megalomania
May 18th, 2003, 03:31 PM
HMTD Factory
Frequent Poster
Posts: 225
From:
Registered: FEB 2001
posted 03-06-2001 03:57 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I guess explosive raw material can be discussed here.
Some idea came up this evening :
1.HNO3 can be made with water and NO2
2.HNO3 will decompose into NO2 in contact with formaldehyde
3. What if a drop of formaldehyde drips into 60%HNO3, fumes NO2, which then bubbles into
another bottle of 60%HNO3?
The decomposed HNO3 is sacrificed, given out
NO2, which concentrated another bottle of HNO3. Excess gas that is not absorbed fast enough can go into another bottle. Bottles can be cool bathed for better absorbtion.
In industrial process, NO2 bubbled through low conc. HNO3 can lift the concentration to, say, higher than 98%.
Damn I should have found out this when I had
access to some nitric acid.
green beret
Frequent Poster
Posts: 101
From: Australia
Registered: DEC 2000
posted 03-06-2001 05:43 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I also would like to hear any methods of concentrating nitric acid.
Morrigan
Frequent Poster
Posts: 81
From: The Netherlands
Registered: OCT 2000
posted 03-06-2001 09:52 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If this works than that would be great. It would mean that no sulfuric acid has to be wasted. This can be used in the nitration instead. And since you don’t loose a lot of actual HNO3 it would almost be too good to be true. Anybody knows or this works?
Mr Cool
Frequent Poster
Posts: 991
From: None of your bloody business!
Registered: DEC 2000
posted 03-06-2001 02:46 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4NO2 + O2 + 2H2O -> 4HNO3
Therefore oxygen will also be needed. The above reaction is how HNO3 is made industrially. I think this is a pretty good idea, but surely some of the original HNO3 will react with the formaldehyde, releasing NO2 as a product, like when copper reacts with conc. HNO3?
If we could find a way to break it down with catalysts, or maybe you could heat it to break it down without boiling off any water and diluting the HNO3 in the second flask, then that would be better.
HMTD Factory
Frequent Poster
Posts: 225
From:
Registered: FEB 2001
posted 03-06-2001 04:38 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Actually oxygen is not involved. When NO2 reacts with water it will produce HNO3 and HNO2. HNO2 can self react to produce HNO3 and some byproduct(NO and some water).
Beware that when HNO3 is reduced to low concentration, copper will not produce NO2 anymore but will produce NO instead. Formaldehyde itself is a catalyst.
2NO2 + H2O -> HNO3 + HNO2(absorbtion)
3HNO2 -> HNO3 + 2NO + H2O(self react of HNO2)
----------------------------
net :
3NO2 + H2O -> 2HNO3 + NO
The first flask will be filled with 60% HNO3 and a drip of formalin. it will fume out NO2
in large quantity. Gas is guided into a second flask of HNO3, excess gas not absorbed goes to the third flask of HNO3, excess gas goes to the fourth...etc.
When the second flask is concentrated, it can be removed for use. The original third flask
will be the second, fourth become third, a new flask of raw HNO3 will be the fourth...
The process will be encouraged under low temperature and high pressure. The first flask will experience the highest pressure, the second will be the second highest, third the third, foruth the foruth. (due to the liquid pressure need to be overcame in each flask.)
Using NO2 to concentrate HNO3 is a process not used widely in industry because boiling HNO3 and H2SO4 is cheaper.
Another way to concentrate HNO3 involving H2SO4 is to make weak HNO3 into a salt say
NaNO3. The salt then react with H2SO4 to produce HNO3, which can be distilled out to seperate with Na2SO4 and remaining H2SO4.
Mr Cool
Frequent Poster
Posts: 991
From: None of your bloody business!
Registered: DEC 2000
posted 03-07-2001 04:52 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oxygen makes it much more efficient, because it will oxidise the NO produced, turning it into NO2, which will dissolve and make more HNO3. That is why it is used in large scale production.
Using NO2 is not used to concentrate HNO3, it is used to make it in the first place, because it is a great deal cheaper on an industrial scale than using H2SO4 and a nitrate.
So the formaldehyde isn't used up at all? That's good.
