nicodem,
> In theory it should be 4-methoxy-3-nitro-amphetamine?
yes, i think so.
> Could you explain a little more. Does that mean you first took 60mg
> and a little later (when?) 50mg more or was that in two separate trials?
separated by about 1 hour. (duration is short as with all compounds in the
family).
> Are you sure? Like you said the m.p. are close, but how about taste, color,
> TLC or other properties?
i'd say 95% sure. i've had very variable results with PMA, but the one common
thing to all PMA experiences: high heart rate and this sleepy feeling at
the begin of the trip was totally missing.
the chemist needs some serious kick in the ass, because no PMA was prepared
for comparison purposes. taste and appearance are just like every other molecule
in this family. the only way to tell will be a higher dose experiment. the rest
of the research group already announced that they are interested in it, i'm still
a bit sceptical.
vitus,
> Would you describe the general effects as euphoric, psychedelic,
> or merely an intoxicated feeling?
if i have to choose from those 3, i'd take euphoric. but it was mostly body
feeling, so if i can pick something else, i'd describe it as "agreeable".
> What I have been pondering on is N-ethyl-PMA. Has anyone tried this yet?
there's a thread in the general forum, where bwiti said he ingested 1g of
PMEA(sp?) and it did not do much. but as usual his posts are rather cryptic.
> It might be a good idea to avoid above foods too when experimenting with
> it, or with its analogs.
i don't know anything about pharmacology, but i'm willing to avoid those foods (is
there anything you _may_ eat?). the drinks OTOH might pose a problem.