think on that as a crazy thing,but on other sites of the world,buy this can be not too much safe, but perfectly legal.
   And carries too diethylamine,ethylamine,..... ;D ;D.
  Something says to me this seller knows what he sells,and it´s very posible he acced to mislabel the packages if customs on the destin country are too much hard....
   Posibly too,ebay make the posibility of order to a different adress,include far a lot from original adress,pay with another ebay acount,another paypal acount,so....
   I will not recomend anybody buy  it of course!,but i believe can be easy to get to people from some countries talking a little to the seller,.....
   i posibly will buy him some Calcium sulfate,and will ask for some "adjusting" on packages information because customs,...so i will see how it works.Information coming soon....  :)
« Last Edit: May 12, 2011, 09:45:28 PM by sassa »

jon

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,883
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #56 on: May 12, 2011, 09:41:49 PM »
yeah like i said there are a lot of foreign outfits that advertise there the trick is to find out where they do business off ebay because private does'nt really mean private.

salat

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 276
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #57 on: May 13, 2011, 01:22:14 AM »
A company with that name was operating out of North Carolina a while ago - they seemed suspicious to me based on what they were selling.  Reagent something - makes me think some agents think they are being clever.

Salat
Salat

jon

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,883
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #58 on: May 13, 2011, 02:44:13 AM »
that's what they do they pose as an overseas outfit to make people comfortable.
what did you do look them up in whois?
they say are in henderson, nevada
you know you can look at those websites that the dea run like that one for example and learn a lot about what they are looking at.
suprize! suprize! SOCKS error trying to get to them behind tor, these guys really are fishy.
« Last Edit: May 13, 2011, 04:46:34 AM by jon »

akcom

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 430
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #59 on: May 13, 2011, 03:47:51 AM »
The solution was left to cool and the ammonium chloride was filtered out.  The solution then reduced to dryness under vacuum.  Vacuum was removed, MeOH added, and reflux attained.  The MeOH was decanted, let slowly cool to RT, then put in the freezer. 

I made the mistake of only cropping out the AmCl once, not twice.  After recrystallization from MeOH I got a lot of translucent plate-like crystals, but also a lot of white powder as well.  Added it to some NaOH solution and all I smelled was ammonia :\  Seems like I should have either reduced the solution w/o cooling until AmCl precip out THEN filtered, or just reduced the solution half way and filtered a second time.  Just posting this here so no one else makes the same mistake I did.

jon

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,883
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #60 on: May 13, 2011, 07:29:53 AM »
just extract all the ammonium chloride with methanol.
if it is offf color of the crystals are inconsistent you evaporated too much and methylamine co-precipitated
that's how you correct that problem.

akcom

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 430
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #61 on: May 13, 2011, 01:46:43 PM »
jon, I thought methylamine was more soluble than AmCl in MeOH? The AmCl definitely precipitated first from the methanol.
In RoundBottom's write up:
Quote
The temp climbed up to 108°C over 5.5h.  After about 300 minutes a white smoke started filling the distilling flask.  This is what we are waiting for, the sublimation of the MeAm.HCl.  "Distilling to dryness," means the flask doesn’t have any more water in it.  It does not mean, "Boil the hell out of it till everything's crunchy"

Once the smoke appeared, the heat was turned off and the contents were left to cool and solidify for 30 minutes.  Sorry, the appearance of the fluid at this point wasn't noted.  Once cool, 350mL MeOH was poured into the distillation flask and a reflux condenser was put on the flask (actually, the condenser from the distillation phase can be used, as it is already set up and this isn't a heavy reflux).  The heat was turned up again, and the solution was allowed to reflux for about 15 min.

While hot, the solution was decanted into a Pyrex dish (a 1000mL beaker is probably better).  Either way, the container was covered with saran wrap and left on the counter for 2 hours until cool.  It was then moved to the fridge and left overnight.  In the morning the beaker was moved to the freezer for another 2 hours.  The crystals were large crunchy flakes, and the remaining fluid had an amberish tint.
« Last Edit: May 13, 2011, 02:13:59 PM by akcom »

jon

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,883
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #62 on: May 14, 2011, 12:33:08 AM »
yeah that's the idea extract the methylamine out with alcohol.
you would'nt need to do that if you crystallized the ammonium choride first.

salat

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 276
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #63 on: May 14, 2011, 05:26:08 AM »
If you can get some 99% IPA it works really good boiling hot to extract methylamine with.  We dry it with mol sieve or drierite first.  It sucks up extra water that way.  Learned that technique from an old baalchemist writeup. 

