timecube, you did great.
NeilPatrickHarris, you did great.
Problem is Sigma sucks at making apps with full functionality. My original enthusiasm is quickly fading with continued exposure to its wankyness.
Try setting the same temp and corrected temp. Not 760mm pressure? Why not?
Try setting a vac, then setting an observed temp. Your pressure number change? Why can't it figure accurately for any variable?
200 observed set, 200 corrected set, gives 700? set that and it gives an observed of 200.1?
The same trick with 100 gives 99.4?
I am now sorry I recommended this. It seemed as accurate as the straight edge when doing mine and some of the numbers from Rhod's archive for a test against "knowns" and their variation from the numbers the nomograph gives. Now I thought this thing was doing some sort of math... WTF is it doing? Is there an acceptable range of values? One would think good programming would make all out of range things give out of range, not mixed errors and occasional out of range messages(N/A on this POS). Is there an easy way to look at what it is doing and guess at a more accurate range for the thing?
Perhaps I am being overly critical, but shouldn't this POS work like it should?
Why would the brains at Sigma allow for a COMPUTERIZED version of a graphical analog computational device to not use computation? Isn't computation and porn the only two things these devices are really made for, anyway? Seriously, WTF?
Whatever, it works good enough for Sigma's corporate site.
nomograph.swf
