Author Topic: Antibody2's Acidic Al/Hg - MDOH vs MDA  (Read 2339 times)

NeilPatrickHarris

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 274
Antibody2's Acidic Al/Hg - MDOH vs MDA
« on: October 14, 2010, 11:52:13 PM »
following Antibody2's acidic al/hg reduction of the mdp2p oxime to MDA follows some type of curve where a higher ratio of Al leads to MDA whereas a lower ratio of Al leads to MDOH.  this leaves me with 2 questions

1.
why does the amount of Al affect the ratio of MDOH to MDA produced?

2.
also, in his writeup he adds Al periodically throughout the reaction.  you'd think if you don't time the addition of the Al correctly then you risk more MDOH formation.  you'd think a better way to go about this is add the MDP2P oxime incrementally like other Al/Hg's.  Chromic adds all the Al at once at the beginning, waits for the amalgamation then adds the MDP2P oxime all at once along with the AcOH.  I think this sounds like a better way to go about it because the time period in which additions are performed depends on the scale of the Al/Hg.  Smaller Al/Hg's run faster of course and larger runs run longer.  So I like Chromic's variation a little better as to avoid MDOH formation by potentially adding the Al a little too late which would cause MDOH formation one would think.  The only thing is that Chromic ran it on a small scale using only 6.4g MDP2P oxime and he said it ran hot and fast with an impressive MeOH reflux (Chromic used MeOH instead of EtOH) but quickly petered out.  If it were scaled up x4 then one would worry about a runaway reaction of adding all the MDP2P oxime at once.  It's definitely one of those things you just have to run a few times and get the hang of the reaction to be able to know the best addition route.

Antibody2's original write-up:
h**p://www.erowid.org/archive/rhodium/chemistry/alhg.oxime.html

here is Chromic's variation:
Quote
I watched the crazy old man with the dark trimmed glasses go at it again. This time he fucking amazed me! I saw him do something like 125ml MeOH, 25mL H2O, pinch HgCl2 (i'd say about 50mg or so), stirred. 8.9g Al, stirred ~20 mins. Added 6.4g isosafrole ketoxime, added 25g HOAc. ~3 hours pass with mag stirring (flask is only warm to the touch). Slowly added 90g NaOH dissolved in 200mL ice-water. Extracted with 80ml, then 45ml toluene. Washed with 150ml 5% NaOH, filter, 150ml 5% NaOH, 150ml brine. Titrated to pH 4 with HCl in distilled water with stirring. Evaporated water. 5.9g MDA.HCl yield (before recrystallization). (83% crude yield!!!)
The reaction ran HOT and FAST. It was over and done in about two or three hours. The yields are FUCKING STELLAR.
Antibody gets two thumbs up for this procedure!!!
Things learned (this is his third run of ketoxime reduction, btw):
1) you can use MeOH instead of EtOH, which is good news
2) you can amalgamate all the Al before hand and in situ as MM does (very good news!)
This definitely paves the way for OTC MDA.HCl in high yields! (or is it really MDOH.HCl? ahh, who really cares!)
HAPPY, HAPPY, JOY, JOY!!!!!
reaction ran hot during the first hour, with a healthly reflux, then petered out quickly. It was over by two hours and was warm to the touch by the third hour. 83% yield is the highest yield I've ever gotten with an Al/Hg. I can't believe it happened with a ketoxime reduction...  The MDA/MDMA mixture is phenomenal!  it was 75mg/75mg... it included dreaming while awake, long-lasting buzz, full pupil dilation, intense euphoria... all round it's highly recommended!

here's a run Antibody2 did that focused on MDOH instead of MDA:
Quote
Antibody2:
A recent batch of MDOH was prepared via Al/Hg redxn of the ketoxime using 5 equivalents of Al and HOAc, 150mls H2O, 200mls IPA and 1650mls MeOH using the above proceedure. (10x produces higher yeilds with a much higher MDA ratio) In an attempt to further isolate the MDOH, its lower solubility in alcohols was exploited, and was  slowly recrystalized from  an equivalent w/w of boiling MeOH. The crop of crystals that formed when the solution had cooled to RT were vacuum filtered. The balance refridgerated to produce a second crop. Then reduced and and refridgerated to yield a third. (yeild ca. 72% w/w from oxime)

The odour of the first and to a large extent the second crop was completely dissimilar to MDA. The odor could be characterized as sweet. If you are familiar with MDA there is no mistaking the two.

