Post 348175 (https://www.thevespiary.org/talk/index.php?topic=6373.msg34817500#msg34817500)
(terbium: "Aluminum reductant stoichiometry.", Chemistry Discourse)Post 348185 (https://www.thevespiary.org/talk/index.php?topic=6373.msg34818500#msg34818500)
(terbium: "Imine/Aluminum reduction stoichiometry.", Chemistry Discourse)Post 53425 (missing)
(KrZ: "Raney Nickel Nitromethane Reduction", Chemistry Discourse)http://www.geocities.com/dritte123/PSPF.html (http://www.geocities.com/dritte123/PSPF.html)
WOW, thanks abacus! You saved me alot of time trying to make methylamine.hcl from paraformaldehyde/ammonium chloride because it took me a full day just to get a mere 40g
Any moron who can follow simple directions should be able to make methylamine from paraformaldehyde & ammonium chloride by the kilo in half a day.
EDit: But I think the "kilos" i purchase may be a bit big coz I end up with 1050mls Isosafrole from them and after checking notes I got 550g MDMA.HCL from the last one after vacuum distillation of freebase, gassing in acetone AND recrystalling (twice) in ethanol.
This is the specific example I was talking about. If I were a DEA agent, he would be under constant surveilance. Never underestimate an agency that recieves billions of dollars a year to do shit like this. Your best chance of not getting caught is to not let them know you exist and assume that every word you speak is being recorded at their headquarters. If they can intercept the communications of those terrosist bastards, they can intercept your's as well if they are looking for someone who does what you do.
Also, it doesn't matter what kind of code words or evasive phasing you use. When someone writes "SWIM just cooked up a successful batch of 1 kg of product" the DEA knows that 9 times out of 10, the word "SWIM" can be replaced by "I". If they even suspect that you are doing something like this, they will enter your name into their list of people to get fucked. Remember - they don't have to play by the rules if no body finds out. Although they can't use an illegal wiretap as evidence, they can still gather information from it. Eventually, they'll have enough information to intercept you while you are actually performing some illegal activity (i.e. - transporting) that would grant them a search warrant. It's all over from there.
They might not be able to get the IP from this website, but if I understand correctly, they can trace it through your ISP router.
Even if they know you are accessing the hive, they are unable to tell one username from another because of the ssl encryption. The only way they could determine what user you are from your ip would be by checking the time of post on the hive and comparing that to the time your ip sent information to the hive. To prevent this problem either all packets sending and receiving need to be same size (they may already be, I dont know, does anybody know for sure?) or all posts need to be queued until a certain number of posts, say 10 or 20 are made before the hive software updates the message board, each post having the same time. Even in the case of the latter it would still be possible to deduce which username you have (provided you make enough posts over a long enough period of time) by the process of elimination, so the former is definitely the best solution. Of course,what are the chances that your ISP (or your ISP's ISP, etc.) would deploy this method. If they know an incriminating post was made during the time you were accessing the hive there's a one in however many people were online at the hive at the time chance it was you (provided posting and reading packets don't differ). Actually I do wonder if "post" packets differ from just "read" packets or PM packets. If they did the ISP could easily tell the exact time each time you made a post, then look at the message board and find the username that made a post at each of those times. If nobody knows if they do differ or not swim will sniff the packets and find out. But I'll get back on topic: good work abacus ;)
Post 389594 (https://www.thevespiary.org/talk/index.php?topic=9780.msg38959400#msg38959400)
(Rhodium: "Shortcuts can easily become detours", Methods Discourse) strongly argued against Ruth's proposal to skip distillation of isosafrole because he could not afford spending time on that, as he considered himself a "production chemist", and now this outrageous statement that one should take crude sassafras oil and subject it to isomerization directly followed by performic oxidation to MDP2P without any isolation or purification at all of the intermediates - and all this without any purity checks.Post 385627 (https://www.thevespiary.org/talk/index.php?topic=11211.msg38562700#msg38562700)
(Rhodium: "Isosafrole Physical data", Newbee Forum)) so you cannot separate safrole (mp 11°C) and isosafrole by freezing like that.