Author Topic: Antibody2's Acidic Al/Hg - MDOH vs MDA  (Read 2339 times)

NeilPatrickHarris

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 274
Re: Antibody2's Acidic Al/Hg - MDOH vs MDA
« Reply #120 on: December 26, 2011, 04:21:02 AM »
moving from the oxime talk back over to the real topic at hand - antibody's al/hg oxime reduction.... i've run this reaction a number of times and it works flawlessly except for a couple failures i had which were exactly what Oerlikon reported on the previous 2 pages.  i amalgamated in either EtOH or MeOH, i've tried it both ways and it seems as though when you run it with EtOH you're more likely to have to add ice cubes to the water bath to cool it down because it runs hotter and seems to gel up easier too.  with MeOH it refluxes a little heavier but runs less of a chance of needing external cooling and doesn't gel up quite as easily as EtOH does.  the downside to MeOH is that it's emulsion-prone during the toluene extractions after the reaction is done, however if you follow my advice below and use 35% NaOH solution (i think RoidRage posted these results first a couple pages back), then use of the 35% NaOH solution will prevent the bad emulsions you may get otherwise like if you used a more dilute 10% NaOH solution and whatnot.  the stronger concentration NaOH solution gives the alcoholic/aqueous solution much more density than a more dilute NaOH solution.  if you use MeOH then be sure to use pure MeOH, not the "denatured alcohol" crap from your local hardware.  the denatured alcohol is a waste, you'll waste oxime and get crap yields.  madprossor stated this many years ago on the hive, it really fucked up his yields bad and RoidRage stated the same thing a couple pages back i think.  so be sure to use a pure alcohol for whichever you choose, for EtOH use 96% grain alcohol, for MeOH use pure methanol.

a note on the failures: waited for amalgamation to take off (same point of reference as i use with the MeNO2 al/hg - h2 bubbles evolving from solution at a decent rate, al foil is getting dull and some pieces begin to float, the EtOH or MeOH starts to turn cloudy) and then i add the oxime.  after adding the oxime everything is fine, amalgamation is still taking place, then i add the glacial acetic acid and as soon as the glacial acetic acid is added the amalgamation slowly winds down and dies.  the common factor here is with all the successful reactions i had used external heat to pre-heat the flask.  everytime i had a failure where the GAA killed the amalgamation were times i did not use any external heat at all.  going back over Oerlikon's posts, he didn't use external heating either.  Oerlikon's attempts were at a scale of ~8-25g oxime, all of which failed due to no external pre-heating.  all my attempts were around 10g oxime, give or take a few grams and experienced the same result.

so here's a quick procedural write-up on how the events take place for a successful al/hg using some external pre-heating:

*put 3-neck RBF in a water bath and toss a large stirbar in the RBF.  charge your RBF with MeOH (or EtOH if you prefer), H2O and HgCl2.  attach a reflux condenser to middle neck and stopper the side necks.  turn on stirring on and wait until HgCl2 is dissolved.

*once HgCl2 is dissolved, begin feeding ice cold water through the reflux condenser and turn on the hotplate and heat the water bath to 55-60C

*once the desired water bath temp is reached then turn off your hotplate.  you can remove the water bath at this point but i just leave it in place so that i can toss ice cubes in it to make it cool the RBF if necessary.  unstopper a side neck and add the al foil balls in through that neck.  since the MeOH/EtOH has been pre-heated, the amalgamation will take off very quickly.  instead of waiting 15-20+ minutes for the amalgamation to progress enough for it to be ready for addition, with the pre-heating to 55-60C it will take off to that point within 1-3 minutes, so have everything necessary for the remainder of the reaction already weighed out and ready for addition because once the aluminum is added you won't have time to weigh out anything.  i use a 10 molar eq of Al and GAA in relation to oxime per antibody

*once the amalgamation is ready (very fast with pre-heating, 1-3 minutes), unstopper a side neck and add the oxime then add the GAA, then re-stopper that neck.

*upon adding the oxime and GAA, the al/hg which take off very vigorously very quickly.  the most intense part of this reaction is the first 10 minutes after addition of the oxime/GAA, with emphasis on the first few minutes.  the MeOH/EtOH will get incredibly thick and turn into a thick gel just as antibody says.  you'll add a small amount of MeOH/EtOH to return it to a liquid consistency as needed.  for most people, stirring will fail and i have to resort to swirling the flask by hand.  during the first 10 minutes i also keep an eye on the water bath thermometer, as the RBF gets hotter it will heat up the water bath temperature as well.  i just keep an eye on the water bath thermometer and if i see the temperature of the water bath raising above 60C then i toss a couple ice cubes into the water bath.

