synthetikal.com Forum Index


electrochem reduction of 1-nitroalkenes to amine Success! :)
Goto page 1, 2, 3, Next
Post new topic   Reply to topic    synthetikal.com Forum Index -> Phenethylamines
Author Message
Bumblebee

Joined: 26 Mar 2005
Posts: 44
1718.58 Points

Fri Apr 15, 2005 8:36 pm
Reply with quote

EDIT: SWIM did it with success last night: read it at the new post now at the bottom

Somebee remembered what it read on rhodiumīs a time ago. This bee read similar things in Festerīs Purple Book...
But this poor Bee, has no idea,
what will it have to use, so that it does not lose??? Laughing

Quote:
Experimental

Electrolysis: Divided standard beaker-type cell (150 ml), cathode = Hg pool (19.5 cm2) or graphite P 127 (9 cm2, Sigri), anode = Pt foil (2 cm2, ref. electrode = SCE, Luggin cappilary, diaphragm = glass frit (G4), current source = Wenking HP 88 (Bank Electronic).
General procedure for the reduction of 1-nitroalkenes to oximes

The cathodic compartement of the cell was charged with 30 ml of 0.1M sulfuric acid in IPA/water (3:2, v/v), subsequently by 3 mmol of substrate. Then the anodic chamber was filled with 8 ml of supporting electrolyte and introduced into the catholyte properly in order to minimize the space between the electrodes. With stirring and cooling (10-15°C) controlled potential electrolysis was carried out at -0.25 to -0.55 V (SCE), depending on the substrate (for the graphite cathode the potentials were about 400 mA more cathodic). After 4.0-4.2 F*mol-1 had been consumed (i < 10 mA) the catholyte was treated with 10 mmol of hydroxylammonium chloride in 25 ml of water and with sat'd NaHCO3 until pH was approx. 5. After 1 h of stirring, 100 ml of water was added and the solution extracted with 3 portions of ether. The combined org. phases were washed with brine and water, dried (MgSO4) and concentrated to afford essentially pure oximes. Final chromatographic purification (petr.ether/ether 4:1 to 2:1) afforded the oximes in the following yields:

* Phenylacetaldehyde oxime, 85%
* (4-chlorophenyl)acetaldehyde oxime, 85% (graphite cathode 76%)
* Phenylacetone oxime, 91% (graphite cathode 85%)
* 1-Phenyl-2-butanone oxime, 92%
* 4-Methoxyphenylacetone oxime, 91% [contains 4% 1-isopropyloxy-1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-acetone oxime as an impurity]

General procedure for the reduction of the 1-nitroalkenes to the amines

The cathodic compartement was charged with 70 ml of 0.3M sulfuric acid in IPA/water (2:1, v/v), subsequently by 6 mmol of the 1-nitro olefin. After introducing the anodic chamber filled with 20 ml of supporting electrolyte, controlled potential electrolysis (-1.1 to -1.3 V) was performed at 10-15°C with stirring. After 7 to 8 F*mol-1 gas evolution increased, and the reduction was terminated. the acidic catholyte was partially evaporated at reduced pressure and the residue extracted twice with ether. To the remaining aqueous phase 2M NaOH was added (pH 13) and the resulting emulsion was extracted with five portions of ether; the combined extracts were dried (MgSO4) and concentrated to afford the amines:

* 2-Phenethylamine, 66%
* Amphetamine, 60%
* 4-Chloro-β-phenethylamine, 60-69%
* 1-Amino-2-(3-cyclohexen-1-yl)ethane, 60-69%



In Festers Book the Process was done slightly different:

He refers to US Patent 1,879,003.
a divided electrolysis cell was made by use of a beaker of appropriate size. in this was a porcellain cell divider made out of an old porcelain beaker or vial with glaze removed by sandblasting or sanding.
in the cathode-part of this cell was filled a mixture of 2 parts ethanol 1 part acetic acid and 1 part sulfuric acid as the catholyte.
the anode part (the ceramic beaker) was filldes with 5% sulfuric acid.
the cathode should be made of lead or coppel and the anode should be made of graphite platinized mesh or lead.
he uses 0,2 A /cmē surface of the cathode... in his example:
3000ml beaker equipped with a 12x6cm cathode= 72cmē cathode surface
72cmēx0,2A=14,4 ampere current flow.
he dissolves 164g P2nP in the catolyte and put a stirrer to it.
the current was passed through the solution for 16 to 30 hours.
than the EtOH is removed by distillation together with some ethylacetate that was formed during the reaction.
the residue was made strongly basic (Ph13) and extracted with toluene.
distilled off the toluene than vacuum distilled the amphetamine.
Yield: around 70ml freebase

what should the power supply be able to do? At wich voltage the reduction is done?
I think a copper-cathode and and a graphite-anode will do their jobs....
is it worth a try??


Last edited by Bumblebee on Fri May 06, 2005 9:09 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Bumblebee

Joined: 26 Mar 2005
Posts: 44
1718.58 Points

Sat Apr 16, 2005 9:59 am
Reply with quote

nobody who has experience with it? is it worthwhile... is it not?
what kind of power source?
I thought it is a good way around Hg-Salts and the contamination Problem.

I had one additional thought...
when iīm distilling off the ethanol along with the ethylacetate, would it not be possible to distill off the remaining acid (H2SO4, Acetic) as well?? so a smaller amount of NaOH would be needed to basify reaction mix, and the whole thing would become more easy to handle...
I am an absolute newbee with not to many options to express what i mean with my traces of english Embarassed

BB
Back to top
nubee
Master Archiver
Joined: 18 Feb 2005
Posts: 215
Location: homeless
18648.26 Points

Sat Apr 16, 2005 4:42 pm
Reply with quote

can you remeber or find out the name of the book ?? as i feel it maybe available for download...

and yes, i too feel a certain "pull" towards the exploration of electrochemistry... Laughing
Back to top
Bumblebee

Joined: 26 Mar 2005
Posts: 44
1718.58 Points

Sat Apr 16, 2005 10:13 pm
Reply with quote

Sorry, i talked about Uncle Festers purple book... Embarassed
i meant SOMM (Secrets of methedrine manufacture, sixth edition) by Uncle Fester.
its available for download and to buy.
Back to top
MargaretThatcher

Joined: 16 Feb 2005
Posts: 142
4420.96 Points

Sun Apr 17, 2005 5:43 am
Reply with quote

I'm a bit sceptical of these Fester electrochemical synthesese. Maybe they work. I don't know. There's that one with the palladium coin and a sheep gut condom. Sounds a bit dodgy to me.

You'll notice that the patent describes a controlled voltage reaction. Depending on the exact conditions, an incorrect voltage will either not work, encourage side reactions or over oxidise/reduce. When you have the thing working according to the patent, it is probably possible to simplify matters and create an exact recipe that works specifying current density applied for a certain time period.

There are lots of instructions for diy reference electrodes out there and it isn't too difficult to make your own voltage controlled source. You could even do it manually first time.
Back to top
Bumblebee

Joined: 26 Mar 2005
Posts: 44
1718.58 Points

Sun Apr 17, 2005 9:14 pm
Reply with quote

I were a bit sceptical too... thats whay i asked.
But i think it would be no problem to try and give the made experiences to you....

I also donīt trust in everything what i read in "Secrets of Propane, 2-Amino N-Methyl 1-Phenyl manufacture" because some recipes were not tried by the author himself, and are theory or journal articles. But since i know that Fester is originally working as electroplater (respective in that industry), so i trust a bit more in his electrochemical recipes...