HMTD Factory
Frequent Poster
Posts: 225
From:
Registered: FEB 2001
posted 03-08-2001 03:54 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I know it is used to produce HNO3 but in the previous context NO2 is used to "lift the concentration" of HNO3 so we can call it "concentrating".
Mr Cool
Frequent Poster
Posts: 991
From: None of your bloody business!
Registered: DEC 2000
posted 03-08-2001 04:07 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah I know what you mean.
I still say adding O2 as well is a good idea.
PHILOU Zrealone
Frequent Poster
Posts: 479
From: Brussels,Belgium,Europe
Registered: SEP 2000
posted 03-09-2001 09:01 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Heh guys, enough dreams or talk about nothing... let us think a bit:
HNO3 with NO2 should give conc. HNO3 following what you all say!!!!Bullseyesshit
Then enlight my stupid constatations with your big knowledge:
*why the process to make HNO3 from NO/NO2/H2O/O2 can only reach low conc. HNO3 (5%) and that it needs to be distilled to get the 69% HNO3??????
*If NO2 with HNO3 would turn into conc. HNO3 spontaneously; then why the hell are we so concerned by a little NO2 in our HNO3 when making let's say PETN, NG, RDX,...red HNO3 should not exist then and thus shouldn't be a problem to us!!!!
Let's hope you got the point!
Think twice before dreaming or affirming things!!!!
------------------
"Life that deadly disease sexually transmitted".
"Chemistry is all what stinks and explode; Physic is all what never works! ;-p :-) :o)"
HMTD Factory
Frequent Poster
Posts: 225
From:
Registered: FEB 2001
posted 03-10-2001 01:41 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because the dissloving of NO2 in water is a reversable process. If the environment favors on direction, the balance will shift. Sometimes the shift is so insignificant it is
too slow for mass production.
One reason that in industry HNO3 is only made to 70% is that "They can't afford to wait that long" to use one single process. concentrating HNO3 with H2SO4 (stage 2) will be more cost effective than blowing NO2 into it.
I hope you got the point.
Mr Cool
Frequent Poster
Posts: 991
From: None of your bloody business!
Registered: DEC 2000
posted 03-10-2001 08:15 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It does not need to be distilled if the conditions are correct. If it needed to be distilled from 5% in industrial processes, this reaction would not be used because it would be too costly. But it is used, so distillation is unecessary.
NO2 with HNO3 will not turn into conc. HNO3. None of us have said that it will. It needs water and oxygen, and conditions that favour a reaction.
Like HMTD said, I hope you get the point.
I thought you were better than that.
Edit: this is why HNO3 below a certain conc. is always colourless, not red or brown. The dissolved NO2 will gradually react with the water in it and O2 from the air to make HNO3. However, high conc. HNO3 does not contain enough water to react all of the NO2.
[This message has been edited by Mr Cool (edited March 11, 2001).]
firebreether
Frequent Poster
Posts: 110
From:
Registered: NOV 2000
posted 03-21-2001 04:35 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You could always just take 70 % HNO3 and distill it the way you would for making HNO3 from KNO3 + H2SO4. like by vaccuum distilling it. this should work (i think) because the HNO3 has a lower BP and therefore would boil before the H2O that it is diluted with.
PHILOU Zrealone
Frequent Poster
Posts: 479
From: Brussels,Belgium,Europe
Registered: SEP 2000
posted 04-04-2001 11:18 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I see your points now but stil in industry they don't make 70% nor 100% from that process since you can only acheive a very low concentration without distillation!
------------------
"Life that deadly disease sexually transmitted".
"Chemistry is all what stinks and explode; Physic is all what never works! ;-p :-) :o)"
Bitter
Frequent Poster
Posts: 290
From: 11 Downing Street, London, England
Registered: SEP 2000
posted 04-04-2001 03:37 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't know if this is a stupid idea, Philou, but I don't suppose you recommend electrolysing a low concentration of nitric acid to drive off the water, thus concentrating the nitrate, do you ? The electrodes would have to be graphite, of course, but this method, if it did work, would save us all the hassle of screwing around with NOx gasses and sulphuric acid.
