xoo1246
August 5th, 2002, 06:12 PM
I'm working on a SC that uses a thin copper liner. I will be propelling the the liner by some ANNM(the highest Vod I can accomplish this far).
The AN has been dried, still I'm a bit worried about Cu(NO3)2 forming when the liner is in contact with the AN. I filled the container once to get an aproximate number on how many grams it could hold, emptied it and left it, some AN was left and after a a day blue dots were visible. The copper cone had been cleaned and thus there wasn't much oxide on the surface. I have cleaned it again with iron wool to remove the marks. Now I have to assemble it again.
The question is, can the problem be solved by heating the liner under a flame for a while to create a protective coating of copper oxide? I don't want to coat it with glue and I don't want my device to auto-ignite. (EDIT: I will try it overnight on a piece of copper plate, but I want to have your opinion on the mather too)
While I'm at it, what kind of stand-off is acceptable when it comes to an inperfect cone such as this one(certainly not 6xd), and should the the cone sides be overlapped?
Here are pictures of the device for anyone interested:
<a href="http://w1.478.telia.com/~u47802930/SCPrototype01.jpg" target="_blank">http://w1.478.telia.com/~u47802930/SCPrototype01.jpg</a>
<a href="http://w1.478.telia.com/~u47802930/SCPrototype02.jpg" target="_blank">http://w1.478.telia.com/~u47802930/SCPrototype02.jpg</a>
<a href="http://w1.478.telia.com/~u47802930/SCPrototype03.jpg" target="_blank">http://w1.478.telia.com/~u47802930/SCPrototype03.jpg</a> (won't use legs)
<a href="http://w1.478.telia.com/~u47802930/SCPrototype04.jpg" target="_blank">http://w1.478.telia.com/~u47802930/SCPrototype04.jpg</a>
<a href="http://w1.478.telia.com/~u47802930/SCPrototype05.jpg" target="_blank">http://w1.478.telia.com/~u47802930/SCPrototype05.jpg</a>
<a href="http://w1.478.telia.com/~u47802930/SCPrototype06.jpg" target="_blank">http://w1.478.telia.com/~u47802930/SCPrototype06.jpg</a> (taken minutes ago, it looks uggly now due to all the rough handeling)
<small>[ August 05, 2002, 05:18 PM: Message edited by: xoo1246 ]</small>
The AN has been dried, still I'm a bit worried about Cu(NO3)2 forming when the liner is in contact with the AN. I filled the container once to get an aproximate number on how many grams it could hold, emptied it and left it, some AN was left and after a a day blue dots were visible. The copper cone had been cleaned and thus there wasn't much oxide on the surface. I have cleaned it again with iron wool to remove the marks. Now I have to assemble it again.
The question is, can the problem be solved by heating the liner under a flame for a while to create a protective coating of copper oxide? I don't want to coat it with glue and I don't want my device to auto-ignite. (EDIT: I will try it overnight on a piece of copper plate, but I want to have your opinion on the mather too)
While I'm at it, what kind of stand-off is acceptable when it comes to an inperfect cone such as this one(certainly not 6xd), and should the the cone sides be overlapped?
Here are pictures of the device for anyone interested:
<a href="http://w1.478.telia.com/~u47802930/SCPrototype01.jpg" target="_blank">http://w1.478.telia.com/~u47802930/SCPrototype01.jpg</a>
<a href="http://w1.478.telia.com/~u47802930/SCPrototype02.jpg" target="_blank">http://w1.478.telia.com/~u47802930/SCPrototype02.jpg</a>
<a href="http://w1.478.telia.com/~u47802930/SCPrototype03.jpg" target="_blank">http://w1.478.telia.com/~u47802930/SCPrototype03.jpg</a> (won't use legs)
<a href="http://w1.478.telia.com/~u47802930/SCPrototype04.jpg" target="_blank">http://w1.478.telia.com/~u47802930/SCPrototype04.jpg</a>
<a href="http://w1.478.telia.com/~u47802930/SCPrototype05.jpg" target="_blank">http://w1.478.telia.com/~u47802930/SCPrototype05.jpg</a>
<a href="http://w1.478.telia.com/~u47802930/SCPrototype06.jpg" target="_blank">http://w1.478.telia.com/~u47802930/SCPrototype06.jpg</a> (taken minutes ago, it looks uggly now due to all the rough handeling)
<small>[ August 05, 2002, 05:18 PM: Message edited by: xoo1246 ]</small>