RoidRage

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 386
Re: Antibody2's Acidic Al/Hg - MDOH vs MDA
« Reply #1 on: October 15, 2010, 06:44:15 AM »
I also like the fact that temperature control doesn't seems to be needed, as opposed Antibody's version. Unless I'm miskaten, it's probably due to the fact that it already runs cooler since it uses MeOH/AcOH instead of EtOH/AcOH. I never saw this variation before but I'm glad I just found it .  Can't wait to try the result  ;D

NeilPatrickHarris

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 274
Re: Antibody2's Acidic Al/Hg - MDOH vs MDA
« Reply #2 on: October 15, 2010, 12:17:57 PM »
it seems sometimes Chromic used heat sometimes he didn't.  i think the general population would apply heat after the exothermic reaction was done and they'd keep the heat going anywhere from 3-5 hours.  there really isn't a whole lot out there on this procedure, i'm really curious to know why the amount of Al effects formation of MDOH vs MDA.  AB2 said the lowest amount of Al and AcOH you can get away with was 7.5 eq, with 10 eq being the desirable amount, using 5 eq favors MDOH and lower overall yields.  anyway here are some more trials from the old hive archives:

Quote
he treated 9g of wet mdp2p oxime (it had been drying 5days as a paste, and was finally 'crumbly') as if it were 9g of dry oxime using antibody's reduction in EtOH.

it took a bit more EtOH than expected, like 200ml of 85% to start with and 3x 20ml more to keep it stirring over 5h. required intermittent cooling the first 1.5h to keep it at 60C.

anyway, swim used his head and added 28.5g NaOH (still overkill as pH was 14) instead of the 80g antibody reccomends, no NaCl, and enough h2o to make 1.5x the volume of EtOH in the reaction.

extracted with 100ml, 4x 50ml toluene, washed with 3x 100ml brine, dried, and gassed out 7g of bright white mda.hcl.

if you fail to add enough water to the alcoholic mother solution, it simply is not dense enough for the toluene to separate out on top. which complicates the workup and can cause emulsions that would never have otherwise occured...

anyway, the best part is that swim measured the MP at 186-188C.

from Phikal-
hydrochloride salt [of MDOH] had a mp of 149-150 °C (and should not be confused with the hydrochloride of MDA which has a mp of 185-186 °C since the mixed mp is depressed, mp 128-138 °C)

swim expected his MP to be 1-2C high, as he was measuring the temp of an oilbath containing a test tube with ~30mg mda at the bottom. so the MP is right on, no mdoh present here!

from /hiveboard/methods/000454529.html
Quote
11.6g ketone (should have used the higher fraction) + 5.67g NH2OH.HCl + 48.9ml EtOH + 9.8ml H2O + 5.15g Na2CO3. reflux 1.5h, add 25ml H2O. yield .4g dry oxime, + 8.6g oxime which was separated by decantation then evaporation (1week drying).

9g oxime + 10.8g Al, 177ml EtOH + 19ml H2O, amalgamate, add the oxime + 25g HOAc. antibody says to use 83g NaOH in 138ml soln for extraction but 16.7g NaOH will neutralize the HOAc. added 3x 20ml 85% EtOH to keep reaction from jelling-up. stirred 5h, got thick, added 28.5g NaOH in 125ml H2O, (pH 12ish), added 210ml H2O, extracted 5x50ml toluene, washed 3x 80ml brine, dried over 15g MgSO4, gassed 2x to yield 7g MDA.HCl

Quote
21.25g ketone, 9.43g Na2CO3 + 18ml H2O, heat, add ketone + 89.6ml EtOH, 10.1g NH2OH.HCl, reflux 1.5h, add 45.8ml H2O, place in freezer 20h in a large beaker (added 30ml more H2O). added seed crystal, waited, and filtered 17.7g of slightly yellow oxime (after drying 1day), melting point 80-something C.