*from here on out just keep an eye on it, keep the water circulating through your reflux condenser ice cold, add a small amount of MeOH/EtOH as needed if the solution gets too thick and gel-like, add a couple ice cubes to the water bath if necessary (this is most likely to only occur during the first 10 min's), swirl flask by hand if stirbar is stuck.  the time frame of events in relation to a ~10g oxime scale is that the first 10 minutes are the most intense, then it continues at a steady/easy pace for just under an hour, then it will steadily cool down from that point.  Once the reaction is complete and has started cooling off you can either reflux for 3 hours or you can let it stir overnight for several hours with no external heat.  i'm not entirely sure what the bare minimum reaction time is without effecting yields but the 2 alternatives i mentioned are the 2 options i follow.

*when it's ready to be worked up, i add a 35% NaOH solution per RoidRage's trials he posted.  i have previously added a more dilute NaOH solution but i prefer the 35% NaOH solution even though it's overkill.  the benefit to the 35% NaOH solution is that the work-up seems less emulsion-prone and separation is much faster/easier during the extractions.

*from here on out you just work it up per normal: extract, wash, a/b, gas or titrate, recrystallize.
« Last Edit: December 27, 2011, 08:23:47 PM by NeilPatrickHarris »

Gypsy

  • Larvae
  • *
  • Posts: 33
Re: Antibody2's Acidic Al/Hg - MDOH vs MDA
« Reply #121 on: January 20, 2012, 03:30:31 PM »
so I was reading about someone who preformed the standard piperonal->nitropropene (MP was 3 degrees lower than literature after rexing from IPA once) ->al/hg reduction->xylene extraction-> solvent dried over anyd. mgso4.
but as soon as they attempt to salt it with dry HCL (standard generator type, with h2s04 desiccator), the solution turns yellow to green and finally to black. with no precipitation of product. Whats going on?
edit: Gave it another try, this time I figured it out. Will post pictures (if permitted?) and a write up of how I reached the end product.
« Last Edit: January 31, 2012, 01:28:22 PM by Gypsy »

thescientist3000

  • Pupae
  • **
  • Posts: 50
Re: Antibody2's Acidic Al/Hg - MDOH vs MDA
« Reply #122 on: March 05, 2012, 11:31:41 PM »
Ferret here, would like to know a couple things, with the recent updates/revisions.

If ferret were to scale up a tad bit 50-100 range, what necessary modifications would be needed?

Couple areas of concern are:
1. Use of external heat needed still, to kick off al/hg
2. Addition rate of oxime/acetic acid.  (scoop by scoop,drip by drip fashion, or all at once)

Use of external heat, sounds like a good thing regardless.  Almalgamating the rxn as a whole would be much nicer than dropping in activated aluminum  as well.  The rate of addition may be more important to avoid a volcano eruption and choked out condensors...

Please advise the ferret.

antibody2

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 158
Re: Antibody2's Acidic Al/Hg - MDOH vs MDA
« Reply #123 on: March 08, 2012, 11:31:56 PM »
1. External heat is a good idea, continue until  all reagents are added and the rxn is well under way (vigourous hydrogen evolution) Then turn it off, you may require cooling if hydrogen evolution gets out of hand

2. Add oxime, stir until disoolved, then add the acid slowly over a minute or two

3.You can add all the aluminum at once if you want, but you will need an overhead stirrer and more solvent. Also the likleyhood of the hydrogen evolution getting out of hand is increased so external cooling will probably be required. Have another tub underneath your beaker in case it runs away on you or use a beaker with lots of head room.

thescientist3000

  • Pupae
  • **
  • Posts: 50
Re: Antibody2's Acidic Al/Hg - MDOH vs MDA
« Reply #124 on: March 12, 2012, 10:23:55 PM »
Ferret would like to know how long is the oxime stable for, once converter from ketone?

Oximes are generally pretty "storeable" so she would like to know if this can be stored air-tight in dark/cool place for a while/long time unlike its oil little sister...

Also, anyone hear from NPH?  Hope everything is ok, went from pretty active to quiet. 
Cheers.
TS

NeilPatrickHarris

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 274
Re: Antibody2's Acidic Al/Hg - MDOH vs MDA
« Reply #125 on: March 14, 2012, 07:32:44 PM »
Ferret would like to know how long is the oxime stable for, once converter from ketone?

Oximes are generally pretty "storeable" so she would like to know if this can be stored air-tight in dark/cool place for a while/long time unlike its oil little sister...

