Author Topic: Enemies of submerged culture  (Read 349 times)

overunity33

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Enemies of submerged culture
« on: June 03, 2011, 07:30:28 AM »
I think its important to know what other organisms might contaminate a submerged culture of claviceps.  There is a high osmotic pressure which I believe very few common organisms can live in.  The Fungi list is from an indoor distribution, lets assume there are no sources of soil in the room and no animals in the house.  The bacteria list is from a study involving a dentists office, whos atmosphere should represent a properly cleaned lab.

Fungi:

Cludosporium (38.8%)
spergillus/Penicillium (19.8%),
Leptosphaeria A (7.9%)
unidentified basidiospores (6.5%)
unidenti-fied ascospores (2.8%)
Ganoderma (2.6%)
Alternaria(1.9%)
Coprinus (1.8%)
Epicoccum (0.3%)
Other unidentified spores (8.9%)
hyphal fragments (6.3%)

bacteria:
Streptococci forming 79.23%
staphylococci/micrococci (15.7%)
corynebacteria (2.3%)
endospore-form-ing bacilli (1.45%),
Gram-negative bacteria (1.31%),
actinomycetes (0.01%).


From what I understand there are practically no viruses which could affect claviceps noticeably.  Of all these which do you think are a threat to a submerged culture of claviceps ?  Is there a Merck index for organisms, like their environment or range of osmotic pressure?

The Lone Stranger

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 198
Re: Enemies of submerged culture
« Reply #1 on: June 03, 2011, 09:21:48 AM »
Is that Aspergillus or spergillus ? I`ve never heard of spergillus and cant find it in scroogle .

"I think its important to know what other organisms might contaminate a submerged culture of claviceps"

Things that can get into the culture that will grow on the same substrate .

"There is a high osmotic pressure which I believe very few common organisms can live in."

What is the preasure ? If Claviceps can live in it why would other fungi and bacteria have a problem ?

"whos atmosphere should represent a properly cleaned lab."

Why ? A dentists is an open public room where fungi , bacteria and virii get in with the air wich isnt filtered and with all the , us , dirty contaminated bastards that wander in and out with no sterilility precautions .

Any culture would be made in a sterile maybe over-preasure lab and / or at least in a sterile over-preasure glove box . The tanks that sandoz grow it in are massive stainless steel silo like tanks ......... or at least that is how they grew it shown in the fotos i`ve seen . Those tanks would need to be agresively sterilised . I did a lot of asking years ago about it and was told that trying to grow and get ergot alkaloids from a liquid culture is a waste of time for anyone who hasnt got a proper lab , exactly the right claviceps and who cant test the claviceps used before its used for content . I was also told that they have to keep chooseing new cultures to use . Plus that to grow it properly it has to be kept moveing and be airated . That would make it nearly imposible to do for anyone without a lab .

The easyest way to get claviceps is from a flour mill

Youve probably all read it but there is a nice book out there called "Die mutterkorn-alkaloide" by uncle Albert ( <---- Hofmann ) .

The whole idea of  liquid cultivateing claviceps as a source of ergot alkaloids is stupid as its hard and easyer to get them from  / in countrys like india and / or by growing plants that produce them in their seeds there as has been shown recently by the busts on big LSD labs in india

The strangeness factor ------> If thats fuckin shit and a load of bolloks please tell me and point me in the right direction to find the facts .
« Last Edit: June 03, 2011, 09:46:58 AM by The Lone Stranger »

overunity33

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Re: Enemies of submerged culture
« Reply #2 on: June 03, 2011, 02:31:23 PM »
I know youre only trying to be constructive but if you really think that ergot cultivation at home is impossible why not read the lsa bioreactor post and then check out ergot cultivation medium thread... aniraceam has proved it.  As far as logistics go, you think sterilized air flow to a in-culture bubbler is gona stop the type of people who are driven for this then you are for sure wrong.

aniracetam

  • bioanalytical chemist
  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 123
Re: Enemies of submerged culture
« Reply #3 on: June 03, 2011, 03:09:37 PM »
(first batch was compromised, second batch was successful, characterized by ESI-MS.)
lately what I've found (under the microscope, and experimentally) is two possible factors which may inhibit alk production...the presence of [rod-shaped] endospore bacteria, i.e. bacillus spp., and mutation of a producer  strain to a nonproducer strain (this is noticeable from multiple passages on PDA plates). The former is for obvious reasons: competition for substrate, if it is actively colonizing. The latter is probably more of an issue, and one which needs to be addressed further. A paper which describes this is attached
*gives credit to Vespiary colleagues...thanks, guys*

UV-induced mutation is a roll of the dice, and arsenate salts are not easy to come by. what are some other options to regenerate the genetics for alk production?
It seems this issue is the most challenging aspect of the project, but it is also more amenable than, say,
getting wild-type c.purpurea to produce alks in submerged culture.

claviceps is a rather aggressive fungus, especially the nonproducer strain; it colonizes much more quickly than p.cubensis, so it's pretty resistant to bacterial competition (aside from bacillus, which can also thrive in the high osmotic pressure of ferm broth). However, it is the slower-colonizing darker variety of claviceps that is desirable for alk production.  