Salat
Salat

jon

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,883
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #64 on: May 25, 2011, 03:44:45 AM »
yeah i didn't record my yields but with a minimal vacuum i didn't crop any ammonium chloride so i know yields were pretty high.
temperature control also helps things greatly.

salat

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 276
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #65 on: May 28, 2011, 12:08:39 AM »
I think his yields are about what your seeing - I forget the terminology I'll ask later.  He doesn't always weight it - he just see's he's got 1 1/2 or 4 moles or such rough amounts.

Salt
Salat

newbiechem

  • Pupae
  • **
  • Posts: 62
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #66 on: March 06, 2012, 05:57:30 PM »
jon if temp. is kept at the sweet spot for the 4 hours, no need cool down and filter the amonium? you put in the bottle and keep the temp at 106 then add vaccum??? or the whole thing its done at the bottle and you just add the vaccum.... sorry just got a lil confused. bright start filter couple of times, and the other paper on rhodium filter once before rising temp. and sassa also filter once. but if keep at right temp no need to filter? and you dont rise temp when adding vac? keep at 106?

i saw at a pond shop those old coke bottles, of 1500ml they are very cool might work also.

thanks
peace
« Last Edit: March 06, 2012, 06:04:24 PM by novicebrchem »

Balkan Bonehead

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 117
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #67 on: March 19, 2012, 11:08:45 PM »

the way to keep temps in that range is by reacting it in a boiling saturated solution of table salt it boils exactly 106 i bunged 32 ounce beer bottles to an aspirator and pulled a very gentle vacum if the vacum is to high you will know because it will simply foam out.


I take it that that refers to the boiling temperature of saturated salt solution at or near sea level, no? For those of us who live at higher elevations, perhaps a more soluble salt like calcium chloride would work to reach the desired temps.

jon

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,883
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #68 on: March 19, 2012, 11:26:08 PM »
no you have to cool it down and filter it periodically when you see methylamine crystallizing on the surface during volume reduction under vacum allow it to cool to room temperature and filter it off.
continue reducing then repeat this process.
if it's done exactly right you won't need to separate out ammonium chloride at least that's been my experience.
and, furthermore the methylamine salt is less hygroscopic and easier to handle when it is purer.

lugh

  • Global Moderator
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 876
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #69 on: March 20, 2012, 12:31:15 AM »
This old thread has some relevant information:

https://the-collective.ws/forum/index.php?topic=9890

The end results from the effort applied 8)
Chemistry is our Covalent Bond

newbiechem

  • Pupae
  • **
  • Posts: 62
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #70 on: May 03, 2012, 04:10:01 PM »
at my altitude salt water boils at exactly 104...... would this do the job? since water boiling at 104, i believe the contents will be boilling at a lower temp. correct? would these 2 degress make a big difference? would jons method still work with minimum amonium back, with the water bath boiling at 104? or should i just separete first crop?
thanks
peace

newbiechem

  • Pupae
  • **
  • Posts: 62
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #71 on: May 07, 2012, 03:57:18 AM »
well with vaccum or no vacuum theres lots of boilling, so i assume the co2 bubles is the lil small ones that form on the top and side of flasks right? they goes down a lil bit and floats around right?
and hot IPA will dissolve the methylamine correct? will crystalize when cold? or have to evaporate? sorry these dumb questions.  is there a rate for the IPA:methylamine?
thanks

newbiechem

  • Pupae
  • **
  • Posts: 62
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #72 on: May 11, 2012, 04:35:28 AM »
using 37% formaldehyde should water be added?
bright star uses Paraformaldehyde and add water, also he states that if using 37% solution water still be added....
now the picture easay on rhodium does not add water, and ratios are a bit different.....

can one use bright star ratios with no water? since using 37% formaldehyde? the ratios on the picture essay, and the bright star paper are quite different....

does it make a difference if one uses jon method with the vacum, but using 37% formaldehyde solution instead paraformaldehyde? should water be added using 37% solution? or can just make 400ml 37% formaldehyde with 135 amonium no water and slight vacum? tryed different ratio (from picture essay, at rhodium) tryed its ratio with slight vacum and  totally failed!!! now i see why, tryed 550ml 37% and 250gr amonium, maybe thats why yield sucked unlike jon experience.

apreciate any help
peace
« Last Edit: May 11, 2012, 05:00:58 AM by newbiechem »

fresh1

  • conspirator
  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 339
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #73 on: May 19, 2012, 05:38:34 AM »
hey matey I'm sure many would like to help you but your question/s are kinda confusing  ???

