nbk2000
December 3rd, 2002, 01:47 AM
While we were down, I had time to do some further research into the use of chemical agents during the Waco Seige.
An interesting bit of info came up in a lawsuit by one of the survivors against the feds. This was info about the toxic effects of DCM/MC (dichloromethane/methylene chloride) when combined with CS and fire.
MC is a very potent, fast-acting inhalation general anesthesia agent, nearly on a par with Halothane, the most potent agent currently used in surgical anesthesia.
The narcotic effects of MC follow a pattern. Anyone caught in the spray itself would experience tachycardia and possibly cardiac arrest. MC is known to sensitize the heart, particularly if the person is already under stress or fearful.
In the case of most inhalation general anesthetics this effect is most pronounced if the person experiences a rapid change in the air concentration--partial pressure of the compound--of the agent. As the MC/CS cloud expanded within the building anyone exposed would experience difficulty in breathing due to the CS.
The MC, being a potent anesthetic agent, would tend to alleviate the pain as narcosis set in and the brain began to shut down. It has been shown that a concentration of 0.46% (volume) in inhaled air will eliminate spontaneous movement, leaving the victims unable to flee to fresh air, leaving them trapped in a toxic atmosphere.
MC is flammable in a vapor concentration greater than 12-14%. It is generally considered nonflammable so long as it is used in well-ventilated areas or in the open air. But within the confines of a building, the immediate area of release would be too rich in fuel (MC) to combust. This bubble of gas would then expand, getting mixed with more oxygen until it reached its flammibility range. At this point, if there's an ignition source, the vapor will ignite in a flash fire.
During combustion, both chemicals involved produce toxic smoke. CS generates hydrogen cyanide (an asphyxiant), while MC generates hydrogen chloride and chlorine (both corrosive edema inducers). Both give copious amounts of carbon monoxide (asphyxiant).
DCM itself is decomposed by the liver in CO, which impairs blood oxygenation. When combined with an oxygen deficient atmosphere, toxic gases, respiratory stressors (CS/HCl/CL<sub>2</sub>), and greatly increased oxygen demand caused by the fight or flight response, it can be predicted with a high level of confidence that the target will expire from lack of oxygen. :)
If the gas doesn't ignite, it'll continue to dilute to below it's igniton range, but will still be powerfully irritating and incapacitating.
(BTW, dogs are used for testing anesthetics since they're very similar to humans in response and dosages. Something to keep in mind when testing such things. :) )
Oh, and MC is also a solvent for many CW agents, such as H, CX, G and V series, etc. This would be preferable for high stakes attacks. I'll refer to such a MC/CW mix as MCX.
Envisioned uses would be to use as an adjunct to conventional attack such as fragmentation weapons. A suicide bomber could have his bombs on his chest, with the MCX in a plastic bag on his back in a knapsack or such. When he exploded, his body would absorb the flame, preventing premature ignition, but the shrapnel would penetrate and disperse the MCX over the scene.
As the survivors are recovering from the initial shock, they're being anesthetized or confused by the MC, making them more likely to remain exposed to the X for a longer period of time, increasing its effectiveness.
This would also complicate rescue efforts since the first responders would also be hindered by the MC, requiring use of protective equipment to avoid falling victim themselves, thus increasing response times/possibly taking out trained personnel/and increasing terror.
Also, MC penetrates and irritates the skin, increasing its permeability to other agents.
As the vapor cloud expanded, it could flash fire on any ignition source, spreading the fire must faster than it would by normal spread. The flashfire would then create the toxic combustion products in addition to any additional trauma by thermal effects.
Even after a flashfire, there'd still be uncombusted MCX remaining to contaminate the scene.
Given all these factors, I believe MCX would be more effective than a neat CW agent in a small scale attack because of the synergistic effects.
<img src="http://www.itcilo.it/english/actrav/telearn/osh/kemi/scan/sandh6.gif" alt=" - " />
:D
In a conventional style bombing, a container of the material could be placed outside of the initial fireball radius so that it'll be shattered by fragmentation/blast with no risk of premature ignition from the fireball.
