Post 394630 (missing)
(Chromic: "Success making GBL!", Chemistry Discourse)
As far as I know it has not been "tested". It seems many bees have worked the synth and bioassayed, and even experienced satisfactory results, but, no one really knows for sure if what is produced is actually "pure" substance. IMHO analytical analysis, will be the only way to know if what we have is what we "think" we have. I would hate to think that everyone is poisining themselves through some unknown impurity due to this synth.
Exactly the reason we didn't release a writeup.. maybe that rearrangement product is the foul tasting impurity in the GBL.. does anyone know the chemical data on that in comparison to GBL ? BP, etc?
Post 394630 (missing)
(Chromic: "Success making GBL!", Chemistry Discourse) seems to indicate ( "The bioassay is, without a doubt, ABSOLUTELY POSITIVE! The quality is the same as A.C.S. butyrolactone." ) that there is at least some GBL in the final product.Post 394630 (missing)
(Chromic: "Success making GBL!", Chemistry Discourse)). But to give it the proper deference, it should only be referred to as "Very Poisonous Gas". It may get angry if you call it something like "Slightly Poisonous Gas" or don't capitalize its name.http://www.mwsc.com/MSDS/86.PDF (http://www.mwsc.com/MSDS/86.PDF)
Post 264620 (https://www.thevespiary.org/talk/index.php?topic=6690.msg26462000#msg26462000)
(PrimoPyro: "Re: Nitric Oxide", Chemistry Discourse)).