synthetikal.com Forum Index


electrochem reduction of 1-nitroalkenes to amine Success! :)
Goto page Previous1, 2, 3
Post new topic   Reply to topic    synthetikal.com Forum Index -> Phenethylamines
Author Message
Lego

Joined: 15 Apr 2005
Posts: 55
2506.80 Points

Sat Jul 02, 2005 8:19 pm
Reply with quote

icecool wrote:
Shouldn't chemicals that are being dried with MgSO4 be dried for at least 12 hours?


If a bee wants to dry a solvent after an extraction it is enough to stirr it for some minutes with the drying agent. The drying agent, MgSO4 or Na2 SO4 should bee added as long it sticks together. If you stirr the solution, then stop stirring it and it 'snows' it is OK:

Btw: great work, that's very interesting, electro chemistry offers so many possibilities.

PS: Bumblebee: your yield is about: 37,0%
Back to top
loki
guinea pig
Joined: 09 Mar 2005
Posts: 391
14167.88 Points

Sun Jul 03, 2005 4:16 am
Reply with quote

it would be good to get a series of TLC plates done taken from the tank at some period through the reaction to establish exactly how many coulombs are required to do the reaction. then once the approximate point is established run it at normal amps up until the point of the plate just before it's done and then wind the amps back to like 1/4 of the normal and do a set of plates, try and establish the numbers within a very narrow margin. i'm not sure what method of visualising the plates would be most appropriate.

i'm quite fond of electrolytic chem cos of the fact that it doesn't use many chemicals, but the thing of getting the wattage right makes it tricky.
Back to top
Vitus
Psychoscientist
Joined: 19 Apr 2005
Posts: 72
Location: Dunwich
2608.18 Points

Sun Jul 03, 2005 6:03 am
Reply with quote

Quote:

next time i will think about using less Voltage (use just the 5V out from PC Supply).
while the 12V out from those Pwrsupplys will give you up to 5 A the 5volt output serves you with up to 15 A.


Are you still around bumblebee? Anymore feedback you can give us?

Why is it that with the 3 different PC power supplies I've tried the 12V line gives up to 5-6A while the 5V line gives about 2A under the same conditions?
The 3.3V line on the newer models can deliver up to 30A and more, yet only 1A at most is delivered under these conditions. What am I missing here? My knowledge of electricity is still a bit lacking Embarassed

Quote:
it would be good to get a series of TLC plates done taken from the tank at some period through the reaction to establish exactly how many coulombs are required to do the reaction.


You can calculate the theoretical amount (complete reduction requires 6 faradays) but the actual amount needed depends mainly on the design of your cell. Doing the reduction with the PC power supply will always result in quite some loss of atomic hydrogen due to H2 evolution, especially at the 12V line, this can be optimalized only by using a decent adjustable lab power supply and reference electrode, as was described by lady Thatcher earlier in this thread.

Stirring the catholyte speeds up the process a lot of course. I don't think one even needs TLC, as the progress of the reaction can be followed visually. One starts with a suspension of nitroalkene in alcohol/AcOH/mineral acid. One can see the nitroalkene gradually going into solution over time, and the colour of the solution fades*. At this point you know that you are at the oxime stage, in the half of the process. Simply let it run for at least the same time it took for reducing nitroalkene -> oxime, and the reduction is completed. Also you should notice increased H2 evolution at the end of the process when you use the lab power supply+reference electrode, as hydroxylamine present from some decomposition of the oxime will lower the overvoltage.

* : One exception here is 2,5-dimethoxyphenyl-2-nitroethene which will form a red polymeric substance under the usual reaction conditions. Still it goes gradually in solution of course, but a different approach is needed to avoid as much as possible the formation of this red tar.


Fact is that under Bumblebees conditions -using a copper, lead or lead amalgam cathode with a current density ranging from about 50-200 mA/cm2- one will always obtain some product, but the yields stay on the lower side. More can be done to optimize this procedure...



So why aren't you working on it? Very Happy
Back to top
Vitus
Psychoscientist
Joined: 19 Apr 2005
Posts: 72
Location: Dunwich
2608.18 Points

Wed Jul 13, 2005 2:30 pm
Reply with quote

This was emailed to me recently. I hope the sender doesn't mind me posting it here.


