Main Index   New Window   Search   Profile   Send Private   Check Private   Who's Online   Elements Table   FAQ   No Encryption   Logout

 

26 Online, 3451 Registered

 

You have 0 new messages

 

 

Main Index    The HIVE light edition (TM)

 

Stimulants

Thread:    Bookmark  Back to search

 

Posts 1 - 5 of 5

 Subject: a tale of two hypo nanos 

 

 

 

 

 

 

geezmeister
(Stranger)
10-19-01 13:53
No 226881

  

  

a tale of two hypo nanos

 Bookmark  Reply 

 


SWIG's stash of red phos has run low and is weary. He waits to replenish his supply, but until that day comes (patience is the rule) he decided to play with a bottle of
hypophospohorous acid he had on hand, a gift from a fellow enthusiast. SWIG used TFSE to great length, reading between what appeared to be many lines, before attemptin his first hypo rxn.

He had ten gms of pseudo left from his last I2/red p cook (did not have enough red p to use it all). He followed Pebble's synth as best one can in a 250 ml Erlenmeyer flask on the electric range. A little scary, but there were three distinct stages, smells, and when it was done, it was clearly done. Produced just shy of seven grams of finished but not recrystalized product. The bio assay was excellent, on par with SWIG's red p product. Very smooth, very long-legged.

Encouraged, SWIG boiled the bottle of acid to concentrate it, taking it off the heat when the temperature reached 15 degrees C above the intital boiling point. Being completely out of product and in need fuel for the weekend's chores, he bought some of those clean convenience store pills and got eight grams of pseudo. He used ten ml of
hypo, and fifteen grams of iodine. He chilled his acid down for thirty minutes before starting. He added his pseudo and his iodine to the flask first, then the cold hypo. This gave him exactly enough time to hook his hose to the top of the 500 ml volumentric flask he was using. The hose looped over the top of the standard to a muffler jar-- a one litre Erlenmeyer filled 2/3 with water. The mix fumed and boiled immediately. He added heat and all went well for about seven minutes, at which time the muffler jar suddenly and spontaneously erupted in flames. The hose spewed out of the flask, flame sprouting from its free end. Smoke, white and noxious, began filling the room. SWIG calmly pulled the flask from the heating element, tossed a wet towel over the muffler jar, and put a clamp on the hose. He then proceeded to run like hell. Thankful that he lives well out of town, and glad that he had that big fan running full blast, he returned shortly to find the fires out. The flask with water in it had an orange film on the inside above the water line. This came off easily with water. SWIG returned the flask to the heating element, albeit at reduced temperature, and continued the cook. Within twenty minutes of the return, the sides of the flask were clear and the contents were golden colored. No activity going on, SWIG called the cook over, and let the flask cool. Without filtering, he added xylene to the flask and then 20% NaOH solution. Not enough, had to add more naOH. That done he managed 7 gms of excellent product. Clean, very clean, and very effective.

That fire was scary as hell, though. Spontaneous combustion, no open source of flame, no source of spark. Will reflux next time. No more of the old hose to the jar trick for SWIG!


GMZ--long a lurker gone public lately

 

 

 

 

 

 

BenWiFFen
(Line Monitor)
10-19-01 18:36
No 226987

  

  

Re: a tale of two hypo nanos

 Bookmark  Reply 

 


Do I have this right. You used the 10 Gs you had left over from old rxn then added 8 more to it. And came out with 7g. Did you use ant R/P with the acid. I don't know much about the
hypo but I have read that a small amount of R/P will help the rxn.


