Author Topic: Effect on yield in henry condensation of differing amines  (Read 1209 times)

pyramid

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 129
Re: Effect on yield in henry condensation of differing amines
« Reply #40 on: May 30, 2011, 11:43:27 PM »
If the TETA-tetraacetate works, can you please give an example, solvents used etc etc and state yield?
I am glad this is being tried.
What are the reaction conditions and which benzaldehyde is being used?


Tsathoggua

  • Autistic sociopath
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 662
Re: Effect on yield in henry condensation of differing amines
« Reply #41 on: May 31, 2011, 04:23:51 AM »
Can you not read? Tsathoggua's procedure thus far has been posted in its entirety, in quite considerable detail.

I cannot yet state hi's/it's yield, for the reaction has not yet been brought to its conclusion
Nomen mihi Legio est, quia multi sumus

I'm hyperbolic, hypergolic, viral, chiral. So motherfucking twisted my laevo is on the right side.

pyramid

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 129
Re: Effect on yield in henry condensation of differing amines
« Reply #42 on: May 31, 2011, 04:31:50 AM »
Well, dearest Tsathoggua, I posted that at a time at which you had not yet edited your post to include details.

Edit: reading over there are a few things I would have changed and I will tell you them. First is the amount of solvent is very large for the small amount of benzaldehyde being used. Also I would not have used MeOH, use IPA!
Next is he should really try these things on a much smaller scale, especially if he is concerned about the price of these benzaldehydes. We are talking 500mg of aldehyde for preliminary runs really.
But anyway, as I said glad it is being tried.

The molecular weight of the benzaldehyde is 180.2 so 3g is 16.6mmol.

With EDDA in IPA 2 hours after adding the nitroalkane the product is already solidifying as a solid yellow mass in the flask, I do notknow the solubility of this nitroethene in MeOH but this may not be the case, I do not know. He may wish to evap off some of the solvent if after 24-36hr  there is no precipitation. Bt try the freezer first to see what happens.

Though i think Tsathoggua should get isopropanol to conduct these tests with so he knows if it is effective by how readily the nitroethene is crystallizing out of the solvent.

As i previewed my post he posted, and tell him no worries about that...it is no problem.

Well, look forward to hearing the results of this  ;)
« Last Edit: May 31, 2011, 04:57:53 AM by pyramid »

Tsathoggua

  • Autistic sociopath
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 662
Re: Effect on yield in henry condensation of differing amines
« Reply #43 on: May 31, 2011, 04:41:36 AM »
His bad, he hadn't noticed that.

Consider his semisarcastic reply retracted, in that case.
Nomen mihi Legio est, quia multi sumus

I'm hyperbolic, hypergolic, viral, chiral. So motherfucking twisted my laevo is on the right side.

Tsathoggua

  • Autistic sociopath
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 662
Re: Effect on yield in henry condensation of differing amines
« Reply #44 on: May 31, 2011, 07:40:18 PM »
An update:

The methanolic solution containing the aldehyde, TETA-acetate and MeNO2 is even more vividly yellow, quite spectacular, and yellow clumps have started crystallizing out while it is being permitted to chill in the coldest section of the freezer.

Judging from my limited ability to observe the nature of the crystalline deposits whilst still in solution I conjecture, given the liability of impure nitrostyrene to appear orange to reddish, that this is of quite reasonable purity. Tsathoggua shall have to get off his arse and do a paper chromatogram or two....he knows there is some watercolor paper saved somewhere.........

I have to say, his work looks quite nice, for the first time he has attempted this nature of reaction.

Edit-Some solvent solubility data could be useful here, if somebody would care to provide the following, for rextylization purposes:

Soluability in H2O, THF, dichlor, toluene, EtOAc. Soluability is obviously reasonable in the lower alcohols,

Are these nitrostyrenes and nitropropenes visible under UV on a chromatogram? what about the starting (para-alkyl) carbonyl compound(s)? any chance iodine can be used to stain the nonvisible components here? obviously the organic base should stay in the MeOH fraction, and the precipitated nitroalkene can bee filtered off at the buchner during workup.

Tsathoggua says the nitroalkene is crashing out like snow in a russian winter in the freezer right now, and the first part of the product is ready to be filtered off, no filter paper left at the moment, so the same watercolor paper that is about to be used for a chromatography analysis attempt shall be utilized.
 
