Author Topic: Why not strait to Iodosafrole? Why always Bromo to Finklestein?  (Read 1414 times)

pbinteger

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 124
Why not strait to Iodosafrole? Why always Bromo to Finklestein?
« on: October 05, 2012, 05:12:11 PM »
Hello,

I've read Jon's posts thoroughly.
Why does everyone go the Bromo route with the swap?

All I've been able to find is -- it's cheaper. According to my calculations it couldn't be that much cheaper and it's a lot more work.

Are there any reasons why the RxN won't run properly with NaOI or KI directly into GAA (or DMSO), and H2SO4?

Thank You

lugh

  • Global Moderator
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 876
Re: Why not strait to Iodosafrole? Why always Bromo to Finklestein?
« Reply #1 on: October 05, 2012, 08:16:13 PM »
Quote
Why not strait to Iodosafrole? Why always Bromo to Finklestein?

The availability of iodine and it's compounds are restricted in many parts of the world  ;) Thus halogens such as bromine or chlorine are used for the carbonium ion rearrangement reaction :-X The mechanisms involved are explained in the attached chapter from an organic chemistry textbook  :P The end results from the effort applied  8)
Chemistry is our Covalent Bond

EMTWC

  • Larvae
  • *
  • Posts: 28
Re: Why not strait to Iodosafrole? Why always Bromo to Finklestein?
« Reply #2 on: October 06, 2012, 01:04:10 PM »
Quote
Why not strait to Iodosafrole? Why always Bromo to Finklestein?

The availability of iodine and it's compounds are restricted in many parts of the world  ;) Thus halogens such as bromine or chlorine are used for the carbonium ion rearrangement reaction :-X The mechanisms involved are explained in the attached chapter from an organic chemistry textbook  :P The end results from the effort applied  8)

iodine is easily made from OTC stuff:

http://www.homechemlab.com/iodine.html

or for those who like a visual reference:
   
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ydYMZKgn9pE
roll some bones and catch a fire

Sedit

  • Global Moderator
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,099
Re: Why not strait to Iodosafrole? Why always Bromo to Finklestein?
« Reply #3 on: October 06, 2012, 01:25:33 PM »
Are there any reasons why the RxN won't run properly with NaOI or KI directly into GAA (or DMSO), and H2SO4?

Yes, the obvious reason of I2 formation. Add H2SO4 to a Salt solution of Iodide and see if you can prevent the formation of the purple color. If you can't then there is your answer.
There once were some bees and you took all there stuff!
You pissed off the wasp now enough is enough!!!

pbinteger

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 124
Re: Why not strait to Iodosafrole? Why always Bromo to Finklestein?
« Reply #4 on: October 06, 2012, 03:15:40 PM »
Thank you Lugh for the reference. I will read through it carefully. Sedit: I knew about the obvious Iodine production, but couldn't that just be washed away in a sep funnel? Shouldn't you still yield some viable iodosafrole in the RxN? This would certainly mean lower yields, but If the RxN is kept VERY cold then it should keep I2 production low I would think.
« Last Edit: October 06, 2012, 03:19:56 PM by pbinteger »

carl_nnabis

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 245
Re: Why not strait to Iodosafrole? Why always Bromo to Finklestein?
« Reply #5 on: October 06, 2012, 04:14:03 PM »
One could possibly use H3PO4 then, dissolved and dried in a solvent, and use this acid to free the HI instead?
It is indeed strong enough, and it also does not oxidise the HI to I2 like H2SO4 does, but its main issue is there is in commercial concentrated one 85% only so maybe sodium sulfate to a solution of H3PO4 airtight sealed proper dried could omit the whole bromination step for those who can get iodine easily i would say.
"It's like the drug trip I saw when I was on that drug trip!"

pbinteger

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 124
Re: Why not strait to Iodosafrole? Why always Bromo to Finklestein?
« Reply #6 on: October 06, 2012, 05:51:45 PM »
I've tried the straight Iodo reaction several times now once with DMSO (smells terrible) and several other times with GAA, and I THINK I've been able to separate out and rotovap off Iodosafrole. Everyone says it should be dark purple. Mine seems to be a more dark burgundy color (which would indicate Iodine). The thing is while I don't think my RxN is running at optimum efficiency (lots of unreacted salts) It is without a doubt liberating HI.
KI seems quite easy to get ACS grade, and it's not nearly as expensive as NaI which is also fairly easy to get but extremely expensive.
I'm about to test some of my iodosafrole by dripping it onto cold H2SO4.

