Author Topic: Short Question Thread 2.0  (Read 5709 times)

Baba_McKensey

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 109
Re: Short Question Thread 2.0
« Reply #380 on: April 17, 2013, 08:39:16 PM »
Use algebra.

Flight

  • Larvae
  • *
  • Posts: 23
Re: Short Question Thread 2.0
« Reply #381 on: April 17, 2013, 11:41:21 PM »
Could the mathematical formula be posted?

That would be extremely helpful

RoidRage

  • Dominant Queen
  • ****
  • Posts: 386
Re: Short Question Thread 2.0
« Reply #382 on: April 18, 2013, 12:00:36 AM »
C'mon..We're not going to start spoonfeeding high school mathematics ::)

Wizard X

  • Lord of the Realms
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,224
Re: Short Question Thread 2.0
« Reply #383 on: April 18, 2013, 12:53:35 AM »
Buffered Performic Route....

How does one calculate the amount of H2O2 to use?  So instead of using 35% say only 29% is available. Also, is using 29% a good idea or should only 35% be used.

Thanks,
F

The moles of H2O2 required in a balanced equation.

Learn Concentration: Weight/Weight % (AKA Mass fraction)

Conversion of % W/W to Molarity, moles per litre,  mol/Lt.

Data required is % W/W and density of the solution.

(% W/W x density) /100 = grams per ml (g/ml)

(grams per ml / formula weight) x 1000 = Molarity, moles per litre,  mol/Lt.


Refs:
http://www.iun.edu/~cpanhd/C101webnotes/aqueoussolns/wwpcnt.html
http://pages.towson.edu/ladon/concas.html
http://www.ausetute.com.au/weightpc.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_fraction_(chemistry)
Albert Einstein - "Great ideas often receive violent opposition from mediocre minds."

Flight

  • Larvae
  • *
  • Posts: 23
Re: Short Question Thread 2.0
« Reply #384 on: April 18, 2013, 01:31:06 AM »
Quote
The moles of H2O2 required in a balanced equation.

Learn Concentration: Weight/Weight % (AKA Mass fraction)

Conversion of % W/W to Molarity, moles per litre,  mol/Lt.

Data required is % W/W and density of the solution.

(% W/W x density) /100 = grams per ml (g/ml)

(grams per ml / formula weight) x 1000 = Molarity, moles per litre,  mol/Lt.

Sorry, not looking to be spoon fed, actually was just needing more of a clarification that the right path was being followed.  Thanks for the assistance Wizard X.

Tsjanga

  • Larvae
  • *
  • Posts: 27
Re: Short Question Thread 2.0
« Reply #385 on: April 21, 2013, 10:09:27 PM »
If we go from Heli to its oxime form then reduct it to an amine and dehydogenate it would we get easily to some of our favorite mdxx?

pbinteger

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 124
Re: Short Question Thread 2.0
« Reply #386 on: April 24, 2013, 04:02:12 PM »
Herro!

I've been reading up on all the variations on the al/hg amalgam. I've noticed that some prefer to wash the excess Hg salts off their aluminum before completing the reaction.

What is the purpose of this?

Thank You

Scr0t

  • Larvae
  • *
  • Posts: 3
Re: Short Question Thread 2.0
« Reply #387 on: April 24, 2013, 07:30:36 PM »
I think it's over concerns of some residual mercury contamination in the product.

https://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=17479

pbinteger

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 124
Re: Short Question Thread 2.0
« Reply #388 on: April 24, 2013, 08:47:38 PM »
Hi Scr0t,

This refers to washing the freebase -- which I always do VERY thoroughly followed by a standard acid / base workup.

I was talking about kicking off the amalgam in water, then removing the aluminum and washing it in a strainer to get excess mercuric salts out, then placing it back in MeOH to finish the reaction with MeNH2 or Nitromethane etc...etc..

I was curious what benefit this lends to the reductive amination.

Thanks!

