Author Topic: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?  (Read 1851 times)

jon

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,883
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #60 on: May 13, 2011, 07:29:53 AM »
just extract all the ammonium chloride with methanol.
if it is offf color of the crystals are inconsistent you evaporated too much and methylamine co-precipitated
that's how you correct that problem.

akcom

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 430
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #61 on: May 13, 2011, 01:46:43 PM »
jon, I thought methylamine was more soluble than AmCl in MeOH? The AmCl definitely precipitated first from the methanol.
In RoundBottom's write up:
Quote
The temp climbed up to 108°C over 5.5h.  After about 300 minutes a white smoke started filling the distilling flask.  This is what we are waiting for, the sublimation of the MeAm.HCl.  "Distilling to dryness," means the flask doesn’t have any more water in it.  It does not mean, "Boil the hell out of it till everything's crunchy"

Once the smoke appeared, the heat was turned off and the contents were left to cool and solidify for 30 minutes.  Sorry, the appearance of the fluid at this point wasn't noted.  Once cool, 350mL MeOH was poured into the distillation flask and a reflux condenser was put on the flask (actually, the condenser from the distillation phase can be used, as it is already set up and this isn't a heavy reflux).  The heat was turned up again, and the solution was allowed to reflux for about 15 min.

While hot, the solution was decanted into a Pyrex dish (a 1000mL beaker is probably better).  Either way, the container was covered with saran wrap and left on the counter for 2 hours until cool.  It was then moved to the fridge and left overnight.  In the morning the beaker was moved to the freezer for another 2 hours.  The crystals were large crunchy flakes, and the remaining fluid had an amberish tint.
« Last Edit: May 13, 2011, 02:13:59 PM by akcom »

jon

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,883
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #62 on: May 14, 2011, 12:33:08 AM »
yeah that's the idea extract the methylamine out with alcohol.
you would'nt need to do that if you crystallized the ammonium choride first.

salat

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 276
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #63 on: May 14, 2011, 05:26:08 AM »
If you can get some 99% IPA it works really good boiling hot to extract methylamine with.  We dry it with mol sieve or drierite first.  It sucks up extra water that way.  Learned that technique from an old baalchemist writeup. 

Salat
Salat

jon

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,883
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #64 on: May 25, 2011, 03:44:45 AM »
yeah i didn't record my yields but with a minimal vacuum i didn't crop any ammonium chloride so i know yields were pretty high.
temperature control also helps things greatly.

salat

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 276
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #65 on: May 28, 2011, 12:08:39 AM »
I think his yields are about what your seeing - I forget the terminology I'll ask later.  He doesn't always weight it - he just see's he's got 1 1/2 or 4 moles or such rough amounts.

Salt
Salat

newbiechem

  • Pupae
  • **
  • Posts: 62
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #66 on: March 06, 2012, 05:57:30 PM »
jon if temp. is kept at the sweet spot for the 4 hours, no need cool down and filter the amonium? you put in the bottle and keep the temp at 106 then add vaccum??? or the whole thing its done at the bottle and you just add the vaccum.... sorry just got a lil confused. bright start filter couple of times, and the other paper on rhodium filter once before rising temp. and sassa also filter once. but if keep at right temp no need to filter? and you dont rise temp when adding vac? keep at 106?

i saw at a pond shop those old coke bottles, of 1500ml they are very cool might work also.

thanks
peace
« Last Edit: March 06, 2012, 06:04:24 PM by novicebrchem »

Balkan Bonehead

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 117
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #67 on: March 19, 2012, 11:08:45 PM »

the way to keep temps in that range is by reacting it in a boiling saturated solution of table salt it boils exactly 106 i bunged 32 ounce beer bottles to an aspirator and pulled a very gentle vacum if the vacum is to high you will know because it will simply foam out.


I take it that that refers to the boiling temperature of saturated salt solution at or near sea level, no? For those of us who live at higher elevations, perhaps a more soluble salt like calcium chloride would work to reach the desired temps.

jon

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,883
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #68 on: March 19, 2012, 11:26:08 PM »
no you have to cool it down and filter it periodically when you see methylamine crystallizing on the surface during volume reduction under vacum allow it to cool to room temperature and filter it off.
continue reducing then repeat this process.
if it's done exactly right you won't need to separate out ammonium chloride at least that's been my experience.
and, furthermore the methylamine salt is less hygroscopic and easier to handle when it is purer.

