Author Topic: Indole & substituted indole-3-aldehydes  (Read 62 times)

no1uno

  • Global Moderator
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 681
Indole & substituted indole-3-aldehydes
« on: December 21, 2009, 04:32:23 AM »
Indole(s) are reportedly easily formylated @ the required 3-position by the Reimer-Tiemann Reaction using chloroform and potassium hydroxide, giving indole-3-aldehyde. This useful material could then, hypothetically, be treated with nitromethane to give the nitrostyrene or nitroethane to give the a-methyl-nitrostyrene. Alternatively, there are other ways to extend the side chain that might be more useful to the individual experimenting...

Anyway, the procedure outlined in the attached paper is presented here:

Quote
Indole-3-aldehyde.

Indole (20 g.) was dissolved in a mixture of chloroform (150 ml.) and 96 % alcohol (400 ml.) contained in a 2L flask fitted with a rubber stopper carrying a reflux condenser, a stirrer and a dropping funnel. The mixture was kept gently boiling over an electric hot plate and stirred while a solution of potassium hydroxide (250 g.) in water (300 ml.) was gradually dropped in over a period of 4-5 hours. The mixture was boiled for 30 minutes after the last addition of potassium hydroxide. When the contents of the flask had cooled, the potassium chloride was collected on a Buchner funnel and washed with alcohol. The combined filtrate and washings were then steam-distilled, the receiver being changed when the chloroform and most of the alcohol had passed over. The distillation was continued for 30 minutes after the distillate was no longer turbid owing to the presence of 3-chloroquinoline.

The hot aqueous liquid in the flask was decanted from the tarry residue and set aside to cool. The tarry material remaining was dissolved in the minimum quantity of hot alcohol, the alcoholic solution poured into a litre of hot water, the whole again boiled until the tarry globules had coalesced (an action which can be hastened by the addition of a little sodium chloride to the solution) and then filtered through a hot fluted filter-paper. The tar remaining on the filter was extracted yet another time in the same way. Aldehyde separated from all three aqueous solutions. This was filtered off and the combined filtrates amounting to some 2.5-3.0 litres were concentrated to about 300 ml. This concentrated solution on cooling yielded a further crop of aldehyde. The total yield of aldehyde thus obtained amounted to 7-5 g. (31 % of theory). The crude material melted at 1940 and after recrystallisation from water at 1980 (cf. Ellinger and Flamand, 195'). It contained 9.57% N. C9H7NO requires N9.66%.

As acetaminophen/paracetamol is able to be hydrolyzed in good yield to p-hydroxyaniline (mild acid hydrolysis is best IIRC), then everyone has access to p-hydroxyaniline, diazotization of which with NaNO2 would give the p-hydroxyphenylhydrazine, which, if reacted with pyruvic acid would give 5-hydroxy-indole-2-carboxylic acid. Decarboxylation of which gives 5-hydroxyindole. Treatment of that with chloroform/KOH (as detailed above) would give 5-hydroxy-indole-aldehyde, which opens the door to, potentially, a-methyl-bufetonin analogues, substituted on the phenolic OH and the side chain amine.
"...     "A little learning is a dang'rous thing;
    Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring:
    There shallow draughts intoxicate the brain,
    And drinking largely sobers us again.
..."

Evilblaze

  • Guest
Re: Indole & substituted indole-3-aldehydes
« Reply #1 on: December 22, 2009, 08:37:02 PM »
This is a nice reaction, but there is a really BIG problem: the yield.

Long time ago I tried the Reimer-Tiemann reaction with phenol. And it was horrible. The yield was near to 10% and a lot of insoluble tar was at the bottom of the glass. The reagents were relative cheap, but 10% is 10%! And actually I needed parahydroxy-benzaldehyde and not salicylaledhyde so at the end I got 1% yield to the parahydroxy-benzaldehyde. At the end I got mad and I just threw out this thing to the trash.  //Anyone knows a synthesis to parahydroxy benzaldehyde?:D

And the same with indole.... Phenol is a cheap reagent, if the yield is 10% than you don't loose too much, but indole costs a lot. And if the yield is 10% when you use indole.... Probably you will get mad ;)

But if someone tries it and it is successful, than I can say just one thing: congratulation!

//And don't forget if you use indole aldehyde to make tryptamines or some kind of drugs like that, than you need to hydrogenate it because the NO2 and the double bond. And the indole is sensitive to hydrogenation (with Pt at 20 Celsius it can be fully hydrogenated, even the benzene ring turns to cyclohexane). So be careful and always use the calculated amount of hydrogen!
« Last Edit: December 22, 2009, 08:43:44 PM by Evilblaze »