The standard Ammonium Chloride / Formaldehyde route to Methylamine has worked really well for me. Mmmmm Fish...

Anway the Amination has never run for me. I've tried it several times and I've taken meticulous notes. I was able to achieve 15% solution of bone dry IPA by bubbling MeAm gas but when I added this (?iodosafrole?) it doesn't seem to go. I've got my last amination attempt still sitting at room temperature. If you remove a stopper and waft the smell of ammonia will knock you back. It seems to be very slowly changing to a lighter burgundy and also has tinges of yellow oil on the surfaces. It's been sitting now for 4 days. I was hoping that perhaps water got in somehow (vapor from heat) and that this will still run just very slowly. I have a friend who is going to run NMR on this (?iodosafrole?)

I don't know -- I'm going to try the bromo to Finklestein next, but It just didn't make sense to me initially.

 

carl_nnabis

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 245
Re: Why not strait to Iodosafrole? Why always Bromo to Finklestein?
« Reply #7 on: October 06, 2012, 05:58:46 PM »
Your DMSO smells?
Pure DMSO shouldnt smell bad at all, just a bit sweet glycol-like .
Dimethylsulfide is contaminating yours, just to notice it could maybe interfere there, i dont know?
"It's like the drug trip I saw when I was on that drug trip!"

pbinteger

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 124
Re: Why not strait to Iodosafrole? Why always Bromo to Finklestein?
« Reply #8 on: October 06, 2012, 11:56:16 PM »
It smelled pretty bad post reaction.

The Iodosafrole I just attempted to aminate came from a GAA, H2SO4 attempt. I made damned sure that the concentration was 15%. The reaction vessel picked up 60grams of Methyl Ammonium Chloride over a gassing period of 5 hours. It never really changed color. The oil was a dark burgundy and the reaction vessel is still a dark burgundy after 4 days.

I also went to great lengths to dry IPA including Rotavapping it and storing it in a mason jar with MGSO4 that had been baked for hours to complete dryness. There could only have been trace amounts of water in there.

Shouldn't this reaction change color noticeably?

I'm waiting to work it up because I didn't feel like it went. The only change has been a slight change in color -- it's gotten more translucent and seems to have some yellow layer near the surface that is incredibly thin.

Does anyone have any idea what could have gone wrong? I can provide the entire work up if need be. I actually posted it yesterday but was nervous about posting it.

T-cowboy

  • Pupae
  • **
  • Posts: 57
Re: Why not strait to Iodosafrole? Why always Bromo to Finklestein?
« Reply #9 on: October 07, 2012, 09:27:27 PM »
Why reinventing the wheel. Bromo-finkel-gas (Nh3,menh2n in ipa) boom... as outlined exatly in other posts. it has worked for me! ONCE. ;) i understand modifications and such but stick to true and tried stuff. i remember a guy here, did a finkelstein in IPA.. i really felt bad for him or for his lack of research..

pbinteger

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 124
Re: Why not strait to Iodosafrole? Why always Bromo to Finklestein?
« Reply #10 on: October 07, 2012, 09:39:35 PM »
I read that thread... I felt bad for him too. How did he confuse Acetone with IPA?

So you actually got this to work!?

What were your yields like when you worked up the Methylamine IPA soup?

Did you notice a color change when you dropped your Iodosafrole into the MeAm IPA soln?

If so, how long did it take?

