Poll

What Instrument would you like?

Raman Spectrometer
4 (18.2%)
FT-IR Spectrometer
9 (40.9%)
FT-UV/NIR Spectrometer
7 (31.8%)
Laser Meter (nm/mW)
1 (4.5%)
Lab Quality Laser
1 (4.5%)

Total Members Voted: 12

Author Topic: Who would be interested in low-cost Instrumentation?  (Read 189 times)

no1uno

  • Global Moderator
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 681
Who would be interested in low-cost Instrumentation?
« on: December 21, 2010, 10:12:40 AM »
Say someone, somewhere was looking at making available some pretty sick Instrumentation, that would allow anyone to work out what is in their flask, what would you want? Would you want Gas Chromatography with a Plasma, Atomic Emission Spectrometer? Would you want to be able to hook up a Mass Spectrometer to that? Would you want FT-IR? What about UV-NIR?

Tell the gods what you would like and why... Let them know what you would like in a nice, bench-top instrument that required fuck all maintenance... Maybe you'd like to take the IR Spectrum but of the gas phase of a molecule (gets rid of a whole lot of fucking preparation)...

Let's just say someone, somewhere is using their evil to perpetrate a greater evil, working out a way so that amateur chemists and A-grade cooks might learn more and be able to make some divinely inspired offerings...

BTW Tetramethylammonium Hydroxide is available by the bloody 200L drum if you are using it to etch silicon dioxide/silicon crystal ;)
"...     "A little learning is a dang'rous thing;
    Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring:
    There shallow draughts intoxicate the brain,
    And drinking largely sobers us again.
..."

micro

  • Pupae
  • **
  • Posts: 70
Re: Who would be interested in low-cost Instrumentation?
« Reply #1 on: December 23, 2010, 10:58:28 PM »
I'm not sure which one I would like the most.
But if you need any help with the electronics I'm glad to help.

Wizard X

  • Lord of the Realms
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,224
Re: Who would be interested in low-cost Instrumentation?
« Reply #2 on: December 23, 2010, 11:54:36 PM »
When the Hive was online, I was testing and typing a write-up on a home-made Gas Chromatography instrument with chemical database for members there. After the Hive went offline I never finished the testing and write-up. I still have it and maybe post it?

Look at the attachment Home-made Detection Device for a Mixture of Ethanol and Acetone.

Gas Chromatography + Mass Spectrometer.
« Last Edit: December 24, 2010, 03:35:21 AM by Wizard X »
Albert Einstein - "Great ideas often receive violent opposition from mediocre minds."

Vesp

  • Administrator
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,130
Re: Who would be interested in low-cost Instrumentation?
« Reply #3 on: December 24, 2010, 12:35:26 AM »
What sort of price tags are we talking here for each one? 100 or 1000 dollars?

I am very very interested in all of them or any of them and would be interested in making or building one when the time and money permits.

This would be very good for many people, not just us...
I don't know the benefits or significant differences between all of the spectrometers...

Bitcoin address: 1FVrHdXJBr6Z9uhtiQKy4g7c7yHtGKjyLy

no1uno

  • Global Moderator
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 681
Re: Who would be interested in low-cost Instrumentation?
« Reply #4 on: December 24, 2010, 10:55:51 AM »
Between $300 & $1,000, depending upon the number of gratings, the number of sensors, etc. FT-IR actually looks good from a price point of view... So does Raman & Laser Meters, UV-NIR, looks like a bitch, 3 gratings, 3 sensors, = expensive. I'm looking into what "test" materials could be sent with each one, maybe dialkoxytetrahydrofuran?
"...     "A little learning is a dang'rous thing;
    Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring:
    There shallow draughts intoxicate the brain,
    And drinking largely sobers us again.
..."

no1uno

  • Global Moderator
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 681
Re: Who would be interested in low-cost Instrumentation?
« Reply #5 on: December 24, 2010, 11:04:58 AM »
I'm not sure which one I would like the most.
But if you need any help with the electronics I'm glad to help.

Help with electronics? Yessir, that I do need, I'm going to have to build a microcontroller that can interface with a standard 5MP CMOS camera, then using a "Pushbroom" technique, even out the pixels in each column, then in a sweeping type action, push the lot down to a 1 pixel high single row - which will be image v intensity (Monotone = 0-255 measure of luminosity - however, that has to be dealt with by virtue of the fact that luminosity and perceived luminosity aren't the same thing, so some rows need to be multiplied by a constant to get to 100%, then they need to be adjusted for the passband of the filter(s). All this while turning lights on and off.

On top of that, building a non-trivial Program to deal with the streaming data (hopefully pre-broomed or the amount of data will be huge).

