Author Topic: Performic with 15% HCl hydrolysis result  (Read 5443 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

methlab

  • Guest
Performic with 15% HCl hydrolysis result
« on: May 26, 2004, 02:17:00 PM »
Hi guys!
Tried the hydrolysis with 15% HCl after buffered performic,
worked very good, this is the choice for my future experiments...

1) In a 250ml rbf: 200g Safrole heated with 5g KOH (85%) at 120C to removed water, then continued heating over night (10 PM - 12 AM) without vacuum at 160C-170C. Distilled Isosafrole, weight was 196g.

2) Put in a 2l 3-neck rbf: 196g Isosafrole, 400ml DCM and 120g NaHCO3, prestired for 15 minutes. Started to add performic acid, which was made 1h before with 400ml 30% H2O2 and 620ml 85% formic acid. Added 50cm liebig condenser on top and refluxed for 24h.
Yield 284g monoformyl-glycol.
3) In a 2l 3-neck rbf: 284g monoformyl-glycol, 300ml ethanole (96%), 250ml H2O and 250ml HCl (31%) was heated for 2.5 hours with mild reflux, liebig on top. Separated about 180g raw mdp2p. extracted remaining layer with 2x 100ml DCM and combined with raw mdp2p.
Stripped off DCM and water, then distilled the rest with water aspirator vacuum.
Yield: 164g clean MDP2P.

greetings

biffman

  • Guest
15% HCL Hydrolysis
« Reply #1 on: May 26, 2004, 05:09:00 PM »
Nice work methlab.
I am assuming that you mean 96% ethanol (not ethanole).
Yes?  Or am I not up to speed on something here?

Have you yet to use the produced ketone in any further reactions?

ApprenticeCook

  • Guest
great results... thanks methlab.
« Reply #2 on: May 26, 2004, 06:43:00 PM »
great results... thanks methlab.


abolt

  • Guest
Aminate and report back
« Reply #3 on: May 28, 2004, 12:04:00 AM »
284g monoformyl-glycol, 300ml ethanole (96%), 250ml H2O and 250ml HCl (31%) was heated for 2.5 hours with mild reflux, liebig on top

Your numbers seem to be out. Using Chromics numbers you would require something like 300 mls OH, 500 mls H2O and 500 mls of 31% HCl.

Did you do a bisulfate test? What color was the ketone? What temps did it distill at?


Aminate and report back.


icexool

  • Guest
Why did you use ethanol?
« Reply #4 on: July 22, 2004, 03:24:00 PM »
Why did you use ethanol?
Isn't methanol a lot cheaper or just DCM again.
Anyway very interesting info and experiment you did there.
That is just a very nice complete synthese about safrole --> MDP2P

BTW Isn't it easier to drive off the water of your KOH so you get crystals...and use them insted of KOH solution?

ApprenticeCook

  • Guest
ethanol/methanol very close/same price, very...
« Reply #5 on: July 22, 2004, 05:30:00 PM »
ethanol/methanol

very close/same price, very similar solvent qualities... really doesnt matter in most cases....
Whats at hand when it was done....
Higher boiling point, reduces solvent reflux and possible loss...

BTW Isn't it easier to drive off the water of your KOH so you get crystals...and use them insted of KOH solution?
There is water in the KOH crystals, even if you use solid KOH, you need to heat them to drive it off.


endo1

  • Guest
ethanol
« Reply #6 on: July 22, 2004, 07:09:00 PM »
Is the purpose of the ethanol just to set a lower reflux temp here?

abolt

  • Guest
Is the purpose of the ethanol just to set a...
« Reply #7 on: July 22, 2004, 09:32:00 PM »
Is the purpose of the ethanol just to set a lower reflux temp here?

No, It would in fact slightly raise the reflux temperature. If ethanol is easier to get then use it. It's only benefit over Methanol is that it is less toxic. Alcohol is used in hydrolysis to make the the glycol and acidic aquoues layers more miscible. It is not absolutely necessary.

Of course if you had UTFSE, you would know this already.


icexool

  • Guest
I still didn't find a clear answer via the...
« Reply #8 on: July 23, 2004, 04:37:00 PM »

amine

  • Guest
it will make a big fat (white w/ slightly...
« Reply #9 on: July 24, 2004, 02:46:00 AM »
it will make a big fat (white w/ slightly green mass of crystal product).

OcoteaCymbarum

  • Guest
Why so much peracid?
« Reply #10 on: July 24, 2004, 10:40:00 AM »
I was just wondering why you used so much formic and peroxyde.
Reading post

Post 184264

(baalchemist: "Re: Medium scale performic", Methods Discourse)

Baalchemist uses about twice as much as you for almost 4 times more iso. Which means that the amount you used could maybe cut down by almost 50% with great yields. His yield using his ratios gave about 81.5%, a bit higher than your 75%.

