Author Topic: Acetophenone scheduled?  (Read 269 times)

antibody2

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 158
Acetophenone scheduled?
« on: April 26, 2011, 10:41:12 PM »
Does anyone know definitively the legal status of acetophenone? Ab2 was talking with another bee recently who attempted to order some from her normal chem co, only to be informed:

"The chemical product(s) being purchased is/are scheduled as a Class A precursor, in Schedule VI, Part I of the CDSA, and could be used in the clandestine production of controlled substances." :-\

And to order it would require filling out an end use declaration. Apparently this happened in Canada. Ab2 has been all over RCMP, Health Canada, DoJ websites and there is NO mention of it anywhere. although Phenylacetic acid acid is on the schedule and it isn't a huge leap to go from one to the other. By the same token HgCl2 is also in the same category, cannot be purchased without filling out and end use declaration, yet it does not appear on any of the schedules.

Does anyone know the status of acetophenone in the US?

Does anyone have a "current" list of scheduled chemicals? Ab2 gets the impression that what is online is at least a decade out of date.



jon

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,883
Re: Acetophenone scheduled?
« Reply #1 on: April 26, 2011, 11:34:12 PM »
that's odd how are you going to make paa from acetophenone?
sounds like one of those overzealous chemical companies.

antibody2

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 158
Re: Acetophenone scheduled?
« Reply #2 on: April 27, 2011, 12:06:49 AM »
that's odd how are you going to make paa from acetophenone?

Willgerodt Reaction

check it out: http://www.erowid.org/archive/rhodium/chemistry/willgerodt.html

And no, not an overzealous chem co. The form had aHealth Canada logo on the top, so it is official, in Canada anyways . . .

psychexplorer

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 138
Re: Acetophenone scheduled?
« Reply #3 on: April 27, 2011, 12:43:05 AM »
HgCl2 sometimes requires an end user declaration, shipping to a confirmed business address, or other sundry measures because it is on the DEA's special surveillance list.

It's extreme toxicity certainly doesn't help, however its SSL inclusion means a chemical company can be fined heavily if their HgCl2 is found at a clandestine lab and they were anything but cautious in the extreme in its sale.

antibody2

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 158
Re: Acetophenone scheduled?
« Reply #4 on: April 27, 2011, 01:01:27 AM »
The DEA SSL is 12 years out of date!  Ab2 almost thinks that it is intentional, all this ambiguity. But it seems clear that the chem companys are working from a different list than what is posted.

atara

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 256
Re: Acetophenone scheduled?
« Reply #5 on: April 27, 2011, 02:48:52 AM »
Tableting machines? Really? What a waste of t--

better not say it.

The ambiguity is intentional. The DEA isn't interested in helping anyone get away with making drugs and they'd rather have nobody know what they're watching.

psychexplorer

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 138
Re: Acetophenone scheduled?
« Reply #6 on: April 27, 2011, 03:53:10 AM »
It may be 12 years old, but it isn't 12 years out of date.

The only thing on there which is dated is RP, which was subsequently send to the list I graveyard. Everything else isn't restricted but does raise some questions.

The point of the SSL was to make distributors aware of what was popular in clandestine cookery but not hot enough to be listed. Distributors are generally unaware of the specific recipes popular with the cooks.

If you look at the list, it still screws up our acquisition, even today.

I'm sure the DEA has their own internal shit list. Knowing their budget, they probably have their own datamining software, all of which is useless if the only person seeing the order records is the clerk at the chem distributor. The smaller guys do not run batch data transfers to the DEA for prior approval.

I don't see why listing tableting machines is that unreasonable, from their perspective. It's a suspicious item, with limited use, and typically only needed by verifiable businesses. If a couple tatted guys pull up in a white van and buy one for cash, the SSL listing lets them massively fine the distributor. Clearly a breach of personal liberty, but at least there is a chain of logic behind that one.