Quote:


# To: vitus@hotmail.com
# Subject: Electrochemical reduction
# From: georgewbush@aol.com
# Date: Thu, 15 May 2005 10:19:28 -0700
# Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
# Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii

Dear Sir,


A couple of days ago I was informed by the Federal Bureau of Thought Investigation (FBTI) that you were pondering on the possibility of electrochemical reduction of nitroalkenes in a divided cell, using commonly available materials such as ceramics and a PC power supply. This concept intrigued me so I decided to perform a small experiment. The PC-AT power supply from daddy's old 80286 was used as the current source.


anolyte was 8% H2SO4
catholyte consisted of 30 ml IPA, 30 ml 80% AcOH, 10 ml 29% HCl and 10 ml conc. NH4OAc solution.

(The NH4OAc can probably be left out, it was added as an attempt to improve conductivity)

In the flowerpot was suspended 4 g of a substituted phenyl-2-nitropropene, and magnetic stirring was started. Using the 12 V line of the PC power supply the current delivered was 3.5 A (makes current density around 175 mA/cm2).

Temperature control was not easy, but the catholyte could be kept relatively stable around 40°C using the cooling spiral (made from plastic tubing). The cooling bath for the anolyte had to be refreshed with cold water from time to time. A running water bath should work much more efficiently.

Mol wt. MDP2NP = 208 g/mol and there are 6 moles of electrons needed for complete reduction to the amine. 1 F = 96500 coloumbs; 6 * 96500 = 579000 A.s = 160.84 A.h
4 g MDP2NP = 0.02 mol so 3.22 A.h are needed in theory.

With 3.5 A current passing through the reaction mixture, based on the article of Slotta and Szyska (10) one would need about 2.5-3 hours to reduce it completely to the amine.

At the 1 hour point all nitroalkene in suspension was gone and a light-yellow solution was obtained. An hour later the solution was clear. At this point the current had dropped to 1.5 A, and there was considerable corrosion noted at the anode. There was also an increase in hydrogen evolution noted.

At the 5 hour point the current had dropped to 1 A, and the process was terminated.

After standard A/B workup there was obtained 1.7g of amine.HCl, which corresponds to a yield of about 50%.

Now I know that the current drop was caused mainly by the excessive corrosion of the anode. I've read on a well-known internet bulletin board that addition of some gelatine to the anolyte helps minimize corrosion ( https://sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=533 ). A small experiment using 1% gelatine added to the anolyte consisting of an 8% sulphuric acid solution showed that this helped considerably, and a constant current of 4-5 A could be maintained for several hours. Care must be taken that a lot of frothing occured in the anolyte this way.


I hope this was in any way helpful to you.

Jesus saves!

yours,

W."





Setup of a cell using a flowerpot: https://sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=4145


Last edited by Vitus on Tue Jul 19, 2005 8:46 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
bio
Working Bee
Joined: 13 Feb 2005
Posts: 236
9718.84 Points

Wed Jul 13, 2005 3:12 pm
Reply with quote

..........Why is it that with the 3 different PC power supplies I've tried the 12V line gives up to 5-6A while the 5V line gives about 2A under the same conditions?
The 3.3V line on the newer models can deliver up to 30A and more, yet only 1A at most is delivered under these conditions. What am I missing here? My knowledge of electricity is still a bit lacking Embarassed .....................

V=IR means Volts = Current X Resistance therefore

12V/6A=2 Ohms ........This is the cell resistance

5V/2 Ohms = 2.5A.........And so on and so forth

An easy way to adjust the current, lacking proper equipment, is to adjust the electrodes spacing. Farther apart more resistance and heating losses so overheating can also be controlled to some extent this way as well.

Since current efficiency is never 100%, especially in crude setups, more than the calculated Faradays must be passed, as much as 150% in many cases.

An LM317 voltage regulator can be made into a constant current regulator by mearly adding a variable resistance on the output and connecting the sense line downstream. These regulators have only 3 leads and a current regulator can be made with only one (1) external part (the potentiometer 25 OHM 5 watt) A 5A LM317 can be had for about $5-9.
Back to top
Vitus
Psychoscientist
Joined: 19 Apr 2005
Posts: 72
Location: Dunwich
2608.18 Points

Thu Jul 14, 2005 2:22 am
Reply with quote

In the previous post I have been confusing overall cell voltage with electrode potential measured to the reference electrode. Thanks for pointing out that the delivered current depends on the cell resistance.

In the experiment the electrodes were placed as close to each other as possible, but overheating is still a main issue when the flowerpot is used.