Wizard, I think GC is the best option for the home instruments, heat the cell to gasify the components, then using a gas cell we can run Atomic Emission, FT-IR, UV-NIR, and then Quadrupole Mass Spectroscopy - the microchannel plates simply increase the number of electrons running through small holes, the surge of electrons hits a conductive plate and is therefore detected - detection/time = the spectrum (did my head  in working that out). But with FT-IR, UV-NIR, GC-MS and AES, there really should be a whole lot of data to wade through.
"...     "A little learning is a dang'rous thing;
    Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring:
    There shallow draughts intoxicate the brain,
    And drinking largely sobers us again.
..."

Wizard X

  • Lord of the Realms
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,224
Re: Who would be interested in low-cost Instrumentation?
« Reply #6 on: December 25, 2010, 10:49:12 PM »
Albert Einstein - "Great ideas often receive violent opposition from mediocre minds."

akcom

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 430
Re: Who would be interested in low-cost Instrumentation?
« Reply #7 on: December 26, 2010, 07:21:20 PM »
I don't know what you need as far as programming, but I'd like to offer my services in that arena.  I'm competent in x86 assembly, proficient in python and java, and a master of C/C++/D.  I really haven't dealt much with image processing, but it doesnt sound too hard to work out.

Wizard X

  • Lord of the Realms
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,224
Re: Who would be interested in low-cost Instrumentation?
« Reply #8 on: December 26, 2010, 11:04:09 PM »
I don't know what you need as far as programming, but I'd like to offer my services in that arena.  I'm competent in x86 assembly, proficient in python and java, and a master of C/C++/D.  I really haven't dealt much with image processing, but it doesnt sound too hard to work out.

I have all the software covered. I'll upload it here or at http://wizardx.4shared.com the next couple of days.
Albert Einstein - "Great ideas often receive violent opposition from mediocre minds."

Wizard X

  • Lord of the Realms
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,224
Re: Who would be interested in low-cost Instrumentation?
« Reply #9 on: December 27, 2010, 11:52:08 PM »
I don't know what you need as far as programming, but I'd like to offer my services in that arena.  I'm competent in x86 assembly, proficient in python and java, and a master of C/C++/D.  I really haven't dealt much with image processing, but it doesnt sound too hard to work out.

I have all the software covered. I'll upload it here or at http://wizardx.4shared.com the next couple of days.

Uploaded here http://www.4shared.com/file/lSAN8uFi/Chromatograph_Apps.html

Quote
Look at ReadMe.txt in zip file.


The Gas Flow Calculator (FlowCalc) for capillary gas chromatography. (gccalc.exe)
Very useful tool for calculation of flow / pressure / linear velocity of carrier gas through capillary column at defined conditions.
The general kinetic equations were used for calculation of the flow conditions of gas in tube with friction. Physical constants was taken from the Physics Handbook by A.Kikoin.


Flow meter "GC Timer" (GCTIMER.EXE) - FREE Useful tool for old GC's with bubble flowmeters. Simple timer that calulates flow for specified volume between two time intervals.


Look at unichrom.hlp for info on UniChrom V4.7.9.609.exe & UniChrom DDK.exe

UniChrom system is constructive independent from signal source (e.g. chromatograph, optical or another type spectrometer) measuring system for acquisition, processing and storage of spectrometric information (DPS - data processing system) and includes itself three following functional modules: input signal converter or other signal source, data transmission media and personal computer containing service functions for visual representation, mathematical methods for data measuring, processing and storage.

PeakFit V4.11 - look at peakfit.pdf & Install.txt for info.
Albert Einstein - "Great ideas often receive violent opposition from mediocre minds."

no1uno

  • Global Moderator
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 681
Re: Who would be interested in low-cost Instrumentation?
« Reply #10 on: December 28, 2010, 10:39:58 AM »
C/C++/C# have massive image manipulation libraries online. The other option is Java, modifying Image J. I'm checking out the options, there are a wealth of them, I've also decompiled a Delphi application and actually have the full script of the decompiled version (it came open nicely, there cannot have been any obfuscation at all, if there is Delphi comes open as 1/2 unusable crud at the best of times).

Those are the programs I need, I'm also looking for someone who has experience mating Aptina/? CMOS Cameras, Monochrome 5MP, to either PIC/TI Launch Pad (@$4.50 a throw, the TI Launchpad looks fucking interesting), there is a shitload of code available for both, while the launchpad has some serious memory onboard if only we could access the larger chips that are built in...
"...     "A little learning is a dang'rous thing;
    Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring:
    There shallow draughts intoxicate the brain,
    And drinking largely sobers us again.
..."

no1uno

  • Global Moderator
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 681
Re: Who would be interested in low-cost Instrumentation?
« Reply #11 on: January 02, 2011, 03:11:31 AM »
I don't know what you need as far as programming, but I'd like to offer my services in that arena.  I'm competent in x86 assembly, proficient in python and java, and a master of C/C++/D.  I really haven't dealt much with image processing, but it doesnt sound too hard to work out.