Can you describe the colors?

atara

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 256
Re: Why not strait to Iodosafrole? Why always Bromo to Finklestein?
« Reply #11 on: October 08, 2012, 04:53:12 PM »
HI can be problematic. I- is much more easily oxidized than Br-, and a stronger nucleophile besides, allowing it to affect the stability of the ether ring, and it's kind of unstable in the presence of oxygen anyway. The thing is, I've read a whole lot of attempts with HI, and many of them just didn't work very well, and most of the attempts I've seen to use HBr did work pretty well.

http://its.goofyti.me/u/http://parazite.pp.fi/hiveboard/picproxie_docs/000537223-The_Cleavage_of_Ethers.pdf

The rate of the reaction declines with increasing water content of the acid (84,147). Hydrogen bromide reacts more rapidly than hydrogen chloride and less rapidly than hydrogen iodide (84,147). Hydrogen bromide reacts about six times as rapidly as hydrogen chloride (84) while, under these conditions, hydrogen iodide reacts too fast for measurement.
« Last Edit: October 08, 2012, 04:54:57 PM by atara »

pbinteger

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 124
Re: Why not strait to Iodosafrole? Why always Bromo to Finklestein?
« Reply #12 on: October 09, 2012, 03:41:02 PM »
I am getting geared up to try an HBr run.

Thank you for the information. So does anyone have any idea what could have separated out of these HI attempts? After basifying, then separating, then washing with water, my solvent layer contains a dark red oil that can be isolated through vaccuum distillation or rotovapping. It doesn't contain I2 because by the final wash the separation between aqueous and organic is perfect (I2 would wash into water right?)

I need to get set up for TLC on this stuff until I can get NMR.

I'd like to post all my notes and pictures of the glass rig, but I'm a bit nervous about that. I'm using a proxy for everything on this forum but who knows who is lurking here. Would you all agree my nervousness is justified?


-pbinteger.

Wizard X

  • Lord of the Realms
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,224
Re: Why not strait to Iodosafrole? Why always Bromo to Finklestein?
« Reply #13 on: October 10, 2012, 12:48:37 AM »
I am getting geared up to try an HBr run.

Thank you for the information. So does anyone have any idea what could have separated out of these HI attempts? After basifying, then separating, then washing with water, my solvent layer contains a dark red oil that can be isolated through vaccuum distillation or rotovapping. It doesn't contain I2 because by the final wash the separation between aqueous and organic is perfect (I2 would wash into water right?)

I need to get set up for TLC on this stuff until I can get NMR.

I'd like to post all my notes and pictures of the glass rig, but I'm a bit nervous about that. I'm using a proxy for everything on this forum but who knows who is lurking here. Would you all agree my nervousness is justified?


-pbinteger.

Iodine Solubility. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iodine#Solubility
Being a nonpolar molecule, iodine is highly soluble in nonpolar organic solvents, including ethanol (20.5 g/100 ml at 15 °C, 21.43 g/100 ml at 25 °C), diethyl ether (20.6 g/100 ml at 17 °C, 25.20 g/100 ml at 25 °C), chloroform, acetic acid, glycerol, benzene (14.09 g/100 ml at 25 °C), carbon tetrachloride (2.603 g/100 ml at 35 °C), and carbon disulfide (16.47 g/100 ml at 25 °C).[27] Elemental iodine is poorly soluble in water, with one gram dissolving in 3450 ml at 20 °C and 1280 ml at 50 °C. Aqueous and ethanol solutions are brown reflecting the role of these solvents as Lewis bases. Solutions in chloroform, carbon tetrachloride, and carbon disulfide are violet, the color of iodine vapour.


Hydrobromic acid has a pKa of -9, making it a stronger acid than hydrochloric acid, but not as strong as hydroiodic acid (pKa of  ~ –9 (approximate, in water, see leveling effect), pKa of 2.8 (in acetonitrile).