The calculation by Fester was made as follows:
Example:
1mol of P2nP
done in a 2500-3000ml Beaker
Quote:

A reasonable size cathode in this case would measure at least 12cm by 6 cm for a face area of 72cmē. 200 milliamps (0.2 amp) per square centimeter of face gives a required current flow of 14,4 amps, shown on the current meter.
the current meter is wired in on the line serving the anode...
Fairly heavy wiring would be needed to Carry that much current....
The reduction of 1-phenyl-2-nitropropene to 1-Phenyl 2-Aminopropane is an 8-electron reduction. So the theoretical amount of current needed to do the reduction is 8 faraday per mole of the nitroalkene in solution in the catholyte.
One faraday is 96500 coulombs, and a coulomb equals an amp-second. At 14.4 amps one farady passes into solution in 6700sec. this is 1,86 hours. Eight faradays flow in just under 15 hours. The process isnīt 100% effecient so at least 12 to 16 faradays will be needed to do the reduction to completion. This will take 24 to 30 hours...

He describes that a grester electrode surface area will allow more current to pass.
More current decreases the reaction time proportional.
after Reaction Alcoholic contents of the catholyte are distilled off, residue was made basic and extracted with nonpolar.
nonpolar/Propane, 2-Amino 1-Phenyl freebase mixture is distilled @ 2-10mm Hg.
then x-talized with HCl (i would suggest using H2SO4 in alcoholic solution with excess freebase (Ph8), and you will get snowwhite Propane, 2-Amino 1-Phenyl-sulfate with nice smell that doesnīt hurt to the nose)...

EDIT: One imprtant Idea. Fester used a little "Frosty the snowman" figure with paint and glaze removed....
@ first the anolyte so as the catholyte are bozh very good counductants. the only thing that reduces current flow is the ceramic cell divider.
since its only purpose is to let current pass, and hold the Propane, 2-Amino 1-Phenyl away from the anode, it will be the best way to reduce thickness of the cell dividers walls....
then with a laboratory power supply, let pass 1-2V with 14-15 A trough the solution. the lower the voltage the more easy are 15 Amps to reach. The only thing that makes a need for higher voltage is the celldivider that holds back electrons.
That means i will have to trim the voltage to 1,5V and the current limiter is set to 15 A and with the amperemeter is controlled that enough current passes by, and if not the cell walls were made thinner...
Back to top
MargaretThatcher

Joined: 16 Feb 2005
Posts: 142
4420.96 Points

Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:42 am
Reply with quote

If you make or procure an SCE reference electrode, your chances of success will be higher. Thus you have 3 electrodes, the working electrode, the counter electrode and the reference electrode. The voltage is applied between the working and counter electrodes; the reference electrode is used only for measurement of potential difference with the working electrode.

http://www.bioanalytical.com/products/ec/faqele.html

In the patent, they will have used a potentiostat to control the potential difference, but you could do it manually.
Back to top
Bumblebee

Joined: 26 Mar 2005
Posts: 44
1718.58 Points

Fri May 06, 2005 9:57 pm
Reply with quote

Very Happy Laughing Smile Surprised Very Happy
Yeah! Right! Because SWIM has the right do do this legally we did it last night. So i got finally rid of that nasty P2NP i found a time ago.... Wink Rolling Eyes

I am a simple mind, so i let that thing with the reference-electrode sit aside because it would get too much complicated for me and my abilitys.

first i searched for a good cell divider... the glassing of a porcellain beaker was grinded off with a dremel and used in an attempt just with plain water and some H2SO4 to make it more conductive. the was only 100mA going through the solution... Crying or Very sad ...fucked it up...

Then i did think about the sheeps condom.... didnīt find it anywhere... Sad

then i found out that Cellophane is good for using it as the cell divider, but i lacks of stability. The bags i formed got destroyed in the worm solution, but current passes by very good.

At least i found an little tiny terracotta flower pot without glaze or anithing. This was just perfect it lets through 3-5A with my PC-Powersupply i used.

