Found link @ Phrixus-think I'll lurk for quite awhile here before exposing my ignorance... 
.
30 year background in nursing and alternative healing [did you know hydrazine sulfate and DMSO are useful in cancer treatment?], so that's what I'll be looking for primarily-but never can resist reading an enlightened post on biochemistry, energetics or weapons.
Hi dialysisdog, Good to see you at the Vespiary, I read about the use of Hydrazine sulfate via the link you ended up posted a few posts down.
http://www.hydrazinesulfate.org/ Found, what I managed to read, as very interesting, sort of made me quite nauseous due to the attitudes and behaviour, if indeed correct, by the
NCI and FDA.(not the first time Frank has had this physical response to their described behaviour) so I will finish it off, but perhaps not in one go...
I look forward to reading the Russian Paper, and will follow up with other literature associated. I am far from being biochemically enlightened, DAM IT- but learning, some learnt, and seeing that revision is necessary in such a broad area< but do understand a little about the pathway of gluconeogenesis, and that particular enzyme which is specific for this pathway. I also somewhat remember that the initial Pyruvate > Oxaloacetate, also specific for gluconeogenisis, uses Co-A, or is involved somehow which I think induces the possible breakdown of stored triglycerides, so if the 2nd step is inhibited, then the breakdown of triglycerides in the initial step may also be inhibited - although I know its very complex, and my description here may not be so accurate, but seems to fit the bill, and somewhat explains the weight gain- or reduction of associated weight loss, and irrespective of that, how dare these GROUPS take such a plausible, and what looks like very encouraging results, and treat it with contempt, and as if anything bar big money spent on lengthy pharmaceutical research is but pseudoscience. Im obviously stating the obvious/ yet it was great seeing Dr Gold speak his mind, from his position, and hopefully a change may result. Im looking forward, to find what sort of inhibition it is, and the effect of the initiall step, whether biotin could play a role.
Have you checked this out -
In Australia, a news story hit a couple of years ago, (Ill try and track the newspaper article - I actually saw it on the television) regarding local Biomedical Research Drs at a hospital utilizing a new revolutionary treatment for cancer via the use of placing electrodes within the tumor itself and sending some amperage that results in necrosis of such cells due to exteme pH values cuased by such treatment, where specificity was very very good. This treatment required expensive disposable platinum electrodes, something at around 10,000 bucks a pair plus the instrumentation for this technique is extremely expensive, and of course we are only at animal-guinea pig trials,yet such treament maybe availiable in the next 10 years. From my perspective the inert electrodes would not have to be platinum.That the correlation that platinum salts added to the destruction of the cells, well Im not convinced, yet the fact that cis-platiin an existing treatment makes it perhaps sound plausible- but theyre totally different, but still doen't infer if it was true, that such platinum electrodes need to be disposed of, especially in light of todays use of autoclaves designed specifically for such purposes. I am referring to the TV news report, So unless I can track it down, cannot backup my words here.
I then discovered that this is common practice in China, and has been for many years, and discussed in an internation meeting in 1998, yet their results were unable to be used, but were used - well at least in support of this ongoing research beginning with animal trials, intrumental developements, obviously legal contracts for all involved, big money, stretching this treatment for as long as they can, so these researchers, developers of such instrumentation can make as much freakin money as they can. After all, its not as if someones life is in the balance. oops hold on Frank,dont get all hostile here.. sorry.. and of course Frank may have it all wrong about this situation. Its just when reading the findings, some 7 years ago, seeing the TV report some 2 years ago, well after reading the following
"Information from Western countries, including Australia, is based mainly on animal studies.
Promising reports have been published on the electrolytic ablation of melanoma tumours. Early
animal studies by Schauble et al.14 and David et al.15 on melanoma tumours in hamsters showed
melanoma tumour growth inhibition or regression in all animals treated with electrolysis. More
recently a small human trial by Plesnicar et al.16 treated five patients with electrolysis for primary
or metastatic melanoma tumours. They concurred with the results from the animal studies, with
all lesions decreasing in size following electrolysis. No serious complications were noted.
Nordenstrom12, one of the pioneers of the field, has also trialled both lung and breast cancer
treatment. In using electrolysis on lung tumours there was regression of the tumours in 12 out of
26 tumours in 20 patients, several of whom were previously thought to be inoperable. A trial on a
single patient with breast cancer treated by electrolysis showed complete ablation of the tumour
and mammographic follow-up at two years showing no evidence of recurrence. These trials had
no mortalities, and morbidity was limited to slight fever and local pain following the surgery"
So with such reviews why the Fuck isn't it maintream treatment by now, This in conjunction with inhibition of gluconeogenesis, could
be saving lives, extending lives, and it just dumbfounds me reading what youve stat dialysisdog, and what Ive added with respect to
possible proven cancer treatments, that are being with held due to MONEY as far as I can tell.
http://www.surgeons.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Home&Template=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentFileID=1783Anyway, nice that youve joined the forum, and I look forward to reading those papers..
Frank
