Author Topic: On Methylenedioxyamphetamines  (Read 75 times)

RoidRage

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 386
On Methylenedioxyamphetamines
« on: November 25, 2010, 01:14:44 PM »
Hello again everyone ;D

I've been wondering for 2 hours where start this thread ;D


What are you preferences? I personally haven't tried MDEA since It seriously sounds shitty. With Uni, I cannot research as often as I'd like too. Anyway even even with more time, MDEA certainly wouln't be a priority.. Right  now I'm thinking GHB, 2C-B and  mescaline, which  all looks to be 500 times better than MDEA.

Anyways, sticking to thread title, the great question is: what is your favorite amphetamine??? ;D

I personally like MDA 100% more than MDMA. ;D.. I don't like MDMA and find it's a cheap trip, never got anything  magic out of it from 50mg to 999 miligrams.
I 'm 100% dissapointed with MDMA....tooks me 3-4 months to set-up the lab correctly from ABSOLUTLY ZERO, so I was angry at first since the buzz was so cheap. Anyways, looks like everybody want the  methylated form around... I wish all tabs would be 100%MDA :D


MDA is really hallucinogenic, as opposed to MDMA in normal dose
MDA last longer
MDA gives more energy, a lot more
You can redose effectively with MDA, as opposed to MDMA




Anyways guys, which one is your favorite amphetamine :D ??

embezzler

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 228
Re: On Methylenedioxyamphetamines
« Reply #1 on: November 25, 2010, 10:43:58 PM »
Something is definitely up with either your neurons or your stock if you never got magic at a gram!!!! Wouldnt expect the 50mg to do much in either case and the build up of tolerance is a massive issue.

The MDMA is metabolized to MDA in the body anyway.

I like DOB but you need to set time aside to do it properly. Mescaline is shit hot too but it was a cactus extract I used not pure mescaline hcl so there may be differences when one factors in the other alkaloids of varying activity.
All that we see or seem is but a dream within a dream...

RoidRage

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 386
Re: On Methylenedioxyamphetamines
« Reply #2 on: November 26, 2010, 12:53:42 AM »
Thanks for the reply...

There's definitly nothing wrong with the stock, so it must be my brain ;D

I forgot about DOx, sounds fun too :D