|
|
| Author |
Message |
DrugPhreak
Working Bee
|
| Joined: 07 Mar 2005 |
| Posts: 114 |
| Location: Bee Hive |
4261.30 Points
|
|
|
FB receiving flask?
Mon May 30, 2005 9:59 pm |
|
|
| Would it be ok to use a FB receiving flask under moderate-high (29.5") vacuum? Or should the receiving flask be a RB also? The current fractional vacuum distillation will use a 125 or 250ml flask, but SWIDP is just wondering about this for when they scale up etc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
joe_aldehyde
huxleys associate
|
| Joined: 06 Apr 2005 |
| Posts: 310 |
|
5653.90 Points
|
|
|
Mon May 30, 2005 10:06 pm |
|
|
| usually, duran erlenmeyers do just fine in such situations since your vacuum isn't really strong. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Star-light
Blacklight bulb
|
| Joined: 26 Mar 2005 |
| Posts: 77 |
|
2681.50 Points
|
|
|
Mon May 30, 2005 10:39 pm |
|
|
| Quote: |
usually, duran erlenmeyers do just fine in such situations since your vacuum isn't really strong
|
Maybe they do usually, but in general using a flat bottomed flask under distillation is a bad idea. Even if the vacuum is not really high then they are much more liable to implode than a RB flask. The same is true for both the distillation and receiving flasks.
A vacuum of 29.5 inches is almost 750mm of mercury. The pressure difference between the inside and outside of the flask is almost as much as when there is a complete vacuum inside the flask.
Of course there are FB flasks that are built for vacuum, but unless you have one of these then please avoid using them in a vacuum situation or you may end up in an accident. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
joe_aldehyde
huxleys associate
|
| Joined: 06 Apr 2005 |
| Posts: 310 |
|
5653.90 Points
|
|
|
Mon May 30, 2005 10:44 pm |
|
|
| 750mm of mercury is 750 torr which is...only 10 torr less than atmospheric pressure! not a strong vacuum, right? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DrugPhreak
Working Bee
|
| Joined: 07 Mar 2005 |
| Posts: 114 |
| Location: Bee Hive |
4261.30 Points
|
|
|
Mon May 30, 2005 11:11 pm |
|
|
| This is the KNF pump I spoke about previously. It pulls 29.5" Hg (10mmHg). Thanks for the info. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Star-light
Blacklight bulb
|
| Joined: 26 Mar 2005 |
| Posts: 77 |
|
2681.50 Points
|
|
|
Mon May 30, 2005 11:22 pm |
|
|
| joe_aldehyde wrote: |
|
750mm of mercury is 750 torr which is...only 10 torr less than atmospheric pressure! not a strong vacuum, right?
|
Sorry Joe, by bad explanation. What I meant was the vacuum pulled was 750mm or the remaining pressure was 10mm Hg. Not a high vacuum, but too high for using standard FB flasks safely.
Oh, and DP, the bigger your flasks get the more danger you are in. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DrugPhreak
Working Bee
|
| Joined: 07 Mar 2005 |
| Posts: 114 |
| Location: Bee Hive |
4261.30 Points
|
|
|
Mon May 30, 2005 11:37 pm |
|
|
| So there's a chance of even a RB flask imploding if it's kind of large? Say like... 6 liters? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Star-light
Blacklight bulb
|
| Joined: 26 Mar 2005 |
| Posts: 77 |
|
2681.50 Points
|
|
|
Mon May 30, 2005 11:59 pm |
|
|
| DrugPhreak wrote: |
|
So there's a chance of even a RB flask imploding if it's kind of large? Say like... 6 liters?
|
I have never used a flask of that size under vacuum. I think it is generally recommended that you don't put flasks above 5L under vacuum, unless they have specifically been designed for vacuum use.
When using flasks above 1L it is a good idea to wrap the flask in fiber-reinforced ¾ inch friction tape to reduce the damage if one does break.
Always check a flask before using it and do not use a cracked, starred, or badly scratched flask as it is more likely to break.
Oh, and relieve your vacuum slowly to avoid sudden pressure changes which could cause breakage of the flasks. Do not relieve vacuum until the apparatus has cooled. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DrugPhreak
Working Bee
|
| Joined: 07 Mar 2005 |
| Posts: 114 |
| Location: Bee Hive |
4261.30 Points
|
|
|
re: FB receiving flask?
Tue May 31, 2005 2:44 am |
|
|
| Thanks for the info. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
loki
guinea pig
|
| Joined: 09 Mar 2005 |
| Posts: 391 |
|
14167.88 Points
|
|
|
Tue May 31, 2005 8:34 am |
|
|
| definitely get heavywall pyrex rbfs, and there is ones you can get that have a special plastic coating that would reduce the danger in the case of an implosion, i'm not sure how much temperature they can take tho, depends on what the plastic is |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DrugPhreak
Working Bee
|
| Joined: 07 Mar 2005 |
| Posts: 114 |
| Location: Bee Hive |
4261.30 Points
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|