> I'm filled with curiosity as to how molecular hydrogen is convinced
> to attract a couple of electrons into that smallest of orbitals, split,
> and become married, temporarily, to a nice bone constituant such as Calcium.
actually metal hydrides can be made exactly that way: metal + molecular H2
(usually at high temperature). interestingly CaH2 is an exothermic compound meaning
that 1 mol CaH2 is energetically more favorable than 1 mol Ca and 1 mol H2.
what do we learn from this? Ca's wish to get rid of 2 electrons is bigger
than H2's desire not to take 2 electrons and become 2H-. (well ofcource
that's simplicistic - there's other energetic reasons why compounds form).
(the splitting of H2 part is greatly enhanced by a high temperature ->
but that's the kinetic aspect)
not so surprising, when you consider that H- has exactly the same electron
structure as He, a noble gas. and noble gas configuration is the holy grail
of atoms, isn't it? (well, simplicistically speaking again..
).
there's other methods to make hydrides, one beeing cross-hydrogenation (if
that is even a word). i.e. moving H- from one metal to another.
then some compounds have hydrogens that can act as hydrides (hydridoids?
):
take for example the formiate in the leuckart reaction: HCOO-. CO2 pisses off
and H- stays behind.
am i reasonably comprehensible?
> Seems promising, anyway. Can anyone predict what would happen if some CaH2
> was introduced into ammonia
i don't think it will give solvated electrons, if that is what you're after...