Scr0t

  • Larvae
  • *
  • Posts: 3
Re: Short Question Thread 2.0
« Reply #389 on: April 25, 2013, 06:24:20 PM »
Hello!
I was referring to possible mercuration of the benzene ring by Hg+2 that may be present. Washing the Al is not difficult and gives one peace of mind if you're paranoid about mercury.

Quote from: Nicodem
Mercuric(II) salts are strong soft acids which tends to react with soft bases like the Pi-systems of benzene, toluene or other electron rich aromatics via the electrophilic aromatic substitution. It also reacts with the Pi-bonds of alkenes and alkynes as well as other similarly soft bases. The product with benzene or toluene, the corresponding arylmercuric salts, are preferentially partitioned in the organic solvents rather than water.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organomercury#Mercuration_of_aromatic_rings

I have done Al/Hg reductions of nitrostyrenes with and without washing the Al and have not noticed any difference in yield so I expect it probably wouldn't make any difference, yield wise, with reductive amination.

pbinteger

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 124
Re: Short Question Thread 2.0
« Reply #390 on: April 25, 2013, 06:29:14 PM »
Thanks Scr0t -- that answers my question!

 ;D

pbinteger

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 124
Re: Short Question Thread 2.0
« Reply #391 on: May 06, 2013, 02:53:04 AM »
Does anyone have a ref / link to a write up on

Methyl-3,4-Methylenedioxyhydrocinnamic aldehyde + KMnO4 -> Methyl-3,4-Methylenedioxyphenylpropionic acid + NaN3 + H2SO4 -> MDA


syn

  • Larvae
  • *
  • Posts: 12
Re: Short Question Thread 2.0
« Reply #392 on: May 08, 2013, 09:25:55 AM »
Having problems with an oximation.

My numbers are-
2000ml of ethanol
2000ml of water
1000g of aldehyde
1000g of hydroxylamine HCl
580g of sodium carbonate

So the reaction appears to have went a lot better this time. Excess hydroxylamine was used. After basing a bunch of the oxime came out of solution as a powder on the bottom of the flask. Now hears were it gets weird. There is the oxime at the bottom, a layer of water in the middle, and an organic layer at the top. The layer at the top looks just like the oxime I got from the last oximation I did except that was at the bottom. Any help would be appreciated.

Tsjanga

  • Larvae
  • *
  • Posts: 27
Re: Short Question Thread 2.0
« Reply #393 on: May 08, 2013, 06:42:39 PM »
Having problems with an oximation.

My numbers are-
2000ml of ethanol
2000ml of water
1000g of aldehyde
1000g of hydroxylamine HCl
580g of sodium carbonate

So the reaction appears to have went a lot better this time. Excess hydroxylamine was used. After basing a bunch of the oxime came out of solution as a powder on the bottom of the flask. Now hears were it gets weird. There is the oxime at the bottom, a layer of water in the middle, and an organic layer at the top. The layer at the top looks just like the oxime I got from the last oximation I did except that was at the bottom. Any help would be appreciated.

Try to add the hydroxylamine.hcl very very slowly in droplets instead of the whole bunch at once  :) Also stirring the shit out of it?
Is the Sodium Carbonate H2O free?

Does anyone have a ref / link to a write up on

Methyl-3,4-Methylenedioxyhydrocinnamic aldehyde + KMnO4 -> Methyl-3,4-Methylenedioxyphenylpropionic acid + NaN3 + H2SO4 -> MDA

I will send you a PM with some info  ;)
« Last Edit: May 08, 2013, 07:03:33 PM by Tsjanga »

Tsjanga

  • Larvae
  • *
  • Posts: 27
Re: Short Question Thread 2.0
« Reply #394 on: May 08, 2013, 07:04:06 PM »
Somebody could help me, a friend has found the powdered version of the aldehyde we are talking about here.
Could he just get it and return it to the liquid? 

syn

  • Larvae
  • *
  • Posts: 12
Re: Short Question Thread 2.0
« Reply #395 on: May 08, 2013, 10:05:37 PM »
There is no powdered version. The aldehyde is a clear/yellow liquid or it isn't the aldehyde. What do you mean add it in droplets? Hydroxylamine HCl is a powder and adding the solution to your aldehyde in small amounts won't do anything because it has to be the freebase to react. I added all my hydroxylamine HCl in 1 liter of water and added it to the ethanol/aldehyde. Then I added sodium carbonate with stirring over the course of 4 hours a few hundred ml at a time.

