Author Topic: How the DEA Scrubbed Thomas Jefferson's Monticello Poppy Garden from Public Memo  (Read 66 times)

Naf1

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 753
How the DEA Scrubbed Thomas Jefferson's Monticello Poppy Garden from Public Memo
« on: April 20, 2010, 12:35:20 AM »
Visitors to Monticello don't learn how Jefferson cultivated poppies, and his personal opium use may as well never have happened.

Thomas Jefferson was a drug criminal. But he managed to escape the terrible sword of justice by dying a century before the DEA was created. In 1987 agents from the Drug Enforcement Agency showed up at Monticello, Jefferson's famous estate.


Jefferson had planted opium poppies in his medicinal garden, and opium poppies are now deemed illegal. Now, the trouble was the folks at the Monticello Foundation, which preserves and maintains the historic site, were discovered flagrantly continuing Jefferson's crimes. The agents were blunt: The poppies had to be immediately uprooted and destroyed or else they were going to start making arrests, and Monticello Foundation personnel would perhaps face lengthy stretches in prison.

The story sounds stupid now, but it scared the hell out of the people at Monticello, who immediately started yanking the forbidden plants. A DEA man noticed the store was selling packets of "Thomas Jefferson's Monticello Poppies." The seeds had to go, too. While poppy seeds might be legal, it is never legal to plant them. Not for any reason.

Employees even gathered the store's souvenir T-shirts  --  with silkscreened photos of Monticello poppies on the chest  --  and burned them. Nobody told them to do this, but, under the circumstances, no one dared risk the threat.

Jefferson's poppies are gone without a trace now. Nobody said much at the time, nor are they saying much now. Visitors to Monticello don't learn how the Founding Father cultivated poppies for their opium. His personal opium use and poppy cultivation may as well never have happened.

The American War on Drugs started with opium and it continues today. Deception is key to this kind of social control, along with the usual threats of mayhem. Ever since the passage of the Harrison Act made opium America's first "illicit substance" in 1914, propaganda has proven itself most effective in the war on poppies. This has not been done so much by eradicating the poppy plant from the nation's soil as by eradicating the poppy from the nation's mind.

Prosecutions for crimes involving opium or opium poppies are rare. But that has less to do with the frequency of poppy crimes and everything to do with suppressing information about the opium poppy. A public trial might inadvertently publicize forbidden information at odds with the common spin about poppies and opium. This might pique interest in the taboo subject and, worse, undermine faith in the government.

The U.S. government strategy to create and enforce deliberate ignorance about opium, opium poppies, and everything connected with them has proven remarkably effective. The Monticello campaign exemplifies an effective tactic. The poppies were swiftly removed, and sotto voce threats ensured no one would talk about it afterward. Today, visitors to Monticello learn nothing about opium poppy cultivation or why Jefferson cultivated it in his garden.

Disinformation about poppies has been spread far and wide. Some of it is subtle, like when the New York Times talks about people growing "heroin poppies." Some misinformation is so bald-faced as to stun the listener into silence, as when a DEA agent tells a reporter that the process of getting opium from opium poppies is so complex and dangerous that "I don't even think a person with a Ph.D. could do it.

This enforced ignorance reduces the chances of anyone even accidentally discovering the truth about poppies. Poring through back issues of pharmaceutical industry news from Tasmania might yield a mother load of cutting edge poppy science  --  from genetically altered poppies that ooze double-strength opium to state-of-the-art machines designed to manufacture "poppy straw concentrate." Tasmania's output meets roughly a third of the world's narcotic requirement. But how many people know that Tasmania is the home of the world's largest and most modern opium industry?

By Jim Hogshire
http://www.alternet.org/drugs/145872/how_the_dea_scrubbed_thomas_jefferson's_monticello_poppy_garden_from_public_memory
« Last Edit: April 20, 2010, 12:42:12 AM by Naf1 »

Tsathoggua

  • Autistic sociopath
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 662
Re: How the DEA Scrubbed Thomas Jefferson's Monticello Poppy Garden from Public Memo
« Reply #1 on: April 21, 2010, 08:08:37 PM »
LMFAO, that DEA pig is full of so much shit.

