Author Topic: Protocatechualdehyde preparation  (Read 2488 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

demorol

  • Guest
Protocatechualdehyde preparation
« on: July 01, 2002, 02:54:00 AM »
Two nice patents about protocatechualdehyde preparation were found on Espacenet.

Process for preparing protocatechualdehyde and its derivatives

Patent US4165341



Abstract
A process for preparing protocatechualdehyde or a 3-alkoxy-4-hydroxybenzaldehyde which comprises subjecting catechol or a 2-alkoxyphenol to reaction with glyoxylic acid in a basic aqueous medium in the presence of a catalyst containing one or more compounds selected from aluminium oxide, silicon oxide and hydrated aluminium oxide in an amount of not less than 0.01 g per 1 g of the starting catechol or 2-alkoxyphenol at a temperature of 0° to 50° C, and then oxidizing the thus obtained reaction mixture in a basic medium.

Process for preparing protocatechualdehyde

Patent EP0786446



Abstract
Protocatechualdehyde is prepared by the steps of reacting piperonyl dichloride with molecular chlorine in the presence of phosphorus trichloride, phosphorus pentachloride or sulfuryl chloride to prepare dichloropiperonylidene dichloride and hydrolyzing the dichloropiperonylidene dichloride. The piperonyl dichloride can be prepared by the reaction of piperonal with thionyl chloride in the presence of DMF.

Life without chemistry would be a mistake.

ChambeRed

  • Guest
Could anyone possibly help me with mabey a ...
« Reply #1 on: November 07, 2002, 06:34:00 PM »
Could anyone possibly help me with mabey a skeleton procedural for the top abstact for producing protocatechualdehyde from pyrocatechol.I would like to try this possibly,I'm a newbee so that abstact kinda leaves me in the dark but this is what I'd do if for some reason I absolutely had to without anything else to go on(or a clue what i'm doing)

Prepare a solution of 150g. catechol dissolved in 200ml dh20 and pour into addition funnel.In a 3-neck 2000ml fbf is placed??250g.glyoxylic acid in 500ml 10%NaOH solution?? then add 8g. aluminum oxide(that would be my choice if all are equal)and add reflux condenser(I don't think a condenser is needed none of the rxn components have b.p's below 50c?)the other two necks are plugged with (1)a thermometer submerged in the flask contents to monitor temp.
(2)the addition funnel with catechol/dH2O solution
contents of addition funnel added at a rate to keep the temp from rising above 50c(also not sure if the additon is even needed,mabey just place the flask in a plastic tray and add the catechol all at once and then just add icewater as needed??)
Let this stir for??3hrs. after addition is complete??, unless rxn is still noticeably going then just let it stir until at least an hour after it has died down.
Totally lost here?guess i'd pour the contents of the rxn flask into a 25%NaOH solution stir the shit out of it for awhile and extract the whole shebang with Ether or DCM.
And if that didn't work next time i'd try a mild reflux for a few hrs with 25%NaOH solution.
And if that didn't work i'd try adding concentrated NaOH solution to the mix slowly and see what happens.
And if that didn't work.....well guess i'd bee screwed :) .Any comments on any aspect of the reaction or any comments at all would be very appreciated,Thanks! :) .Peace,Chambered.

Bee's don't die,we just multiply.

starlight

  • Guest
oxidation step
« Reply #2 on: November 08, 2002, 02:39:00 AM »
I haven't read what you have proposed in detail, but have read it enough to see that you have missed the oxidation step described in the patent (have another look at the patent).

In the patent they suggest that this oxidation step be done with CuO in an autoclave, so not sure how far you will get on this one (i.e. if there is a way to do the oxidation without autoclave).

ChambeRed

  • Guest
Thanks starlight,where are you seeing anything ...
« Reply #3 on: November 09, 2002, 10:20:00 AM »
Thanks starlight,where are you seeing anything about CuO or an autoclave?I've looked up the patent and I don't see any more than whats in the top abstact above.Peace,Chambered.

Bee's don't die,we just multiply.

starlight

  • Guest
you need to look at more than page 1
« Reply #4 on: November 11, 2002, 02:18:00 AM »
there are several pages to the patent. I have looked at it on gb.espacenet.com. you probably have not clicked through far enough.

ChambeRed

  • Guest
Thank you,I tried to find more but apparently I ...
« Reply #5 on: November 11, 2002, 02:31:00 AM »
Thank you,I tried to find more but apparently I was clicking the wrong button cause it wouldn't show me anymore :P .Now that I know for sure there is more I can be a little more persistent in finding it :) .Thanks,Chambered.The many,many synthetic routes available when one starts with an essentially scratch molocule like catechol is mind-boggling and chemistry at its best imho.Thank you kindred spirits,for helping me see what life CAN bee :) .

Bee's don't die,we just multiply.

ChambeRed

  • Guest
I feel like a moron and probably am but how do ...
« Reply #6 on: November 12, 2002, 10:14:00 AM »
I feel like a moron and probably am but how do you view the other pages?when I follow the link above it says page 1 of 1 and I've clicked on practically everything clickable to no avail.Help please :-[ .

Bee's don't die,we just multiply.

Rhodium

  • Guest
Alternative patent search
« Reply #7 on: November 12, 2002, 03:22:00 PM »
Go to

http://patft.uspto.gov/netahtml/srchnum.htm

and type in the US patent numbers 4165341 or 5696301 to see them. If you want to see the patent images too, click the "images" link at the top of the page.

ChambeRed

  • Guest
Thanks chief that made an elightning read.
« Reply #8 on: November 12, 2002, 07:09:00 PM »
Thanks chief that made an elightning read.The patent states that oxidation can be done at either atmospheric or under pressure,I imagine a good comprimse could be a regular pressure cooker(used for canning)with mag. stirring.Overall I think this sounds not too bad with good yields and selectivity(bolth over 90% in patent),all though it's not as eaisy as the Riemer-Tiemann reaction outlined in TSII but yields are better and probably selectivity as well.

Bee's don't die,we just multiply.