Author Topic: psilocin  (Read 8089 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

obituary

  • Guest
psilocin
« on: March 01, 2001, 05:45:00 AM »
Unfortunately, obit is not computer inclined in many ways. therefore, obit can't just draw the pretty picture scheme for you. plus, obit can't name the compounds- so just look up the reference.

new synth for Psilocin:

Natural Product Reports(NPR)
Volume 18 Number 1
February 2001
pages 1-130
ISSN 0265-0568
Royal Society of Chemistry
www.rsc.org/npr

look at scheme nine on pages 70 and 71

definately a novel synthesis, but maybe of some academic interest.

KrZ

  • Guest
Re: psilocin
« Reply #1 on: March 01, 2001, 07:16:00 AM »
Does anyone have or know where to get the reference for complete psilocin/psilocibin isolation?  I was reading about an isolation of the hemiacetate at some point and it sounded awfully fun.

dmt_elvis

  • Guest
Re: psilocin
« Reply #2 on: March 02, 2001, 12:04:00 AM »
I just computer generated over 3000 routes to psilocin.

Lilienthal

  • Guest
Re: psilocin
« Reply #3 on: March 02, 2001, 12:15:00 AM »
The article from Natural Product Reports is a review. The original publication is:
Heterocycles 51, 1131 1999 H. Sakagami, K. Ogasawara: A new synthesis of psilocin.

Post 11807

(Lilienthal: "New tryptamine literature", Tryptamine Chemistry)
 :)

lugh

  • Guest
Re: psilocin
« Reply #4 on: March 02, 2001, 01:37:00 AM »
The historical method for purification is chromatography, see Com. Ren. Acad. Sci. Par. 269, 51 (1969) & 275, 613 (1972);  and BSC 1523 (1959). Thin layer or 5% alumina-Nickel column using t-butanol-acetic acid-water [ACS 22, 1210 (1968)] or 10% alumina-Nickel plate with dichloromethane-methanol and the psilocin eluted with methanol.

Quicksilver

  • Guest
Re: psilocin
« Reply #5 on: March 02, 2001, 02:50:00 AM »


Poster: dmt_elvis
Subject: Re: psilocin
I just computer generated over 3000 routes to psilocin.


And you invented the internet too.  Kudos.


-quicksilver-

dmt_elvis

  • Guest
Re: psilocin
« Reply #6 on: March 02, 2001, 03:54:00 AM »
the proof is on the site. fuck you.

dmt_elvis

  • Guest
Re: psilocin
« Reply #7 on: March 02, 2001, 03:57:00 AM »
the combinatorics of applying an algorithm to all possible permutations of the reassembly of a carbon skeleton from disjoins based on a known reaction data base can lead to 100000 routes, many hundreds of which remain after culling out the ones too costly, lenghty or less likely to happen w/o interference from gamma protons, leaving groups, etc

obituary

  • Guest
Re: psilocin
« Reply #8 on: March 02, 2001, 07:42:00 AM »
well kinda disappointed to hear it's nothing new, but thought obit would post it just in case.  thanks Lili.

Osmium

  • Guest
Re: psilocin
« Reply #9 on: March 02, 2001, 11:31:00 AM »
Damn Mr Hughes, so glad that you are back. We really need another socially inept imbecile like you.
Why don't you make the free zone happy with your presence? We all suck here, don't you remember?

KrZ

  • Guest
Re: psilocin
« Reply #10 on: March 02, 2001, 03:42:00 PM »
Thanks lugh!  That's just what I needed!  Can't wait to fire up the ol' chromatography column now...

dmt_elvis

  • Guest
Re: psilocin
« Reply #11 on: March 02, 2001, 04:08:00 PM »
I have the chemistry. You don't. Fuck off, Troll.

Rhodium

  • Guest
Re: psilocin
« Reply #12 on: March 02, 2001, 04:22:00 PM »
You have access to a program which spits out a thousand wild ideas a second, and that's it (kinda reminds me of FMAN, but this time with complete structural diagrams).

For that "chemistry" to be worth anything, it must be disseminated to real practical chemists who can work out the experimental details, and because you say that won't happen, then there is no use of it whatsoever.

If you had ever CONTRIBUTED anything to the board, for example by publishing selected examples of what SYNGEN can do for the phenethylamine/tryptamine community, all this negative response and flaming wouldn't happen, and you would be a productive member of our community just like everybody else.

Its like if you worked in the Sigma-Aldrich stock-room, and was bragging about "look at all the chemicals I have access to". Noone cares about such things.

KrZ

  • Guest
Re: psilocin
« Reply #13 on: March 02, 2001, 06:28:00 PM »
Stop it! You are ruining the good vibes I am getting off of this thread.

dmt_elvis

  • Guest
Re: psilocin
« Reply #14 on: March 02, 2001, 07:28:00 PM »
My tryptamine and phenethylamine routes are only released to a select, private group. And they are remarkable.
Sour grapes, asshole.

dmt_elvis

  • Guest
Re: psilocin
« Reply #15 on: March 02, 2001, 07:32:00 PM »
wild ideas, my ass. You can't argue with the chemistry.
If you fuckers hadn't treated me so badly, you would have free copies and I would share my routes... no dice now, assholes. Think twice next time. Some of the routes I have would make the Feds spit hairballs....sour grapes!

dmt_elvis

  • Guest
Re: psilocin
« Reply #16 on: March 02, 2001, 07:36:00 PM »
a 4 step, practical synthesis to lysergic acid was the first thing this program found... bow to the Machine, simmer in your bile. You suck.

Rhodium

  • Guest
Re: psilocin
« Reply #17 on: March 02, 2001, 08:20:00 PM »
And none of the syntheses have ever been transformed into an actual product, we know. You can keep your grapes, you'll need them when discovering that your account no longer works.


http://rhodium.lycaeum.org


FlamingMaggot

  • Guest
Re: psilocin
« Reply #18 on: March 02, 2001, 10:48:00 PM »
See ya little Tel-void! Wouldn't wanna be ya!

Say hi to all your friends at the Euro-LSD-Cartel! Maybe you can show me how to culture claviceps at your top secret pilot plant sometime, ay?

Bwahahahahah!

Quicksilver

  • Guest
Re: psilocin
« Reply #19 on: March 03, 2001, 01:33:00 AM »
This is the official FUCK YOU post.

FUCK YOU!

-quicksilver-