Author Topic: iodides are obviously under scruntiny  (Read 280 times)

jon

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,883
iodides are obviously under scruntiny
« on: September 11, 2009, 12:54:48 AM »
and swij found this out like so.
a package of potassium iodides arrived tuesday.
walking into the apartment complex a balding man in shorts talking on a cell phone with a dog whom swij has never seen at this complex was overheard saying "he's coming your way"
and of course his tone of voice and conversation grew louder as he tried to change his subject.
so conclusion.
beware of iodides people.

Vesp

  • Administrator
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,130
Re: iodides are obviously under scruntiny
« Reply #1 on: September 11, 2009, 01:50:24 AM »
And how do you know this isn't just paranoia?
Bitcoin address: 1FVrHdXJBr6Z9uhtiQKy4g7c7yHtGKjyLy

Agent Madhatter

  • Guest
Re: iodides are obviously under scruntiny
« Reply #2 on: September 11, 2009, 02:00:26 AM »
Sounds pretty scary. I hope the complex wasn't the location any of you were staying at.

jon

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,883
Re: iodides are obviously under scruntiny
« Reply #3 on: September 11, 2009, 02:08:31 AM »
well swij knows bacon when he see's bacon this guy is totally out of place.
the fact that he's walking a dog to sort of blend in tips him off as well does that little snippet of his conversation where he states "he's coming your way" in a low tone of voice and how his tone later changed.
these guys are really amatuers, swij knows what this sort of thing looks like. swij decided it's best to be cautious rather that pay.
and no swij is'nt really paranoid just observant that's all.

Agent Madhatter

  • Guest
Re: iodides are obviously under scruntiny
« Reply #4 on: September 11, 2009, 02:12:09 AM »
Where did swij buy it from? A large chemical manufacturer? OR someplace in china?

jon

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,883
Re: iodides are obviously under scruntiny
« Reply #5 on: September 11, 2009, 02:29:40 AM »
actually a well known auction site.
swij did'nt see it under any lists but apparantely it brings heat so watch out.
guess the moral of the story here is even unlisted chems bring heat.
« Last Edit: September 11, 2009, 02:36:27 AM by jon »

Vesp

  • Administrator
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,130
Re: iodides are obviously under scruntiny
« Reply #6 on: September 11, 2009, 02:48:37 AM »
I see, and well known auction site is known to report anything like that so I've heard...


Bitcoin address: 1FVrHdXJBr6Z9uhtiQKy4g7c7yHtGKjyLy

jon

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,883
Re: iodides are obviously under scruntiny
« Reply #7 on: September 11, 2009, 02:55:25 AM »
he suspects this is the case of course technically it's not watched but in reality land things are different well he'll open his bathroom window for the next 3 months so they can have a gander at his glorious genetalia.
survellience is nothing new.

ahhha!!!
just as he suspected
technically not list 1 but lookie here:

http://www.photoformulary.com/DesktopModules/StoreProductDetails.aspx?productID=661&tabid=9&tabindex=2&categoryid=26&selection=0&langID=0
« Last Edit: September 11, 2009, 03:27:16 AM by jon »

Douchermann

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 397
Re: iodides are obviously under scruntiny
« Reply #8 on: September 11, 2009, 04:30:34 AM »
Well it doesn't help that photographer's formulary is a joke.  They're total sell outs and pretty much report anything to DEA just so they don't have to hide their genitals with their tail.

That's actually somewhat interesting, and to think, I was about to order some iodide salts in fair quantity. 

jon

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,883
Re: iodides are obviously under scruntiny
« Reply #9 on: September 11, 2009, 04:47:55 AM »
see that's what swij did first 56 grams brought no attention but a pound and look out charlie!!!
that's what got thier goat swij really loves the rxn between iodosafrole and methylamine.
damn swij is'nt going to be rollin for a good minute.