OK we set it up as follows:
A beaker 1000ml was filled with 300ml catholyte made out of 2 parts EtOH, 1part H2SO4, and one part Acetic Acid (we did use GAA because we had nothing else) it has got the smell of ethylacetate instantly after mixing...
in the catolyte the flower pot (diam:4cm) was placed, and filled with dil. 5% H2SO4.
The P2NP (15g) was stirred into the catholyte which got yelloish couloured.
in the Catholyte was placed the Cathode made out of copper (50mm x 60mm t=3mm) and in the anolyte a piece of graphite (ca 2x2cm and 10cm long).
the Beaker was placed in a water bath on the magstirrer, and equipped with a stirbar.
the electrodes were connected to the 12V output of a PC-powersupply with an amperemeter in line.
the power was switched on an a lot of Hydrogen formed in the catholyte at the cathode. He let it run for 12 Hours @3-4,5A. Anolyte was filled up 2 times with H2O because of the evaporation.
A lot of heat was produced but external cooling with a water bath did it hold in a 40°C area...
after the 12 hours the yellow P2NP colour and the smell was gone, and the catholyte seemed whithe to light light yellow.
the cathode was in good condition but the anode was now just 5mm in diameter where it came in touch with the anolyte,Shocked .

the formed ethylacetate was destilled out of the solution and we stopped at a temperature of 110°C in the distilling flask (we are both no destilling experts and i hate distillations because make everytime something false and i am not patient enough...) but i think we didnīt became all the etylacetate out of solution.

the residue (about 200ml) was chilled, and made basic with NaOH, and Voila: strong smell of 1phenyl2aminopropane Very Happy Shocked Very Happy.
a brown oil floats to the top (seemed to be ca 6ml),
the water layer was still yellowish and Ph around 4 so we added some more NaOH-solution and suddenly there were clouds in the water layer and the coulour turned to blue-grey (????), the water was strongly basic to ph-paper, so i stpped adding more NaOH.
200ml toluene was added, and the freebase extracted (there was a lot of bown/greyish mess in the water layer that formed an emulsion as we tried to separate.
the first pure light yellowish toluene layer was collected and a second extraction with toluene was done again... we tried to destroy the foamy emulsion between the layers with some IPA but then a big crystalline mass appeared at the bottom:oops: (what is this???)

toluene was poured off and put to the first extraction we done.
the toluene was washed 3 times with H2O and set aside. It appears as a yellow liquid and holds still a lot of freebase i think, a piece of paper soaked in the toluene and dried at the air smelled like good product Wink Laughing

i donīt know if he should try to crystallize it now or after a distillation (you know: no eperts... blah ) since the half of the product will sick to the walls of the dilstilling setup...
i think we ry to dry the Toluene and crystallize once and the recrystallize from___?? ...

so long
BB
Back to top
thenewrunne
Chemically Balanced
Joined: 26 Mar 2005
Posts: 45
914.96 Points

Sat May 07, 2005 1:39 am
Reply with quote

bumblebee! That's just awesome. I was looking for "real" experimental information on the electo-method.

Will you be doing more trials of this? Would you mind putting together a more formal report about it so we have less of a problem following the path you took?
Back to top
Bumblebee

Joined: 26 Mar 2005
Posts: 44
1718.58 Points

Sat May 07, 2005 3:23 am
Reply with quote

i will first have to figure out what the extraction problems are, otherwise i canīt tell for sure what is better or not in the reaction when the product get lost while extracting... Smile
for sure we try again maybe scaled up a bit.


@thenewrune: what do you mean with a mor formal report? If you mean my english... its not really easy for me to express what i mean and have seen because i have anothe native language. wich part couldnīt you follow. Smile
this was meant as a raw writeup of the experiment. To s how that and how it works.
If i forgot anything... ask Wink

we will try to do this at a lower voltage next time using the 5V 15A Output from the Computer-Power Supply...

the fine thing is that there is nothing in this reaction that can be put on a "watched list". neither the acetic acid nor the sulfuric.... and ethanol and power from your power supply cannot be forbidden.... Very Happy
Back to top
MargaretThatcher

Joined: 16 Feb 2005
Posts: 142
4420.96 Points

Sat May 07, 2005 4:27 am
Reply with quote

Superb results. Let us know if this gets right through to the finished product and an idea of yield.