Maybe simple refrigeration technology a la https://www.wetdreams.ws/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=2059 could be used for cooling especially in case of larger scale reductions?
Or just performing it in a freezer? Smile


In the Slotta and Szyszka J.Prakt.Chem article (https://www.synthetikal.com/Rhodiums_pdfs/chemistry/electromesc.txt) 3.5 h at 6 A are theoretically needed to achieve complete reduction. The authors let it run for 12 h, which accounts for a current efficiency of 342%.
Back to top
bio
Working Bee
Joined: 13 Feb 2005
Posts: 236
9718.84 Points

Thu Jul 14, 2005 7:22 am
Reply with quote

Try using a membrane made from an auto battery bag. They are polypropylene (the gray ones) allow closer spacing and work quite well. The maintenance free higher quality ones have the best bags.

.......The authors let it run for 12 h, which accounts for a current efficiency of 342%...

That would be more like 29% but you get the idea. Losses with clay pots are HUGE so this would not be surprising.

hose PP wet wipes for glass would probably work as a membrane if doubled up and ironed. I use the bags cut up and glued to a frame for easy cleaning. Hey you could buy some Nafion! Just don't forget to send me a piece.
Back to top
Vitus
Psychoscientist
Joined: 19 Apr 2005
Posts: 72
Location: Dunwich
2608.18 Points

Thu Jul 14, 2005 8:11 am
Reply with quote

Argh I'm getting mathematically dyslexic Smile


mmm how do the car battery PP bags differ from regular PP bags or sheet? I'll try to locate a car battery soon and give it a try.

Have also been thinking about glass fibers or fritted glass.

I can't immediately imagine what "hose PP wet wipes for glass" are.


Quote:
Hey you could buy some Nafion! Just don't forget to send me a piece.


Sure. When I win the lottery. Promised! Wink
Back to top
bio
Working Bee
Joined: 13 Feb 2005
Posts: 236
9718.84 Points

Thu Jul 14, 2005 11:03 am
Reply with quote

The plastic needs to be semipermeable not just a fine filter! The battery ones are maybe 20mils thick and if filled with water, for example, it just slowly seeps out if held in the air. Plastic bags don't leak.

A super fine frit is still too coarse yet could work for some things. Good luck cleaning it though. Membranes tend to get gunked up and the bags are easy to clean with a toothbrush. Clay pots went out with the dinosaurs but ceramic semipermeable plates are available, maybe try JMatthey (Alpha/Aesar)

Those polypropylene glass wipes have about half the area fused and by using several together and ironing the porosity can be adjusted. Higher heat shrinks and partially fuses the fabric. I make them for clean in place filters on an electrolytic lead acetate production tank.
Back to top
Vitus
Psychoscientist
Joined: 19 Apr 2005
Posts: 72
Location: Dunwich
2608.18 Points

Thu Jul 14, 2005 10:43 pm
Reply with quote

So the divider had to be semipermeable to let through ions but not molecules, except water.

Then Fester's condoms must be as thrustworthy as his books I guess Smile
Back to top
The_Dude

Joined: 07 May 2005
Posts: 27
1009.74 Points

Sat Jul 16, 2005 6:03 am
Reply with quote

Hope this helps.

Properties for Polypropylene Film

Permeability to Carbon Dioxide @25C x10-13 cm3. cm cm-2 s-1 Pa-1 6 @ 30C
Permeability to Hydrogen @25C x10-13 cm3. cm cm-2 s-1 Pa-1 30
Permeability to Nitrogen @25C x10-13 cm3. cm cm-2 s-1 Pa-1 0.3
Permeability to Oxygen @25C x10-13 cm3. cm cm-2 s-1 Pa-1 1.7 @ 30C
Permeability to Water @25C x10-13 cm3. cm cm-2 s-1 Pa-1 16
Permeability to Water @38C x10-13 cm3. cm cm-2 s-1 Pa-1 70

http://www.msu.edu/~aurasraf/permeability.htm

http://www.devicelink.com/mpb/archive/98/09/005.html

http://www.freepatentsonline.com/4237526.html

Medical supply houses might be a good place to look at.

http://www.chemplex.com/Section-1/Microporous-Polypropylene-Film.html

BTW, great work.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    synthetikal.com Forum Index -> Phenethylamines All times are GMT + 5.5 Hours
Goto page Previous1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3

 



Powered by phpBB 2.0.11 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Igloo Theme Version 1.0 :: Created By: Andrew Charron