Gear Driven

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hematite
(Individual)
10-20-01 08:52
No 227177

  

  

Re: a tale of two hypo nanos

 Bookmark  Reply 

 


This situation is easily avoided by changing your addition sequence and technique when everything is placed into the reaction vessel.
A beaker of
Hypophosphorus acid on it's own in any quantity that is heated and concentrated will, if not monitored and removed from heat in time, spontaneously combust with all the vigour and determination of red phosphorous.....smoke and all. But I am not informing you of anything you dont already know there!
If the concentrated acid is placed in the reaction vessel first (chilling not required as long as it is room temp and not still hot from concentrating it) The feedstock is added and swirled and dissolved as much as it will, and it matters not that all of it wont want to go into solution.
Then without any heat at all I2 is added to the mix in small enough portions so all that eventuates is the fizzing reaction of the I2 as it hits and reacts, and dissapears into the solution. If this addition is for instance in a vessel with a stopper and hose it is simplicity itself to drop small amounts into the neck and place the stopper on until the fizzing stops, if the neck is smallish like a ground glass joint addition through the condensor is favoured and this is assisted by the I2 first being ground in a mortar and pestle to avoid clumping and blocking the tube, difficult once condensation begins in any case so a suitable instrument to probe and clear the tube is needed before beginning.
Once all the I2 has been added the reaction will continue for as long as it wants to still no heat or radical anythings and very soon after will give you a nice clear/yellow solution.
Heat is now applied in sufficient amounts only until a reaction is self sustaining at which point it removed and the reaction allowed to take it's course, then heat is reapplied until the point is reached when you are at reflux of a now clearer and paler yellow solution, at which point if you have the ratios and conentration of acid correctly pre-determined.....you are finished.
Adding red P during any of this will only serve to nesesitate it's removal again at some stage and I see this as an interesting but pointless step unless one enjoys red over yellow for rxn visual stimulation.
I offer this as advice only due to my concern for the unninitiated person getting fried in many possible ways by not being made aware of this combustion PROBABILITY, not POSSIBILTY, and not as a synthesis for discussion and debate at this point in time. If you dont agree with my advice I couldn't care less so save your energies spent replying in going and proving me incorrect as your time will be better spent and answers more forthcoming.
cool


Regards, Hematite.

 

 

 

 

 

 

geezmeister
(Stranger)
10-22-01 07:14
No 227758

  

  

Re: a tale of two hypo nanos

 Bookmark  Reply 

 


Hematite: 
 Your detailed response is very much appreciated. The procedure you suggest for a
hypophosphorous-I2 reduction makes sense to SWIG, who now has only four hypo reactions under his belt. He will follow your suggestions his next time around. SWIG said he is surprised that there is so little info on hypophosphorous acid reactions on the board, given that it is fast,
clean, and fast. And clean. And works quite well. And it is fast. And clean. And works very well,thank you. SWIG said he’d done two more reactions since the last post, both quite successful. He thanks you for your help!

BenWiffen: There were two separate reactions, one with ten grams of pseudo, one with eight. The process using
hypo is certainly a direct and fast method for doing a nano style cook.


GMZ--long a lurker gone public lately

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hematite
(Individual)
10-23-01 19:00
No 228184

  

  

Re: a tale of two hypo nanos

 Bookmark  Reply 

 


Yeah it's just not in the ballpark compared to many methods in terms of willingness to hash and rehash from every conceivable hash point and then some.
My only guess is that humans would be forced to agree en-mass about something that is difficult to dispute because there is no need to.
What fun would it be if every thread started with;
Goddammit sob#(*%$^&%%^......another trouble free run and now I'm high once more.
It would probably end up reading like this though which could be fun again;
Hey people, I was doing the usual
hypo synth in the garage the other day and spilled a storage jar and a battery from it fell into the reaction and split in half and I couldnt get it out before it fizzed a lot. the dark grey colour of the gear was a worry at first but then I just had some and it was good so what do you think about adding a few batteries to each one? And if I was to do this would it be stronger if I used duracells and not rechargables?


Regards, Hematite.

 

 

 

 

Posts 1 - 5 of 5  

End of thread  

 

 

 

 http://www.the-hive.ws/

 

 mailto:hyperlab@the-hive.ws   forum@the-hive.ws

 

 

 

 

 

 



Lycaeum     Erowid     Rhodium

PIHKAL    TIHKAL    Total Synthesis II