CragHack
Frequent Poster
Posts: 618
From:
Registered: DEC 2000
posted 04-04-2001 03:59 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
that might work in theory but you have to consider the effect the electricty would have on the H+ and the NO3- ions that are in the solution. now that i brought the question up, would electrolyzing (for lack of a better word) have any effect on the other components (other than the water) when) in the acid?
------------------
...Æ
PHILOU Zrealone
Frequent Poster
Posts: 479
From: Brussels,Belgium,Europe
Registered: SEP 2000
posted 04-05-2001 07:49 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That would cost a lot of energy; but yes, virtually it is possible, since all voltages and intensity are available quite easily from transformators, and that at certain voltage only certain reactions occurs.
------------------
"Life that deadly disease sexually transmitted".
"Chemistry is all what stinks and explode; Physic is all what never works! ;-p :-) :o)"
HMTD Factory
Frequent Poster
Posts: 225
From:
Registered: FEB 2001
posted 04-06-2001 02:28 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If HNO3 do not decompose under electrolysis in aqeuous solution...like H2SO4...
But the electrode must not be graphite.
HNO3 can oxidize graphite. (Powder factory workers use HNO3 to remove micro carbon particles trapped inside their body tissue, finger nail for example.)
Bitter
Frequent Poster
Posts: 290
From: 11 Downing Street, London, England
Registered: SEP 2000
posted 04-06-2001 09:53 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What do you suggest then ? Metals can't really be used otherwise they will react (don't forget it's incredibly strong acid we're making).
I don't think it is going to be appropriate to use platinum and gold and similar metals as electrodes due to cost, at 99% volume, these metals will probably begin to react with the acid anyway.
HMTD Factory
Frequent Poster
Posts: 225
From:
Registered: FEB 2001
posted 04-06-2001 12:39 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No, platinum or gold don't react with HNO3 at
whatever concentration. Unless somebody is
drunk enough to add some HCl into HNO3.
Why will somebody need a thick rod of platinum or gold for electrode?
Maybe it's not well-known that platinum plated needle electrode is available from lab suppliers...These electrodes really go a long way...
Frequent Poster
Posts: 225
From:
Registered: FEB 2001
posted 03-06-2001 03:57 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I guess explosive raw material can be discussed here.
Some idea came up this evening :
1.HNO3 can be made with water and NO2
2.HNO3 will decompose into NO2 in contact with formaldehyde
3. What if a drop of formaldehyde drips into 60%HNO3, fumes NO2, which then bubbles into
another bottle of 60%HNO3?
The decomposed HNO3 is sacrificed, given out
NO2, which concentrated another bottle of HNO3. Excess gas that is not absorbed fast enough can go into another bottle. Bottles can be cool bathed for better absorbtion.
In industrial process, NO2 bubbled through low conc. HNO3 can lift the concentration to, say, higher than 98%.
Damn I should have found out this when I had
access to some nitric acid.
green beret
Frequent Poster
Posts: 101
From: Australia
Registered: DEC 2000
posted 03-06-2001 05:43 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I also would like to hear any methods of concentrating nitric acid.
Morrigan
Frequent Poster
Posts: 81
From: The Netherlands
Registered: OCT 2000
posted 03-06-2001 09:52 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If this works than that would be great. It would mean that no sulfuric acid has to be wasted. This can be used in the nitration instead. And since you don’t loose a lot of actual HNO3 it would almost be too good to be true. Anybody knows or this works?
Mr Cool
Frequent Poster
Posts: 991
From: None of your bloody business!
Registered: DEC 2000
posted 03-06-2001 02:46 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4NO2 + O2 + 2H2O -> 4HNO3
Therefore oxygen will also be needed. The above reaction is how HNO3 is made industrially. I think this is a pretty good idea, but surely some of the original HNO3 will react with the formaldehyde, releasing NO2 as a product, like when copper reacts with conc. HNO3?
If we could find a way to break it down with catalysts, or maybe you could heat it to break it down without boiling off any water and diluting the HNO3 in the second flask, then that would be better.