« Last Edit: May 31, 2011, 09:11:30 PM by Tsathoggua »
Nomen mihi Legio est, quia multi sumus

I'm hyperbolic, hypergolic, viral, chiral. So motherfucking twisted my laevo is on the right side.

Tsathoggua

  • Autistic sociopath
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 662
Re: Effect on yield in henry condensation of differing amines
« Reply #45 on: May 31, 2011, 10:12:29 PM »
IPA could be used, although it would have to bee purchased.

As far as the price tag of the benzaldehyde, it wasn't excessive at all, actually, at least not compared to the worth of the amine, but thats really not the point of what is being done here. The point is to successfully complete the reaction (well, at least, clean up that nitroalkene, the amine catalyst should still be in the methanolic fraction, which has been taken off at the buchner. A quick wash with MeOH spiked with a little GAA is in order he thinks, followed by pure MeOH.

Keeping all the fractions, of course. In the end all the solvent fractions will be stripped and examined for further nitroalkene of a likely lesser purity.

Color is slightly orange when soaking wet with orange MeOH from the rxn pot, drying to citrine/cadmium yellow.
The rxn mixture as stated, has been taken off at the buchner, of course has been saved and shall be evaporated down and shock-crystallized again by freezing. This was started immediately on his waking up, and continued until the workup began, the result was the color of the methanol fraction changing from bright clear yellow, to an orange slurry containing curdy precipitate, which appears to be bright yellow when evaporated.

The unsaturated bond in the nitroalkene should permit staining via iodine vapor, correct?

Will an amine stain with I2? Tsathoggua is hoping the wood-free paper doesn't itself stain.....
Nomen mihi Legio est, quia multi sumus

I'm hyperbolic, hypergolic, viral, chiral. So motherfucking twisted my laevo is on the right side.

Tsathoggua

  • Autistic sociopath
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 662
Re: Effect on yield in henry condensation of differing amines
« Reply #46 on: June 01, 2011, 02:31:53 AM »
Pic time-First crop of nitroalkene, 1.02g, after being washed with ice-cold MeOH.



http://www.imgplace.com/viewimg827/7187/67nitro.jpg Bugger-well there is the link, somebody fancy taking a look and seeing why the hell it won't embed?

« Last Edit: June 01, 2011, 02:36:57 AM by Tsathoggua »
Nomen mihi Legio est, quia multi sumus

I'm hyperbolic, hypergolic, viral, chiral. So motherfucking twisted my laevo is on the right side.

akcom

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 430
Re: Effect on yield in henry condensation of differing amines
« Reply #47 on: June 01, 2011, 12:55:43 PM »
You have to embed the direct link: http://img827.imageshack.us/img827/7187/67nitro.jpg

letters

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 138
Re: Effect on yield in henry condensation of differing amines
« Reply #48 on: June 01, 2011, 08:40:27 PM »
that 1.02g yield is how much yield? most simple amine salts can be easily washed away from the crystals with water. then let it air dry and recrystallize from an appropriate solvent. which aldehyde are you using? ipa and methanol are both good solvents which work for most nitrostyrenes and nitropropenes, respectively.
and, you mean stains for TLC?

Tsathoggua

  • Autistic sociopath
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 662
Re: Effect on yield in henry condensation of differing amines
« Reply #49 on: June 02, 2011, 02:14:27 PM »
Are these nitroalkenes typically soluable in water?

Aldehyde used is 2,5-MeO-4-Me-PhCHO, nitroalkane added is (currently) MeNO2, although when this is done, EtNO2 condensation shall bee performed.

As far as TLC goes, check your inbox....about those plates. Tsathoggua in this case refers to paper chromatography however, having no plates at the moment.

3g of benzaldehyde was used in the first reaction, so thats approximately 1/3rd yield, however this is not the end yield. There is still significantly more nitroalkene to bee had in the reaction mixture and MeOH washings. Most of the remaining methanol will be distilled off (should be fine at atmospheric pressure, one would think, given the BP of MeOH is only 65 C at 1atm), then the total reaction mixture harvested for recrystallization with a little boiling MeOH.