The organic layer at the top has now turned slightly brownish. The layer at the bottom is salt so if the oxime did form it's in the organic lay. I'm throwing it on to reflux for a bit. With such a large excess of hydroxylamine present the reaction should have gone. Will run TLC :-\
« Last Edit: May 09, 2013, 02:52:00 AM by syn »

Tsjanga

  • Larvae
  • *
  • Posts: 27
Re: Short Question Thread 2.0
« Reply #396 on: May 09, 2013, 08:02:39 AM »
There is no powdered version. The aldehyde is a clear/yellow liquid or it isn't the aldehyde. What do you mean add it in droplets? Hydroxylamine HCl is a powder and adding the solution to your aldehyde in small amounts won't do anything because it has to be the freebase to react. I added all my hydroxylamine HCl in 1 liter of water and added it to the ethanol/aldehyde. Then I added sodium carbonate with stirring over the course of 4 hours a few hundred ml at a time.

The organic layer at the top has now turned slightly brownish. The layer at the bottom is salt so if the oxime did form it's in the organic lay. I'm throwing it on to reflux for a bit. With such a large excess of hydroxylamine present the reaction should have gone. Will run TLC :-\

There is a powdered version, but can we use it that is the question.
Just add the hydroxylamine slowely and then let the Sodium Carbonate drop into the solution don't dump in like 100ml at once but use your funnel or something to let it drip. Here the guy's did it in about 5 hours with droplets and had a great success with dumping a shitload in at once they came up with the same problem you had.

If you want you can send me a PM  ;)

antibody2

  • Subordinate Wasp
  • ***
  • Posts: 158
Re: Short Question Thread 2.0
« Reply #397 on: May 23, 2013, 06:57:02 PM »
teahead - that will depend on the reaction that produced the MDP2P, it might work coming from an O2 wackier, but unlikely to work well coming from a benzo wacker or performic reaction.

Almost every time Ab2 attempted to move onto the next step in a synth without properly purifying things she had poor to horrible results. It really is worth the effort to take the high road. Even if the reaction is partially successful, you will have a difficult time crystallizing your end product, because of all the contaminants that remain.

If you are impatient, go buy a fridge compressor at a used appliance store for $20. They make great disposable vacuums

myCH3

  • Pupae
  • **
  • Posts: 77
Re: Short Question Thread 2.0
« Reply #398 on: May 24, 2013, 05:52:53 AM »
Quote from: Tsjanga

[quote author=pbinteger link=topic=2962.msg36473#msg36473 date=1367808784
Does anyone have a ref / link to a write up on

Methyl-3,4-Methylenedioxyhydrocinnamic aldehyde + KMnO4 -> Methyl-3,4-Methylenedioxyphenylpropionic acid + NaN3 + H2SO4 -> MDA

I will send you a PM with some info  ;)
[/quote]

anyway I could get in on that info as well?

Tsathoggua

  • Autistic sociopath
  • Foundress Queen
  • *****
  • Posts: 662
Re: Short Question Thread 2.0
« Reply #399 on: May 25, 2013, 05:31:31 PM »
Can't comment on the peracid rxn, never done it. But a quick look at a bottle of (off the shelf 9%, from the UK, pharmaceutical) H2O2 reveals phosphoric acid, and phenacetin as the other ingredients present.
Nomen mihi Legio est, quia multi sumus

I'm hyperbolic, hypergolic, viral, chiral. So motherfucking twisted my laevo is on the right side.