So I have to find a few more references but as I read more about all the assassinations and attempts, and all the plausible theories behind them, I start to understand the war on drugs better. Although all the information we get could be considered suspect considering how much of it is online and how much easier it is to alter online content compared to print media.
we know from this article:
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-iran-bomb-20111205,0,7550482.story that the CIA:
purposely disseminates incorrect scientific information to slow nuclear research
supplies faulty parts for machines
alters computer software to make it work improperly
this is interesting too
http://www.statesman.com/news/texas/iranian-student-activist-killed-in-houston-2106032.html
all the media articles mention that she was a women's rights activist, but her parents say that this was exaggerated and that she wasn't all that political (there could be alot of reasons for this).
then there is the clumsy assassination attempt by the Iranian car salesman
and the assassination of a nuclear scientist which some say could have been by Iran to make it look like the CIA and Israel were assassinating Iranians (apparently he was not a very high ranking scientist and thus not really a prime target)
anyways all this is really confusing is it the CIA making it look like Iran or Iran making it look like the CIA. Its a great puzzle though. I feel like they have influence over the news probably through tips to news agencies because they all seem to report things the same way. maybe I'm paranoid, but I wouldn't be surprised if some of the synth's circulating are disinformation from some organization. Also, everyone pretty much agrees that the DEA read here but I wonder if part of their strategy is as saboteur and agent provocateur.
On the Wikileaks page there was a reprint of a document by a private organization detailing techniques to discredit wikileaks by submitting bogus documents anonymously and then later exposing them as false, among other things. Its really hard to know if what you are reading is real or not, I've come to realize.
we know from this article:
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-iran-bomb-20111205,0,7550482.story that the CIA:
purposely disseminates incorrect scientific information to slow nuclear research
supplies faulty parts for machines
alters computer software to make it work improperly
this is interesting too
http://www.statesman.com/news/texas/iranian-student-activist-killed-in-houston-2106032.html
all the media articles mention that she was a women's rights activist, but her parents say that this was exaggerated and that she wasn't all that political (there could be alot of reasons for this).
then there is the clumsy assassination attempt by the Iranian car salesman
and the assassination of a nuclear scientist which some say could have been by Iran to make it look like the CIA and Israel were assassinating Iranians (apparently he was not a very high ranking scientist and thus not really a prime target)
anyways all this is really confusing is it the CIA making it look like Iran or Iran making it look like the CIA. Its a great puzzle though. I feel like they have influence over the news probably through tips to news agencies because they all seem to report things the same way. maybe I'm paranoid, but I wouldn't be surprised if some of the synth's circulating are disinformation from some organization. Also, everyone pretty much agrees that the DEA read here but I wonder if part of their strategy is as saboteur and agent provocateur.
On the Wikileaks page there was a reprint of a document by a private organization detailing techniques to discredit wikileaks by submitting bogus documents anonymously and then later exposing them as false, among other things. Its really hard to know if what you are reading is real or not, I've come to realize.


And for a matter of fact the whole trade does it. Look at how many of the things provided in articles are working as presented if at all