Is this stuff soluable in dichloromethane? that would allow for taking out the TETA residue easily.
« Last Edit: June 02, 2011, 02:33:32 PM by Tsathoggua »
Nomen mihi Legio est, quia multi sumus

I'm hyperbolic, hypergolic, viral, chiral. So motherfucking twisted my laevo is on the right side.

pyramid

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 129
Re: Effect on yield in henry condensation of differing amines
« Reply #50 on: June 02, 2011, 03:48:39 PM »
It is a 27.1% yield. Do you know how to calculate yields? I suggest you learn it well, it will help alot as well all things about molecular weight, especially when making your own reactions.
Do not evaporate at atmospheric temp! The catalyst is still in there! That is asking for polymers..

It is not soluble in water, it is soluble in DCM. It is not easier though to clean it by extraction. A good trituration in ice cold MeOH should remove all the crap and make it adequate for reduction.
« Last Edit: June 02, 2011, 04:07:12 PM by pyramid »

Tsathoggua

  • Autistic sociopath
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 662
Re: Effect on yield in henry condensation of differing amines
« Reply #51 on: June 02, 2011, 04:00:11 PM »
Its being dyscalculic that makes things difficult, I am severely so.

No, I don't know how to calculate %yield.

What further suggested workup here, to remove catalyst? Tsathoggua isn't familiar with the soluability of the nitroalkene product.
Shulgin works up by washing nitroalkene with a little MeOH. Presumably losing product here too.

Some, of course, is ready for reduction. But the rest is still in there, more has crashed out of MeOH rxn fluid, needing filtering off.
Can SOME of that MeOH be removed by atmospheric pressure distillation? obviously too much was used.
« Last Edit: June 02, 2011, 04:12:55 PM by Tsathoggua »
Nomen mihi Legio est, quia multi sumus

I'm hyperbolic, hypergolic, viral, chiral. So motherfucking twisted my laevo is on the right side.

pyramid

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 129
Re: Effect on yield in henry condensation of differing amines
« Reply #52 on: June 02, 2011, 04:27:40 PM »
I suGgest instead of trying to evaporate at atmospheric temp and risking losses just crash it with water. It will be better in the end.

About the calculations, there is lots of info on how to figure out yields and molar stuff. I think there is even stuff on like the-collective or something...I don't want to try to explain it right now but really, I urge you to just spend a little time to understand it. It's too difficult to do chemistry without it especially when you need to create your own reactions. I know you can learn it!

Yes in washing with MeOH product is lost. It is much much better to use IPA as most nitroethenes are quite insoluble in it when it is ice cold. Can Tsathoggua not find a pharmacy for isopropyl rubbing alcohol or something then dry and distill it himself? It would be great for his work. Anyway

If you do not want to crash the MeOH with water, leave the solution in a big beaker or something outside I guess..

Also if you cannot find molecular weight info about your substrates then use chemdraw or the pubchem program to draw the molecule and find the weight.
And NaBH4 - Zn/HCl reduction is good for this substrate as well as all other things,..take it into consideration
Also if you are going to make any derivatives like 2-methoxybenzy,l 2-hydroxybenzyl (these are must do's!!) the NaBH4 has a use there too...
LAH really is not needed anymore unless you are making tryptamines or doing other types of chemistry.

Tsathoggua

  • Autistic sociopath
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 662
Re: Effect on yield in henry condensation of differing amines
« Reply #53 on: June 02, 2011, 04:36:29 PM »
Interesting-A second crop has been obtained, via evaporation of a sample of the methanol washings from the original.

The original obtained product is curdy rather than crystalline in nature, and bright yellow this has been set aside in a vial. the orange crystals were obtained via washing this above product with ice cold MeOH and evaporating the washings yield of this looks nice, very nice.

Suggested procedure from here? washing the yellow, curd-like product with cold MeOH through the buchner and collecting whats left? or can this yellow product be reduced directly?

This crop of crystalline material, this, is ready, after trituration under dH2O, Tsathoggua would think, to remove any trace of catalyst, and subsequent drying, for reduction with LAH in THF.

To be quite truthful, ethers, specifically THF and diisopropyl ether, make him much more nervous than LAH does. A lot more so in fact.

He is thinking, of the primary reaction mixture, partially evaporate at atmospheric pressure, AT ROOM TEMPERATURE, then pour the mixture onto salted ice in ice cold brine. The H2O insoluability really is handy....thanks for that info.

As for IPA...the rubbing alcohol here is full of methyl salicylate. All of it, that he has ever seen is contaminated with shite, gah, probably wouldn't get served at the local pharmacy anyway........the pharmacist manager is an obsequious git that slimes and fawns when picking up a prescription, but Tsathoggua went in for some bicarb yesterday, only for (without saying what the use is) had the pharmacist say 'thats the wrong one' and go get the pharmacist, who then spent ages looking for ranitidine (heartburn) despite being informed that ranitidine is not what the customer wanted, 'suggesting' he consults his doctor instead.