lugh

  • Global Moderator
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 876
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #69 on: March 20, 2012, 12:31:15 AM »
This old thread has some relevant information:

https://the-collective.ws/forum/index.php?topic=9890

The end results from the effort applied 8)
Chemistry is our Covalent Bond

newbiechem

  • Pupae
  • **
  • Posts: 62
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #70 on: May 03, 2012, 04:10:01 PM »
at my altitude salt water boils at exactly 104...... would this do the job? since water boiling at 104, i believe the contents will be boilling at a lower temp. correct? would these 2 degress make a big difference? would jons method still work with minimum amonium back, with the water bath boiling at 104? or should i just separete first crop?
thanks
peace

newbiechem

  • Pupae
  • **
  • Posts: 62
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #71 on: May 07, 2012, 03:57:18 AM »
well with vaccum or no vacuum theres lots of boilling, so i assume the co2 bubles is the lil small ones that form on the top and side of flasks right? they goes down a lil bit and floats around right?
and hot IPA will dissolve the methylamine correct? will crystalize when cold? or have to evaporate? sorry these dumb questions.  is there a rate for the IPA:methylamine?
thanks

newbiechem

  • Pupae
  • **
  • Posts: 62
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #72 on: May 11, 2012, 04:35:28 AM »
using 37% formaldehyde should water be added?
bright star uses Paraformaldehyde and add water, also he states that if using 37% solution water still be added....
now the picture easay on rhodium does not add water, and ratios are a bit different.....

can one use bright star ratios with no water? since using 37% formaldehyde? the ratios on the picture essay, and the bright star paper are quite different....

does it make a difference if one uses jon method with the vacum, but using 37% formaldehyde solution instead paraformaldehyde? should water be added using 37% solution? or can just make 400ml 37% formaldehyde with 135 amonium no water and slight vacum? tryed different ratio (from picture essay, at rhodium) tryed its ratio with slight vacum and  totally failed!!! now i see why, tryed 550ml 37% and 250gr amonium, maybe thats why yield sucked unlike jon experience.

apreciate any help
peace
« Last Edit: May 11, 2012, 05:00:58 AM by newbiechem »

fresh1

  • conspirator
  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 339
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #73 on: May 19, 2012, 05:38:34 AM »
hey matey I'm sure many would like to help you but your question/s are kinda confusing  ???

As for 'extra water' it depends what you're starting with, but from the sounds of things with you... 'no'  and don't forget there a good chance there is going to be water in your precursors to some degree, again depending on what you start with.

 would you like to try and outline what you are doing again, with much more detail? :) that way folks can try to answer (and is prbly why no one has :P)

What chemicals are you starting with? what method are you following?  I assume Brightstars but this topic also mentions other methods too :-\

  Maybe if you were to write out what you have done, the method used, exact amounts of each used and the procedure you followed would help us a lot ;)

Or if you have worked out what went wrong, maybe you could share your experience for any other wasps who have similar problems which would be 8)

Hope your dreams are getting sweeter coz after all that's the goal ;D
"Curiosity is a gift"

fresh1

  • conspirator
  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 339
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #74 on: May 24, 2012, 09:52:20 PM »
I havent seen this synth detailed clearly here  (esp for you NBC ;))

Quote
Hydrolysis of Hexamine to paraforamide

140g of Hexamine is carefully dissolved in 400mL of Muriatic Acid (31.45% HCl) to which at least 100mL of (preferably) absolute ethanol has been added. Add the hexamine slowly while stirring vigorously and with good ventilation as some nasty fumes are produced. Allow all to stir at room temperature for at least 8 hours but preferably 16. The solution will become turbid within several hours of the initial mixing. I *believe* this is the formation of a formaldehyde trimer of some sort and I suspect that the original equation for the conversion of hexamine into methylamine fragments is therefore incorrect. At any rate, filter off this white precipitate which is obviously not an amine salt due to it being fluffy even in Florida's humidity (almost all simple amine salts are hygroscopic). Finally, remove the excess water, hydrochloric acid and freako volatile products by, ideally, heating the liquid at low to medium heat in a porcelain saucepan. Stove-proof glass would be ideal, but stainless-steel, aluminum and copper are definitely not! The concentration can generally be left unattended for a couple of hours, but try to stick around and babysit it at least the first time so you will have a good idea of how long it takes for your particular stove/pots/etc... Also, the methylamine HCl will form a melt if heated too long at which point it will sublimate off. It will then appear as if it's taking forever for the stuff to concentrate when in fact you are merely boiling your product away. After the concentrated slush has become sufficiently "thick", take it off the heat every so often to see if it doesn't soldify, insuring that the water is mostly gone and that not too much sublimation has occured (some is inevitable and even desireable). The yield of Methylamine HCl should be around 200g as white deliquescent crystals.

d) Notes on the process

If the crystals are opaque white and do not deliquesce quickly in air of average humidity (65% rh), they may be contaminated with some Hexamine or some bizarre polymer. Washing 100g of the crude product with 100mL of Chloroform by stirring in a beaker then filtering, repeated as many times as necessary, will remove Hexamine. Methylamine HCl is insoluble in Chloroform whereas Hexamine is at the rate of 1g to 10mL.