The program will have to be able to utilize several spectral databases, which will be packaged with it on CD/DVD. The spectrometers will be connected via either ethernet or USB 2.0 to the laptop/PC (thus the program will have to be able to access streaming monochrome images, etc.). The program will be required to take the intensity values (0-255 ie. grayscale) and convert them, using known optical filter transmission data curves and also perceived intensity/Wavelength curves to correct the values to the theoretical 100% transmission across the various ranges.

The program will also need to utilize some simple noise reduction algorithms and "pushbrooming" (taking a square image several hundred/thousand pixels high and condensing it to a single row that is a representative, corrected value). The output will need to utilize this single pixel high column to graph the intensities of the collected light and/or the absorption as and where required. There is a need for a single GUI, that can control the multiplicity of spectrometers, returning results, potentially from several units, to enable the determination of the identity of the various substances. There is also the potential to use the single pixel image, increasing it to 10-20 pixels and placing it above the graph thereof. The program will also need to be able to perform a Fast-Fourier Transform on the streaming information with some units, and to provide representative image therefrom in addition to the graph of intensity v wavelength.

This is no small task, assistance is required, that said, assistance can and will be paid for provided it is of direct use. Suffice to say, anyone who wishes to avail themselves of instrumentation at some future point in time need only set up an account somewhere that is untraceable and a price can and will be worked out (of course, won't actually be me, no?)...*

Put quite frankly, the 2-MethoxyBenzyl-PEA's, the various Fentanyls and several other dreams are not something one should even attempt without adequate instrumentation. Real instruments are going to take real components and a fucking shitload of designing. They are not precisely something one will be building at home unassisted (unfortunately). I was hoping to be able to come up with a couple of at home methods, but they are somewhat involved. Personally, if the cost of instruments can be reduced enough (by purchasing components in bulk & keeping the profit margin down), it'll be easier for all concerned. I'm having to pay for a shitload of assistance in order to get the designs right, that money will have to be recouped of course, but it also tells me that these are a little too intricate to build in the basement. What I'm looking at is ~$500 (retail) for a Raman Spectrometer, about the same for UV-VIS-NIR and depending upon the fucking around with stepper motors, etc. it may be possible to get FT-IR/FT-NMR in the same sort of bracket (That isn't for some fucked unit on ebay that requires several grand to get operating).

I'm also looking quite hard at modifying the various Parr-Pressure Vessels (the sealed magnetic stirrer gland I could modify with the soon to be patented modified Halbach-Array) and other items of lab equipment (I'm thinking along the lines of flat-pack Hoods/Gloveboxes with re-usable pressure-swing-type inert gas/hydrogen generators). If I (or someone else) has to enter this market (and it is a bitch of a market to enter), I'm going to have to be prepared to diversify, then again, it looks like a nice opportunity to get some nice equipment (both for myself & others) that is otherwise risky as fuck to purchase, or simply unobtainable without a research group.

Funny, it actually looks like there may be a serious market for low-cost, Accurate/Quality Instruments - legitimate as all get fucking out too...

* To put it mildly, my friend (unit that he is), is quite happy to go to 1/2 - 1/3 the list price for certain customers, just something to remember. When his site is up, I'd be very fucking suprised if it were all that hard to find (I'd almost certainly expect to see it under discussion @SM for a start).
« Last Edit: January 02, 2011, 03:25:27 AM by no1uno »
"...     "A little learning is a dang'rous thing;
    Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring:
    There shallow draughts intoxicate the brain,
    And drinking largely sobers us again.
..."

no1uno

  • Global Moderator
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 681
Re: Who would be interested in low-cost Instrumentation?
« Reply #12 on: January 05, 2011, 09:25:02 AM »
Ok, further to the last discussion - I have actually decompiled the Delphi Software written by Prof. A Scheeline (Cellphone Spectrometer), if anyone is seriously interested in working something up that is capable of doing what we want, let me know & I'll send you the decompiled files (they've actually come apart pretty well - it scans nicely unlike some decompiled files)

I'd prefer either C#/F# (Fortran being renowned asthe fastest option generally for mathematical modeling). There are also several PDF's online about designing software to be used with high row-count sensors and pushbrooming (ie. using a couple of algorithms to find the statistically & relativistically weighted mean of the rows, giving essentially a single pixel high row of corrected information).

However, I would dearly love to utilize a combined GUI, both to process the information & check the results against various databases, but also to control each instrument via the USB/Ethernet ports. I'd actually like to have a unified GUI, which can be used for displaying the details of any/all instruments attached to the machine. Multispectral data (ie. from 2 or more instruments), greatly narrow down the possibilities and increase the probability of a direct match. With a single piece of software and super fast data acquisition for and from each instrument in the range, I honestly believe it would be best if such a viewpoint dominated design.