17.7g oxime + 21.25g Al foil, 380ml MeOH + 77ml H2O, add oxime, add 49.17g HOAc, ran awhile. added 52.6g NaOH to pH 12, 4g more NaOH gave pH 13, 320ml H2O. added 10g NaOH, 40ml H2O, 100ml brine. split the mother liquor in half. added 100ml toluene- total emulsion. broke emulsion by adding 300ml brine and extracted with additional 50ml, 40, 30, 2x 20 toluene. to other 450ml mother liquor added 450ml brine, extracted 70,50,40,2x30,20ml toluene. washed the 400ml total toluene extracts w/ 2x 100, 2x 75, 4x 50ml brine (until no emulsion forms). added 24g MgSO4.1H2O for drying, gassed 4x to yield 14g MDA.HCl

Quote
12.7g 2nd fraction ketone. add 5.64g Na2CO3 to 10.8ml H2O, heat, add ketone in 53.5ml EtOH, add 6.2g NH2OH.HCl, reflux 2h. add 31ml H2O and cool 12h in freezer. filter and dry overnight to get 10.68g mdp2p oxime.

10.68g oxime + 12.8g Al, 164ml EtOH + 16.6ml H2O, 29.7g HOAc. add 2x 45ml 85% EtOH as necessary. added 34g NaOH in 360ml H2O to pH 14. extract 70ml, 2x 60, 50, 40 toluene (280ml). wash 3x 100ml brine (no emulsions). dry over 18g MgSO4, gas 7.06g MDA.HCl (with some Al unreacted).

Quote
20.6g ketone, 9.15g Na2CO3 + 17.5ml H2O, heat, add ketone, 86.8ml EtOH, 10.05g NH2OH.HCl, reflux 2h, add 50ml H2O, cool, seed and filter after 7h, then filter again 6h later to catch the oxime that slipped thru. yield 22.62g oxime weighed on a Mettler +-1mg.

22.62g oxime + 27.144g Al, 382ml 85% EtOH = 346.8ml EtOH + 35.2ml H2O, amalgamate, add oxime + 62.8g HOAc, add 75ml 85% EtOH during reaction (should have used 150ml as Antibody2). (also should have used good EtOH instead of the orange-store denatured S-L-K shit). stirred 6.5h. add 71g NaOH in 380ml H2O to pH 14 which causes reflux to begin again. poured mother liquor into a 1L beaker, added 60ml H2O to carry the excess AlOH+goodies over. extracted 104ml, 92ml, 79ml, 72ml, 63ml, 52ml, 40ml xylene (492ml total). washed 5x 100ml brine. dry over 32g MgSO4.1H2O. gas 12.4g MDA.HCl. fuck that bad-EtOH nonsense.

here's a trial by Chromic where he didn't use any acid but did use external heat.  he then theorizes why AB2 thought the acid was necessary, i don't think any duplicated these attempts or gave a real peer review:
hiveboard/methods/000476580.html
Quote
175ml MeOH, 35ml H2O, 100mg HgCl2, 11.5g Al. Stirred about 15 minutes. Then 16.4g crunchy white isosafrole ketoxime was added (it did not all dissolve?). Reacted until all foil was gone (lightly refluxed around 2hr point until end of rxn, at which point all ketoxime did dissolve). Basified with 60g NaOH in 135ml water. Extracted with toluene, washed with 10% NaOH, filtered toluene, washed again with 10% NaOH. Titrated with HCl until pH 4. Evaporated water. 12.7g white MDA before IPA recrystallization. (69%)

I must say that the yields aren't the 83% I got before with the 10 eq AcOH and 10 eq Al--but then again only 5 eq Al was used (so this could explain the lowered yield).

Perhaps the difference between the two of us trying it could be the external heat I applied? Perhaps the acetic acid consumes the foil fast enough to raise the temperature, and hydrochloric acid too quickly for it to matter? Just a thought.

