|
|
| Author |
Message |
java
Consumer
|
| Joined: 07 Feb 2005 |
| Posts: 736 |
| Location: The Mexican Republic |
21794.14 Points
|
|
|
Freedom of Information for Whom?
Tue Feb 22, 2005 11:07 pm |
|
|
I posted this at WD sometime back and thought this would go fine here..........java
Read the whole thread here and comments........
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted - Jan 31 2005 : 3:18:51 PM
Is there or isn't there freedom of information. I read about people trying to find ways to erase information from their computers, as if having information is against somone's law?
Information is everywhere the libraries and the web is full of it. Now you say, if in case of an infraction with the law, if they find information relative to the infraction, then it was planned. The phobia and fear of the draconians can be blinding if one falls to their fear tactics.
Information is just that , and if any LE wants to make a case of it , so beit. We should not shy away from having and storing information as it's intellectual information and it's a right we have in a civilized world,......freedom of information......
Having said all that , in the US fear FBI section 215, which will search everywhere and you can't tell anyone about it......and so one has be aware and fight this draconian law which violates human rights ....yes in the US....read about it......java
---------------- ---------------- ------------------
Support the ACLU they are trying to restore the rights of the sleeping and over recreated US citizens......
It's better to die on your feet, than live on your knees...............Emiliano Zapata (UH)
Edited by - java on Jan 31 2005 10:02:08 PM |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lief
|
| Joined: 16 Feb 2005 |
| Posts: 112 |
|
4494.38 Points
|
|
|
Fri Mar 11, 2005 6:04 am |
|
|
| I know someone who has gone into at least four different libraries (even after 9/11) that belong to various departments of the US federal government and ordered journals having articles in them about drug synthesis and then xeroxed them and brought them home. No one asked him anything about what he was copying. He's not doing anything illegal, of course, he's just interested in chemistry. At one of the libraries you can see the white house one block away. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
java
Consumer
|
| Joined: 07 Feb 2005 |
| Posts: 736 |
| Location: The Mexican Republic |
21794.14 Points
|
|
|
Re:Freedom at the Library
Tue Apr 05, 2005 10:54 pm |
|
|
The library won't tell you anything, as a matter of fact they are prohibited from informing you they've checked your interests and the books you've checked out ........ java
Here is a wallet size info on your rights and what to do in case the LE ever crosses your path.......
http://rapidshare.de/files/1143444/wallet_card.pdf.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lief
|
| Joined: 16 Feb 2005 |
| Posts: 112 |
|
4494.38 Points
|
|
|
Wed Apr 06, 2005 5:28 am |
|
|
| They don't know what's being copied, either. The Mexican government is corrupt. You have to bribe the police, prosecutors and judges. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nubee
Master Archiver
|
| Joined: 18 Feb 2005 |
| Posts: 213 |
| Location: homeless |
18579.78 Points
|
|
|
Wed Apr 06, 2005 6:39 am |
|
|
the US is one" country", there are many others with different states of this so called freedom... in fact i think America prides it self on being one of the more "free" countries...
in Australia there are many banned books still , i have heard from multiple people of others who have had the possesion of a book such as festers or an other of that type used against them in court as well as computers taken and anal-eyes'd.
sure , you'd have to be pretty unlucky to get prosecuted for just having information, (though they are doing it with mp3's now), but in combination with some more physical apparatus/materials, and you've got a good case of intention, without even lighting your bunsen. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lief
|
| Joined: 16 Feb 2005 |
| Posts: 112 |
|
4494.38 Points
|
|
|
Sat Apr 09, 2005 7:34 pm |
|
|
| Quote: |
According to a memo obtained by CBS News Correspondent Stephanie Lambidakis, Attorney General John Ashcroft reveals that the FBI has never used its expanded powers to obtain records from libraries and businesses, despite widespread fears from librarians and civil libertarians that FBI agents are visiting libraries as part of terrorism and criminal investigations.