As for 'extra water' it depends what you're starting with, but from the sounds of things with you... 'no'  and don't forget there a good chance there is going to be water in your precursors to some degree, again depending on what you start with.

 would you like to try and outline what you are doing again, with much more detail? :) that way folks can try to answer (and is prbly why no one has :P)

What chemicals are you starting with? what method are you following?  I assume Brightstars but this topic also mentions other methods too :-\

  Maybe if you were to write out what you have done, the method used, exact amounts of each used and the procedure you followed would help us a lot ;)

Or if you have worked out what went wrong, maybe you could share your experience for any other wasps who have similar problems which would be 8)

Hope your dreams are getting sweeter coz after all that's the goal ;D
"Curiosity is a gift"

fresh1

  • conspirator
  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 339
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #74 on: May 24, 2012, 09:52:20 PM »
I havent seen this synth detailed clearly here  (esp for you NBC ;))

Quote
Hydrolysis of Hexamine to paraforamide

140g of Hexamine is carefully dissolved in 400mL of Muriatic Acid (31.45% HCl) to which at least 100mL of (preferably) absolute ethanol has been added. Add the hexamine slowly while stirring vigorously and with good ventilation as some nasty fumes are produced. Allow all to stir at room temperature for at least 8 hours but preferably 16. The solution will become turbid within several hours of the initial mixing. I *believe* this is the formation of a formaldehyde trimer of some sort and I suspect that the original equation for the conversion of hexamine into methylamine fragments is therefore incorrect. At any rate, filter off this white precipitate which is obviously not an amine salt due to it being fluffy even in Florida's humidity (almost all simple amine salts are hygroscopic). Finally, remove the excess water, hydrochloric acid and freako volatile products by, ideally, heating the liquid at low to medium heat in a porcelain saucepan. Stove-proof glass would be ideal, but stainless-steel, aluminum and copper are definitely not! The concentration can generally be left unattended for a couple of hours, but try to stick around and babysit it at least the first time so you will have a good idea of how long it takes for your particular stove/pots/etc... Also, the methylamine HCl will form a melt if heated too long at which point it will sublimate off. It will then appear as if it's taking forever for the stuff to concentrate when in fact you are merely boiling your product away. After the concentrated slush has become sufficiently "thick", take it off the heat every so often to see if it doesn't soldify, insuring that the water is mostly gone and that not too much sublimation has occured (some is inevitable and even desireable). The yield of Methylamine HCl should be around 200g as white deliquescent crystals.

d) Notes on the process

If the crystals are opaque white and do not deliquesce quickly in air of average humidity (65% rh), they may be contaminated with some Hexamine or some bizarre polymer. Washing 100g of the crude product with 100mL of Chloroform by stirring in a beaker then filtering, repeated as many times as necessary, will remove Hexamine. Methylamine HCl is insoluble in Chloroform whereas Hexamine is at the rate of 1g to 10mL.

It has been determined that the best batch size is to process 70g of hexamine at a time. This is primarily due to the fact that the amount of heat necessary to boil something increases exponentially with the volume. It seems to normally take 4-6 hours to fully concentrate the methylamine solution with a 70g batch but as much as 16 hours to do 200g. Of course, the solution can be split up among pans to evaporate, but try and keep it at 100g expected yield per pan to get the best tradeoff between time and volumetric efficiency

enjoy  ;)
"Curiosity is a gift"

Happyman

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 122
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #75 on: September 04, 2012, 11:26:54 PM »
Hexamine, hcl and reflux does in fact work fine...

Otherwise caffeine in a concentrated lye solution and distill off methylamine. 100gr caffeine has about ~15g methylamine yield.

If you do the reaction in anhydrous ethylene glycol (antifreeze) you can distil off dry methylamine gas.