Did you apply external heat when you tried it without acid? Was all the foil consumed? (I've learned that if the foil is not completely consumed it's a terrible sign for an Al/Hg)

Now my next question is a terrible question. Was it the lack of acid or the reduced amount of foil that dragged down the yield ~10%? (or was it a sort of sloppy workup, where the rxn mix was only extracted 1x with toluene, or was it because I used less base... oh no, sorry guys. there's more small, tiny riddles to be solved) Well, at least we know that the acid isn't necessary for an Al/Hg reduction of ketoximes.

from the same thread, Antibody2's response as to why AcOH was the acid of choice:
Quote
i have a theory on why the HCl didn't work as well as HOAc,and it was beacause the HCl was a strong enough acid to react directly with the Al forming alot AlCl3 before the oxime was ever reduced, while the HOAc wasn't a strong enough acid to form an Al salt, not quickly anyways, otherwise the rxn mixture would have been basic at the end of the rxn not still acid.

So i think when HCl was used as the acid in short order it was the same as if no acid was used, which gave the reduced yeilds consistent (or lower) with what Chromic just posted. Thats my theory, for whatever it is worth.

here's a statement by madprossor who ran the AB2's mdp2p oxime reduction many times:
hiveboard/methods/000524033.html
Quote
antibody's AcOH/Al/Hg worked as expected. better in EtOH than MeOH (many emulsions when extracting with toluene in the later case).

and an FYI, per Rhodium "MDP2P oxime derivative, mp 86-87°C"
source: hiveboard/novel/000399715.html
« Last Edit: October 15, 2010, 12:23:45 PM by NeilPatrickHarris »

NeilPatrickHarris

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 274
Re: Antibody2's Acidic Al/Hg - MDOH vs MDA
« Reply #3 on: October 15, 2010, 02:59:36 PM »
wikipedia answered my question:

Quote
Hydroxylamine (NH2OH), or hydroxylamines (R-NHOH) can be reduced to amines.[5]

        NH2OH (Zn/HCl) -> NH3
        R-NHOH (Zn/HCl) -> R-NH2
^ h**p://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydroxylamine

the oxime is reduced to MDOH which is then further reduced to MDA.  so if enough reducing agent is not available then it will stop at MDOH and not be able to reduce it any further.  Antibody2 seemed to say that 5eq Al was enough to reduce to MDOH with decent yields, so twice as much (10eq) Al ensures there's enough reducing agent to reduce all the oxime present all the way to the primary amine

RoidRage

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 386
Re: Antibody2's Acidic Al/Hg - MDOH vs MDA
« Reply #4 on: October 15, 2010, 08:29:23 PM »
wikipedia answered my question:

Quote
Hydroxylamine (NH2OH), or hydroxylamines (R-NHOH) can be reduced to amines.[5]

        NH2OH (Zn/HCl) -> NH3
        R-NHOH (Zn/HCl) -> R-NH2
^ h**p://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydroxylamine

the oxime is reduced to MDOH which is then further reduced to MDA.  so if enough reducing agent is not available then it will stop at MDOH and not be able to reduce it any further.  Antibody2 seemed to say that 5eq Al was enough to reduce to MDOH with decent yields, so twice as much (10eq) Al ensures there's enough reducing agent to reduce all the oxime present all the way to the primary amine

Cool...I've always wondered what favored MDA formation over MDOH. Your reasoning is pretty logical.

Since procedures seems pretty scarce, I think I will report my results when I have run a couple reactions with differents reactions conditions.

Methansaeuretierchen

  • Larvae
  • *
  • Posts: 27
Re: Antibody2's Acidic Al/Hg - MDOH vs MDA
« Reply #5 on: October 16, 2010, 04:03:06 AM »
A question btw... would NaBH4 reduce a oxime to a hydroxylamine?

tregar

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 122
Re: Antibody2's Acidic Al/Hg - MDOH vs MDA
« Reply #6 on: October 18, 2010, 03:06:17 PM »
Don't have much to add, just wanted to say excellent thread and compilations.

RoidRage

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 386
Re: Antibody2's Acidic Al/Hg - MDOH vs MDA
« Reply #7 on: October 19, 2010, 11:07:30 AM »
Any ideas why the damn oxime revert back to MDP2P when I add water post-reaction ? As far as I know, the oximation process is fully reversible but in acidic conditions. I've never even though this process was supposed to have complications. I've already ran the reactions 3 times and it's the same thing everytime. I add water, solution turns cloudy, and the ketone slowly sinks to the bottom while it's in the freezer.  ??? Only time I was able to recover what I suppose is the oxime, is when I didn't add any water post-reaction. Then I putted the reaction content in the freezer, but only for 35minutes, then suction filtered and washed it with cold water, but It again turned back to the ketone. Was able to recover a whole 300mg of what I supposed is the oxime. Only way I can test now is with marquis reagent and it actually turns purple after drying.

