LOL.

I did something similar in my spesh school (the one intended for those with AS rather than classically autistic like myself, as opposed to the LFA/kanner's autism school I went to before that)

There was this guy who was a right royal wind up merchant par excellence, a deliberately aggravating ratbastart supremo bar none, the staff got on my case at the beginning, seeing as how I was paid cash not to use curse words (not a huge amount sadly, but every time I swore, they had it so I lost a little bit of the money I would have earned), but for some reason, after he pushed, and pushed, and pushed for weeks and months, eventually I turned round and shivved him with a sharpened pencil.

They accepted that, without complaint, seeing as how I didn't employ any of the cruder offensive (english) words in my vocabulary as I stabbed him

I don't remember all of this one, but  when I was of primary school age, either just starting or not far in, and it was being realised I didn't fit in at all, or wish to associate with kids, and would NOT put up with being patronized or talked down to as if I were just some little child to be ordered about and told what to think, what to say, how to sit, how I should go about learning what it was intended I learn (irrespective of learning it, I had issues with being told HOW I MUST learn the things in question, etc.) I got referred to a psychologist, this was way before I was dx as spesh, apparently I got rather irritated with the headshrinker, asking me questions that to me, were blindingly obvious in answer and that were so simple, anyone should know, the way psychs do with (or rather, TO, there is a difference, subtle in semantics, but large in nature) people of that age, I took as insulting to my intelligence, and stabbed her in the leg, whilst making a rather offensive comment about bongo drums (she was black)

I think I was about 5 at the time.

Boy, you were a pretty hardcore kid Tsat. O.O

Ey? tim mcveigh used nitromethane-sensitized ammonium nitrate to send all those government filth to meet the god the yanks so often wank off over.

Not sure what he used to set it off though, probably something pretty powerful. ANFO needs a powerful secondary HE booster as well as a blasting cap, not sure about ANNM though.

Not sure if she would know the technical details, but my girl used to be his penpal, when he was in jail.

He used some kind of commercial NG based explosive as booster.
ANFO needs booster,ANNM doesn't,but I would use it in bomb of this scale and importance just to be sure.

It should be a rule that weapons are never discussed on this board, hypothetical or whatever.  Lets keep the patriot act up off this bitch.

Never wanted anything to do with roguesci myself....its attractive of bad attention, if that makes sense.

besides, if I decide I need to kill somebody, you can bet your bottom (dollar?) that I won't post there, here, or anywhere else, and offer anybody schematics of my brand spanking new ricin-bullet-shooting umbrella with a how-to post and a 'check these neat pics' attatchment. No, said somebody will simply dissolve internally and die, and I will have fuck all to do with it.

And of course, some local paki will be found with a vial of ricin and islamite literature on the property, or at least, their body will

I suppose that would be true.

Hard research has found humans of both genders to prefer serial monogamy, which falls outside the false dichotomy of permanent monogamy vs. promiscuity. Chemically, we are wired to form pair bonds for somewhere 4-7 years at a time. Interestingly, this begun with the raising of primate offspring beyond the age of dependence, but has persisted into the present day because of the tendency of personality and interest to change over time.

When people get bored in their relationships, there is an underlying neurochemical cause. Plus, the very idea of personality, beliefs, interests, and other issues related to compatibility has created a new modern way of thinking when it comes to relationships, which exist on a higher level, causing changes in those issues to be a significant cause of pair splits.

The idea of monogamy for life is an artificial social construct from an age in which the primary purpose of male-female relationships (in those days, anything else was stoned, and not with good chronic) was not viewed as being anything related to the enjoyment or empowerment of either party. Ancient relationships were intended to reproduce, form domestic units, unite different families, delineate bounds of female "property" to keep male subjects from fighting, and keep potentially unruly subjects too preoccupied with domestic affairs and responsibilities to think about overthrowing autocrats.

There is absolutely nothing natural about it and the meme has become self-perpetuating. People hold the ideal up to others because the ideal was held up to them. The mainstream does not deeply question the wisdom of whether people prefer to be in a permanent bond. The arguments in favor typically become religious, center around the 19 year window from conception to legal independence of children, or are based upon romanticized but statistically unlikely ideas of human nature.