Lone Stranger, cocci bacteria are the ones which are inhibited in a high-osmotic pressure solution, as the lack the rigid cell-wall of bacillus; hence, they do not readily colonize. to determine what the osmotic pressure is of a solution, some solution density calculations are conducted. It's a widely accepted fact in microbiology that certain strains of fungus can not only grow in said solutions, but also alter their morphology. This is discussed in the the book "The Fungi" by Carlisle et al.

It's easy to knock an experiment, a la drone342, since there are easier methods out there; but you
really don't know unless you attempt the experiment yourself.
all the easy stuff has been beaten to death, pure science involves tackling problems.
« Last Edit: June 05, 2011, 05:57:37 PM by aniracetam »
"Experiments are the only means of knowledge at our disposal. The rest is poetry, imagination." - Max Planck

overunity33

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Re: Enemies of submerged culture
« Reply #4 on: June 03, 2011, 04:58:12 PM »
I think that paper sums it up pretty well.  Keep your cultures on cornsteep malt agar and transfer it every week or so, from the darker producing colonies.  Maybe every once in a while start a fresh culture from a dehydrated/lypholized master culture.

Thanks for the info, have you noticed a morphological difference between the producing and weak strain on PDA?

Also in that paper they say that they are using a sporilating strain... the most common academic strain is non-sporilating.  When you grow it on cornsteep malt agar you induce sporilation and at this point can determine the producing colonies... The academic strain should still exhibit similar morphology on this medium even tho it doesnt sporilate.. right?

Worst case a properly done freeze drying will return the strain to its max vigor, something about the better substrains surviving...

gentamicin should take care of various baccilus right? Kaomycin is avaliable at the same prices, same places and I think is just as if not more heat stable.

Tsathoggua

  • Autistic sociopath
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 662
Re: Enemies of submerged culture
« Reply #5 on: June 03, 2011, 05:20:39 PM »
It will be Aspergillus.

The easiest way to get Claviceps spp. is in the wild, on grass.

Liquid cultivation isnn't stupid at all, yes its hard, yes you have to revitalise your cultures, yes it involves working with some all-around pretty vile mutagenic chemicals.

Besides, a chindian could grass Tsathoggua up, if it choose to do so,  there are reporting procedures in place with (pseudo)ephedrine  sales you know, official agreements between hong kong-US, india-US and more, even extending in some cases, to trades that the US are never a party to, for reporting of sales to certain places.

He just doesn't have the faith in mankind that some people must do........people suck, they are greedy, venial, twofaced and shallow for the most part, if some chindian gets offered the chance to double his rations to TWO bowls of rice a week in exchange for a list of the names of his customers...do you think he isn't going to leap up and say 'yessir uncle sam thank you sir, now may I lick your boots clean in the name of holy ganesh while I'm at it?'

Some of the species occuring in that sample strike me as perhaps atypical, and perhaps not typical constituents of what might be flowing around say, an inner city, the countryside, your backgarden shed...it will vary.

Coprinus, Ganoderma I feel safe in saying will not pose a threat. those two are both saprophytic species growing mostly on dead wood, other unidentified basidiospores and ascospores are likely to be a lesser threat and belong to macrofungi. Most endospore forming bacteria are anaerobes which form spores to protect against destruction in aerobic conditions or other hostile environments, and will not reproduce in the highly oxygenated environment of a Claviceps culture (such as Anthrax, and Clostridium species)

I believe mutagenesis is essential, what strain was the one used by you, aniracetam? in every single paper I have ever read, wild type fungi produced the merest scraps of alkaloid in culture, we are talking 10-15mg/l.
Nomen mihi Legio est, quia multi sumus

I'm hyperbolic, hypergolic, viral, chiral. So motherfucking twisted my laevo is on the right side.

aniracetam

  • bioanalytical chemist
  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 123
Re: Enemies of submerged culture
« Reply #6 on: June 03, 2011, 05:53:45 PM »
Here's some spot tests I did with Van Urk's (2% paradimethylaminobenzaldehyde in 10:90 conc. H2SO4:95% EtOH). (sorry about the pic quality, iphone 3G camera sucks)

the outer violet spots on the filter paper are tartrate salts of alkaloids, the middle yellow spot is just Van Urk's. The other outer spots are extracts of the raw LC. The dark green/blue spots on the paper are tryptamine hcl standard. all spots are dry.
« Last Edit: June 03, 2011, 06:15:09 PM by aniracetam »
"Experiments are the only means of knowledge at our disposal. The rest is poetry, imagination." - Max Planck

The Lone Stranger

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 198
Re: Enemies of submerged culture
« Reply #7 on: June 03, 2011, 07:07:27 PM »
Thanks for noticeing me trying to be helpfull and saying it . I was expecting lough to come in and be obnoxious again . .

