I have seen the enemy...

[Aristocles]

Kinda scary stuff, although par for the course, I guess...

"There has been a marked increase in hate crimes that corresponds to the growing number of hate sites on the Internet," said Christopher Wolf, chairman of the International Network Against Cyberhate. "Online recruitment to hate groups has been effective, and we have seen an increase in membership to hate groups."

I wonder if he is refencing black on white crime or perhaps the rise in zionists crime worldwide?

"'It's not the decision of the private companies or the international bodies or the international experts to say what is and isn't good content," said Meir Brand, director of Google Israel. "It's the decision of the lawmakers, the people elected by government.'"

"Lawmakers" = ZOG and that's exactly what scares the ever lovin' shit outta moi!

"He points to an example from several weeks ago, when users on the Vanguard News Network started exchanging ideas over how to "infiltrate" Jewish communities to learn more about the secret meetings held by Jews to discuss the "takeover."

The ADL, he said, only began investigations when one user posted about his own experience in "infiltrating a Los Angeles synagogue."

"It raised a flag for us because it meant that he had actually gone and done something in the Jewish community there. Now we are looking into it and trying to track this user to see if he is dangerous," said Marcus. "

Un-fucking-believable... "track this user"? incredible... is this what it's coming too?

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1192380801048&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

[megalomania]

A rising number of "hate" groups, eh? Sounds like liberal-speak for a new definition of what is considered hate, now encompassing any form of criticism or rejection of homosexers, woman, negros, and other pervert groups. Don't like gays sticking their dicks in your ass? Don't support they are perfectly normal? Perhaps you are a little disgusted or offended? Well, you are a hater my friend!

Brand your enemy a racist, a hate monger, a sexist, a homophobe, or a bigot and you can try, convict, and execute his reputation in the court of public opinion even (especially) if the allegations are untrue.

There is not a rise of hate groups, there is a rise of libs calling everyone who disagrees with them a hate group.

[LibertyOrDeath]

Groups like the ADL have defined "hate speech" as "any speech Jews hate to hear," and "hate group" as "any group of straight white males who have organized to promote their own interests."

If the ADL is so bothered by bigotry, then why don't we hear them complaining about the fact that "democratic" Israel is actually an ethnostate created by, of, and for the Jews, and in which only Jews are first-class citizens?

If whites wanted to create our own state -- even if it were done peacefully, without violently expelling the native inhabitants on the land -- the first people to shriek "UNFAIR! RACISM!" would be the ADL. It's only okay when Jews do it, you see. There's one standard for the Jews and another standard for everyone else.

You see, my friends, we whites are the ONLY group that is forbidden to organize or freely associate along racial lines. It's not "hate" for there to be an African American Students' Association, a Latino Students' Association, a Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, or a Black Entertainment Television station, but if so much as TV commercial appears that doesn't have enough black faces in it, the chorus of outrage is deafening. The muds want to have their own exclusive, segregated groups while simultaneously integrating into ours.

American leftist Jews have long been at the forefront of the push to turn the US into a multicultural society. Some prominent Jews have even gone on record as saying that the reason for this was because it was deemed safer for Jews to live in a heterogeneous society where they wouldn't stand out as much. This is especially well-documented in the case of immigration policy:

http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/books-immigration.html
A congruent opinion is expressed by prominent Jewish social scientist and political activist Earl Raab1 who remarks very positively on the success of American immigration policy in altering the ethnic composition of the United States since 1965. Raab notes that the Jewish community has taken a leadership role in changing the Northwestern European bias of American immigration policy (1993a, p. 17), and he has also maintained that one factor inhibiting anti-Semitism in the contemporary United States is that '(a)n increasing ethnic heterogeneity, as a result of immigration, has made it even more difficult for a political party or mass movement of bigotry to develop' (1995, p. 91). Or more colorfully:

The Census Bureau has just reported that about half of the American population will soon be non-white or non-European. And they will all be American citizens. We have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country.

We [i.e., Jews] have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it irreversible'and makes our constitutional constraints against bigotry more practical than ever. (Raab 1993b, p. 23).2

Indeed, the 'primary objective' of Jewish political activity after 1945 'was ... to prevent the emergence of an anti-Semitic reactionary mass movement in the United States' (Svonkin 1997, 8). Charles Silberman (1985, 350) notes that 'American Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because of their belief -- one firmly rooted in history -- that Jews are safe only in a society acceptant of a wide range of attitudes and behaviors, as well as a diversity of religious and ethnic groups. It is this belief, for example, not approval of homosexuality, that leads an overwhelming majority of American Jews to endorse 'gay rights' and to take a liberal stance on most other so-called 'social' issues.'3

More great stuff from Prof. MacDonald here:
http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/books.htm#articles

Read up on this stuff while you can, folks. Before too long, it will be as illegal to possess such writings as it is now to have kiddie porn.

[Kaydon]

Brand your enemy a racist, a hate monger, a sexist, a homophobe, or a bigot and you can try, convict, and execute his reputation in the court of public opinion even (especially) if the allegations are untrue.

There is not a rise of hate groups, there is a rise of libs calling everyone who disagrees with them a hate group.

Hit the nail on the head, Mega.

If you can brand your enemy, and get the public to buy it, half the battle is won.

[TreverSlyFox]

I would bet it's not just Liberals that use a hate message to brand a group.

The PTB I'll bet have a few "False Flag" operations ongoing to brand any group they either fear or raise too many questions. The Militia got branded after Oklahoma City even though they had no hand in it and had actually tossed McVeigh out as being a hot head long before. But that didn't matter and TPTB use the Media to brand the Militia as the bad guys.

[Big Mac]

A rising number of "hate" groups, eh? Sounds like liberal-speak for a new definition of what is considered hate, now encompassing any form of criticism or rejection of homosexers, woman, negros, and other pervert groups. Don't like gays sticking their dicks in your ass? Don't support they are perfectly normal? Perhaps you are a little disgusted or offended? Well, you are a hater my friend!

Brand your enemy a racist, a hate monger, a sexist, a homophobe, or a bigot and you can try, convict, and execute his reputation in the court of public opinion even (especially) if the allegations are untrue.

There is not a rise of hate groups, there is a rise of libs calling everyone who disagrees with them a hate group.

Feh, when they say "hate" they mean: Anyone who doesn't believe that we should all have apartments (or condos, as most of the California immigrants seem to be demanding here in Austin) that are painted in pastels and have Phillip fucking Glass piped through the government issued speakers (a la North Korea). Honestly, this crap is getting old really fast.

I can simply concur with you. Libs seem to just want to brand new enemies. As history has shown in a clarity akin to crystal: when that happens, it means they are about to move.

So grab your whiskey, your women, and your weapons, my dear friends. The seas seem to be getting ready to storm up.

I think I made a wise choice joining up with this board.

[Jacks Complete]

It's not just the Jews doing this. It's a standard tactic. The anti-gun lot here are so utterly hateful, they use emotion and screaming to get the pro-gun spokesman thrown out! I recall one where the bitch yelled "He's a gunman! He's a gunman!" until HE was asked to leave!

Everyone except the non-religious straight white man does it successfully. When he does it, people ignore it, or they shout it back, but louder.

[megalomania]

A liberal is a conservative that has not yet been robbed. :)