yes i'm the boiling in water method I've used before, often a procedure requiring Na2CO3 calls for doing this instead of sourcing washing soda or whatever, esp. where direct ingestion is to follow, like with GBL ->NaGHB.
I think another reason this was preferable was because there is a visual indication of the reaction finishing, because CO2 stops bubbling out. It takes about an hour, was it? Maybe a half hour.
This method, on the other hand can cause worry, cause even though CO2 must and will be released by the reaction, there is no liquid medium for the gas to bubble through, so it's invisible.
This was why I did some experimenting by calculating the molar weight.
In reality I didn't discover how immediate this was, it was heated for an hour initially, etc. etc. But looking closely I started noticing that little subtle hints of a reaction where happening for only a few minutes after turning the heat on, and then nothing more. I discovered a new subtle hint yesterday:
The reaction does produce H2O, so once you turn the flame on, if you take a spoon and stir the NaHCO3 around a bit, youll notice it clumps for a few moments, and then with a bit of heating becomes dust-like grainy. If you do this you can actually see the CO2 escaping,. it looks like little comets of powder shooting up, and then disappearing, pretty cool actually.
This could ofcourse be done on borosilicate glass as well, it'll just take a bit longer.
I do it for about 5 minutes now, yet I still suspect that I'm heating for maybe 5 or 10 times longer than necessary.