synthetikal.com Forum Index


AMPH phosphate prep'n and bioassay! :D
Page 1 of 1
Post new topic   Reply to topic    synthetikal.com Forum Index -> Pharmacology

has SWIY ever tried uncommon anions in PEA salts, if yes, which?
yes: phosphate
40%
 40%  [ 2 ]
yes: nitrate (not recommended)
20%
 20%  [ 1 ]
yes: acetate
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
yes: maleate
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
yes: fumarate
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
yes: lactate
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
yes: ascorbate
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
yes: none of the listed, i will post which
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
no, what is an anion?
40%
 40%  [ 2 ]
Total Votes : 5

Author Message
joe_aldehyde
huxleys associate
Joined: 06 Apr 2005
Posts: 310
5653.90 Points

Thu Jul 07, 2005 1:19 am
Reply with quote

swim prepared this compound by dropwise adding 85% phosphoric acid to a solution of phenylisopropylamine in dry diethylether with vigorous stirring, the formed fluffy precipitate being filtered off. freebase was purified preliminarily via 2x a/b extraction. due to improper conditions, phosphate and hydrogenphosphate salts also formed to a considerable extent which are hygroscopic and were slightly pink, they were discarded.
the pure dihydrogenphosphate salt dried very fast, was not noticably hygroscopic and was sparkling white. it was not recrystallized before...

...the bioassay of an unknown dose, maybe 15-25mg of the salt via nasal administration, confirmed the beneficial properties of said compound described in the paper available from rhodium. the onset was rapid, stimulation was gentle and there was no dilation of the pupils at all times. heart frequency was slightly increased, but never uncomfortable. as noticed with any stimulant of the phenethylamine type, there was significant vasoconstriction in the genitals (generally referred to as "chemistry cock" where the subject lives Smile. there was also no "transition chill" as noticed with the sulfate. the plateau lasted about 3 hours, the whole experience about 4 hours. there was no apparent neurotransmitter depletion as usually strongly present upon administration of the sulfate salt. no hangover, no noticable after effects.
the administered substance would thus be referred to by swim as an ideal stimulant for therapeutic use.

there will certainly be more trials of phenethylamine phosphate salts.

it would be favorable to define conditions in which the formation of salts other than the desired dihydrogenphosphate could be excluded.
Back to top
Vitriodor

Joined: 11 Feb 2005
Posts: 91
Location: Belgium
2618.86 Points

Thu Jul 07, 2005 6:29 am
Reply with quote

joe_aldehyde wrote:
due to improper conditions, phosphate and hydrogenphosphate salts also formed to a considerable extent which are hygroscopic and were slightly pink, they were discarded.

it would be favorable to define conditions in which the formation of salts other than the desired dihydrogenphosphate could be excluded.


How did you determine the salt was the desired one? And how do you separate this from the others? If you make the sulphate salt, itīs suppose to be two molecules of PEA which reacts with one molecule sulphate. I thought that three PEA molecules would react with one phosphate. BTW, for MDMA, phosphate crystallisation always worked well for swim, although never a crystalline material was obtained. Itīs more chalk like. A crystallisation with HBr will also work.

Vit
Back to top
Lego

Joined: 15 Apr 2005
Posts: 52
2408.30 Points

Thu Jul 07, 2005 1:40 pm
Reply with quote

Vitriodor wrote:
I thought that three PEA molecules would react with one phosphate. BTW, for MDMA, phosphate crystallisation always worked well for swim, although never a crystalline material was obtained. Itīs more chalk like. A crystallisation with HBr will also work.

Vit


Phosphoric acid usually reacts only with one or at the maximum two protons, the other is not so acidic in order to protonate an amine, e.g. codeine phosphate is one codeineH+ molecule and one H2 PO4 - molecule. Many other drugs also bind only one molecule of phosphoric acid to one drug molecule.

The best way to determine the composition of your amphetamine phosphate would bee a potentiometric perchloric acid titration. There you would clearly see the different amouts of phosphate (if at all), hydrogenephosphate and dihydrogenephosphate.
Back to top
joe_aldehyde
huxleys associate
Joined: 06 Apr 2005
Posts: 310
5653.90 Points

Thu Jul 07, 2005 2:28 pm
Reply with quote

Vit: as described in the paper swim referenced to, the dihydrogenphosphate is a flocculent powder which is suspended in the solvent and keeps doing so upon vigorous stiring, whereas the hydrogenphosphate (probably with the inclusion of H3PO4 molecules) is a paste and settles to the bottom.
swim excluded the possibility of impurities forming any byproducts with phosphoric acid since the paste-like substance was soluble in water and yielded a precipitate upon base addition, which could be converted to the flocculent powder described earlier. swim guesses this is being called "empirical knowledge".

swim had no means of determining mp. or ambitions of doing a DC with the powder since its properties were as described and there were no major fuckups in the synthesis of the free amine, so the salt was assumed to be reasonably pure.


swim don't know of the appearance that MDMA*H3PO4 has, but his AMPH*H3PO4 is also a bit "chalk like", but unless in big chunks every powder is substiantially "chalk-like". crystals might only be obtained if recrystallized, while swim don't see any use for that since his salt was snow-white.
swim also don't see any sense in making HBr salts. you could save your precious HBr for other things.
Back to top
Vitriodor

Joined: 11 Feb 2005
Posts: 91
Location: Belgium
2618.86 Points

Fri Jul 08, 2005 2:04 am
Reply with quote

Lego, Joe, thanks for clarifying. Actually, I should have known better. When looking at an acid/base constants table, for H3PO4 7.4*E-3 (mol/lit) is given, for H2PO4- it is already 6.2*E-8 and for HPO42- it is 4.8*E-13. This explains why the triple salt hardly will be formed. For sulphates on the other hand, the second proton acidity is high (1.2*E-2) and therefor disalts will form.

In relation to MDMA phoshate crystallisation, suddenly it all becomes clear to me what is happening. Next to a fine powder a paste, as Joe just described, is formed. It really sticks to the bottom/walls (and in this way you can easily separate the two as described). After filtration of the whole mixture, followed by drying and grinding, the resulting powder feels what I call "chalk like" (dusty?) in contrast to MDMA HCl powder which is more crystalline. Another difference observed: it is difficult to get a white powder when making MDMA phosphate, it always has an off-white appearance and recrystallisation (in acetone) did not improve it very much. For MDMA HCl it is not difficult to get a white crystalline material however.

About using HBr for crystallization, I actually never did that, but it is possible as I learned from another bee. Again I have to agree: I donīt see any advantage doing so.
Vit
Back to top
radio879dmt

Joined: 27 Jun 2005
Posts: 11
418.74 Points

Sat Jul 09, 2005 7:42 pm
Reply with quote

Nice! I was always interested in this.. but it sounds like the best salt to make of amphetamine for sure Smile
Back to top
the alchemist

Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 46
Location: Planet Earth, Terran System
1568.10 Points

Mon Jul 11, 2005 6:31 am
Reply with quote

How does amphetamine compare with dextro-amphetamine? Does the other isomer produce an effect?
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    synthetikal.com Forum Index -> Pharmacology All times are GMT + 5.5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 



Powered by phpBB 2.0.11 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Igloo Theme Version 1.0 :: Created By: Andrew Charron