I have no experience with the formic but im reading about it, thats why i ask

OC

OcoteaCymbarum

  • Guest
Performic/hcl hydrolysis is just amazing!
« Reply #11 on: July 30, 2004, 07:04:00 PM »
Swim did his first performic ever, and will never look back. It's one of the easiest/cleanest protocol I've ever come across.

295 grams isosafrole
90.1 grams Sodium bicarbonate
800ml DCM
This was left to stir overnight after preparing my first ever peracid, mag stirrer broke, didnt stir, so it volcanoed off the sep funnel 20 minutes into initial addition.

The next morning decided to prepare 215grams H2O2 with 384grams 88% formic(was prepared in 2 half batches, the second one just as addition had started)
This was dripped over 2 hours and afforded a good reflux.
Initially the solution was yellow, left to stir an extra 26 hours. The solution is orange at that time.

Distilled off dcm to be left with 430grams of the glycol, a dark orange syrup.

The hydrolysis was performed according to Chromic's ratios:
525ml MeOH
877ml Water
877ml Muriatic acid
430g glycol.

The MeOH, water and glycol were combined and temp was brought to 60 celsius when the acid was added. Refluxed for 2.5 hours (around 80-84). Clearly you could see the beautiful oil falling off.

Cooled down, bottom layer sep off, top extracted with DCM (around 400 ml). The dcm was then washed 4 times with 700ml water. Once with brine, dcm distilled off.

Under vacuum, 251 grams of golden ketone, a beautiful pale yellow came over at 100-102 degrees. I cant wait to aminate it. This is truly an amazing synth for those who have access to formic acid, and thanks chromic for that easy hydrolysis. I had never tried with sulfuric and I wont ever have to.

My estimation is that an extra 5% can be pulled off easily by reducing losses during washing the DCM. I was under time constraint and it seems it always possible to get some more DCM out of the water providing you sep off and give some extra time for the layers to separate.
Maybe washing the dcm/glycol before distillation and hydrolysis could also help. I will do that next time.
Someone else should try this, using baalchemists ratios, I got nearly quantitative glycol formation(430/433)

ApprenticeCook

  • Guest
Access to formic acid?
« Reply #12 on: July 30, 2004, 10:15:00 PM »
Access to formic acid?
This method is next to golden for OTC'ness, formic via method on rhodiums from oxalic and glycerol (if you cant get these two chems otc theres something wrong).

Good report OC.
-AC


OcoteaCymbarum

  • Guest
All the chems I want
« Reply #13 on: July 31, 2004, 07:32:00 AM »
I have access to most chems required for most synths here on the hive, so I have no problem getting formic, no questions asked. But ill keep that in mind, if ever I needed, thanks for the tip.
And to say I had been running wackers for a while. Never again!!!
Comparing the 2 methods opened my eyes. Easier protocol, less washing, less waste, less cash for chems, no benzoquinone breathing, no palladium at 25 bucks a gram, impossible to fuck up, a better yield and easy scale up! The perfect synth IMHO

2) Put in a 2l 3-neck rbf: 196g Isosafrole, 400ml DCM and 120g NaHCO3, prestired for 15 minutes. Started to add performic acid, which was made 1h before with 400ml 30% H2O2 and 620ml 85% formic acid. Added 50cm liebig condenser on top and refluxed for 24h.
Yield 284g monoformyl-glycol.


I think here weights should be used. So u used about 452 grams of peroxyde(density of a 33%) and 756.4 grams formic acid(density of a 90%)
I think u shoud save your formic by using a lot less. I think baalchemists ratios are much less then yours and the same result is obtained. Too much peracid for nothing.

3) In a 2l 3-neck rbf: 284g monoformyl-glycol, 300ml ethanole (96%), 250ml H2O and 250ml HCl (31%) was heated for 2.5 hours with mild reflux, liebig on top. Separated about 180g raw mdp2p. extracted remaining layer with 2x 100ml DCM and combined with raw mdp2p.
Stripped off DCM and water, then distilled the rest with water aspirator vacuum.
Yield: 164g clean MDP2P

Your HCl concentration seems a litlle low, but it seems it stil works fine. Methanol can be used with the same success, and its cheaper for me at least. I used a much lower alcohol to water percentage with the same success, maybe you can save on that 96% ethanol.

ApprenticeCook

  • Guest
impossible to fuck up Carefull....
« Reply #14 on: August 01, 2004, 02:50:00 AM »
impossible to fuck up

Carefull.... dont get complacent with this method, it can go ugly easily if your not attentive.
It is easier though, im suprised people are still asking about wacker....
OTC of this method is FAR over what any other....

Yeah keep that in mind incase formic sources dry up....

-AC


abacus

  • Guest
Yeah right. Been there done that
« Reply #15 on: August 01, 2004, 04:10:00 AM »
Apprentice cook,

Do some work.