I've remade calculations just to be sure Chromic didn't make any mistakes (would have highly surprised me but I just wanted to make sure)

Since the reaction is so straightforward, I'm wondering what the problem is. It isn't the ketone (density checked, color & smell as usual). I really don't think it can be the sodium carbonate lol. Could be the hydroxylamine Hcl, since I didn't buy it directly from a chemical vendor, but the appearance, smell & everything else is like it's supposed to be. And it reacts as it should when it is added to the base (Agree it could be any others salts, but highly unlikely...I wouldn't see the point of selling ''fake'' Hydroxylamine Hcl).

I plan on trying it again when I come back from uni, but this time I won't add water post reaction neither, and I won't actually wash it with water post-reaction.
« Last Edit: October 19, 2010, 11:22:05 AM by RoidRage »

RoidRage

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 386
Re: Antibody2's Acidic Al/Hg - MDOH vs MDA
« Reply #8 on: October 19, 2010, 07:38:51 PM »
Damnit....Retried the oxime formation and only got 2g of Wet oxime from 9g of ketone...There is definitly a problem somewhere...Anybody got ideas...I'd rather ask here than start a new thread lol

jon

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,883
Re: Antibody2's Acidic Al/Hg - MDOH vs MDA
« Reply #9 on: October 19, 2010, 11:52:27 PM »
have you considered dean stark water removal?

if you want to isolate a ketoxine you have to remove water.
likely a mild reducing agent would reduce the ketoxime in equilibrium if it is chemoselective.
likely nabh4 would work **if*** there the oxime was'nt in equilibrium ie. dry in alcohol.
« Last Edit: October 20, 2010, 12:20:33 AM by jon »

akcom

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 430
Re: Antibody2's Acidic Al/Hg - MDOH vs MDA
« Reply #10 on: October 19, 2010, 11:59:02 PM »
Jon, what are you referring to when you say "likely NaBH4"?   I really don't see why the reaction is failing to begin with.

From the archive:
Quote
In this example anethole ketone was used to form anethole ketoxime, but the amount of MDP2P is the given and in the end it will give a similar yield. Detailed notes on using isosafrole ketone aren't in my lab book as the procedure is straight forward and I never thought it necessary to take notes.
Added a 1" magnetic stirbar, 14ml dH2O and 6.7g Na2CO3 (126mmol base, 1.35 equiv) to a 250ml round bottom flask. Start stirring and add 9.6g (NH2OH)2.H2SO4 (116mmol hydroxylamine in the salt, 1.25 eq). Allow this to stir until uniform and add 72ml MeOH and 15.3g PMP2P (93mmol phenylacetone, 1 eq - or 16.6g MDP2P). Refluxed for 60 mins then added 37ml cold water. A white sludge settles to the bottom of the flask. This is not the oxime. Move this to the freezer for one hour. Remove and shake. Crunchy crystals of ketoxime should form. Do not confuse this with a thick sludge that always forms. Suction filter the solution and wash the crystals with 186ml of cold water. If you go to filter before the crystals form, you will see an oil form in the filter flask, this is your oxime that failed to crystallize. The yield of white anethole ketoxime in this example was 14.6g (87% yield). Expect a higher yield! I accidentally spilled some oil in transferring it... Isosafrole ketoxime has always been prepared in just as good yields, but has always turned out an off-white color. No purification was ever used before proceeding to the reduction. Make sure the oxime is bone dry--this can take days--before you take the yield and progress to the reduction. Also note that other substitutions for the hydroxylamine source, other alcohol solvents and other bases (baking soda, sodium acetate, etc) have worked just as well when in equimolar amounts.

jon

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,883
Re: Antibody2's Acidic Al/Hg - MDOH vs MDA
« Reply #11 on: October 20, 2010, 12:19:17 AM »
right if you have it dry in alcohol i don't see why it would'nt work.

akcom

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 430
Re: Antibody2's Acidic Al/Hg - MDOH vs MDA
« Reply #12 on: October 20, 2010, 12:30:16 AM »
Even in something like 91% iPrOH, I don't see why it wouldn't work.  Oxime formation isn't an equilibrium is it?

