Author Topic: Alternative HI preparation  (Read 5563 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Hermetic

  • Guest
I first added a single chunk of iodine, ...
« Reply #20 on: April 06, 2002, 12:35:00 AM »
I first added a single chunk of iodine, approximately 5mm square and maybe 2 mm thick to 10ml turpentine.  I wouldn't call this reaction violent on this scale, but semi-spectacular.  The iodine crystals seem to burst into solution over the course of a few minutes.  About four minutes into this, I held a piece of 0-14 range pH paper inside the neck of the 25mL flask, and it turned pink, as if to indicate a low pH.  I would think that heating would serve to condense the remaining halogenated terpene to whatever that will become, and therefore release HI(g) which could be taken up into the water easily as long as vigorous stirring is maintained in an ice-water bath.  I don't really wish to find out what happens upon heating a potentially explosive turpentine/hydriodic acid mixture in a glass vessel.  Not knowing the actual concentration of reactable substances in the turpentine will hinder theoretical calculations a bit, but over time the experimental data can be collected and formulated into a "recipe" if you will.  After my afternoon nap I will continue the experiments.

I assume you to mean gum rosin.  Isn't that what turpentine is produced from?  I don't really know, so I can't say for sure.  It would be nice to know the amount of terpenes, etc. in typical gum turpentine.

If I can get out of the city this weekend, I may try dumping about 0.1 mole iodine crystals into a liter of turps just for kicks.  Maybe I can reach around a big tree and just kind of pour it in all at once. :o

"Wyatt, I am rolling."

Elementary

  • Guest
Thinking about HI gas
« Reply #21 on: April 06, 2002, 01:03:00 AM »
What I'm interesting in is the potential to make HI gas, thats why I'm asking about how lively the reaction is when no water is present. It sounds from what you say that the reaction can be kept relatively tame with lower quantities.

My leaning towards HI gas is its use in replenishing the HI solution in a phosphorus-less HI eph' reduction.

Leonard Cohen cheers me up !

Hermetic

  • Guest
second run data
« Reply #22 on: April 06, 2002, 09:33:00 AM »
Elementary, the reaction seems very tame, as described below (somewhat).  As for piping HI (g) into a reaction, you’re on your own there.  I have had two nasty incidents with suckback lately (including digging the remnants of a once nice thermometer out of a ceiling.  Those mercury spill cleanup kits are pretty useless for acoustic tiles).  Until I can cure my carelessness, I will be extra cautious.  I am also looking for the no phosphorous route of HI reduction.  Electro has been a bust for me, and more lab-oriented techniques are not possible quite yet.  If I could get quantities of redP, I wouldn’t care so much about the HI.  It does seem that HI (g) was spontaneously coming off of the small sample test of turpentine/iodine, indicated by the pinking of the pH paper in the neck of the flask (above post).

Results of second experiment:

Into a 1000mL Erlenmeyer flask were placed 300mL turpentine with 300mL distilled water.  It was stirred vigorously with magnetic stirring for 5 minutes, and then poured into a separatory funnel.  Upon sitting for 15 minutes, the layers were distinct, with a slightly cloudy water layer (bottom layer).  The water layer was discarded, and the turpentine layer washed 2X with 150mL distilled water.

The now “clean” turpentine was combined into a clean 1000mL Erlenmeyer flask with 100mL distilled water, placed on magnetic stirring, and solid iodine added by the following schedule.

0 minutes 2.0g
12 minutes 3.0g
30 minutes 3.5g
40 minutes 5.1g
66 minutes 4.9g

For a total of 18.5g I2.  Iodine was added without any planned timing, just when it felt right.

Results of each addition were very similar; the solution turned a dark brownish color, nearly black at times.  No gas formation, no pressure increase, and no temperature increase.  Slight fog condensing on walls of flask above the mixture, tested acidic to pH paper.  At 80 minutes, the solution was removed from stirring and poured into a separatory funnel.  Layering was much quicker than with unwashed turpentine (previous post), and very distinct.  Lower water layer was a clear orangish-brown.  Upper turpentine layer remained dark brown to black, even upon standing for one hour.  Both solutions will be allowed to stand overnight in the dark and then inspected further.  The pH of the water layer was 0-1, indicating a strong acidity of some sort.

To the separated turpentine layer was added 50 mL water, it was swirled, and then tested for pH.  Strong acidity was again indicated, leading one to believe that either HI is trapped in the turpentine layer (likely), or that more halogenated terpene was continuing to condense and release HI into the water layer (also distinctly possible, according to the patent text). 

It seems as if the earlier suggestions of using no water in the reaction and directing the formed HI (g) into a receiving vessel containing distilled water may be a better route.  It seems as if the iodine would react quicker, also.  However, I defend my original choice of using water in the experiment as a way to contain formed HI (g).  After all, even failures provide valuable data.  I prefer to start simply, and then gradually move to the goal. 