Oxalic acid with glycerol is another example of a long and tedious synth that ends up with a formic acid strength of around 33%. 

For any bees wanting some good formic, heres a tip, go and buy it, forget trying to get it from oxalic acid.

Abacus

lugh

  • Guest
That Depends on your Technique
« Reply #16 on: August 01, 2004, 05:26:00 AM »

For any bees wanting some good formic, heres a tip, go and buy it, forget trying to get it from oxalic acid.




From Cohen's Practical Organic Chemistry

Formic Acid
Berthelot, Ann. Chim. Phys., 1856, (3) 46, 477 ; Lovin, Bull. Soc. Chim., 1866, (2) 5, 7 ; 1870, (2) 14, 367.

50 grams. anhydrous glycerol.
200 grams oxalic acid (in four portions of 50 grams).

The glycerol is dehydrated by heating it gently in a basin on a sand-bath until a thermometer with the bulb immersed in the liquid indicates 175°. Fifty grams of commercial crystallised oxalic acid and 5o grams of glycerol are heated in a retort (250 c.c.) over wire-gauze, with condenser and receiver. A thermometer is fixed through the tubulus with the bulb in the liquid. The reaction begins at about 80°, and at 90° proceeds briskly, carbon dioxide being evolved. The temperature is maintained at 105-110° until the evolution of gas has slackened. Some aqueous formic acid has meanwhile collected in the receiver. The contents of the retort are now cooled to about 80° and a further 50 grams of oxalic acid added. The reaction recommences on heating with the formation of aqueous formic acid, which becomes more concentrated with each fresh addition of oxalic acid until the distillate eventually contains 56 per cent. of acid. The other portions of oxalic acid are added in the same way. In order to regain the formic acid which remains as monoformin in the retort, the contents are transferred to a round flask, diluted with about 250 c.c. of water and distilled in steam, until the distillate has only a faintly acid reaction (about 250 c.c.).
Distillation in Steam.- A large flask, or preferably, a 1 gallon tin is closed by a double bored cork. A safety-tube passes through one hole, and a bent tube which terminates below the Cork passes through the second hole, and is attached by rubber tubing to the inlet tube of the distilling flask (1 litre). The flask is sloped to prevent the contents being splashed over into the condenser. It is heated on the sand bath or asbestos board to boiling, and steam passed in. The united distillates are poured into a basin and neutralised by adding lead carbonate until, on heating, no further effervescence occurs. The liquid is now left for a moment to settle, and the clear solution decanted, whilst hot, through a fluted filter. The residue in the basin is boiled up again with a volume of water equal to that decanted, and again a third and fourth time, and filtered hot each time until no more lead formate is dissolved. The lead formate will have now passed into solution and the liquid is then evaporated down on a sand-bath or ringburner, until crystals appear on the surface, when the liquid is put on one side to cool. Lead formate crystallises out in long white needles. Yield about 150 grams. In order to obtain pure formic acid, hydrogen sulphide is passed over the heated lead salt. It is carried out as follows:
The powdered salt, dried on the water­bath, is introduced in a long layer into a sloping wide tube, loosely stopped at the lower end by a plug of glass wool or asbestos. To the lower end of the tube a receiver, in the form of a distilling flask, is attached, which is protected from moisture by a drying-tube. The salt is heated gently by moving a flame along the tube whilst hydrogen sulphide, washed through water, and dried by passing through a U-tube containing calcium chloride, is led over the salt in not too rapid a stream. The lead formate blackens, and is slowly converted into lead sulphide and formic acid, which drops into the receiver. The acid, which retains a strong smell of hydrogen sulphide, is freed from the latter by distillation over a little dry lead formate. Yield is nearly theoretical.


;)




ApprenticeCook

  • Guest
abacus, if you do the method properly as lugh...
« Reply #17 on: August 01, 2004, 05:14:00 PM »
abacus,
if you do the method properly as lugh said you can get ~55%, you must use anhyd glycerol otherwise your distillate is so dilute its useless.

And i dont make it, have tried and get ~55-60%, i buy it no probelms, so the methods inability to produce 80% on its own is of no coincidence to me.

Lugh like that method... thanks. Another option should the sources dry up.

-AC


hypo

  • Guest
or...
« Reply #18 on: August 02, 2004, 12:04:00 AM »
...you go the easy way and just buy acetic acid.


abolt

  • Guest
hypo
« Reply #19 on: August 02, 2004, 01:10:00 AM »
Does swihypo have any idea on yield differences regarding peracetic and performic??


hypo

  • Guest
it's about the same
« Reply #20 on: August 02, 2004, 01:28:00 AM »
afaik the first step is more or less quantitative, it's the hydrolysis that's the killer.

the only difference is that you have to wait 4 days for the peracetic to form.
keep your formic acid for when you need it (e.g. leuckart).