It has been determined that the best batch size is to process 70g of hexamine at a time. This is primarily due to the fact that the amount of heat necessary to boil something increases exponentially with the volume. It seems to normally take 4-6 hours to fully concentrate the methylamine solution with a 70g batch but as much as 16 hours to do 200g. Of course, the solution can be split up among pans to evaporate, but try and keep it at 100g expected yield per pan to get the best tradeoff between time and volumetric efficiency

enjoy  ;)
"Curiosity is a gift"

Happyman

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 122
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #75 on: September 04, 2012, 11:26:54 PM »
Hexamine, hcl and reflux does in fact work fine...

Otherwise caffeine in a concentrated lye solution and distill off methylamine. 100gr caffeine has about ~15g methylamine yield.

If you do the reaction in anhydrous ethylene glycol (antifreeze) you can distil off dry methylamine gas.

Any details? How concentrated?

sassa

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 120
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #76 on: September 06, 2012, 02:44:22 PM »
Hi everybody again guys!glad to read you again!i'm not playing on the hobby since months,but i read you almost every day!
   About the methylamine synth with paraformaldehyde and ammonium chloride,i only can say it's so easy and fool prof,that anybody can follow it with 99% succes probabilty without serious skills on vacuum methods,distillations,...i made on that days i didn't know to operate a vacuum pump,a stirrerr,almost vent a separation funnel,but following bright star's article it's impossible to fuck up.possibly not the purest methylamine made,but i made reductions both with that methylamine and pure grade lab methylamine(it's possible to get it looking for a little without risk) and the results are exactly the same...more exactly i think i prefer salt made from brights star's method than pure methylamine....that comment about more intense high with final salt it's not a childs tale,and when i had both types methylamine,i used to prefere the less pure.yields where exactly as good too.
    I remember the most tricky part of reaction,after get the crop of non reacted ammonium chloride,when you are reducing the solution and aplying vacuum at the end to ride off the water,i remember to put the vacumm  pump to max.,and not able to understand when all the water was out,because i was waiting for a crystal formation on liquid surface in the flask....i was stressing the solution with lot time max vacuum and posible high temperatures than 106 celsius,waiting for that crystalls,and possible subblyming that liquid methylamine....when i was sure the reaction failed...disconected the vacuum and heat,and when i was directly go to discard the solution,something orange-red, saw started to solidify as a white chunk....putted quickly on a beak,and on 20 seconds was 200 gr white rock.
    Take care to not let happens that...because when you want to use it and weight like 40 gr that stuff,break that rock was impossible!...so a pain in the ass to work with...and important,,,allways wear gloves,the smells fixes to hands,cloths as hell,and it's a pain to ride off it

EMTWC

  • Larvae
  • *
  • Posts: 28
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #77 on: September 10, 2012, 05:28:53 AM »
co2 evolution is visible from the top of the reaction soup ie. no co2 should be seen bubbling from the bottom.

any further questions feel free to ask

salt bath is sexy....rocks my twat at 105ish...hoping/hail mary-ing that one is pulling cO2 off the top...........but aspi on slightly or not, bubbles from bottom.

what pooch am I screwin namnoj?
roll some bones and catch a fire

dream0n

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 204
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #78 on: September 10, 2012, 05:36:13 AM »
EMTWC: I have issues with your language already, and it's your second* post. My english translator breaks on your post for whatever reason, I apologize.
« Last Edit: September 10, 2012, 06:15:32 AM by dream0n »
off to bigger and better things - don't worry I will visit from time to time

EMTWC

  • Larvae
  • *
  • Posts: 28
Re: methylamine synthesized ala Bright Star´s:it´s good enough?
« Reply #79 on: September 10, 2012, 05:58:05 AM »
don't believe post was pointed towards dreamOn, but

did you have something positive to add?

there's 2 posts
roll some bones and catch a fire