HMTD Factory
Frequent Poster
Posts: 225
From:
Registered: FEB 2001
posted 03-06-2001 04:38 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Actually oxygen is not involved. When NO2 reacts with water it will produce HNO3 and HNO2. HNO2 can self react to produce HNO3 and some byproduct(NO and some water).
Beware that when HNO3 is reduced to low concentration, copper will not produce NO2 anymore but will produce NO instead. Formaldehyde itself is a catalyst.
2NO2 + H2O -> HNO3 + HNO2(absorbtion)
3HNO2 -> HNO3 + 2NO + H2O(self react of HNO2)
----------------------------
net :
3NO2 + H2O -> 2HNO3 + NO
The first flask will be filled with 60% HNO3 and a drip of formalin. it will fume out NO2
in large quantity. Gas is guided into a second flask of HNO3, excess gas not absorbed goes to the third flask of HNO3, excess gas goes to the fourth...etc.
When the second flask is concentrated, it can be removed for use. The original third flask
will be the second, fourth become third, a new flask of raw HNO3 will be the fourth...
The process will be encouraged under low temperature and high pressure. The first flask will experience the highest pressure, the second will be the second highest, third the third, foruth the foruth. (due to the liquid pressure need to be overcame in each flask.)
Using NO2 to concentrate HNO3 is a process not used widely in industry because boiling HNO3 and H2SO4 is cheaper.
Another way to concentrate HNO3 involving H2SO4 is to make weak HNO3 into a salt say
NaNO3. The salt then react with H2SO4 to produce HNO3, which can be distilled out to seperate with Na2SO4 and remaining H2SO4.
Mr Cool
Frequent Poster
Posts: 991
From: None of your bloody business!
Registered: DEC 2000
posted 03-07-2001 04:52 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oxygen makes it much more efficient, because it will oxidise the NO produced, turning it into NO2, which will dissolve and make more HNO3. That is why it is used in large scale production.
Using NO2 is not used to concentrate HNO3, it is used to make it in the first place, because it is a great deal cheaper on an industrial scale than using H2SO4 and a nitrate.
So the formaldehyde isn't used up at all? That's good.
HMTD Factory
Frequent Poster
Posts: 225
From:
Registered: FEB 2001
posted 03-08-2001 03:54 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I know it is used to produce HNO3 but in the previous context NO2 is used to "lift the concentration" of HNO3 so we can call it "concentrating".
Mr Cool
Frequent Poster
Posts: 991
From: None of your bloody business!
Registered: DEC 2000
posted 03-08-2001 04:07 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah I know what you mean.
I still say adding O2 as well is a good idea.
PHILOU Zrealone
Frequent Poster
Posts: 479
From: Brussels,Belgium,Europe
Registered: SEP 2000
posted 03-09-2001 09:01 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Heh guys, enough dreams or talk about nothing... let us think a bit:
HNO3 with NO2 should give conc. HNO3 following what you all say!!!!Bullseyesshit
Then enlight my stupid constatations with your big knowledge:
*why the process to make HNO3 from NO/NO2/H2O/O2 can only reach low conc. HNO3 (5%) and that it needs to be distilled to get the 69% HNO3??????
*If NO2 with HNO3 would turn into conc. HNO3 spontaneously; then why the hell are we so concerned by a little NO2 in our HNO3 when making let's say PETN, NG, RDX,...red HNO3 should not exist then and thus shouldn't be a problem to us!!!!
Let's hope you got the point!
Think twice before dreaming or affirming things!!!!
------------------
"Life that deadly disease sexually transmitted".
"Chemistry is all what stinks and explode; Physic is all what never works! ;-p :-) :o)"
HMTD Factory
Frequent Poster
Posts: 225
From:
Registered: FEB 2001
posted 03-10-2001 01:41 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because the dissloving of NO2 in water is a reversable process. If the environment favors on direction, the balance will shift. Sometimes the shift is so insignificant it is
too slow for mass production.
One reason that in industry HNO3 is only made to 70% is that "They can't afford to wait that long" to use one single process. concentrating HNO3 with H2SO4 (stage 2) will be more cost effective than blowing NO2 into it.
I hope you got the point.
Mr Cool
Frequent Poster
Posts: 991
From: None of your bloody business!