|
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/08/19/national/main569135.shtml
Do you really think the government is going to waste a lot of time and money checking up on millions of students and US civilians to see if they're looking up processes for synthesizing drugs in libraries? At one university, I can go into the chemistry library without showing any ID and xerox anything I want. No one checks. Also, I know from experience that a lot of companies and inventors look for articles like these everyday. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lief
|
| Joined: 16 Feb 2005 |
| Posts: 112 |
|
4494.38 Points
|
|
|
Sat Apr 09, 2005 7:44 pm |
|
|
One thing you need to ask yourself, java, is that if the USA is such a bad country why are there so many Mexicans trying to get into the country? Why are there so many illegal aliens in the USA? Why do more Canadians immigrate to the USA than Americans immigrating to Canada?
| Quote: |
Border Patrols Growing in Arizona
USA TODAY
As hundreds of civilian "Minuteman" volunteers prepare to monitor a 20-mile stretch of Arizona's border with Mexico, the federal Department of Homeland Security will announce plans today to send more than 500 additional agents to patrol the state's remote southern border.
The 25% increase in Border Patrol agents in Arizona is the second phase of a buildup that began a year ago. It's part of an effort to stem the flow of illegal immigrants crossing the state's notoriously porous 370-mile border and to prevent potential terrorists from entering the country.
|
http://www.teamamericapac.org/ta-tapr-050330-minuteman.shtml |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
java
Consumer
|
| Joined: 07 Feb 2005 |
| Posts: 736 |
| Location: The Mexican Republic |
21794.14 Points
|
|
|
Encroachment on freedom
Sun Apr 10, 2005 12:57 am |
|
|
Thanks to Wareami for posting this at WD,.....the focus is on the U.S. and it's attack on freedom at the moment....although, it's also known there is illegal government actions all over the world encroaching on freedom....stay in focus .......java
| Quote: |
March 15, 2005
Liberty Watch: From Michael Ostrolenk, CCLE Policy Fellow
The REAL ID ACT (H.R. 418), which passed the House will soon be moving to the Senate attached to a supplemental appropriations bill. The bill would force states to issue all adults federally approved electronic ID cards, including driver's licenses. Licenses or identity cards that do not meet the rules could be rejected -- meaning that your access to airplanes, trains, national parks and court houses could be denied.
There are immigration, border control, asylum, and national id provisions within the bill. The bill gives the Secretary of Homeland Security sole discretion to waive all laws as necessary to ensure expeditious construction of certain barriers and roads at the U.S. border. It prohibits courts, administrative agencies, and other entities from reviewing the Secretary's decision.
The id provisions include the requirement for specific data, a common machine readable technology and that as a condition of receiving grant funds or other financial assistance under the title, States must participate in the interstate compact regarding the sharing of driver's license data (the Driver License Agreement). The specific data required include digital picture and primary residence. Both of these requirements might not seem problematic. However, it is a mandate from the Federal government which violates the spirit of federalism, it could violate the privacy of individual citizens who choose not to give their primary residence for their own security reasons (e.g., spousal abuse) and it further entrenches the mistaken notion that free people are required to identify themselves at the will of law enforcement and government bureaucrats.
The common machine readable technology could also lead to the use of radio frequency identifiers (RFIDís). This technology is dangerous in that the information stored on the identification card will be transmitted at a distance to be read by those who have the appropriate technology. Think how easy it will be for state and federal agencies to track citizens every move. They will be able to do so without anyone even knowing they are being tracked. The drivers license agreement that is referred to in the bill would set up the conditions for state databases to be connected to Canadian and Mexican databases. It would create a tri-national database system. Fortunately, there is a transpartisan coalition of groups working to defeat the bill once it arrives in the Senate. This diverse coalition whose members have different concerns regarding various provisions include the ACLU, Gun Owners of America, Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, American Conservative Union, Americans for Tax Reform and the American Policy Center.
http://www.cognitiveliberty.org
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
IndoleAmine
Dreamreader Deluxe
|
| Joined: 09 Feb 2005 |
| Posts: 681 |
| Location: Bahamas |
18717.10 Points
|
|
|
Sun Apr 10, 2005 7:40 am |
|
|
Lief, you said: [quote]Why do more Canadians immigrate to the USA than Americans immigrating to Canada?[quote]
I guess it are economical reasons that make people move from canada to the us of A - not everone likes earning money with forest trees...