Also, anyone hear from NPH?  Hope everything is ok, went from pretty active to quiet. 
Cheers.
TS

yep, still around just been really busy and haven't had much time to check things out.  the longest i've stored this oxime was about a month with no issue at all.  i would imagine it would keep for MUCH longer.

fresh1

  • conspirator
  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 339
Re: Antibody2's Acidic Al/Hg - MDOH vs MDA
« Reply #126 on: March 15, 2012, 06:28:52 AM »
Quote
Will post pictures (if permitted?) and a write up of how I reached the end product.

absolutey definitely ;D I imagins many would find your results and reasoning useful, so Go Hard Gypsymon 8)
"Curiosity is a gift"

thescientist3000

  • Pupae
  • **
  • Posts: 50
Re: Antibody2's Acidic Al/Hg - MDOH vs MDA
« Reply #127 on: March 17, 2012, 03:12:03 AM »
Is room temp oximation procedure same as regular reflux one, except longer stirring time?


Oerlikon

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 365
Re: Antibody2's Acidic Al/Hg - MDOH vs MDA
« Reply #128 on: March 22, 2012, 11:31:52 PM »
No NPH,unfortunately not.
Your preheating thing helped but GAA did it again!

Combined and heated to 55-60°C:
160mg HgCl2
200ml MeOH
39,3g H2O

added 14,4g Al,amalgamation started fast and furious,waited like 3-5min.

added
10mg oxime
reaction started to foam,heat and bubble.
added 39,3g GAA in few portions.
After first few tiny portions reaction speed increased along with bubbling/foaming,
after all the GAA was added reaction died. :(
Tried to apply heat in vain.
My temper started to boil vigorously,
took 1mg alprazolam and 30mg morphine.HCl to calm down to avoid structural damage to the glassware.

SO WHAT THE FUCK AM I DOING WRONG!?

Too much GAA!?

Welcome to my lab,
where you can choose your own dreams!

DopeBee

  • Pupae
  • **
  • Posts: 52
Re: Antibody2's Acidic Al/Hg - MDOH vs MDA
« Reply #129 on: April 05, 2012, 02:45:39 AM »
Added to a 2000ml beaker:
28g Al
400ml MeOH
78g H2O
160mg HgCl2

After 30 minutes once the amalgamation was underway, the following was added:
78g GAA
20g oxime

No external heat was necessary for the reaction. Within 30 minutes the reaction began to heat up and reflux, not too vigorously though. It seemed to keep a steady pace for several hours though. After 3 hours it gelled up completely and returned to room temp.

jon

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,883
Re: Antibody2's Acidic Al/Hg - MDOH vs MDA
« Reply #130 on: April 05, 2012, 05:59:26 AM »
that's what i hate about those al/hg's you can only run 20-30 grams.

DopeBee

  • Pupae
  • **
  • Posts: 52
Re: Antibody2's Acidic Al/Hg - MDOH vs MDA
« Reply #131 on: April 05, 2012, 07:08:02 AM »
250g Al/Hg is fine with an ice water bath and cold water condenser to keep it under control.

jon

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,883
Re: Antibody2's Acidic Al/Hg - MDOH vs MDA
« Reply #132 on: April 05, 2012, 01:14:59 PM »
yeah the bucket reductive amination, but what a mess to work up.

NeilPatrickHarris

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 274
Re: Antibody2's Acidic Al/Hg - MDOH vs MDA
« Reply #133 on: April 05, 2012, 07:45:40 PM »
No NPH,unfortunately not.
Your preheating thing helped but GAA did it again!

Combined and heated to 55-60°C:
160mg HgCl2
200ml MeOH
39,3g H2O

added 14,4g Al,amalgamation started fast and furious,waited like 3-5min.

added
10mg oxime
reaction started to foam,heat and bubble.
added 39,3g GAA in few portions.
After first few tiny portions reaction speed increased along with bubbling/foaming,
after all the GAA was added reaction died. :(
Tried to apply heat in vain.
My temper started to boil vigorously,
took 1mg alprazolam and 30mg morphine.HCl to calm down to avoid structural damage to the glassware.

SO WHAT THE FUCK AM I DOING WRONG!?