Their war on iodine doesn't make any sense. The only people shut down by a lack of I2 are the low grade cooks. That bunch will be shut down anyway from a lack of psuedo. That didn't stop them from screwing with the general public.


It's also worth mentioning that watchlists can appear to change from one place to another, when actually the culprit is management and its prior frustrations. If an unlisted, non-SSL chemical causes DEA trouble for a distributor, they might require ID, EUDs, etc. in the future. I've seen several places selling common items later concocting homebrew paperwork for specific, common chemicals with a definite use in clandestine synthesis, even though those chemicals are not controlled in any way.
« Last Edit: April 27, 2011, 04:00:05 AM by psychexplorer »

jon

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,883
Re: Acetophenone scheduled?
« Reply #7 on: April 27, 2011, 09:07:34 PM »
yeah there was this certain photochemical site that wanted eud's for nearly every godamned thing they sold, i wondered why they even bothered at all?
no one, even innocent expirimenters wants a rouge paramilitary police agency up thier ass with a proctoscope.
it's not a matter of "if your doing nothing wrong you've got nothing to worry about" logic.
most people understand these guys operate outside of the law.

you can still get tableting machines off the books if you got an extra 4 grand.
then you can basically print money you know a good batch followed by a bunk one, then repeat the process.

not to mention knockoff pharmacueticals and popular supplements.
« Last Edit: April 27, 2011, 09:38:29 PM by jon »

psychexplorer

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 138
Re: Acetophenone scheduled?
« Reply #8 on: April 28, 2011, 01:00:42 AM »
If you and I are thinking of the same supplier (and I think we are), then word has it they actually did have a run-in with the DEA. After getting a good talking to, the chemically-ignorant owner made a pointless, knee-jerk reaction, asking for unnecessary EUDs on stuff which isn't that hot, while ignoring other things which are way more interesting. His policy was a reaction to an actual problem which had nothing to do with generalized lists or advisory memos. He posted this much elsewhere within the photo world, so this isn't hearsay.

jon, browsing through his catalog, I'm sure you can imagine much better things from the EUD-free side than from those few things which stupidly require a bit of paperwork.

It's a good example we can learn from. A photo guy who knows nothing of drugs (who could just as easily be a chem company who also knows nothing of drugs) reacted to an existing problem. Our other suppliers may, too. There is no way to know for sure what chemicals are on a company's internal shitlist. We know of the DEA's public lists, and we know some suppliers advertise a paperwork requirement on certain items, but we have not the slightest clue what actually goes on in the ordering department.

Lowly clerks wouldn't know good clandestine chemistry if it called them up and asked to open an account. We have no way of knowing what might be shitlisted at a particular company because we have no way of knowing if and/or what they had sold in the past to busted labs.

That's why it is easy to say don't order x, but a bit tougher to say that it is ok to order y. A lot of things are questionable or unknown, which is why it helps to have an order history full of safety goggles, pipettes, and ACS NaCl. If the account doesn't reek of a cook, then the clerk has less of a reason to pay attention to that office memo about acetophenone, PdCl2, allyl alcohol, benzoquinone, hexamine, catechol, HNO3, or whatever other reasonably common chemical might have been declared to be the devil at one particular firm.

Methyl Man

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 143
Re: Acetophenone scheduled?
« Reply #9 on: April 28, 2011, 03:18:45 PM »
Just want to say thanks for your observations in this discussion, guys. I love this place  :D

« Last Edit: April 28, 2011, 03:51:44 PM by Methyl Man »
There's a methyl to my madness...
==+==+==+==+==+==+==+==+==+==

poisoninthestain

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 298
Re: Acetophenone scheduled?
« Reply #10 on: April 28, 2011, 04:17:02 PM »
I have to agree with antibody's statements regarding the scare tactics employed. I can still easily buy HgCl2 within the states no problem but i prefer to make it since its cheaper...same goes for most of the people working at suppliers that don't really know these off the record reactions and only really come after you when you do things list 1 or 2...everything else...unless done in excess or multiple combinations...is pretty safe(definitions of safe may vary)...in reality a lot of what's scheduled can easily be made at home...that surveillance list doesn't frighten me at all. List 1 I almost always look to china if it can't be chopped from another compound. A certain auction site is very useful for that very reason.  Normal people getting rid of chems and just looking for a quick buck...easy loophole no company reporting.