I must admit that my atempts to grow ergot werent with liquid cultures and were in the 70s but since then i have kept watching for usefull information . LSD chemists and drug experts i`ve met said basicly what i am saying .

I dont say its imposible but it would take a lot of work , money and the returns would be small . The sterilisation / sterile work and airation again not imposible but dificult . The fact that one would have to find new cultures and test and identify them is also a no no factor .

The size of a container , steriliseing that container , steriliseing the substrate , keeping it all sterile and the small amount of ergot alkaloids that one would get would not be worth the time , effort , cost and dificultys as far as i`m concerned . It would be easyer to buy the acid here or fly to india and buy it there or produce seeds and use them for the synthesis .

I cant remember where i read the reports about labs in india but i think it might have been on necro-nutz and somewhere else . Scroogle says this http://www.mid-day.com/news/2010/oct/141010-USA-LSD-NCB-Gujarat-party-drug.htm Its not the report that i read but its about the same labs .

"Keep your cultures on cornsteep malt agar and transfer it every week or so, from the darker producing colonies.  Maybe every once in a while start a fresh culture from a dehydrated/lypholized master culture."

Sandoz dont do it in that for good reason = because that substarte is not specific enough and very many contaminants grow on it . The substrate/s they use have chemicals added to help the culture grow and so that it can produce more alkaloids . Getting those chemicals is also another cost and risk factor . The dificulty of transfering cultures adds to the possible contamination risks . That can be seen from a lot of the mushroom growing problems many people have with bought cultures that have been grown from cultures that have been grown from cultures and so on instead of produceing new cultures . The fact that the original ergot has to be changed is also a dificulty . Sandoz grows it in specialy inoculated fields and then identifys good strains every time they need to . .

aniracetam . Thanks for the info but the osmotic preasure dificultys are only aplicable to some contaminants and we dont get to choose wich ones we could have problems with . I aint knocking anyones efforts . Halleluja that people are trying . BUT i`m a practical person who is thinking about methods that can be used that work and not that are theory and have , sorry , little chance of haveing any results that would be usefull to anyone but a geek who is prepared to invest a lot of time and money and get very little return .

"people suck, they are greedy, venial, twofaced and shallow for the most part,"

LOL....... YUP they are a bunch of cunts mostly . The dificultys of obtaining things and with people opening their mouths are international and at least in india guards at factorys are bribable . The only real source of ergot alkaloids i have seen was from chemical firms that sold them and replaced a few grams in a kilo/s size order with something else . From those orders they got the ocasional 10 grams ...... but havent had any contact to them for years  .

SO gentelmen . I shall watch the reported progress here with interest BUT i would advise you to stop and go another way .

Tsathoggua

  • Autistic sociopath
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 662
Re: Enemies of submerged culture
« Reply #8 on: June 03, 2011, 07:31:28 PM »
A good producing strain can be regenerated can it not by allowing it to go through its parasitic life cycle, then harvesting either sclerotia, or asexual (and I imagine very similar) conidiospores.
Nomen mihi Legio est, quia multi sumus

I'm hyperbolic, hypergolic, viral, chiral. So motherfucking twisted my laevo is on the right side.

aniracetam

  • bioanalytical chemist
  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 123
Re: Enemies of submerged culture
« Reply #9 on: June 03, 2011, 07:34:01 PM »
I appreciate the advice, Lone Stranger
but, I have the means, skillset, and determination to pull it off.

like I mentioned, all the easy stuff's been done. this is much more fascinating

"Experiments are the only means of knowledge at our disposal. The rest is poetry, imagination." - Max Planck

The Lone Stranger

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 198
Re: Enemies of submerged culture
« Reply #10 on: June 03, 2011, 08:16:06 PM »
Wow light speed replys ......

"A good producing strain can be regenerated can it not by allowing it to go through its parasitic life cycle, then harvesting either sclerotia, or asexual (and I imagine very similar) conidiospores."

Toad god ...... Would each generation not have to be bread for strength and strength of growth and tested because of genetic diferences between generations and ofspring  = BIG work , lota time , lota effort , lota dosh ( <------ cash for those colonials that dont understand the language of the master race ) ,  lota space  . Then with the asexual bit would senescence be a posible dificulty ?

aniracetam  ...... from what i`ve read from you i dont doubt your ability to suceed but again ........ the maths ...... time , cost , risk , dificultys weighed against the returns ? <------ IF the cultures dont get contamination . Then work the same out for seeds containing LSAs . One can grow a garden full of the fuckers every year dead easy as they grow like weeds . Contaminants are not a problem . One needs no sterile work .  ( <--------- Anyone wanna buy a used car or a vacume cleaner ? )

Personaly i`d rather percy pig enjoy my garden and go back to his stye without me than find an ergot factory



Tungsten.