Registered: DEC 2000
posted 03-10-2001 08:15 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It does not need to be distilled if the conditions are correct. If it needed to be distilled from 5% in industrial processes, this reaction would not be used because it would be too costly. But it is used, so distillation is unecessary.
NO2 with HNO3 will not turn into conc. HNO3. None of us have said that it will. It needs water and oxygen, and conditions that favour a reaction.
Like HMTD said, I hope you get the point.
I thought you were better than that.
Edit: this is why HNO3 below a certain conc. is always colourless, not red or brown. The dissolved NO2 will gradually react with the water in it and O2 from the air to make HNO3. However, high conc. HNO3 does not contain enough water to react all of the NO2.
[This message has been edited by Mr Cool (edited March 11, 2001).]
firebreether
Frequent Poster
Posts: 110
From:
Registered: NOV 2000
posted 03-21-2001 04:35 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You could always just take 70 % HNO3 and distill it the way you would for making HNO3 from KNO3 + H2SO4. like by vaccuum distilling it. this should work (i think) because the HNO3 has a lower BP and therefore would boil before the H2O that it is diluted with.
PHILOU Zrealone
Frequent Poster
Posts: 479
From: Brussels,Belgium,Europe
Registered: SEP 2000
posted 04-04-2001 11:18 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I see your points now but stil in industry they don't make 70% nor 100% from that process since you can only acheive a very low concentration without distillation!
------------------
"Life that deadly disease sexually transmitted".
"Chemistry is all what stinks and explode; Physic is all what never works! ;-p :-) :o)"
Bitter
Frequent Poster
Posts: 290
From: 11 Downing Street, London, England
Registered: SEP 2000
posted 04-04-2001 03:37 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't know if this is a stupid idea, Philou, but I don't suppose you recommend electrolysing a low concentration of nitric acid to drive off the water, thus concentrating the nitrate, do you ? The electrodes would have to be graphite, of course, but this method, if it did work, would save us all the hassle of screwing around with NOx gasses and sulphuric acid.
CragHack
Frequent Poster
Posts: 618
From:
Registered: DEC 2000
posted 04-04-2001 03:59 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
that might work in theory but you have to consider the effect the electricty would have on the H+ and the NO3- ions that are in the solution. now that i brought the question up, would electrolyzing (for lack of a better word) have any effect on the other components (other than the water) when) in the acid?
------------------
...Æ
PHILOU Zrealone
Frequent Poster
Posts: 479
From: Brussels,Belgium,Europe
Registered: SEP 2000
posted 04-05-2001 07:49 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That would cost a lot of energy; but yes, virtually it is possible, since all voltages and intensity are available quite easily from transformators, and that at certain voltage only certain reactions occurs.
------------------
"Life that deadly disease sexually transmitted".
"Chemistry is all what stinks and explode; Physic is all what never works! ;-p :-) :o)"
HMTD Factory
Frequent Poster
Posts: 225
From:
Registered: FEB 2001
posted 04-06-2001 02:28 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If HNO3 do not decompose under electrolysis in aqeuous solution...like H2SO4...
But the electrode must not be graphite.
HNO3 can oxidize graphite. (Powder factory workers use HNO3 to remove micro carbon particles trapped inside their body tissue, finger nail for example.)
Bitter
Frequent Poster
Posts: 290
From: 11 Downing Street, London, England
Registered: SEP 2000
posted 04-06-2001 09:53 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What do you suggest then ? Metals can't really be used otherwise they will react (don't forget it's incredibly strong acid we're making).
I don't think it is going to be appropriate to use platinum and gold and similar metals as electrodes due to cost, at 99% volume, these metals will probably begin to react with the acid anyway.
HMTD Factory
Frequent Poster
Posts: 225
From:
Registered: FEB 2001
posted 04-06-2001 12:39 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No, platinum or gold don't react with HNO3 at
whatever concentration. Unless somebody is
drunk enough to add some HCl into HNO3.
Why will somebody need a thick rod of platinum or gold for electrode?
Maybe it's not well-known that platinum plated needle electrode is available from lab suppliers...These electrodes really go a long way...