The Vespiary

The Hive => Novel Discourse => Topic started by: Rhodium on September 09, 2002, 04:15:00 PM

Title: Nickel-on-Charcoal, a dirt cheap Pd alternative?
Post by: Rhodium on September 09, 2002, 04:15:00 PM
Nickel-on-Charcoal - a revolutionary dirt cheap alternative to Pd as a heterogenous catalyst?

https://www.thevespiary.org/rhodium/Rhodium/pdf/nickel-on-charcoal.pdf (https://www.thevespiary.org/rhodium/Rhodium/pdf/nickel-on-charcoal.pdf)


https://www.thevespiary.org/rhodium/Rhodium/pdf/nickel-on-charcoal.preparation.pdf (https://www.thevespiary.org/rhodium/Rhodium/pdf/nickel-on-charcoal.preparation.pdf)

Title: Where is the link?
Post by: weedar on September 09, 2002, 06:21:00 PM
from

https://www.thevespiary.org/rhodium/Rhodium/chemistry/index.html (https://www.thevespiary.org/rhodium/Rhodium/chemistry/index.html)

where is
the link to those PDF-files?

Weedar

Me fail English?That's unpossible!
Title: Why are you asking?
Post by: Rhodium on September 09, 2002, 08:48:00 PM
At the bottom of "Miscellaneous".

Not all the PDF documents in the /pdf/ directory are linked, if you didn't know, a few are just linked from posts here at the Hive.
Title: How about this? http://www.geocities.
Post by: PolytheneSam on September 10, 2002, 01:03:00 AM
How about this?

http://www.geocities.com/dritte123/Nipat.html (http://www.geocities.com/dritte123/Nipat.html)



http://www.geocities.com/dritte123/PSPF.html
The hardest thing to explain is the obvious
Title: I really should read your page more often - it ...
Post by: Rhodium on September 10, 2002, 01:56:00 AM
I really should read your page more often - it contains so much good things. Now, if I just had a little army of clones who could convert your immense list into actual "suggested procedures" - it is really a shame that there are so many unused methods hidden there...
Title: question
Post by: ClearLight on September 10, 2002, 06:27:00 AM

  I read both papers, so, does this mean that to do a reductive amination, you need one of the phosphine ligands?

   Can this be used straight up for a CTH?

  ( Some minor example would be useful for us farther down the learning curve...)


Infinite Radiant Light - THKRA
Title: It has not been tried as a CTH substitute - Yet.
Post by: Rhodium on September 10, 2002, 09:23:00 AM
It has not been tried as a CTH substitute - Yet.

The articles only talk about using it for other catalytic reactions where usually Palladium only has been used before, as in Suzuki/Heck couplings with aryl halides.
Title: Ni/Al2O3 and Ni/C is mentioned in some of my ...
Post by: Barium on September 10, 2002, 11:44:00 AM
Ni/Al2O3 and Ni/C is mentioned in some of my books on heterogenous catalysis. But it appears as it is not very widely used. The reason for this can be conservative chemists as well as a very narrow usefulness. For our purposes it does indeed seem quite useful. So it seems like this is something I might have to order and test.
Title: Nickel.
Post by: Antoncho on September 10, 2002, 05:42:00 PM
Excellent find, Rhodi!

Something big is hiding here; no doubt. Eventually.... Maybee....


Am i correct that there is (as of today) no way to prepare Ni(0) species from Ni(II) other than w/Bu-Li? I mean, pyrolysis is an option too, but the activity of such catalyst yet remains to bee established, no?


Any chances that it could bee used as a Pd substitute in a Wacker? (and - in what way would it bee different in properties from NiCl2, for that matter?)



.....his email adress, that began with labrat@.....





A coincidence, certainly, but a funny one... :)  Where is this guy nowadays[sigh]....?







Antoncho

Title: NaBH 4 most certainly reduce Ni(II) to Ni°, as ...
Post by: Rhodium on September 10, 2002, 10:40:00 PM
NaBH4 most certainly reduce Ni(II) to Ni°, as should a lot of ig-noble metals (like Zn/Al does in the Urushibara catalyst preparation), but as I have read the articles (and especially the second), there is a need to do this only in special circumstances, not as a standard procedure.
Title: Tried grinding up some nickels, mixed with...
Post by: nightshade on June 21, 2003, 06:25:00 PM
Tried grinding up some nickels, mixed with some HCL acid,then poured that on some charcoal,then dumped sone zinc in till it stopped reacting.Now could this be be used as a reduction agent?
Title: Yes and No. More no so...
Post by: Organikum on June 22, 2003, 05:07:00 AM
First: No. It can´t be used as a "reduction agent" or catalyst in organic chemistry after my best of knowledge.

Second: Yes. It can be used as a first class agent for reducing complete wrong expectations on how things might work in chemistry.
Also if the papers was followed up to the point it would have given you a weak catalyst which biggest value was to enable some chemists to publish a paper.
Much more active nickel catalyst is prepared by depositing Ni on celite by precipitation. Stoneold. PolySam had it on his page somewhere since ever.

Title: So none of these posts about different methods
Post by: nightshade on June 24, 2003, 06:31:00 PM
So none of these posts about different methods preparing nickel catalyst are producing a catalyst that has chance at producing some honey?
Title: Urushibara Ni on Al definately works, it has...
Post by: Antibody2 on June 25, 2003, 04:28:00 AM
Urushibara Ni on Al definately works, it has been proven repeatedly!

