amalgum: Apologies if I gave the impression of coming off from a defensive angle.
I know your statement wasn't intended to offend or beelittle anybee.
I was simply pointing out a flaw in that kind of suggestion, as it should bee a well accepted fact, if it weren't for the overlooked mechanics of the RP/HI, or the variables being discussed such as the ones in this thread.
I hope you know that my choice to use that statement as an example, is no ill reflection personally or toward the many useful contributions from SWIM's corner in past.
Looking back, I can see ware I may have given the impression I was being defensive.
Had you elaborated some more in that reply I wouldn't have felt the need to pipe-UP with my reply using your statement as an example!
No offense...okies?
java: Thanx for clearing that UP! Something just struck me as odd considering what's been disclosed in the past from forensicko's
reports.
After some long thought however, prior to posting, I did consider that from a prosecutory standpoint, it would be easily understood why a forensic team might try to fudge the potency analysis for leverage in building an otherwise weak case. But we all know they wouldn't stoop that low now would they?
Methylsulfonylmethane...aka...Dimethyl Sulfone, MSM
That little peace is very enlightening though and something that Ibee's never had to deal with but sees it addressed from time to time here on the board by those plagued by it's presence in streetgear!
So that's all there is to ridding it?
Many bees should be jumping for joy, as I've seen many ways suggested to deal with it's removal, but never so easily.
Maybe I just missed it since it's not an area of concern in Ibee's circle!
