|
|
||||||||
|
Tengo (Newbee) 01-11-04 21:17 No 481933 |
|
OTC! P2P from cinnamaldehyde | ||||||
|
The idea is to epoxidize cinnamaldehyde with percarbonate, followed by a reduction of the aldehyde group clemmensen-style... Under such harsh conditions the ring will open, producing a diol... Now this can be dehydrated, forming P2P. [image] /T |
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Rhodium (Chief Bee) 01-11-04 23:20 No 481949 |
|
Aldehydes undergo Bayer-Villiger oxidation,... | ||||||
|
First step: Not only can the cinnamaldehyde be oxidized by that reagent to cinnamic acid, but the formed epoxyaldehyde can also be oxidized, giving epoxy-cinnamic acid. I believe your proposed reaction is capable of producing a really big mess. Second step: There is no literature precedence of any (substituted or not) epoxycinnamaldehyde being reduced to anything with a methyl group on the end, neither with the epoxide intact nor with it opened to the glycol. As I have told other newbees a thousand times over - do not post a lot of "theoretically possible" routes to interesting chemicals without backing it up with literature references where others have performed a very similar procedure to prove the reaction to be practically feasible. Anyone with a little chemistry knowledge can draw up hundreds of diagrams like the one you just made, some of which may work and some of which fail - they are however useless to anyone unless the general concept is proven in practice. Thus, please do not post anything like the above, unless you for example have a reference where someone successfully has reduced an epoxy-aldehyde to the corresponding propanediol in good yield, as a proof of concept... The Hive - Clandestine Chemists Without Borders |
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Tengo (Newbee) 01-12-04 07:31 No 482021 |
|
I understand. Thanks for the input though... | ||||||
|
I understand. Thanks for the input though... /T |
||||||||