The most unbelievable thing is the difference between simply stating "I'm Mr. Smith and I want chemical A." and "I'm Mr. Smith with Anderson Perfumeries and I'm interested in chemical A".  It could totally be the most bullshit business name ever, completely fake, no credentials. The door is open. Wild.  Talk the lingo, always request MSDS, etc...don't be stupid. Once a supplier knows you you're in.  I always like to mention I'm a returning business customer and their service has always been great.

Iodine scheduling is ridiculous it hurts everyone...its so useful for everyday reactions I just cannot believe it. I'm waiting for the day when they throw down the banhammer on KI...I don't think it'll ever happen but I read a DEA article stating that they are aware of it's use and contemplating regulating it. That was in 2010.




Methyl Man

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 143
Re: Acetophenone scheduled?
« Reply #11 on: April 29, 2011, 05:06:54 PM »
A certain auction site is very useful for that very reason.  Normal people getting rid of chems and just looking for a quick buck...easy loophole no company reporting.

See this is what's confusing for me (assuming we're talking about the same auction site) ... you say the above, but others say that site compiles all info on everyone's purchases (obviously they do) and could give it to authorities. The seller might be a normal person looking only for a quick buck and there's no company to report, but the auction site itself still controls all the information... the seller looking for a quick buck is not in control of that information. Could you clarify this discrepancy please?
There's a methyl to my madness...
==+==+==+==+==+==+==+==+==+==

psychexplorer

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 138
Re: Acetophenone scheduled?
« Reply #12 on: April 29, 2011, 06:58:47 PM »
That very popular auction site itself is extremely friendly with law enforcement. They go out of their way to please the pigs, to minimize their own consequences when people list up stolen goods or fake merchandise.

Most chem sellers are independents and individuals who aren't reporting anything. The site, on the other hand, makes completed listing data available via API. This data is used for everything from marketing, to pricing/listing software, to LE datamining.

Any chem bought off that site can be assumed to leave a trail in an LE computer, somewhere. Whether one order of something common and harmless gets any attention is another matter.

Shake

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 276
Re: Acetophenone scheduled?
« Reply #13 on: May 17, 2011, 01:20:03 PM »
Quote
The only thing on there which is dated is RP, which was subsequently send to the list I graveyard. Everything else isn't restricted but does raise some questions.


red phosphorous isnt hard to make... imo, the shit is easy.. i just learned how

its the ephidrine that is tough to get..


i just found a 20kg drum of chromium trioxide i wish there was more i could use it for.. but is i wanted a few grams i guess i could do the tablet extracts then make methcathinone with chromic.. then clemminson reduction of the double bond
« Last Edit: May 17, 2011, 01:23:41 PM by Shake »

Sedit

  • Global Moderator
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,099
Re: Acetophenone scheduled?
« Reply #14 on: May 17, 2011, 05:40:11 PM »
If you have a simple way to RP please do post in a new thread. Because as it stands I have one of the simplest ways proceeding thru WP, there is using Sodium Hexametaphosphate and that is not what I call simple. Much risk for explosion if water is present and the entire setup is a pain.
There once were some bees and you took all there stuff!
You pissed off the wasp now enough is enough!!!

meme

  • Larvae
  • *
  • Posts: 25
Re: Acetophenone scheduled?
« Reply #15 on: May 28, 2011, 02:47:46 PM »
Please post a synthesis of RP if you have one.  This forum is not for teasing, nor is a synthesis properly presented likely to go downstream enough to get attention unless its spoonfed.