(I BET most canadians who do move to the USA do so ALTHOUGH they feel more free in canada..)
i_a |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Spacemonkey
|
| Joined: 14 Feb 2005 |
| Posts: 29 |
|
759.14 Points
|
|
|
Tue Apr 12, 2005 8:20 am |
|
|
>Why are there so many illegal aliens in the USA?
The USA's Assinine immigration policies maybe?
It doesn't matter how "more or less free" the US is compared to some other country.
The fact is that it's not as free as it purports to be, or more importantly, as it should be.
It doesn't matter weather the government "...is going to waste a lot of time and money checking up on millions of students and US civilians" Which by the way, IMHO they sure as hell do. Theres even been court cases about it I think.
It matters that there are laws on the books, unconstitutional laws I might add, purporting to allow them to do secret survailliance on it's own citizens.
It matters that the government is pissing on the very document that allows them exist and the principals contained therein.
It's a very simple document understandable by anyone who got past grade-school.
"Congress shall make no law.." means Congress shall make NO LAW |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
java
Consumer
|
| Joined: 07 Feb 2005 |
| Posts: 736 |
| Location: The Mexican Republic |
21794.14 Points
|
|
|
Save yourself
Wed Apr 13, 2005 1:14 am |
|
|
Here is something that all will understand .....take some action , save yourself and your children ........posted by stonium over at WD.......java
http://www.aclu.org/pizza/images/screen.swf |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
slacker
|
| Joined: 06 Jun 2005 |
| Posts: 47 |
|
1857.96 Points
|
|
|
re: Freedom of Information for Whom?
Wed Jun 08, 2005 10:28 am |
|
|
| Quote: |
One thing you need to ask yourself, java, is that if the USA is such a bad country why are there so many Mexicans trying to get into the country? Why are there so many illegal aliens in the USA? Why do more Canadians immigrate to the USA than Americans immigrating to Canada?
|
not to mention the thousands of cubans who throw themselves into the atlantic ocean on rafts and 55 gallon drums with no food just hoping they might land in the united states every year. some of them even have to try it several times. fidel must be a real benevolent ruler....
all this bullshit about the united states government spying on you is just fearmongering. like somebody above said, australia has more stringent laws and you dont hear a lot of bitching and whining from the aussies here about that. i dont worry one bit about "the man" spying on me or taking away my rights. you know why? because i have several guns. if i ever feel like my constitutional rights are being taken away then the g-men can eat my hollowpoints and kiss my ass. the second amendment guarantees the rest cant be encroached upon. thats why it was passed - to keep the government in check. not a gun person you say? well then no wonder youre so scared. id be scared too. i feel no sympathy for those who want all of their rights and freedoms but lack the heart and courage to fight for them.
and as for not having freedom of speech in the us, please save it. you people speak about oppression like you had to live through the siege of stalingrad. look up tienamen square (or however the hell you spell it), try living in a culture where you cant leave the house without a veil if youre female, or go to venezuela and try to call hugo chavez a dick and go to prison for it. then tell me about oppression. many of you lack perspective on this matter.
***sidenote: sorry about bringing up these old threads but i just discovered synthetikal the other day so i have some catching up to do on threads i never got the chance to participate in*** |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
joe_aldehyde
huxleys associate
|
| Joined: 06 Apr 2005 |
| Posts: 310 |
|
5653.90 Points
|
|
|
re: Freedom of Information for Whom?
Wed Jun 08, 2005 5:15 pm |
|
|
like guns are a solution, slacker. any of your "amendments" to the constitution mean a slick shit to congress. or how did they NOT fail to pass the patriot act?
i don't mean to personally attack you, but it is no big surprise of reading statements like yours from a person who claims to be a soldier.
if you're going to kill somebody, revenge is not far away, and it's usually not like an "ONE eye for an eye" thing. you kill somebody, somebody else will kill you and your whole family and maybe your whole people. just because they can not achieve this at the moment doesn't mean they would refrain from it at all (only if they were so much smarter than the person who started it all). that's the situation for the near and far east - unless the U.S. are gonna stop playing world police, more and more oppositional parties will gather against them, they have no choice.