Also, please understand me. I originally wished to build a unit that everyone could then copy. As the complexity of the entire issue has become only too apparent, I've actually changed my mind. Quite simply, very few potential users will have the necessary skills, equipment, patience and knowledge to actually build, test, rebuild, retest, the instruments from scratch, and purchasing the components one at a time would mean that it cost them more (even barring fuckups) than simply purchasing a fully functional, pre-aligned unit with datasheets, spare parts/numbers and instruction booklets.

That means that my friend has had to establish a Company with their own money (at quite considerable risk) to build enough of these units to keep prices to a minimum (through wholesale prices from Suppliers/Manufacturer's & also economy of scale). So my friend actually intends to make some profit out of the whole concept. Given the volume of work involved, I personally do not think that that is unreasonable, nor do I think it is unreasonable for someone who assists the swarm and a Company, to expect something back. Unfortunately, the Company is strapped at present, it has money, but it needs to spend pretty much everything it has in order to purchase inventory, etc. If anyone wants something out of this on the flip-side, that should be fine - however, any such remuneration be it in cash or kind, will be based on a percentage of after-tax profit - ie. no sales = no money. However, it is unrealistic to expect people to do work for nothing, especially when their work is directly assisting a private company (regardless of the original concept that led to the Companies inception).

But I do need help, I require someone with the knowledge to help me prepare an .exe boot disk, complete with spectral libraries for multiple instruments, that will be shipped with each instrument. The user-interface needs to be able to communicate with the instruments, determining start/stop/ignition/etc. it also needs real-time streaming of data (and to recognise multiple instruments potentially piggy-backed on each other).
"...     "A little learning is a dang'rous thing;
    Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring:
    There shallow draughts intoxicate the brain,
    And drinking largely sobers us again.
..."

Baba_McKensey

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 109
Re: Who would be interested in low-cost Instrumentation?
« Reply #13 on: January 09, 2011, 05:01:56 PM »

no1uno

  • Global Moderator
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 681
Re: Who would be interested in low-cost Instrumentation?
« Reply #14 on: January 22, 2011, 12:59:44 PM »
Right, I've managed to work out that I can access FEMM 4.2 through Mathematica 7 (using MathLink) & using SketchUp Pro 7 I can draw the thing in sketchup (quite frankly the easiest CAD Drawer for mine, although it has its limits) & export as a .dxf file - which can be imported into Mathematica as well. I've also added the IMTEK & RADIA applications to Mathematica so far... Anyone got any ideas or helpful suggestions on how to go about converting the 2D to the 3D?

I've got a serious leg-up with the electronics and the software for this project, so the need for a 3D model is getting urgent (I'm at the point where I have to order the magnets & that is far from cheap). That said, if the shim-pulse routines can be made to work with the mild inhomogeneity in this design, this could be a major win.

Already ordered a lathe & mill, for use in preparing, milling & threading the various components (an iron band on the outside of the 3D model seems to help - it certainly does in FEMM & various articles).

Can anyone with the requisite skills (ie. with mathematica 7/mathFemm/Radia) please PM me, this is getting rather urgent.
"...     "A little learning is a dang'rous thing;
    Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring:
    There shallow draughts intoxicate the brain,
    And drinking largely sobers us again.
..."

Naphyrone

  • Pupae
  • **
  • Posts: 62
Re: Who would be interested in low-cost Instrumentation?
« Reply #15 on: January 23, 2011, 05:51:17 AM »
Z80 based chips are cheap and decently clocked these days, for ram you can use PSRAM also cheap, would give you lots of program space. More than likely there are some open source board designs. Just a suggestion as it might allow you to cut your costs down. Those pre-made boards are expensive. Also if you haven't go to the digikey website and put in for their free catalog. I have 2 of some older ones, they're bigger than the my local phone book. :)

no1uno

  • Global Moderator
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 681
Re: Who would be interested in low-cost Instrumentation?
« Reply #16 on: January 24, 2011, 11:55:57 AM »
Righto, I'm still modeling at present, I can get FEMM 4.2 to work via MathLink with Mathematica 7. Strangely enough, I can also get Mathematica 7 to Import["c:whatever.ans"] from FEMM 4.2, I'm just reading through the documentation (and there is no fucking end to it) on how to utilize the full matrix generated by FEMM in Mathematica (using Radia, IMTEK & MathFemm). Gonna be a long night

On the plus side, there is a torrent (follow the instructions CAREFULLY) which allows for the installation of SketchUp 7.0 Professional, that provides for wireframe drawing output in .dxf files, which can be imported to mathematica, which seriously solves some issues.
« Last Edit: January 24, 2011, 12:00:29 PM by no1uno »
"...     "A little learning is a dang'rous thing;
    Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring:
    There shallow draughts intoxicate the brain,
    And drinking largely sobers us again.
..."