The larger the value of pKa, the smaller the extent of dissociation. A weak acid has a pKa value in the approximate range -2 to 12 in water. Acids with a pKa value of less than about -2 are said to be strong acids; a strong acid is almost completely dissociated in aqueous solution, to the extent that the concentration of the undissociated acid becomes undetectable. pKa values for strong acids can, however, be estimated by theoretical means or by extrapolating from measurements in non-aqueous solvents in which the dissociation constant is smaller, such as acetonitrile and dimethylsulfoxide. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid_dissociation_constant

Leveling effect or solvent leveling refers to the effect of solvent on the properties of acids and bases. The strength of a strong acid is limited ("leveled") by the basicity of the solvent.
Ionization of acids is less in an acidic solvent than in water. For example, hydrogen chloride is a weak acid when dissolved in acetic acid. This is because acetic acid is a much weaker base than water.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid_dissociation_constant#Acidity_in_nonaqueous_solutions

Hydrobromic acid. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrobromic_acid
Hydroiodic acid. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_iodide
Leveling effect. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leveling_effect
Acid dissociation constant. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid_dissociation_constant



Bromosafrole & Iodosafrole Experiment.

(1a) Add 10mls of 47% w/w Hydrobromic acid in a 50ml flask, and cool to 1-2 oC. Add 1ml of safrole, stopper, and swirl. Do not shake.
(1b) Add 10mls of 47% w/w Hydroiodic acid in a 50ml flask, and cool to 1-2 oC. Add 1ml of safrole, stopper, and swirl. Do not shake.

Keep 1a & 1b at 1-2 oC for 12 hours, swirling every 3 hours.


To LIMIT the Hydrobromic acid and Hydroiodic acid strength (their pKa) we use Glacial Acetic Acid as the solvent. THIS SHOULD BE DONE BY DISSOLVING HBr GAS AND HI GAS IN GAA.

(2a) Add 100mls of Glacial Acetic Acid and 10mls of 47% w/w Hydrobromic acid in a 200ml flask, and cool to 1-2 oC. Add 1ml of safrole, stopper, and swirl. Do not shake.
(2b) Add 100mls of Glacial Acetic Acid and 10mls of 47% w/w Hydroiodic acid in a 200ml flask, and cool to 1-2 oC. Add 1ml of safrole, stopper, and swirl. Do not shake.

Keep 2a & 2b at 1-2 oC for 12 hours, swirling every 3 hours.


After 12 hours reaction time, work-up flasks 1a-b and 2a-b to extract the Bromosafrole (1a & 2a reaction products) & Iodosafrole (1b & 2b reaction products).

Next post will be to test IF the methylenedioxy ring HAS BEEN CLEAVED??

« Last Edit: October 10, 2012, 12:55:40 AM by Wizard X »
Albert Einstein - "Great ideas often receive violent opposition from mediocre minds."

pbinteger

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 124
Re: Why not strait to Iodosafrole? Why always Bromo to Finklestein?
« Reply #14 on: October 10, 2012, 02:31:38 AM »
Mind = Blown

THANK YOU!

I will perform these side by side.

How does one test for methylenedioxy ring cleavage?

pbinteger

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 124
Re: Why not strait to Iodosafrole? Why always Bromo to Finklestein?
« Reply #15 on: October 10, 2012, 04:43:23 AM »
wait a second...

I kept this reaction REEEALLLLY cold... like -30c. I doubt there was much cleavage with HI at that temperature.  Maybe 1%???


sylvania

  • Larvae
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: Why not strait to Iodosafrole? Why always Bromo to Finklestein?
« Reply #16 on: October 11, 2012, 01:46:30 AM »
wait a second...

I kept this reaction REEEALLLLY cold... like -30c. I doubt there was much cleavage with HI at that temperature.  Maybe 1%???

dry ice?

Wizard X

  • Lord of the Realms
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,224
Testing for methylenedioxy ring cleaverage
« Reply #17 on: October 11, 2012, 01:56:45 AM »
Methylenedioxy ring cleaverage.

Complete Ring cleaverage will result in a Catechol, 1,2-dihydroxybenzene (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catechol) while partial results in Guaiacol (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guaiacol).

Both are related to phenol, and therefore share some similar aromatic acid properties.

