Post 437230 (https://www.thevespiary.org/talk/index.php?topic=9257.msg43723000#msg43723000)
(Rhodium: "Fujisawa/Deguchi original performic oxidation", Methods Discourse)Terry Dal Cason, Biography (http://www.scs.northwestern.edu/pdp/npdp/biographies/index.cfm#forensics)
(http://www.scs.northwestern.edu/pdp/npdp/biographies/index.cfm#forensics)Source Criticism of Internet Documents (http://www.bib.slu.se/kurser/sss-proj/samla/ekallintern.html)
(http://www.bib.slu.se/kurser/sss-proj/samla/ekallintern.html)Source Criticism of Printed Documents (http://www.bib.slu.se/kurser/sss-proj/samla/ekalltry.html)
(http://www.bib.slu.se/kurser/sss-proj/samla/ekalltry.html)that is exactly what i suggest, i assumed most others were doing this way too, that is the whole beauty of using DCM instead of acetone, it maintains the perfect temp for that rxn. a light reflux is all you want.
There was alot of discussion on the subject a couple years ago.
I have been reaading here for about 5 years and have never seen this. Labtop doesn't mention this in the latest/best method for the buffered performic. I respect you and I'm not saying it hasn't been discussed. I may have missed it, could you give post numbers? Actually, fuck that, are you saying that you do this (with heating after addition) and it is good and improves yield?
RB, this is also what I thought most bees did.
Post 208344 (missing)
(Rhodium: "Re: 2,3-DM-4,5-MD-P-2-P", Methods Discourse) (thanks)Post 208344 (missing)
(Rhodium: "Re: 2,3-DM-4,5-MD-P-2-P", Methods Discourse)