Title: Some details please?
Post by: ragnaroekk on June 25, 2003, 01:36:00 PM
This calls for the disclosure of some more information!
Urushibara Ni on Al for reducing benzylic aminoalcohols?
Come on!
Temperature ?
amounts/ratios ?
solvent(s) ?
pressure ?
incantations ?

WizardsX was the only one who claimed  a working Ni reductionon this. With W6 raney Nickel used in substrate to catalyst ratio far out.

tell tell tell..... :)
Title: You try, its your experiment
Post by: Rhodium on June 25, 2003, 02:55:00 PM
I don't think anyone has used Urushibara for the reduction of your particular benzyl alcohol, and thus you cannot be spoonfed the data.

Just use a huge excess of U-Al-Ni, and run it overnight. If you get no conversion, try it at reflux. If you then get tars, lower the temperature again. If you succeed, then lower the U-Al-Ni ratio as far as you can without losing yield. You need to experiment yourself.
Title: OK,a Urushibara Nickel on Aluminum or Zinc is...
Post by: nightshade on June 25, 2003, 06:28:00 PM
Title: wrong benzylic alcohol, LOL
Post by: ragnaroekk on June 25, 2003, 10:34:00 PM
I had in mind the experimental section of:

https://www.thevespiary.org/rhodium/Rhodium/chemistry/fenfluramine.html (https://www.thevespiary.org/rhodium/Rhodium/chemistry/fenfluramine.html)



Where there the authors tried invain to reduce such a compound:
Quote
According to the literature [11], hydrogenation of an alcohol group in benzylic position is easy and is performed in mild conditions (5% Pd/C in alcohol at room temperature and standard pressure). However beta-aminated benzylic alcohols are much harder to hydrogenolyse: the yield is acceptable when the reaction is performed in acidic medium [12-14].

Our experiments, using a mixture of the aminoalcohols 4E + 4T + 11E + 11T and different conditions were not successful: when using mild conditions (ethanol-60°C-24h without activator), the reactants were isolated unchanged, and using harder conditions (acetic acid or water-100-110°C-1 to 16 h-in presence of concentrated hydrochloric and sulfuric acid), gives general degradation. The expected products, the amine 1 and the alcohol 6 could only be detected in trace amounts.
Quote


As it appeared to me that AntibodyII was refering to such a reduction done with U-Al-Ni my interest was caught. (on a second read I am not sure now - if AB would specify the reaction he talks about?)

Rhodium, somebody who has to much time and money may try to do this I prefer routes referenced as successful - they are hard enough to reproduce. :)

As the benzylic alcohols are easy made by biosynthetic processes subst. and unsubst., stereoselective and in fair yields the reduction of those is a reaction of growing importance but still to be seen as problematic. The catalytic hydrogenation over noble metal catalysts would have been first choice but the results disclosed in the article are depressing. What now? Silanes? The wonderweapon on the hydroxyl group?  ;D
Title: Time & money
Post by: Rhodium on June 25, 2003, 11:39:00 PM
A lot of time and money? It really doesn't cost more to perform a dozen such experiments than most people spend on alcoholic beverages on a single evening... And if you skip TV for 1-2 weeks, then you have enough time for the experiments too.
Title: Cookie time! "Opportunity is missed by...
Post by: yellium on June 25, 2003, 11:46:00 PM
Cookie time!


"Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work." 

(Thomas A.  Edison)

Title: So the anwser to my question is YES or NO?
Post by: nightshade on June 26, 2003, 12:50:00 AM
Title: Urushibara-Ni Reduction of Phenylnitropropenes
Post by: Rhodium on June 26, 2003, 01:13:00 AM
You are in no position to demand any answers from us, especially not when it is your job to UTFSE and easily find the answer yourself.

But because I am so helpful, I will here provide you with reading material about reduction of phenylnitropropenes to amphetamines using Urushibara catalysts (U-Ni-Al) until your bad karma decays enough for you to post again.

Urushibara Style Amphetamine (by Ritter) (https://www.thevespiary.org/rhodium/Rhodium/chemistry/amph.urushibara.html)

(https://www.thevespiary.org/rhodium/Rhodium/chemistry/amph.urushibara.html)

Synthesis of DOB using Usrushibara Catalyst (by Phikshun2) (https://www.thevespiary.org/rhodium/Rhodium/chemistry/dob.html#urushibara)

(https://www.thevespiary.org/rhodium/Rhodium/chemistry/dob.html#urushibara)
Title: Punished for asking a question?
Post by: nightshade on June 26, 2003, 06:27:00 PM
Punished for asking a question?I read what has been posted about Urushibara nickel,even seen pictures of someone running a batch, but still have a few questions.The only  question that is bad, is the one that's not asked.
Title: You didn't say the magic word
Post by: Rhodium on June 27, 2003, 10:42:00 AM
You asked the same question twice in the same thread, in a not too nice tone, and this while the answer is easily found by either using the search engine here or on my site.
Title: Sorry.
Post by: nightshade on June 27, 2003, 06:56:00 PM
Sorry.
Title: "Sorry."
Post by: calcium on June 27, 2003, 09:15:00 PM