OK, so I just stumbled across a paper that states that catechols are very stable when they form complexes with Fe(II) and Fe(III) ions, and auto-oxidation to quinones won't occur. Here's the reference for the paper:
hxxp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1462-2920.2001.00176.x/pdf
But yeah, as far as I see it, this has some serious implications for synthesis of some of our favorite catechol/dihydroxy compounds, and maybe some of our favorite methylenedioxy compounds...
"Catechols can form stable complexes with various di- and trivalent metal ions, the complexes with trivalent ions being the most stable."
"Fe(II) complexes form preferentially at acidic pH, whereas Fe(III) occurs at pH>7."
The rest of the paper is basically just discussion of catechol biological toxicity, which I couldn't care less about - I'm not planning on eating the stuff.
Does this mean it's as simple as chucking in a few grams of FeCl2 or FeCl3 and HEY, stable catechol??
I'll try and source the two other papers which were cited in this article, (Avdeef et al., 1978 and Hider et al., 1981)
hxxp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1462-2920.2001.00176.x/pdf
But yeah, as far as I see it, this has some serious implications for synthesis of some of our favorite catechol/dihydroxy compounds, and maybe some of our favorite methylenedioxy compounds...
"Catechols can form stable complexes with various di- and trivalent metal ions, the complexes with trivalent ions being the most stable."
"Fe(II) complexes form preferentially at acidic pH, whereas Fe(III) occurs at pH>7."
The rest of the paper is basically just discussion of catechol biological toxicity, which I couldn't care less about - I'm not planning on eating the stuff.
Does this mean it's as simple as chucking in a few grams of FeCl2 or FeCl3 and HEY, stable catechol??
I'll try and source the two other papers which were cited in this article, (Avdeef et al., 1978 and Hider et al., 1981)