Douchermann

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 397
Re: iodides are obviously under scruntiny
« Reply #10 on: September 11, 2009, 05:28:48 AM »
Yar, better safe than sorry.  Could you perhaps use an apartment that does not have your name? Or maybe a self storage that is under someone elses name?  That would be my ideal situation hahaha.

jon

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,883
Re: iodides are obviously under scruntiny
« Reply #11 on: September 11, 2009, 05:33:46 AM »
well swij is'nt really tripping he's just gonna have to lay low for a minute after 3 months they get bored with it.
have to look into it but 3 months is pretty standard.

these dudes are total amatuers kinda makes one chuckle ;D

German

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 228
Re: iodides are obviously under scruntiny
« Reply #12 on: September 11, 2009, 05:40:10 AM »
On your Ebay feedback put that the DEA will show up if you order from them.

jon

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,883
Re: iodides are obviously under scruntiny
« Reply #13 on: September 11, 2009, 05:41:18 AM »
good idea i like it!!!!

u know it is a  "private" transaction but still me thinks a few good people have a way around this.
« Last Edit: September 11, 2009, 05:48:29 AM by jon »

German

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 228
Re: iodides are obviously under scruntiny
« Reply #14 on: September 11, 2009, 07:23:32 AM »
^^^ private just means they can't see what you bought, it doesn't mean they can't read your feedback

jon

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,883
Re: iodides are obviously under scruntiny
« Reply #15 on: September 11, 2009, 07:25:09 AM »
well it's not private to everybody that's pretty fucking obvious.'

hahaha look how stupid these dipshits are dea dude shoots himself in foot checkitout!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_91jcFTbLE8
« Last Edit: September 11, 2009, 07:45:33 AM by jon »

geezmeister

  • Pupae
  • **
  • Posts: 58
Re: iodides are obviously under scruntiny
« Reply #16 on: September 11, 2009, 08:24:39 PM »
It is fair to conclude that the DEA has made the rounds at the photo chem shops and advised them that much of the KI they sell is being diverted to non-photographic purposes. A supplier I'd purchased supplies from for several years put a hold on my last order of supplies because they included a chemical that might be used by someone for improper, non-photographic type purposes and they had just been advised by the DEA that they had been the supplier of a large illegal drug lab in the next state over from them. I called after a couple of days passed without the amount showing up on the money card I used to make the purchase, and no email about the transaction appeared on the email address I had provided when I ordered.

They told me my name and address had been provided to the DEA, who advised them I had no prior history of criminal arrests or convictions and not known as a drug offender or abuser to the local law enforcement agencies. They then asked how I used the supplies I ordered. I detailed how I used them, what else went into the solution, the ratios of the chemicals in the solution, the resulting paper speed and hardness, the type of developer I used, and how a stainless steel platen was essential to speed print drying times and give a smooth surface to the print.

I've not had problems reordering as I have established the nature and purpose of my use of what I order from them.

They suggested I might want to order a larger quantity as the DEA agents had indicated to them they might decide to place bulk KI and NaI on the list of prohibited chemicals. That process will not take long if the DEA elects to do it. I have thus far declined to buy more as I have been considering giving up the hobby process, as quaint and interesting as it is, since doing the same damn thing digitally takes virtually no time, costs less, and requires the purchase of nothing more suspicious than ink cartridges.


jon

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,883
Re: iodides are obviously under scruntiny
« Reply #17 on: September 11, 2009, 09:43:15 PM »
well seeing how it's very difficult to obtain useable quantities of ephedrine why are they even interested in regulating this chemical?
are thier heads stuck this far up thier asses?
oh that's right they work for the government, nevermind.

swij has priors too maybe that's why their interested possibly?
« Last Edit: September 11, 2009, 09:45:39 PM by jon »

jon

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,883
Re: iodides are obviously under scruntiny
« Reply #18 on: September 13, 2009, 10:21:29 PM »
fuckit!!!
 i'm going to run up on one these dudes and teabag them.

hypnos

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 402
Re: iodides are obviously under scruntiny
« Reply #19 on: October 15, 2009, 12:26:34 AM »
whatts "teabagging?" ???
"the two things you can give away and never lose, are what you know, and how you feel...."