THE ACIDITY OF PHENOL. http://www.chemguide.co.uk/organicprops/phenol/acidity.html Phenol reacts with sodium hydroxide solution to give a colourless solution containing sodium phenoxide.


Refs on cleaverage.

http://www.erowid.org/archive/rhodium/chemistry/eugenol.mdma.html

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8004695

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/chin.199443063/abstract;jsessionid=F672F81DDBF11F2F46FACD1C37212E7D.d04t01?deniedAccessCustomisedMessage=&userIsAuthenticated=false

The Reaction of Safrole Derivatives with Aluminum Chloride: Improved Procedures for the Preparation of Catechols or their mono-O-Methylated Derivatives and a Mechanistic Interpretation. http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-50532001000300005



Testing Reagents for Phenols and related compounds.

Basic solutions of catechol react with iron(III) to give the red [Fe(C6H4O2)3]3-. Ferric chloride gives a green coloration with the aqueous solution, whilst the alkaline solution rapidly changes to a green and finally to a black colour on exposure to the air. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catechol#With_metal_ions

Tests for Phenols and Nitro Groups. http://www.wellesley.edu/Chemistry/chem211lab/Orgo_Lab_Manual/Appendix/ClassificationTests/phenol_amine_nitro.html

Quote
Iron(III) chloride is sometimes known as ferric chloride.

Iron(III) ions form strongly coloured complexes with several organic compounds including phenol. The colour of the complexes vary from compound to compound. The reaction with iron(III) chloride solution can be used as a test for phenol. If you add a crystal of phenol to iron(III) chloride solution, you get an intense violet-purple solution formed.

Note:  The test is often done using "neutral" iron(III) chloride solution. Dilute ammonia solution is added dropwise to iron(III) chloride solution to give a faint precipitate of iron(III) hydroxide. Then that precipitate is removed by adding a small amount of the original iron(III) chloride solution.

http://www.chemguide.co.uk/organicprops/phenol/other.html


Vogel, 5th edition, page 1212 - 1213 for phenol. Enol page 1213 - 1214.


Phenolic compounds with a substituent in the para position may not quantitatively produce color with 4-aminoantipyrine. However, para substituents of phenol such as carboxyl, halogen, hydroxyl, methoxyl, or sulfonic acid groups do produce color with 4-aminoantipyrine. http://www.astm.org/Standards/D1783.htm

www.jbc.org/content/72/2/649.full.pdf
www.jbc.org/content/71/2/445.full.pdf



In conclusion...

(1) Control: Add 1 drop of safrole to Phenol test reagent. Observe colour and any precipitation.

(2) Flasks of synthesised Bromosafrole & Iodosafrole are diluted with ether and extracted with a dilute sodium hydroxide solution. This will result in a sodium phenoxide with the Catechol, or Guaiacol compounds.

(3) Separate the sodium hydroxide solution layer from the ether/Bromosafrole or Iodosafrole solution and acidify. Solvent extract with fresh (2X) ether, and distill ether off to see what phenol related compounds result.

(4) Test isolated 'phenol related compound' with Phenol test reagent.
« Last Edit: October 11, 2012, 11:39:50 PM by Wizard X »
Albert Einstein - "Great ideas often receive violent opposition from mediocre minds."

pbinteger

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 124
Re: Why not strait to Iodosafrole? Why always Bromo to Finklestein?
« Reply #18 on: October 11, 2012, 03:22:31 AM »
Excellent Information Wizard...

Do you have all these notes pre-compiled and organized? Just this one thread has beefed up my research notes tremendously.

Dry Ice in Acetone was the large RxN bath I used...

pbinteger

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 124
Re: Why not strait to Iodosafrole? Why always Bromo to Finklestein?
« Reply #19 on: October 15, 2012, 12:19:12 AM »
but seriously... has anyone here.... other than jon pulled this off and gotten decent yields?

if so, are you willing to share your lab notes?

Also... where is jon -- he hasn't posted anything since September.