Idiot....after about 15 minutes, just about managed to walk out with a small tub of bicarb (100g), the fucker refused to sell the larger one.

Ever heard the phrase 'the customer is always right'? fucker obviously hasn't...hows about learning the phrase 'the customer would happily burn your house down you oily, obsequious, toffee-nosed dogooding twat'

Next reactions shall bee conducted in IPA. Thanks again for that tip. He shall get on to his supplier for some IPA when he has spare money....at the moment he does not, for he is watching an auction on some huge collection of labware he wants that is going at the moment for a rather nice price.....

« Last Edit: June 02, 2011, 04:46:18 PM by Tsathoggua »
Nomen mihi Legio est, quia multi sumus

I'm hyperbolic, hypergolic, viral, chiral. So motherfucking twisted my laevo is on the right side.

pyramid

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 129
Re: Effect on yield in henry condensation of differing amines
« Reply #54 on: June 03, 2011, 01:12:52 AM »
Suggested procedure: recrystallize all from IPA, nothing should be orange either

You can just crash in water, don't need it to be brine just straight water. Also don't need to evaporate MeOH if you are crashing.

I do not know how pure this nitroethene must be for reduction with LAH as I have never used it for this.
Your fear of ethers is warranted but you should be very wary of LAH. I have had it ignite twice, both times being careful. Take care with it, weigh and handle it in a remote place.

Too bad about the IPA. Bt does methyl salicylate form an Azeotrope with IPA? If not you can still just distill it and such.

I don't really have anything more to add, good luck.

Tsathoggua

  • Autistic sociopath
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 662
Re: Effect on yield in henry condensation of differing amines
« Reply #55 on: June 03, 2011, 01:25:17 AM »
No idea if methyl salicylate azeotropes with IPA, could always hydrolyse the ester with base though. Anyway, Tsathoggua doesn't like buggering around with OTC solvents...ick! nasty.

He shall have to buy some IPA.

The LAH fires...were they powder fires during transfer to flask, or was it ignition when solvent was added?

Plan is to flame-dry flask, dry THF over NaOH then over lithium (would use Na, but the last experiment towards that.....ooohboy....damn did Tsathoggua ever have to duck fast after his argon line ran dry, spent hours, just to recover a few miserable blobs of Na metal)

Dry solvents prior to use, weigh LAH out under an argon or hydrogen atmosphere. Thinking H2, to avoid buying a new argon tank. Could do the reduction under H2 also for that matter. He would go and attend to it now, but he has a bastard of a headache.....maybe someone he ate disagreed with him.
Nomen mihi Legio est, quia multi sumus

I'm hyperbolic, hypergolic, viral, chiral. So motherfucking twisted my laevo is on the right side.

pyramid

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 129
Re: Effect on yield in henry condensation of differing amines
« Reply #56 on: June 03, 2011, 01:40:44 AM »
I understand not wanting to mess with OTC solvents...to an extent. I have good sources, and i purify alot from OTC sources because I'd rather spend time than money on those things.

Fire happened after crushing lumps in foil. I opened it an it just went, it happened twice. Both days were quite dry and I really don't know why it happened. It was while checking to see the uniformness of the powder, it was not near the flask. I add LAH to the solvent, not the other way around.

You are distilling the solvent just prior to use, correct? I don't know if lithium can be used or not, I cannot comment. I would just use sodium. If you are fine with using LAH sodium is a breeze.
Also, don't even consider doing a fucking reduction under an atmosphere of hydrogen!! That is crazy!

Just do things right! Buy a tank, it may save your hobby. Or life. Once again I will mention, there is now a reduction method that yields just as well without the hazards and workup and the reaction in general is easier and safer.
Please take care with the LAH, I thought nothing would ever happen to me...it did.

Edit: out of curiosity, has Tsathoggua ever performed a reduction with LAH before?
Edit again: I'm not understanding how argon running dry resulted in problems with sodium? What else happened?
« Last Edit: June 03, 2011, 02:13:18 AM by pyramid »

Tsathoggua

  • Autistic sociopath
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 662
Re: Effect on yield in henry condensation of differing amines
« Reply #57 on: June 03, 2011, 03:32:09 AM »
First LAH reduction yes.