My next route will be to bite the bullet and distill the acidic water layer, shooting for the azeotrope of HI (aq); then the turpentine layer, bubbling the vapors into a massed quantity of distilled H20.  I found reference to turpentine boiling at 158 C, but do expect some trash to follow the HI since turpentine is a broad mixture of compounds.  Simple distillation may work (30 degrees difference in bp), and will be attempted for the sake of simplicity.  If that fails to produce a clean enough product, follow-up by fractional distillation will be performed.  Copious temperature/volume data will be collected.

-->Since no apparent heat is released, I would expect that larger scale additions of solid iodine into washed turpentine would be relatively safe.  If distillation works out, I will also be trying the tincture addition to turpentine for the solid iodine challenged in the audience.

All in all, I am still pleased with the results.  I would definitely recommend to anyone else experimenting with this process to wash the turpentine first.  Whatever trash was coming out in the water wash of the pre-reaction turpentine could easily carry over into the distillate.

More experimental results will be posted.  Again, please provide feedback if even remotely relevant.


"Wyatt, I am rolling."

Vibrating_Lights

  • Guest
H(x) and Aromatics
« Reply #23 on: April 06, 2002, 09:44:00 PM »
It seems to swim that when any aromatic is halogenated the H(x) is produced.  when 2C-B is brominated you addBr2 and one of the Br attaches and the other Br is converted toHBr which eventually ends up making the HBr salt.  IN the E:I:Rp rxn t he HI is produced as the E first gets iodinated.  so producing the HI doesn't really seem to be a problem here it is the constant regeneration of it.
Vl_

hermeticsghost

  • Guest
1.Couldn’t log in as me, had to register an ...
« Reply #24 on: April 08, 2002, 05:30:00 AM »
1.Couldn’t log in as me, had to register an alias, but this is Hermetic.
2.Pinene is not an aromatic. (But that's not what you meant, right?)

http://library.thinkquest.org/3659/orgchem/aromatic.html?tqskip1=1&tqtime=0407


3.HI production is exactly the problem I am having.  If I had redP, I wouldn’t even pretend to care about this subject.

Elementary, I heated the darkly colored turpentine layer from above in a hot-water bath (90C) for 20 minutes.  The solution turned a clear brown, but no significant gas production.  Sorry, I can’t safely go much hotter yet.  However, when I washed it with distilled water, the water came off slightly clear-yellow, and very acidic.  Second wash produced only about a pH of 6, so most of the acidic species went with the first wash.  When I get a new thermometer next week, I will try fractional distillation to get the HI (aq) azeotrope.

Would someone with a familiarity with lab-grade 57% HI (aq) give this a go? 

LaBTop

  • Guest
Password
« Reply #25 on: April 08, 2002, 09:22:00 AM »
Ask for a new single-use password for your original username at forum@the-hive.ws , then directly change to a new password after first login (when you received at your registered email address your new single-use PW).
You prolly still used the same PW which you got from us, and Lili has made some changes to the database, that's what happened. LT/

 

WISDOMwillWIN

hermeticsghost

  • Guest
Thanks, LT
« Reply #26 on: April 09, 2002, 01:25:00 AM »
Hey, thanks for noticing my plight.  I tried on Saturday to email my problem in, and it got bounced.  Something about being out of space.  I'll try it again.

starlight

  • Guest
i think this doesn't work
« Reply #27 on: July 20, 2002, 02:18:00 PM »
When I2 is added to turpentine, or the other way round, a highly exothermic reaction occurs which results in the sublimation of I2. Slower addition means that no I2 sublimes.

When no sublimation occurs, there appears to be no gas generated.

The reaction of Iodine with pinene is, I think an example of iodination across a double bond.

Normally this is not so energetically favourable, but because of the ring strain in pinene, the reaction proceeds rapidly and exothermically.

I would be happy to hear of any reason why somebody thinks this will work, but I am skeptical.

Elementary

  • Guest
Maybe using turpentine is not the best choice.
« Reply #28 on: July 20, 2002, 09:07:00 PM »
Maybe using turpentine is not the best choice.

But I have seen many references to the production of HI with I2 and rosin.

And I doubt that someone/company would of gone to all the trouble to patent the process if it doesn't work.

I've got nothing to do today but smile !

starlight

  • Guest
agreed
« Reply #29 on: July 20, 2002, 11:12:00 PM »
yes, I also wonder why somebody would patent something that doesn't work.

my observations with turpentine (which contains around 95% pinene, the reaction constituent stated by Mr Frankforter) suggest that HI is not evolved in significant quantities.

Maybe I am doing something wrong.

I also wonder why a method of generating anhydrous HI, which is not an easy thing to do, is so much overlooked by the Hive and Organic textbooks if it in fact works (it's not exactly new, having been patented in 1921)

The following url shows a reaction scheme for the initial reaction to produce the C10h16I2 product.

http://cstl-cst.semo.edu/Hathaway/CH344/Answers/Answers%20to%20minilab%2019.htm



I'd love this to work, but I'm not sure it does. Rosin Oil also contains pinene.

Maybe I should look up some of those Refs.

Do you have any of those refs. with regard to Rosin that you may be able to share?

Many thanks

./