<small>[ December 03, 2002, 12:53 AM: Message edited by: nbk2000 ]</small>
An interesting bit of info came up in a lawsuit by one of the survivors against the feds. This was info about the toxic effects of DCM/MC (dichloromethane/methylene chloride) when combined with CS and fire.
MC is a very potent, fast-acting inhalation general anesthesia agent, nearly on a par with Halothane, the most potent agent currently used in surgical anesthesia.
The narcotic effects of MC follow a pattern. Anyone caught in the spray itself would experience tachycardia and possibly cardiac arrest. MC is known to sensitize the heart, particularly if the person is already under stress or fearful.
In the case of most inhalation general anesthetics this effect is most pronounced if the person experiences a rapid change in the air concentration--partial pressure of the compound--of the agent. As the MC/CS cloud expanded within the building anyone exposed would experience difficulty in breathing due to the CS.
The MC, being a potent anesthetic agent, would tend to alleviate the pain as narcosis set in and the brain began to shut down. It has been shown that a concentration of 0.46% (volume) in inhaled air will eliminate spontaneous movement, leaving the victims unable to flee to fresh air, leaving them trapped in a toxic atmosphere.
MC is flammable in a vapor concentration greater than 12-14%. It is generally considered nonflammable so long as it is used in well-ventilated areas or in the open air. But within the confines of a building, the immediate area of release would be too rich in fuel (MC) to combust. This bubble of gas would then expand, getting mixed with more oxygen until it reached its flammibility range. At this point, if there's an ignition source, the vapor will ignite in a flash fire.
During combustion, both chemicals involved produce toxic smoke. CS generates hydrogen cyanide (an asphyxiant), while MC generates hydrogen chloride and chlorine (both corrosive edema inducers). Both give copious amounts of carbon monoxide (asphyxiant).
DCM itself is decomposed by the liver in CO, which impairs blood oxygenation. When combined with an oxygen deficient atmosphere, toxic gases, respiratory stressors (CS/HCl/CL<sub>2</sub>), and greatly increased oxygen demand caused by the fight or flight response, it can be predicted with a high level of confidence that the target will expire from lack of oxygen. :)
If the gas doesn't ignite, it'll continue to dilute to below it's igniton range, but will still be powerfully irritating and incapacitating.
(BTW, dogs are used for testing anesthetics since they're very similar to humans in response and dosages. Something to keep in mind when testing such things. :) )
Oh, and MC is also a solvent for many CW agents, such as H, CX, G and V series, etc. This would be preferable for high stakes attacks. I'll refer to such a MC/CW mix as MCX.
Envisioned uses would be to use as an adjunct to conventional attack such as fragmentation weapons. A suicide bomber could have his bombs on his chest, with the MCX in a plastic bag on his back in a knapsack or such. When he exploded, his body would absorb the flame, preventing premature ignition, but the shrapnel would penetrate and disperse the MCX over the scene.
As the survivors are recovering from the initial shock, they're being anesthetized or confused by the MC, making them more likely to remain exposed to the X for a longer period of time, increasing its effectiveness.
This would also complicate rescue efforts since the first responders would also be hindered by the MC, requiring use of protective equipment to avoid falling victim themselves, thus increasing response times/possibly taking out trained personnel/and increasing terror.
Also, MC penetrates and irritates the skin, increasing its permeability to other agents.
As the vapor cloud expanded, it could flash fire on any ignition source, spreading the fire must faster than it would by normal spread. The flashfire would then create the toxic combustion products in addition to any additional trauma by thermal effects.
Even after a flashfire, there'd still be uncombusted MCX remaining to contaminate the scene.
Given all these factors, I believe MCX would be more effective than a neat CW agent in a small scale attack because of the synergistic effects.
<img src="http://www.itcilo.it/english/actrav/telearn/osh/kemi/scan/sandh6.gif" alt=" - " />
:D
In a conventional style bombing, a container of the material could be placed outside of the initial fireball radius so that it'll be shattered by fragmentation/blast with no risk of premature ignition from the fireball.
<small>[ December 03, 2002, 12:53 AM: Message edited by: nbk2000 ]</small>