Author Topic: Push-Pull Reaction Vessel?  (Read 2604 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

BritneySpears

  • Guest
Push-Pull Reaction Vessel?
« on: March 01, 2004, 07:28:00 PM »

Stonium

  • Guest
YO!
« Reply #1 on: March 01, 2004, 08:36:00 PM »

Post 309268

(Rhodium: "Meth related posts go in the STIMULANTS forum!", Newbee Forum)



livid

  • Guest
re: getto-ware
« Reply #2 on: March 02, 2004, 01:48:00 AM »
test your whole set-up w/h2o, and see if it can handle the heat. not just your reaction vessel, all your hoses, push-pull tanks, whatever you use. there is no feeling in the world like sourcing and extracting your ass off, getting ready for that special event, and have your set-up fail. all you bees know what i'm talking about.

ChemoSabe

  • Guest
Safety & expected results
« Reply #3 on: March 02, 2004, 03:21:00 AM »
The fact that a wine bottle has no outlet nipple might actually be an advantage considering potential leaks but the fact that it's a wine bottle in the first place is not an advantage in my opinion.

I'm still not sure why all these early guys liked to use filter flasks for reaction flasks as I don't think filter flasks are designed for that purpose.

Swims druthers would be freestanding FB Rounds or erlenmeyers with 24/40 necks. After swims fire he fully swore off use of any ghetto gear due to a wish to continue living.

And if you really expect some results be sure to read up on the long wet reflux reactions.


morpheus

  • Guest
Problems with wine bottle
« Reply #4 on: March 02, 2004, 12:27:00 PM »
Usually if you look at the bottom of it,it curves up(concave).Preferably you would like a round bottom like a flask has.Precursers get stuck on the high point and all the reducing is going on in the edges.Doing a dry cook
may not bee that bad.A long wet reflux would be a bitch.