Too much GAA!?



that's a lot of GAA.  i just followed antibody's recommendation of 10 molar eq Al to oxime and 10 molar eq GAA to oxime.  here's the ratios that have been used in the past:
in the reaction flask, stirring and pre-heated:
•   139.3g/183.2ml MeOH [1482% w/w MeOH to oxime]
•   37g/37ml H2O [393.3% w/w H2O to oxime]
•    0.18g HgCl2 (0.000668 moles) [0.0137 molar eq hgcl2 to oxime]
when it reaches the desired temp, then the al is added:
•   13.13g Aluminum Foil (0.4865 moles)[10 molar eq Al to oxime]
amalgamation occurs very quickly at this temperature, when the time is right - the oxime is added quickly all at once and immediately after that, the GAA is added all at once:
•   9.4g Ketoxime (0.04865 moles)
•   29.2g/27.8ml Glacial Acetic Acid (0.4865 moles)[10 molar eq AcOH to oxime]
all the nerve-wracking action happens within the first 5-ish min's of adding the oxime and GAA but during the reaction, the solution may become thick or may need some fresh MeOH to help cool it off, so:
•   20ml MeOH additions as necessary [~10% v/v increments to reaction flask MeOH]
some people reflux the reaction for 3 hours, some people let the reaction run at room temp for 5 hours once it's calmed down, prior trials i've just let it run overnight then:
•   397.5g/294.5ml 35% refrigerator chilled NaOH solution (294.5g/294.5ml h2o + 103g NaOH)
then extract, washes, a/b, gas or titrate
« Last Edit: April 05, 2012, 07:48:46 PM by NeilPatrickHarris »

thescientist3000

  • Pupae
  • **
  • Posts: 50
Re: Antibody2's Acidic Al/Hg - MDOH vs MDA
« Reply #134 on: April 08, 2012, 09:05:18 PM »
Ferret would like to know if there are any tips available for forming the oxime from ketone at room temperature?

Is it simply same ratios, but prolonged stirring, without added heat?

A simple write-up would be the best for a ferret.

:TS3k:

RoidRage

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 386
Re: Antibody2's Acidic Al/Hg - MDOH vs MDA
« Reply #135 on: April 09, 2012, 07:11:58 PM »
I'd use the same ratios as for the procedure using reflux. As for reaction time, unless you can follow the reaction by TLC, keep in mind that the general ''rule of thumb'' is that reaction rate double every 10 additional celcius degrees.  I'd let it spin for a day to be sure.

thescientist3000

  • Pupae
  • **
  • Posts: 50
Re: Antibody2's Acidic Al/Hg - MDOH vs MDA
« Reply #136 on: May 28, 2012, 02:29:28 AM »
A ferret performed the acidic al/hg.  Surprised as the extraction was cleaner looking then the normal al/hg.  The gassed product was also cleaner looking, although smaller crystals, more powdery.  On a disheartening note, it was tested with a reagent tester and didnt react appropriately.  Ferret is cautious to bioassay but will do so anyways.  The reagent tester is old, and was last drop so may have went bad.

The acidic performed flawless per notes on here.  Heated up 50c or so, oxime added, acetic added, pace picked up after acid was added, got violent, reacted for 30min, warm for couple hours.

One possibility and a concern would be... If excess hydroxylamine went in with the oxime in al/hg, what would happen?

The oxime was washed numerous times, and crushed, as it got quite hard and crunchy, to hopefully remove all hydroxylamine.

Cross your fingers for the ferret test please!

RoidRage

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 386
Re: Antibody2's Acidic Al/Hg - MDOH vs MDA
« Reply #137 on: May 31, 2012, 05:50:48 PM »
Pretty sure excess hydroxylamine would get reduced to ammonia (Which would probably forms ammonium acetate with GAA). Unlikely a real excess of hydroxylamine is getting into the reduction step though, especially if you used the correct reagents amounts used in this thread. Marquis reagent (I suppose that's what you're using) is known to go bad after a while. What was your yield ?
« Last Edit: May 31, 2012, 06:00:09 PM by RoidRage »

antibody2

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 158
Re: Antibody2's Acidic Al/Hg - MDOH vs MDA
« Reply #138 on: July 06, 2012, 01:42:45 AM »
What reagent did you use to test it?

It is unlikely that more than traces of hydroxylamine would make it into your product as it is soluble in your reaction solvent, thus it will not precipitate with your oxime.

More likely your reagent is past its prime.

thescientist3000

  • Pupae
  • **
  • Posts: 50
Re: Antibody2's Acidic Al/Hg - MDOH vs MDA
« Reply #139 on: August 03, 2012, 10:36:27 PM »
Ferret used Simon's reagent, new.

Upon testing, it reacted the same as MDMA would react, strange.  It went to purple/blue, once "a" was added, even before "b" was added to complete test.

Ferret says another ferret gets sick when taking it, although other ferret feels fine.  There are unknowns though, such as drinking alcohol before consumption, or taking too much, having been used to mdma, where taking too much doesnt get many sick. 

Ferret notices more speedy, and extreme jaw clenching, but no visuals as many speak of.  Cant comment on the other ferrets experiences. 

What is strange is ferret notices mdma having a odor still, slight yellow and large crystals(not washed enough ok.) but the mda is super white and small powdery with no odor, yet no 'tone wash either.