The argon tank ran dry when it was being used as an inert atmosphere for molten salt electrolysis.....understandably, this is messy, when its a molten pool of NaOH and Na, then all that sodium decides it wants to go off like a firecracker.

As for doing the reduction under a H2 atmosphere, this is due to its easy production, and unreactivity towards LAH etc. I take it you are thinking of the flammability of the stuff?

As for alternate reductions, borohydride would be part of a two step process, this is unwanted. Buggering about with Fe/GAA et isn't to Tsathoggua's taste for this, besides, he has neither Fe powder to hand, nor borohydride under his kitchen sink...LAH on the other hand is here and ready to go, as soon as toady recovers from the bastard awful headache he has.


Tsathoggua wonders if lithium, being the beast of a reducing agent it is, might reduce THF....he would imagine though that mere standing over Li prior to use (after predrying of course) wouldn't cause this to a practically important extent.
« Last Edit: June 03, 2011, 03:37:28 AM by Tsathoggua »
Nomen mihi Legio est, quia multi sumus

I'm hyperbolic, hypergolic, viral, chiral. So motherfucking twisted my laevo is on the right side.

pyramid

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 129
Re: Effect on yield in henry condensation of differing amines
« Reply #58 on: June 03, 2011, 05:15:38 AM »
Well...yes now I see you were working with molten sodium.

Yes I am thinking of flammability and if any problem occurs, that is not an inert atmosphere but a highly flammable and in some cases explosive atmosphere.

Two step process, hardly. No iron, let me give you an example so you can see better...I don't think we are on the same page:

Reduction of 4-Me-2,5-DMNS

In a 500ml RBF with stir bar and condenser is added 90ml IPA and 30ml dH2O followed by NaBH4 (4.85g ~129mmol 4eq.) in one portion. Minor fizzing.
Portion wise with good stirring and no cooling there is added 4-Me-2,5-DMNS (7.2g, 30.7mmol). The solution heats to about 45-50C. After addition (it takes about 25minutes) it is stirred for 30 minutes longer. There is a white ppt.
Then the flask is cooled well in ice and slowly keeping temp about 5C about 12ml GAA is added to quench excess borohydride.
white ppt gets thicker but then most dissolves.
In one portion there is added zinc dust (21g, 10eq) then over 1 hour there is added drop wise 75ml 32% aq. HCl.
Ater addition it is stirred at RT for 2 more hours.
Then after this time the reaction mix is filtered and zinc washed with IPA or MeOH. The filtrate is evaporated in vacuum until mostly water is remaining, then it is basified with excess 25% aq NaOH to dissolve salts.
It is extracted 5 times with DCM 75ml, combined extracts washed with 150 ml dilute aq NaOH, twice 200ml water then brine 200ml. The solvent is evaporated and 20ml IPA added to the residue.
Aq HCl is added until it is neutral, then excess acetone/Et2O is added to precipitate the hydrochloride salt.
It is filtered, washed with acetone.
A second crop is obtained by putting the filtrate in the freezer overnight.
Total yield 3.9g fluffy , white crystals, 65%.


Same general procedure has been used  several times, works well each time. Lowest yield was 59% on this substrate. This reduction technique has been used on a slew of 2C-T-x nitroethenes too, works well.

You can see how much easier that is than pretty much anything else. I'm sure those who can acquire the necessary things to handle LAH and solvents used for that can get NaBH4. Just something to think about.
The above procedure works for nitropropene and nitrobutene. Just make sure to keep the temp low during quench, extremely important. You could post extract with toluene, DCM results in some emulsion it's no problem really.

 ;)

letters

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 138
Re: Effect on yield in henry condensation of differing amines
« Reply #59 on: June 03, 2011, 10:36:13 AM »
pyramid is correct. SBH reductions of the double bonds of nitrostyrenes works great. yields are usually stellar and workup is also usually quite nice. you can then reduce the nitroalkane to the amine via Pd/C and ammonium formate CTH (just mix with methanol and let react for a while) or with Zn/HCl, or with Al/Hg or with Raney Nickel, or with LAH or with other stuff. LAH really is a nasty man. If youve never worked with and can avoid it, you should!
ive seen really bad stuff happen with it and used to know 2 chemists, who are deceased now after LAH unleashed her firey fury... I guess it all comes down to how brave/stupid you are and what is it that you are willing to do knowing the risks...