Hello WW3.
and all this because the economic situation of the U.S. has been ruined by their own government. yeah, okay! so the whole world has to suffer from your possibly elected presidents' incapabilities.
and you probably never learned about the principal idea of attack and counterattack, yes? also called a "vicious circle". but hey! go shoot somebody, that might surely help. me, for a start, so i would not continue to call your attitude into question. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zub
|
| Joined: 24 Apr 2005 |
| Posts: 63 |
|
2224.98 Points
|
|
|
re: Freedom of Information for Whom?
Wed Jun 08, 2005 9:10 pm |
|
|
one of the small reasons for mexicans coming to the u.s. is that we sucked their rivers dry so that americans in the south west can have golf courses and swimming pools.
its a pity to judge castro without knowing batista. cuba was the whore house of the u.s.
something had to be done before we stripped it bare, as we did in haiti.
i hate to pick on the u.s. but i can't stand arrogant bullies that refuse to learn any history.
i don't mind so much that we are vicious pricks, globally speaking...its the fucking denial and hypnotic spell that sticks in my throat.
i'm a patriot. this is how i express it today.
americans need to clean house at home.
or remain buffoons.
huge tits are over-rated |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
slacker
|
| Joined: 06 Jun 2005 |
| Posts: 47 |
|
1857.96 Points
|
|
|
re: Freedom of Information for Whom?
Wed Jun 08, 2005 9:19 pm |
|
|
| Quote: |
like guns are a solution, slacker. any of your "amendments" to the constitution mean a slick shit to congress. or how did they NOT fail to pass the patriot act?
|
joe, you missed the point. and it doesnt matter what anything means to congress. the point was that they wont oppress me because i wont allow them.
i never said that guns are a solution for everything. trust me they're not. all i was saying is that its a lot more difficult to oppress somebody who has the means to stand up for themselves than it is to oppress for somebody who isnt intelligent enough to obtain those means.
| Quote: |
i don't mean to personally attack you, but it is no big surprise of reading statements like yours from a person who claims to be a soldier.
|
thank you. ive never been insulted in such a polite fashion before. you say you dont wish to personally attack me and then proceed to do so in the next breath. you should consider going into politics. you managed to call me and idiot and a violent warmonger in one concise statement. brilliant.
| Quote: |
if you're going to kill somebody, revenge is not far away, and it's usually not like an "ONE eye for an eye" thing. you kill somebody, somebody else will kill you and your whole family and maybe your whole people.
|
this is also an undercover insult. the implication being that the stupid soldier isnt capable of controlling his impulses. who said anything about killing anybody for revenge? trust me, gunfights arent fun. i try to avoid all confrontation in my life if i can. as long as nobody attacks me or tries to oppress me then my rifle will sit there on the rack collecting dust. you appear to have an irrational fear of firearms.
| Quote: |
and all this because the economic situation of the U.S. has been ruined by their own government. yeah, okay! so the whole world has to suffer from your possibly elected presidents' incapabilities
|
unemployment rate is about 5.6%. im many countries that is considered full employment. but i suppose the facts dont really matter since you've already made up your mind.
| Quote: |
and you probably never learned about the principal idea of attack and counterattack, yes? also called a "vicious circle".
|
if you choose to clarify and elaborate i will answer this point as soon as i figure out what the hell you're talking about.
| Quote: |
but hey! go shoot somebody, that might surely help. me, for a start, so i would not continue to call your attitude into question.
|
insults number three and four.
insult number three comes when you imply that i like to go around shooting people for some kind of theraputic value.
and insult number 4 comes into play when you imply that i like to shoot everybody who doesnt agree with me. nothing could be further from the truth. i actually like debating issues and hearing ideas different from mine.
maybe next time you could formulate a more coherent response without all the implicit insults. your tone does public discourse a great disservice. dont get so upset when somebody doesnt think just like you. it has happened before and it will happen again. i will refrain from insulting you since it does nothing to advance my arguments. i have more important things to get upset about anyway. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB 2.0.11 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Igloo Theme Version 1.0 :: Created By: Andrew Charron
|