Some marriages today do last until death. Most of those parties are quite religious and preoccupied with satisfying the expectations of others. The remainder, who actually do undergo change in a compatible parallel, happen to be the statistical outliers.

The incidence of marriage is plummeting in developing nations. We may see a slight bump as rights are extended to non-heterosexuals, but the long term is still a decline. As the birth rate falls and the education level rises, more and more people will be bypassing the married with multiple children lifestyle.

you know all this talk of adulterly and getting stoned reminds me of a day in church when the pastor was reading on and on about the trials of david and 400 of his own men wanting to stone him to death.
so i loudly proclaimed "then, eveyone must get stoned"
i felt it was contextual because 400 guys wanted to stone their king and, that was treasonous so hence everyone had to get stoned.

PE ......I am not nesecerily talking about bonds for life . Also where do you get that opinion from ? Based on what ? Some animals form bonds for life and others dont ? 

To only the last three posters . Guys maybe we should rer read my last post with NEUTRAL eyes and THINKING and without predjustice ...... ....... and then make usefull non snoty / childish replys ...... with some facts in them . The replys you have made show more about your personalitys than about what has been said . I think on a site like this it would be better to orientate your replys in an adult way  . Thanks .

Java if you want to debate with me do it in public and try to come up to my level please . Trying to score points and pay me back for the home truthes that i think you needed to be aware of  that i wrote in that PM shows that what i wrote is right .  The fact that people were members of the hive is not a free card for them to try to have extra social points .  If you want social püoints and respect post new ideas , inovative ideas and help others . Otherwise people could maybe think that you are an old vain has been or maybe a never was and never will bee and i wouldnt like to see that .

And ...... who from you has had a / any long and fullfilling relationships ? Who from you has a child / children ? Plus are you sure that a wish for an open relationship with several partners isnt just a psychelogical reaction to not haveing / being able to get a good solid relationship ? Have you had the chance to make a comparison based on personal experience of both ?

Or did i misunderstand those replys ? If so please write them in a way that makes the things you are trying to say clear . If i did misunderstand i apologise . But to show i was wrong you will have to explain your words .

EDIT - PE i just reread your post and i think we could be talking about the same thing . I was pointing out the diference between what the ego wants and what the body needs . The problems that an inbalance between the two can cause and the benefits mentaly and physicaly of getting the right balance .

didnt get what java said much at all, but i hope its not pot stirring as i know what a respectable, intelligent guy you are amongst the community.

The Den of Iniquity, where all the inappropriate and valueless posts are placed

hey! i resent that..

Apart from my fine write ups in vacuous, some of my best work is in the den

Legitimate knowledgeable guys have threads in here, in fact, alot of us do.. some need a break from tireless study to have a laugh, express ourselfs. just talk socially with forum members and the crowd who have been our online buddys for a while..

In this field, if one is serious, he/she doesnt associate much and share things with heaps of people, it can get a little lonely!


Psychexplorer that was some awesome points you just made, with the 4-7 years thing being because that is roughly how long it takes to raise the kid.. a few less lines per paragraph and i reckon i could get through a whole post..

Well, I finally gave in. I'm on the last season now.


I don't watch tv, I hope you all are happy.

Edit: You know what's weird, is the brother-in-law, the DEA guy. It was pretty cut and dry for me from the beginning, here's a DEA agent, a cocky mouthy one at that, he's clearly the antagonist in this story. But, I find him likable, seriously, I like the character. Believe me this does not sit well with me, but there ya go.

Should I kill myself now?

That is called good screenwriting and character development. And when a character that has gained viewers sympathy does something unacceptable it leaves more emotional impact than someone whose character is built evil and expected to do evil deeds. More emotional impact/dissonance = better drama.
I like Breaking Bad not only because it's chemistry themed but because it has really good writing behind it.

In real world too nothing is black and white, people are not pure evil or pure good. Million different colors, million different reasons and
vertexes of peoples motivations.