  • Larvae
  • *
  • Posts: 44
Re: Enemies of submerged culture
« Reply #11 on: June 04, 2011, 11:30:16 PM »
(sorry about the pic quality, iphone 3G camera sucks)

A word of caution when using an iPhone camera: get software that removes metadata. You don't want your GPS location tagged to any of your photos.

I would also like to take this chance to say that I am a huge fan of your work. :P
-W

aniracetam

  • bioanalytical chemist
  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 123
Re: Enemies of submerged culture
« Reply #12 on: June 05, 2011, 03:01:05 AM »
thanks.

there's no service on the phone, it's just a glorified ipod. GPS service is  off.

overunity, the gent sulf should be fine.
 I'm gonna add chloramphenicol next run.

I'm curious about this corn steep/beer wort in agar business... wonder if it will produce a sporulating variety,
which can then be transferred to dallisgrass.
« Last Edit: June 05, 2011, 03:11:14 AM by aniracetam »
"Experiments are the only means of knowledge at our disposal. The rest is poetry, imagination." - Max Planck

Tsathoggua

  • Autistic sociopath
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 662
Re: Enemies of submerged culture
« Reply #13 on: June 05, 2011, 05:19:20 PM »
TLS-I don't know.

And really, if we were interested in just growing LSA containing seeds, or buying acid from india, do you think we would be looking here? no.
Nomen mihi Legio est, quia multi sumus

I'm hyperbolic, hypergolic, viral, chiral. So motherfucking twisted my laevo is on the right side.

aniracetam

  • bioanalytical chemist
  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 123
Re: Enemies of submerged culture
« Reply #14 on: June 05, 2011, 05:38:42 PM »
this is certainly not a simple route, but the implications are mindboggling. ergot fungus is ubiquitous, and finding a way activate/stimulate the alk producing pathway makes this even more intriguing. this fungus is incredibly efficient, it just a matter of coaxing it to spit out the goods, probably the trickiest aspect.
the chemistry is piss in the pot.

here's that sort of simplistic mentality of certain bees complacent with synthetic chemistry, shunning the fungal route: hxxp://www.erowid.org/archive/rhodium/chemistry/lsd.synthesis.html

I say let enzymes do all the work, no need for grignard reagent workups of bromocriptine.
« Last Edit: June 07, 2011, 05:21:30 AM by aniracetam »
"Experiments are the only means of knowledge at our disposal. The rest is poetry, imagination." - Max Planck

The Lone Stranger

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 198
Re: Enemies of submerged culture
« Reply #15 on: June 05, 2011, 09:08:46 PM »
Guys . The work has to be done and i`m glad your doing it . I hope you have sucsess and i volunteer to test it . I just like to play devils advokate and to look at things and see if i can see holes in them and better ways so dont take it to serious and dont let it discourage you . I aint slagging you off and will folow your progress wuth interest .

aniracetam

  • bioanalytical chemist
  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 123
Re: Enemies of submerged culture
« Reply #16 on: June 06, 2011, 07:34:08 PM »
cool
but chances are, we'll have already looked at the same holes
and, I'll analyze them with instruments; some extra utensils I bring to the table.
« Last Edit: June 06, 2011, 07:36:03 PM by aniracetam »
"Experiments are the only means of knowledge at our disposal. The rest is poetry, imagination." - Max Planck

overunity33

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Re: Enemies of submerged culture
« Reply #17 on: June 10, 2011, 05:54:18 AM »
So striking Coprinus, Ganoderma and all the bacteria due to the use of gentamicin sulfate, what other fungi on that list pose no threat?  Can anyone think of a type of fungus which could be present and may pose a threat to a decently established culture of claviceps ?

aniracetam

  • bioanalytical chemist
  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 123
Re: Enemies of submerged culture
« Reply #18 on: June 13, 2011, 04:15:47 AM »
can't think of any...
this strain is very aggressive and resilient
"Experiments are the only means of knowledge at our disposal. The rest is poetry, imagination." - Max Planck

Vesp

  • Administrator
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,130
Re: Enemies of submerged culture
« Reply #19 on: June 13, 2011, 06:29:39 AM »
Just do it all under a laminar flow, clean everything well with lysol or H2O2 before hand, and be diligent about the work. It shouldn't be to difficult to avoid contamination all together; and of course add a bit of gentamicin sulfate.
Bitcoin address: 1FVrHdXJBr6Z9uhtiQKy4g7c7yHtGKjyLy