If a paki barbarian in afghanistan can prepare opium, or the chinese several hundred years ago, could do it, why couldn't a PHD educated western guy :p

IIRC it is just boiling the raw gum in water, skimming off the plant material, and smoking, or precipitating the alkaloids with calcium hydroxide if one wishes to go the whole hog.

Seriously, what the fuck, so scary and dangerous.

What IS scary and dangerous is lying, disingenuous turds like the pork spreading their lies.
Nomen mihi Legio est, quia multi sumus

I'm hyperbolic, hypergolic, viral, chiral. So motherfucking twisted my laevo is on the right side.

Vesp

  • Administrator
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,130
Re: How the DEA Scrubbed Thomas Jefferson's Monticello Poppy Garden from Public Memo
« Reply #2 on: April 21, 2010, 08:31:42 PM »
That is really interesting! I am glad you brought this article to light! I hope it spreads around.... there is a of course this http://memepunks.blogspot.com/2006/06/americas-war-on-science.html

I think the more we can relate to the founding fathers, famous scientists the better off we will be...
Bitcoin address: 1FVrHdXJBr6Z9uhtiQKy4g7c7yHtGKjyLy

Naf1

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 753
Re: How the DEA Scrubbed Thomas Jefferson's Monticello Poppy Garden from Public Memo
« Reply #3 on: April 22, 2010, 12:26:25 AM »
"If a paki barbarian in afghanistan can prepare opium, or the chinese several hundred years ago, could do it, why couldn't a PHD educated western guy :p"

ROFLMAO, or even two illiterate Afghani farmers!

Documentation of a Heroin Manufacturing Process in Afghanistan
U. Zerell, B. Ahrens and P. Gerz

ABSTRACT
The present article documents an authentic process of heroin manufacturing in Afghanistan: white heroin hydrochloride produced using simple equipment and a small quantity of chemicals. The quantities of chemicals actually used corresponded to the minimum needed for manufacturing heroin. The only organic solvent used was acetone, and only a very small quantity of it was used. Because the chemicals used in the demonstration were from actual seizures in Afghanistan, some of the chemicals had been disguised or repackaged by smugglers. Others had been put into labelled containers that proved to be counterfeit, and some glass containers used were not the original containers of the manufacturer displayed on the label.The brown heroin base prepared as an intermediate step in the process shares some of the characteristics of the South-West Asia type of heroin preparations often seized in Germany. The final product of the documented heroin manufacturing process was white heroin hydrochloride, which shares the key characteristics of the white heroin occasionally seized in Germany and other countries in Western Europe since 2000. The present article demonstrates that this kind of heroin can be produced in Afghanistan.

http://127.0.0.1/Naf1/bulletin_on_narcotics_2007_Zerell.pdf

Quotes'

"The method used to process the heroin was demonstrated by two male Afghan nationals from Nangarhar province, who described themselves as illiterate farmers.

The persons processing the heroin identified the chemicals by their external characteristics such as odour and appearance. Sparing use was made of all chemicals required for the production process, with the exception of water. Only a minute quantity of an organic solvent was used. Hot water was used as a solvent throughout the production process. Only a small quantity of the substance referred to as the “key chemical”, acetic anhydride, was used. That amount was so small that it was at the bottom of the range of quantities of acetic anhydride reported to have been used in the process elsewhere. According to the persons processing the heroin, in this case, the fact that such a small quantity was used was not the consequence of a lack of availability of the
chemical; they considered the amount sufficient for the traditional method that they used to make heroin.

The brown heroin base, the white heroin base and the white heroin hydrochloride were analysed to determine their alkaloid content (see table 4).A relatively high monoacetylmorphine content (5.4-7.8 per cent) was found in the samples of the brown heroin base, the white heroin base and the white heroin hydrochloride. That could be a result of hydrolysis: because of the cool, rainy weather at the time of synthesis, it was not possible to completely dry the samples. According to the persons who demonstrated this method of heroin processing, intermediate products are usually directly processed or, as in the case of the morphine base, laid out and air-dried.

The white heroin base has a clearly higher diacetylmorphine content than the brown heroin base: 78.5 per cent. In the process observed, the purification of the heroin preparation with the help of activated carbon was effective: an additional separation of papaverine and narcotine was achieved in the course of that processing stage.

---------
Make sure you read that Article!!!!!!
From my ebook library thread, but thought it was appropriate to link here.

btw;That was a good article also concerning the war on science!