This is just wonderful, check it out:
http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/pexcs/as_requested_iama_convicted_drug_chemist_at_the/
http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/pexcs/as_requested_iama_convicted_drug_chemist_at_the/
He didn't say anything about curing cancer, just said he did some cancer research... doesn't sound like an egomaniac... maybe just don't know enough about him?He was a valuable member of the Hive, but he had some problems regarding being truthful. When he posted that he had done a certain synthesis then it could mean:
So he says he can't get into any academic labs and that he really wants to get back into the legitimate side of science... someone needs to tell him to move to California and apply to grad schools there. California state schools are prohibited by law from asking about a criminal background, aside from sex crimes...
What you describe is seriously sloppy shit... no one should be deceiving others as to whether an experiment has actually been run. Reminiscent of Anders Hoveland on SM. No idea why Polverone hasn't banned that jackass.
He didn't say anything about curing cancer, just said he did some cancer research... doesn't sound like an egomaniac... maybe just don't know enough about him?He was a valuable member of the Hive, but he had some problems regarding being truthful. When he posted that he had done a certain synthesis then it could mean:
1 - He actually did it
2 - He read an article about it and reiiterates it as if he did it *
3 - He read about the subject, say hydrogenation for example and sucked from his thumps a method which could work in his dreams and posted it as if he successfully did it.
Its about convincing that source your legit