Any details? How concentrated?

sassa

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 120
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #76 on: September 06, 2012, 02:44:22 PM »
Hi everybody again guys!glad to read you again!i'm not playing on the hobby since months,but i read you almost every day!
   About the methylamine synth with paraformaldehyde and ammonium chloride,i only can say it's so easy and fool prof,that anybody can follow it with 99% succes probabilty without serious skills on vacuum methods,distillations,...i made on that days i didn't know to operate a vacuum pump,a stirrerr,almost vent a separation funnel,but following bright star's article it's impossible to fuck up.possibly not the purest methylamine made,but i made reductions both with that methylamine and pure grade lab methylamine(it's possible to get it looking for a little without risk) and the results are exactly the same...more exactly i think i prefer salt made from brights star's method than pure methylamine....that comment about more intense high with final salt it's not a childs tale,and when i had both types methylamine,i used to prefere the less pure.yields where exactly as good too.
    I remember the most tricky part of reaction,after get the crop of non reacted ammonium chloride,when you are reducing the solution and aplying vacuum at the end to ride off the water,i remember to put the vacumm  pump to max.,and not able to understand when all the water was out,because i was waiting for a crystal formation on liquid surface in the flask....i was stressing the solution with lot time max vacuum and posible high temperatures than 106 celsius,waiting for that crystalls,and possible subblyming that liquid methylamine....when i was sure the reaction failed...disconected the vacuum and heat,and when i was directly go to discard the solution,something orange-red, saw started to solidify as a white chunk....putted quickly on a beak,and on 20 seconds was 200 gr white rock.
    Take care to not let happens that...because when you want to use it and weight like 40 gr that stuff,break that rock was impossible!...so a pain in the ass to work with...and important,,,allways wear gloves,the smells fixes to hands,cloths as hell,and it's a pain to ride off it

EMTWC

  • Larvae
  • *
  • Posts: 28
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #77 on: September 10, 2012, 05:28:53 AM »
co2 evolution is visible from the top of the reaction soup ie. no co2 should be seen bubbling from the bottom.

any further questions feel free to ask

salt bath is sexy....rocks my twat at 105ish...hoping/hail mary-ing that one is pulling cO2 off the top...........but aspi on slightly or not, bubbles from bottom.

what pooch am I screwin namnoj?
roll some bones and catch a fire

dream0n

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 204
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #78 on: September 10, 2012, 05:36:13 AM »
EMTWC: I have issues with your language already, and it's your second* post. My english translator breaks on your post for whatever reason, I apologize.
« Last Edit: September 10, 2012, 06:15:32 AM by dream0n »
off to bigger and better things - don't worry I will visit from time to time

EMTWC

  • Larvae
  • *
  • Posts: 28
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #79 on: September 10, 2012, 05:58:05 AM »
don't believe post was pointed towards dreamOn, but

did you have something positive to add?

there's 2 posts
roll some bones and catch a fire

EMTWC

  • Larvae
  • *
  • Posts: 28
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #80 on: September 10, 2012, 06:31:50 AM »
no fa fa foolin
roll some bones and catch a fire

Amoreena

  • Larvae
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #81 on: September 10, 2012, 01:17:51 PM »

on slightly or not, bubbles from bottom.


vacuum wasn't "just right"
And she dreams of crystal streams

Sedit

  • Global Moderator
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,099
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #82 on: September 10, 2012, 06:57:18 PM »
don't believe post was pointed towards dreamOn, but

did you have something positive to add?

there's 2 posts

He did have something positive to add, he was explaining that your random broken English jibber jabbering is making it hard for no English speaking members to read what your writing. He was much nicer about it then I would have been.
There once were some bees and you took all there stuff!
You pissed off the wasp now enough is enough!!!

ImAMANGUYS

  • Pupae
  • **
  • Posts: 84
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #83 on: September 10, 2012, 08:22:58 PM »

on slightly or not, bubbles from bottom.


vacuum wasn't "just right"

Do we have an idea of what that "just right" spot is vacuum wise?

Measurements in this case would be helpful.

jon

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,883
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #84 on: September 11, 2012, 02:18:39 AM »
it's really teperature
see at 106C bubbling kicks off vigourously you know you hit the g-spot
once that's happening just apply enough to cause the evolution of co2 to go from the top.
but no more or you evap all your formalin and the reaction fails.