Also, depending on the electrode geometry, you have a cathode area of around 30 cm2, giving a current density of around 100 mA/cm2 (half the patent). Be interesting to see how low a current you can go and still get a product. If you draw a voltage/current graph, you might be able to see where reduction kicks in. If you have a cathode with a high enough hydrogen over-potential, you can reduce without getting any hydrogen evolution. Copper may be high enough, I don't know.

Nice one. Smile
Back to top
Bumblebee

Joined: 26 Mar 2005
Posts: 44
1718.58 Points

Sat May 07, 2005 6:27 am
Reply with quote

should we make the sulphate ore the HCl salt out of it? I think we try making the sulfate with dil. H2SO4 in IPA... dripping it in a nd look what comes out, right?
Back to top
tom-a-rom-rinbow

Joined: 17 Apr 2005
Posts: 15
628.86 Points

Sat May 07, 2005 12:08 pm
Reply with quote

very exciting! as fun as the amalgam reactions are i too think the electroreductions deserve more attention. i wonder if these can be scaled more effectively, given that you can directly control the reaction rate and that there are no stirring problems due to sludge... Twisted Evil

i have no experience with amph, but think it can be crystallized directly from toluene by titration with dilute h2so4. i would dry the toluene over MgSO4 or similar first. sometimes adding a 5-10% portion of diethyl ether before cooling will help crystallization.

otherwise hcl gas is easy to generate by addition of hcl to conc h2so4 (be sure to stir or shake after every 1-2ml or these two will form separate layers). but Propane, 2-Amino 1-Phenyl .hcl is reported to be very hydroscopic and hard to crystallize.
Back to top
thenewrunne
Chemically Balanced
Joined: 26 Mar 2005
Posts: 45
914.96 Points

Sat May 07, 2005 7:21 pm
Reply with quote

Quote:
@thenewrune: what do you mean with a mor formal report? If you mean my english... its not really easy for me to express what i mean and have seen because i have anothe native language. wich part couldnīt you follow. Smile
this was meant as a raw writeup of the experiment. To s how that and how it works.
If i forgot anything... ask Wink


No, the english if fine. More of just setting it up in a standard "Materials" "Procedures" "Results" sections like on Rhodium. I followed everything you read.

Your experiments, if properly documented, could be the first of the "new" Electroreductive reactions. From what I've read on here the electroreductions are not done before they are hard to duplicate. You have figured it out, we need you to share the knowledge and have others duplicate it so we can depend on the reaction.

As raw chemicals get harder and harder to find, doesn't it make sense to start using reactions that use fewer chemicals? If we put the same about of effort into perfecting this reaction as we did on Al/Hg reactions (as an example), we could enable other SyntheitkalBees (known as SBees Smile) to increase their chances of success.
Back to top
Bumblebee

Joined: 26 Mar 2005
Posts: 44
1718.58 Points

Sun May 08, 2005 4:39 am
Reply with quote

ok. Very Happy
i will first determine how much yield we got from the first. monday i can buy some drying agents, to get everything waterfree, and i report back how many sulfate it yielded. if I find a way to make it free of H2O with the equipment we already have i do it earlier.

iīm too lazy to distill it first because of the small scale, and since no Hg or other Poisons were used i skip it.
i hope all the pollution will stay in the toluene... i try to vacuumfilter it wash with icecold ipa in the buchner funnel and we will see if it looks white enough. when not, i will recrystallize....

-wich solvent to rextallize Amph-sulfate??

-any suggestions to determine purity? i fear that it is possible that the H2SO4 will form some other salts with reaction byproducts or acetic acid comounds?!? Confused
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    synthetikal.com Forum Index -> Phenethylamines All times are GMT + 5.5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, Next
Page 1 of 3

 



Powered by phpBB 2.0.11 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Igloo Theme Version 1.0 :: Created By: Andrew Charron