RoidRage

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 386
Re: Antibody2's Acidic Al/Hg - MDOH vs MDA
« Reply #13 on: October 20, 2010, 12:40:03 AM »
have you considered dean stark water removal?

if you want to isolate a ketoxine you have to remove water.
likely a mild reducing agent would reduce the ketoxime in equilibrium if it is chemoselective.
likely nabh4 would work **if*** there the oxime was'nt in equilibrium ie. dry in alcohol.

Are you talking to me Jon lol :D?

Wizard X

  • Lord of the Realms
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,224
Re: Antibody2's Acidic Al/Hg - MDOH vs MDA
« Reply #14 on: October 20, 2010, 12:42:30 AM »
The oxime (from hydroxylamine) had a mp of 85-88 oC. http://www.erowid.org/library/books_online/pihkal/pihkal109.shtml

114 MDOH. http://www.erowid.org/library/books_online/pihkal/pihkal114.shtml

SYNTHESIS: To a well stirred solution of 14.8 g hydroxylamine hydrochloride in 120 mL MeOH there was added 3.6 g of 3,4-methylenedioxyphenylacetone (see under MDMA for its preparation) followed by 1.0 g sodium cyanoborohydride. The oxime, prepared from the ketone and hydroxylamine in MeOH with pyridine, may be substituted for these two components.

81 FLEA. http://www.erowid.org/library/books_online/pihkal/pihkal081.shtml

Albert Einstein - "Great ideas often receive violent opposition from mediocre minds."

jon

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,883
Re: Antibody2's Acidic Al/Hg - MDOH vs MDA
« Reply #15 on: October 20, 2010, 01:15:47 AM »
well they are using in the above example chemoselective reagents for a reason.
i'm not going to argue all day about this.

akcom

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 430
Re: Antibody2's Acidic Al/Hg - MDOH vs MDA
« Reply #16 on: October 20, 2010, 01:32:17 AM »
I'm not arguing, I'm trying to understand why he's obtaining such a large amount of MDP2P.  My only suggestion would be using a stronger base.  For my oxime formations, I use NaOH dissolved in water without any problems.  80% consistent yields.

jon

  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,883
Re: Antibody2's Acidic Al/Hg - MDOH vs MDA
« Reply #17 on: October 20, 2010, 01:39:55 AM »
it's questionable why acids are used in the al'hg reduction then, since the system is basic i have no personal expirience with ketoximes i made mda using different methods.
perhaps it is used to keep it in solution

lugh

  • Global Moderator
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 876
Re: Antibody2's Acidic Al/Hg - MDOH vs MDA
« Reply #18 on: October 20, 2010, 04:16:59 PM »
The reaction works best with acetic acid  ::) The work up using methanol as a solvent is more difficult because of the sodium acetate that's produced during the reaction so it's better to use EtOH or IPA  ;)  One can use sodium borohydride with titanium tetrachloride or nickel Chloride as well  :P  These reductions can be done using THF as a solvent too  :)  It's certainly possible to get the ketone from the oxime, that's one of the ways that p2p is made  8)
Chemistry is our Covalent Bond

NeilPatrickHarris

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 274
Re: Antibody2's Acidic Al/Hg - MDOH vs MDA
« Reply #19 on: October 20, 2010, 04:53:29 PM »
do you have detailed notes you can share for both the oximation and reduction?  i've never done the AcOH al/hg so i can't be of any help there but it will give everybody more info to go by.  chromic did a run without using any acid in MeOH but suffered lower yields, AB2 said without the acid he got nothing but failure.  as far as the type of acid, AcOH is preferred like lugh says.  I'm not sure what difference using stronger acids will do but i seem to recall that by the very least a stronger acid will cause the amalgamation to rip through the Al too fast.  Chromic posted great yields using MeOH but everybody else has difficulty from it for the same reason lugh mentions, Chromic must've had the magic tough is all i can say.  Better to stick with EtOH like AB2 originally wrote up from the sounds of it.